Quote from: aj2k77 on October 07, 2016, 10:43:46 PMWhat on Earth makes them consider Clarke? He's been a direct part of the shit formations, shit substitutions and shit preparation.I actually don't think he was . They had both previously had same posts in some similar /same clubs but never worked together . He RARELY , as Kevin Bond didn't either , left his seat during a game which I found interesting and frustrating
What on Earth makes them consider Clarke? He's been a direct part of the shit formations, shit substitutions and shit preparation.
*sigh*. they got 11 games. Who turns round 5 years of total shite in 11 games?
Quote from: Dazvillain on October 07, 2016, 10:49:03 PMQuote from: aj2k77 on October 07, 2016, 10:43:46 PMWhat on Earth makes them consider Clarke? He's been a direct part of the shit formations, shit substitutions and shit preparation.I actually don't think he was . They had both previously had same posts in some similar /same clubs but never worked together . He RARELY , as Kevin Bond didn't either , left his seat during a game which I found interesting and frustratingConcur. Exactly my pointI thought Clarke and Bond were good appointments, but they have seemingly had little input
Quote from: sickbeggar on October 07, 2016, 10:36:35 PMRelax Daz. Some of us our old and angry and we react badly to this text speak.(I bet you have one of those mobile phones too)And am posting off it now. Thanks for your comment, genuinely. I'm all about consitency and fairness . Moaning and sarcastically posting about my gramatics but not about the last post in another thread this evening (#bants) posted by someone else or even the poor gramatics of done thread titles doesn't seem fair game really . Point made. Back to thread topic... We are not going to ever get another O'neil , cash injection or contracts of the start of Lerner era so it's pretty academic who becomes next boss. We just have to belt in and try to enjoy the ride or get off at the next stop pronto. Simply a matter of choices
Relax Daz. Some of us our old and angry and we react badly to this text speak.(I bet you have one of those mobile phones too)
Quote from: Dazvillain on October 07, 2016, 10:44:50 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on October 07, 2016, 10:36:35 PMRelax Daz. Some of us our old and angry and we react badly to this text speak.(I bet you have one of those mobile phones too)And am posting off it now. Thanks for your comment, genuinely. I'm all about consitency and fairness . Moaning and sarcastically posting about my gramatics but not about the last post in another thread this evening (#bants) posted by someone else or even the poor gramatics of done thread titles doesn't seem fair game really . Point made. Back to thread topic... We are not going to ever get another O'neil , cash injection or contracts of the start of Lerner era so it's pretty academic who becomes next boss. We just have to belt in and try to enjoy the ride or get off at the next stop pronto. Simply a matter of choicesDon't worry about it. I rarely post coherently at the first attempt.
Quote from: sickbeggar on October 07, 2016, 10:46:22 PM*sigh*. they got 11 games. Who turns round 5 years of total shite in 11 games?And £50million
A lot of folk seem anti Bruce, which is fair enough. When asked, many of the people I speak to say they don't want him, but at the same time don't actually say who they do want. We aren't in the ideal scenario with the luxury of choice...believe it or not, top quality managers are no longer forming a queue to come here, so we need to be realistic. Of those in the frame, Bruce has the best credentials, regardless of his past.
sickbeggar, respect your views but have to say the tactics employed by RDM were baffling to say the least and not sure how it would have improved.