Quote from: Eckybloke on January 31, 2017, 10:03:20 AM{(99.9%-(99.9%+X))+0.01%+0.01%)*1/3}+(-100%-99.9%-{(-50%-65%-50%)*1/3}+95%+99%#ThatsAllForJanWindow#UTVglad that is all cleared up
{(99.9%-(99.9%+X))+0.01%+0.01%)*1/3}+(-100%-99.9%-{(-50%-65%-50%)*1/3}+95%+99%#ThatsAllForJanWindow#UTV
Quote from: chrisw1 on January 31, 2017, 08:26:31 AMQuote from: Toronto Villa on January 31, 2017, 12:44:42 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on January 30, 2017, 11:17:02 PMI like Tone, but so far the net spend this window is pretty low.I believe it's called being smart with your money. Would it feel better to you if Lansbury cost 6m, Hourihane cost 5m and Thor cost 8m? We'd be getting the same players, just out of pocket by several million with a very healthy net spend.No, but the quote was 'splashing the cash' In the summer we spent some of the parachute payment and in this window we have pretty much broken even.Like I said I like Tone, but so far we have hardly gone crazy cash wise.We've spent about £50 million, excluding sales.Feel free to point out all the Championship clubs who have spent more.
Quote from: Toronto Villa on January 31, 2017, 12:44:42 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on January 30, 2017, 11:17:02 PMI like Tone, but so far the net spend this window is pretty low.I believe it's called being smart with your money. Would it feel better to you if Lansbury cost 6m, Hourihane cost 5m and Thor cost 8m? We'd be getting the same players, just out of pocket by several million with a very healthy net spend.No, but the quote was 'splashing the cash' In the summer we spent some of the parachute payment and in this window we have pretty much broken even.Like I said I like Tone, but so far we have hardly gone crazy cash wise.
Quote from: chrisw1 on January 30, 2017, 11:17:02 PMI like Tone, but so far the net spend this window is pretty low.I believe it's called being smart with your money. Would it feel better to you if Lansbury cost 6m, Hourihane cost 5m and Thor cost 8m? We'd be getting the same players, just out of pocket by several million with a very healthy net spend.
I like Tone, but so far the net spend this window is pretty low.
Quote from: VILLA MOLE on January 31, 2017, 10:06:14 AMQuote from: Eckybloke on January 31, 2017, 10:03:20 AM{(99.9%-(99.9%+X))+0.01%+0.01%)*1/3}+(-100%-99.9%-{(-50%-65%-50%)*1/3}+95%+99%#ThatsAllForJanWindow#UTVglad that is all cleared up One in and one out (+cash) = 99.9% chanceIf for some reason that fails, then there are 1 of 2 options, but now unlikely.1 certain OUT, and 1 almost certain OUTThen 1 of 3 players OUT 50%: 65% : 50% chance - so whoever the 65% is, is most likely, but far from certain.Then, the most interesting bit - 1 player IN at 95% chance; and another IN at 99% chance.
Quote from: chrisw1 on January 31, 2017, 09:00:28 AMQuote from: cdbullyweefan on January 31, 2017, 08:53:33 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on January 31, 2017, 08:26:31 AMQuote from: Toronto Villa on January 31, 2017, 12:44:42 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on January 30, 2017, 11:17:02 PMI like Tone, but so far the net spend this window is pretty low.I believe it's called being smart with your money. Would it feel better to you if Lansbury cost 6m, Hourihane cost 5m and Thor cost 8m? We'd be getting the same players, just out of pocket by several million with a very healthy net spend.No, but the quote was 'splashing the cash' In the summer we spent some of the parachute payment and in this window we have pretty much broken even.Like I said I like Tone, but so far we have hardly gone crazy cash wise.We've spent about £50 million, excluding sales.Feel free to point out all the Championship clubs who have spent more. Why would you exclude sales?Gueye - £7.1mClark - £5mTraore (?)Callum Robinson?Gestede - £6mAyew - c£7m?Like I said I'm happy with Tone and yes hes spent a chunk of the parachute payment. But your comment, made at this time of year, inferred we are splashing cash all over the place this window, whereas that is not the reality YET.Sorry, meant if you deduct sales. We've spent about £50 million in total. I seem to have exaggerated though, it's probably about £30 million... an absolute fortune for a club in our position. And that's before you count the cost of hiring/firing management teams.
