At what point do you accept that the manager isnt the problem. They were all relatively successful before they took the Villa job. The problems are the owner and a squad of players who are either too lazy, too rich to care or simply incompetent. It doesnt matter who takes over the hot seat. Until the two problems are resolved (or at least one of them) any incoming manager will just be a temporary sticking plaster who will be discarded within 3 years to be replaced by another temporary fix.
Thought Houllier was a gamble that was worth it. Lambert I really wanted. Garde I thought was a decent idea based on what was said of his methods. On that basis Pearson I really don't want. So might be fine. Although Garde and Houllier could not get their coaching team sorted straight away or their first choice so that might have something to do with it.
One of the worries I have with Moyes is he's a carbon copy of Lambert in terms of football philosophy and demeaner, I think he could end up being Lambert mk11 with a great fanfare when appointed by the majority of supporters all excited about the prospect only to end up with the same boring repetitive same players picked every week dying a death football
Quote from: john e on April 03, 2016, 09:20:57 PMOne of the worries I have with Moyes is he's a carbon copy of Lambert in terms of football philosophy and demeaner, I think he could end up being Lambert mk11 with a great fanfare when appointed by the majority of supporters all excited about the prospect only to end up with the same boring repetitive same players picked every week dying a death football Sorry , but your Joking Right??
Quote from: Tony Erdington on April 03, 2016, 09:24:54 PMQuote from: john e on April 03, 2016, 09:20:57 PMOne of the worries I have with Moyes is he's a carbon copy of Lambert in terms of football philosophy and demeaner, I think he could end up being Lambert mk11 with a great fanfare when appointed by the majority of supporters all excited about the prospect only to end up with the same boring repetitive same players picked every week dying a death football Sorry , but your Joking Right??no that's how I see it, Moyes is a very limited manager just like Lambert
Moyes has a track record of consistently getting a side into the top six over a decade on a limited budget and secured CL qualification. What is Lambert's track record? People slate his style of football too, but from about 2009 onwards, that Everton team became far more easy on the eye. If Moyes is remotely interested, this is one occasion when there really should be just a shortlist of one. But he would want guarantees and autonomy that a manager of his standing is probably right to expect. So we'll no doubt opt for a more malleable candidate.
I wonder if Pearson is the man, whether the board will also have some input into his choosing the coaching team.
Quote from: ozzjim on April 03, 2016, 09:17:32 PMThought Houllier was a gamble that was worth it. Lambert I really wanted. Garde I thought was a decent idea based on what was said of his methods. On that basis Pearson I really don't want. So might be fine. Although Garde and Houllier could not get their coaching team sorted straight away or their first choice so that might have something to do with it.That's what worries me about Pearson. His coaching team are currently with a Champions League outfit (makes we want to puke saying that about Leicester), and are not likely to come. So I guess there is uncertainty about him getting a new team around him that works. That and the fact that he is a bit of a tool. Seems well regarded by the ex pros though.Not sure about Moyes either, though he makes sense on paper.I think I would like us to go for Grayson, who has a good record of promotions, and is doing well at PNE.