collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 08:18:44 PM]


Kits 25/26 by Smirker
[Today at 08:18:43 PM]


FFP by RamboandBruno
[Today at 08:13:08 PM]


Morgan Rogers - PFA Young Player of the Year 24/25 by PaulWinch again
[Today at 07:54:36 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Rudy Can't Fail
[Today at 07:49:32 PM]


Brentford v Aston Villa Pre Match Thread. by VillaTim
[Today at 07:41:40 PM]


Unai Emery by PaulWinch again
[Today at 07:39:03 PM]


Lost: 1955-56 pt I by frankmosswasmyuncle
[Today at 07:29:34 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 08:18:44 PM]


Re: Kits 25/26 by Smirker
[Today at 08:18:43 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 08:14:02 PM]


Re: FFP by RamboandBruno
[Today at 08:13:08 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 08:12:43 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by kippaxvilla2
[Today at 08:11:34 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 07:59:48 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 07:58:24 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Who'd take Pulis now?  (Read 26291 times)

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72843
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #120 on: November 21, 2017, 10:06:16 AM »
Diego Lugano. Now at Sao Paulo. Has played 95 (!) times for Uruguay. Can only assume his hilarious Villa Park performance was an aberration and he's normally much better.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15440
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #121 on: November 21, 2017, 10:10:14 AM »
Diego Lugano. Now at Sao Paulo. Has played 95 (!) times for Uruguay. Can only assume his hilarious Villa Park performance was an aberration and he's normally much better.

He was the one who was literally all over Benteke every time the ball came near him in that 4-3 game wasn't he?  He gave a penalty away in that game IIRC.   

Offline Gregorys Boy

  • Member
  • Posts: 4812
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #122 on: November 21, 2017, 11:54:23 AM »
Bruce has a better promotion record and knows the Championship more.  I wouldn't go with Pulis right now no.

Online Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47666
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 16.09.2025
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #123 on: November 21, 2017, 11:57:56 AM »
Bruce has a better promotion record and knows the Championship more.  I wouldn't go with Pulis right now no.

You realise this thread is a year and a half old?

Offline Gregorys Boy

  • Member
  • Posts: 4812
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #124 on: November 21, 2017, 12:05:31 PM »
Bruce has a better promotion record and knows the Championship more.  I wouldn't go with Pulis right now no.

You realise this thread is a year and a half old?

I didn't, but timing is everything I guess...

Offline stuart445

  • Member
  • Posts: 599
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #125 on: November 24, 2017, 09:35:17 AM »
Please let them appoint Mclaren to pay "Albion" style football. Their fans are so delusional about the way they should play and how huge a club they are. Plus was detestable and I would happily never see a side of his face a rugby field again.

We can't really mock Albion fans in regards to the demand about the style of football, all you need do is look at the Bruce Out thread and you'll see that we have a fair share of fans with the same mindset.

Offline Chinchilla Bathhouse

  • Member
  • Posts: 2291
  • GM : 25.01.2020
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #126 on: November 24, 2017, 10:22:21 AM »
Please let them appoint Mclaren to pay "Albion" style football. Their fans are so delusional about the way they should play and how huge a club they are. Plus was detestable and I would happily never see a side of his face a rugby field again.

We can't really mock Albion fans in regards to the demand about the style of football, all you need do is look at the Bruce Out thread and you'll see that we have a fair share of fans with the same mindset.

Indeed. Football fans wanting to watch decent football. Outrageous.

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30275
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #127 on: November 24, 2017, 01:09:01 PM »
I'm not sure you can compare the two anyway. Pulis is way out there on his own when it comes to mind numblingly dull football.

Offline Stu

  • Member
  • Posts: 14024
  • GM : 09.04.2021
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #128 on: November 24, 2017, 01:16:49 PM »
Everyone wants to watch good football, but for some unknown reason boggies fans think they're entitled to it - as if there's an 'Albion Way' to play. This is a club that have been managed by Gary Megson for Christ's sake.

Offline Boz

  • Member
  • Posts: 1924
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #129 on: November 24, 2017, 01:41:52 PM »
Everyone wants to watch good football, but for some unknown reason boggies fans think they're entitled to it - as if there's an 'Albion Way' to play. This is a club that have been managed by Gary Megson for Christ's sake.

And are again, for time being anyway.

Offline wittonwarrior

  • Member
  • Posts: 4610
  • Age: 65
  • Location: Knotty Ash (really)
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #130 on: November 24, 2017, 01:41:58 PM »
Bloose would be a match made in heaven

Online ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26356
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #131 on: November 24, 2017, 01:43:27 PM »
How many fans associate their club with mind numbing  dull football ?
This reputation is caused by a managers philosophy.
Bolton Allardyce
Stoke Pullis
Villa McLeish Lambert Bruce

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30275
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #132 on: November 24, 2017, 02:31:16 PM »
I've never found Bruce's football under us mind numblingly dull. Frustrating sometimes but not dull.

Online Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 41477
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #133 on: November 24, 2017, 02:34:18 PM »
I've never found Bruce's football under us mind numblingly dull. Frustrating sometimes but not dull.

It's frustrating because you care but a neutral would probably find it mind numbingly dull.

Online ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26356
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #134 on: November 24, 2017, 02:36:13 PM »
I've never found Bruce's football under us mind numblingly dull. Frustrating sometimes but not dull.
Fair point.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal