How is that any different to those that defend Ellis and rarely, if ever, criticise him?
So it's the same thing but only one side of it bothers you?
There's an even smaller number of people who have been trying to dismiss that if it had been left to Ellis we'd almost certainly have had Dave Bassett as manager. His role was to find the find next Villa manager, that's who he found until SGT was delivered to him. If you want praise for that decision, well at least he could see the same as everyone else on the planet that SGT was a better choice than Dave Bassett.
Well you only ever criticise those that in your eyes give him no praise, never those that appear on threads to only defend and praise him and never criticise. Seems pretty one sided to me.
Without wanting to defend Doug, while SGT was clearly a far better option, would Dave Bassett have been so terrible ? Okay the football might have been a bit agricultural but he'd probably have got the job done - he had a pretty good record at Wimbledon and later Sheffield United and even Forest to an extent.I'm just saying he was a fairly well regarded young manager at the time. We've seen far worse appointments before and since.
I can't see Dave Bassett unearthing Yorke, Platt and McGrath.