Quote from: cdbullyweefan on January 31, 2017, 08:53:33 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on January 31, 2017, 08:26:31 AMQuote from: Toronto Villa on January 31, 2017, 12:44:42 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on January 30, 2017, 11:17:02 PMI like Tone, but so far the net spend this window is pretty low.I believe it's called being smart with your money. Would it feel better to you if Lansbury cost 6m, Hourihane cost 5m and Thor cost 8m? We'd be getting the same players, just out of pocket by several million with a very healthy net spend.No, but the quote was 'splashing the cash' In the summer we spent some of the parachute payment and in this window we have pretty much broken even.Like I said I like Tone, but so far we have hardly gone crazy cash wise.We've spent about £50 million, excluding sales.Feel free to point out all the Championship clubs who have spent more. Why would you exclude sales?Gueye - £7.1mClark - £5mTraore (?)Callum Robinson?Gestede - £6mAyew - c£7m?Like I said I'm happy with Tone and yes hes spent a chunk of the parachute payment. But your comment, made at this time of year, inferred we are splashing cash all over the place this window, whereas that is not the reality YET.
Then, the most interesting bit - 1 player IN at 95% chance; and another IN at 99% chance.
Quote from: Tokyo Sexwhale on January 31, 2017, 10:27:52 AMQuote from: VILLA MOLE on January 31, 2017, 10:06:14 AMQuote from: Eckybloke on January 31, 2017, 10:03:20 AM{(99.9%-(99.9%+X))+0.01%+0.01%)*1/3}+(-100%-99.9%-{(-50%-65%-50%)*1/3}+95%+99%#ThatsAllForJanWindow#UTVSo presumably Ayew out, Taylor in + £4mQuote from: VILLA MOLE on January 31, 2017, 10:30:20 AMQuote from: Tokyo Sexwhale on January 31, 2017, 10:27:52 AMQuote from: VILLA MOLE on January 31, 2017, 10:06:14 AMQuote from: Eckybloke on January 31, 2017, 10:03:20 AM{(99.9%-(99.9%+X))+0.01%+0.01%)*1/3}+(-100%-99.9%-{(-50%-65%-50%)*1/3}+95%+99%#ThatsAllForJanWindow#UTVglad that is all cleared up One in and one out (+cash) = 99.9% chanceIf for some reason that fails, then there are 1 of 2 options, but now unlikely.1 certain OUT, and 1 almost certain OUTThen 1 of 3 players OUT 50%: 65% : 50% chance - so whoever the 65% is, is most likely, but far from certain.Then, the most interesting bit - 1 player IN at 95% chance; and another IN at 99% chance.Sex whale you have done it again glad that is all cleared up One in and one out (+cash) = 99.9% chanceIf for some reason that fails, then there are 1 of 2 options, but now unlikely.1 certain OUT, and 1 almost certain OUTThen 1 of 3 players OUT 50%: 65% : 50% chance - so whoever the 65% is, is most likely, but far from certain.Then, the most interesting bit - 1 player IN at 95% chance; and another IN at 99% chance.Sex whale you have done it again
