Quote from: Monty on April 13, 2016, 11:20:19 PMQuote from: Clampy on April 13, 2016, 11:14:48 PMQuote from: Monty on April 13, 2016, 11:13:42 PMQuote from: The_ads on April 13, 2016, 10:55:38 PMI said two weeks ago this was a good move and for the majority of you to embrace it. Moyes was a pipe dream and Pearson is a great alternative Quote from: Clampy on April 13, 2016, 11:10:27 PMI wouldn't be too unhappy with that. Quote from: German James on April 13, 2016, 11:11:04 PMOh for fuck's sake.I think this appointment would be particularly divisive among the fans.Apart from Moyes, most other choices would have been as well to be honest. I'm not so sure. I think the difference between Pearson and Bruce or McCarthy, or instance, is that Pearson has actual supporters on here. So in a way it's a more positive reason to be quite sharply divided. That said, put me in the septic tank.Fixed.
Quote from: Clampy on April 13, 2016, 11:14:48 PMQuote from: Monty on April 13, 2016, 11:13:42 PMQuote from: The_ads on April 13, 2016, 10:55:38 PMI said two weeks ago this was a good move and for the majority of you to embrace it. Moyes was a pipe dream and Pearson is a great alternative Quote from: Clampy on April 13, 2016, 11:10:27 PMI wouldn't be too unhappy with that. Quote from: German James on April 13, 2016, 11:11:04 PMOh for fuck's sake.I think this appointment would be particularly divisive among the fans.Apart from Moyes, most other choices would have been as well to be honest. I'm not so sure. I think the difference between Pearson and Bruce or McCarthy, or instance, is that Pearson has actual supporters on here. So in a way it's a more positive reason to be quite sharply divided. That said, put me in the septic tank.
Quote from: Monty on April 13, 2016, 11:13:42 PMQuote from: The_ads on April 13, 2016, 10:55:38 PMI said two weeks ago this was a good move and for the majority of you to embrace it. Moyes was a pipe dream and Pearson is a great alternative Quote from: Clampy on April 13, 2016, 11:10:27 PMI wouldn't be too unhappy with that. Quote from: German James on April 13, 2016, 11:11:04 PMOh for fuck's sake.I think this appointment would be particularly divisive among the fans.Apart from Moyes, most other choices would have been as well to be honest.
Quote from: The_ads on April 13, 2016, 10:55:38 PMI said two weeks ago this was a good move and for the majority of you to embrace it. Moyes was a pipe dream and Pearson is a great alternative Quote from: Clampy on April 13, 2016, 11:10:27 PMI wouldn't be too unhappy with that. Quote from: German James on April 13, 2016, 11:11:04 PMOh for fuck's sake.I think this appointment would be particularly divisive among the fans.
I said two weeks ago this was a good move and for the majority of you to embrace it. Moyes was a pipe dream and Pearson is a great alternative
I wouldn't be too unhappy with that.
Oh for fuck's sake.
Quote from: Rudy Can't Fail on April 13, 2016, 11:23:32 PMQuote from: Monty on April 13, 2016, 11:20:19 PMQuote from: Clampy on April 13, 2016, 11:14:48 PMQuote from: Monty on April 13, 2016, 11:13:42 PMQuote from: The_ads on April 13, 2016, 10:55:38 PMI said two weeks ago this was a good move and for the majority of you to embrace it. Moyes was a pipe dream and Pearson is a great alternative Quote from: Clampy on April 13, 2016, 11:10:27 PMI wouldn't be too unhappy with that. Quote from: German James on April 13, 2016, 11:11:04 PMOh for fuck's sake.I think this appointment would be particularly divisive among the fans.Apart from Moyes, most other choices would have been as well to be honest. I'm not so sure. I think the difference between Pearson and Bruce or McCarthy, or instance, is that Pearson has actual supporters on here. So in a way it's a more positive reason to be quite sharply divided. That said, put me in the septic tank.Fixed.I'm surprised you've warmed so much to Pearson, RCF. Don't you think he's a bit of a backwards, beef-and-potatoes manager in the style of a MON?
When SGT came in first time around I do remember people being unsure because he had managed tiny Watford despite the extraordinary job he did. He also came in with a really bullish attitude really stood up the players, called the place a shambles. Which would be similar to the approach Pearson would adopt isn't it? This place needs it again. Of course it could go spectacularly wrong!
Quote from: kippaxvilla2 on April 13, 2016, 11:33:58 PMWhen SGT came in first time around I do remember people being unsure because he had managed tiny Watford despite the extraordinary job he did. He also came in with a really bullish attitude really stood up the players, called the place a shambles. Which would be similar to the approach Pearson would adopt isn't it? This place needs it again. Of course it could go spectacularly wrong!Wasn't that the idea with Roy keane?
I'm surprised you've warmed so much to Pearson, RCF. Don't you think he's a bit of a backwards, beef-and-potatoes manager in the style of a MON?
Along the way, they broke several club records including most points in a single season (102), most league wins in a single season (31), most league home wins in a single season (17), the most consecutive league wins (9), the most consecutive away league wins (5) and the longest unbeaten run away from home in the league (13) and the most consecutive league games scored in (31) (the latter two records continued on to the following season).
Pearson with Chris Powell as his number 2 is a snippet I have heard off someone whom has been correct with a few previous rumours.