Quote from: Toronto Villa on January 31, 2017, 12:44:42 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on January 30, 2017, 11:17:02 PMI like Tone, but so far the net spend this window is pretty low.I believe it's called being smart with your money. Would it feel better to you if Lansbury cost 6m, Hourihane cost 5m and Thor cost 8m? We'd be getting the same players, just out of pocket by several million with a very healthy net spend.No, but the quote was 'splashing the cash' In the summer we spent some of the parachute payment and in this window we have pretty much broken even.Like I said I like Tone, but so far we have hardly gone crazy cash wise.
Quote from: chrisw1 on January 30, 2017, 11:17:02 PMI like Tone, but so far the net spend this window is pretty low.I believe it's called being smart with your money. Would it feel better to you if Lansbury cost 6m, Hourihane cost 5m and Thor cost 8m? We'd be getting the same players, just out of pocket by several million with a very healthy net spend.
I like Tone, but so far the net spend this window is pretty low.
Quote from: chrisw1 on January 31, 2017, 08:26:31 AMQuote from: Toronto Villa on January 31, 2017, 12:44:42 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on January 30, 2017, 11:17:02 PMI like Tone, but so far the net spend this window is pretty low.I believe it's called being smart with your money. Would it feel better to you if Lansbury cost 6m, Hourihane cost 5m and Thor cost 8m? We'd be getting the same players, just out of pocket by several million with a very healthy net spend.No, but the quote was 'splashing the cash' In the summer we spent some of the parachute payment and in this window we have pretty much broken even.Like I said I like Tone, but so far we have hardly gone crazy cash wise.We've spent about £50 million, excluding sales.Feel free to point out all the Championship clubs who have spent more.
Quote from: Chris Jameson on January 30, 2017, 07:36:17 PMJust you, me and Dave W who hold that view I think Jon.(CJ+DW+JC) x silent majority
Just you, me and Dave W who hold that view I think Jon.
{(99.9%-(99.9%+X))+0.01%+0.01%)*1/3}+(-100%-99.9%-{(-50%-65%-50%)*1/3}+95%+99%#ThatsAllForJanWindow#UTV
Quote from: Eckybloke on January 31, 2017, 10:03:20 AM{(99.9%-(99.9%+X))+0.01%+0.01%)*1/3}+(-100%-99.9%-{(-50%-65%-50%)*1/3}+95%+99%#ThatsAllForJanWindow#UTVglad that is all cleared up
Quote from: cdbullyweefan on January 31, 2017, 08:53:33 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on January 31, 2017, 08:26:31 AMQuote from: Toronto Villa on January 31, 2017, 12:44:42 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on January 30, 2017, 11:17:02 PMI like Tone, but so far the net spend this window is pretty low.I believe it's called being smart with your money. Would it feel better to you if Lansbury cost 6m, Hourihane cost 5m and Thor cost 8m? We'd be getting the same players, just out of pocket by several million with a very healthy net spend.No, but the quote was 'splashing the cash' In the summer we spent some of the parachute payment and in this window we have pretty much broken even.Like I said I like Tone, but so far we have hardly gone crazy cash wise.We've spent about £50 million, excluding sales.Feel free to point out all the Championship clubs who have spent more. Why would you exclude sales?Gueye - £7.1mClark - £5mTraore (?)Callum Robinson?Gestede - £6mAyew - c£7m?Like I said I'm happy with Tone and yes hes spent a chunk of the parachute payment. But your comment, made at this time of year, inferred we are splashing cash all over the place this window, whereas that is not the reality YET.
I'd rather this than Randy Shunnamite Lerner's approach.