Quote from: VILLA MOLE on January 31, 2017, 10:06:14 AMQuote from: Eckybloke on January 31, 2017, 10:03:20 AM{(99.9%-(99.9%+X))+0.01%+0.01%)*1/3}+(-100%-99.9%-{(-50%-65%-50%)*1/3}+95%+99%#ThatsAllForJanWindow#UTVSo presumably Ayew out, Taylor in + £4mQuote from: VILLA MOLE on January 31, 2017, 10:30:20 AMQuote from: Tokyo Sexwhale on January 31, 2017, 10:27:52 AMQuote from: VILLA MOLE on January 31, 2017, 10:06:14 AMQuote from: Eckybloke on January 31, 2017, 10:03:20 AM{(99.9%-(99.9%+X))+0.01%+0.01%)*1/3}+(-100%-99.9%-{(-50%-65%-50%)*1/3}+95%+99%#ThatsAllForJanWindow#UTVglad that is all cleared up One in and one out (+cash) = 99.9% chanceIf for some reason that fails, then there are 1 of 2 options, but now unlikely.1 certain OUT, and 1 almost certain OUTThen 1 of 3 players OUT 50%: 65% : 50% chance - so whoever the 65% is, is most likely, but far from certain.Then, the most interesting bit - 1 player IN at 95% chance; and another IN at 99% chance.Sex whale you have done it again glad that is all cleared up One in and one out (+cash) = 99.9% chanceIf for some reason that fails, then there are 1 of 2 options, but now unlikely.1 certain OUT, and 1 almost certain OUTThen 1 of 3 players OUT 50%: 65% : 50% chance - so whoever the 65% is, is most likely, but far from certain.Then, the most interesting bit - 1 player IN at 95% chance; and another IN at 99% chance.
Quote from: Eckybloke on January 31, 2017, 10:03:20 AM{(99.9%-(99.9%+X))+0.01%+0.01%)*1/3}+(-100%-99.9%-{(-50%-65%-50%)*1/3}+95%+99%#ThatsAllForJanWindow#UTVSo presumably Ayew out, Taylor in + £4mQuote from: VILLA MOLE on January 31, 2017, 10:30:20 AMQuote from: Tokyo Sexwhale on January 31, 2017, 10:27:52 AMQuote from: VILLA MOLE on January 31, 2017, 10:06:14 AMQuote from: Eckybloke on January 31, 2017, 10:03:20 AM{(99.9%-(99.9%+X))+0.01%+0.01%)*1/3}+(-100%-99.9%-{(-50%-65%-50%)*1/3}+95%+99%#ThatsAllForJanWindow#UTVglad that is all cleared up One in and one out (+cash) = 99.9% chanceIf for some reason that fails, then there are 1 of 2 options, but now unlikely.1 certain OUT, and 1 almost certain OUTThen 1 of 3 players OUT 50%: 65% : 50% chance - so whoever the 65% is, is most likely, but far from certain.Then, the most interesting bit - 1 player IN at 95% chance; and another IN at 99% chance.Sex whale you have done it again glad that is all cleared up
Quote from: Tokyo Sexwhale on January 31, 2017, 10:27:52 AMQuote from: VILLA MOLE on January 31, 2017, 10:06:14 AMQuote from: Eckybloke on January 31, 2017, 10:03:20 AM{(99.9%-(99.9%+X))+0.01%+0.01%)*1/3}+(-100%-99.9%-{(-50%-65%-50%)*1/3}+95%+99%#ThatsAllForJanWindow#UTVglad that is all cleared up One in and one out (+cash) = 99.9% chanceIf for some reason that fails, then there are 1 of 2 options, but now unlikely.1 certain OUT, and 1 almost certain OUTThen 1 of 3 players OUT 50%: 65% : 50% chance - so whoever the 65% is, is most likely, but far from certain.Then, the most interesting bit - 1 player IN at 95% chance; and another IN at 99% chance.Sex whale you have done it again
Site being weird.
Paul,we'll keep striving until glorious times like your old days come back Villa again !#UTV
Brentford v Aston Villa tonight, Scott Hogan hopefully coming our way, well done Dr Tony and Steve . Shows we're heading #UTV .
From the office of The Doc via TwitterQuotePaul,we'll keep striving until glorious times like your old days come back Villa again !#UTVFrom the office of The Lord via TwitterQuoteBrentford v Aston Villa tonight, Scott Hogan hopefully coming our way, well done Dr Tony and Steve . Shows we're heading #UTV .