Of course. They were the best ever, and much better than Botham so he can't have been the best ever.Of course, being the best Briton doesn't necessarily mean you're the best in the World. However, given the sheer number of events we compete in and the fact that we do quite well in many of them, I think the best British sportsperson should be recognised as among the greatest, if not the greatest, in their given field. I wouldn't even have Botham in an all-time XI. He'd be behind Sobers, Khan, Kallis and maybe the New Zealand bloke who's name I always forget in the battle for all-rounders' spots. Still struggling to think of who fits the criteria though. Maybe Phil Taylor. Nobody has dominated like him. It's just a shame I can't stand him.
Jocky Wilson was a New Zealand cricket player?
I do think that we tendency to underestimate the incredible range of sporting skill involved in tennis.Speed and stamina, strength and agility, fitness, co-ordination, control, quick thinking. The sheer athleticism of being out there testing you body in so many different ways over such a period of time. I'm not even a massive tennis fan, but there is so much more to it than being a runner, a jumper or a swimmer. For that reason, the best tennis player has to be up there.
Funny, I thought there would be a stand out somewhere considering that we invented most sports and do quite well, but no!It's a bit like being American and trying to name your best rock and roll band...If we are thinking about truly global sports, we have to exclude cricket, rugby, bowls, snooker, tiddlywinks. World sports include football, athletics, swimming, tennis, cycling?What about George Best/Jimmy Greaves/Gordon Banks, Mo Farah/Paula Radcliffe/Daley Thompson/Seb Coe, -no swimmers-, Andy Murray, Wiggins/Cavendish/Hoy/BoardmanOr Lester Piggott?