collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

FFP by Dave
[Today at 02:23:02 PM]


Unai Emery by olaftab
[Today at 02:20:06 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by PaulWinch again
[Today at 01:58:04 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by Dave
[Today at 01:25:27 PM]


Loanwatch 2025-26 by SaddVillan
[Today at 12:58:08 PM]


GUESS THE CROWD R2: ASTON VILLA v Palace, Sunday 31st August! by AV82EC
[Today at 12:40:52 PM]


Amadou Onana by Monty
[Today at 11:53:04 AM]


Brentford vs Aston Villa Post-Match Thread by ChicagoLion
[Today at 07:25:19 AM]

Recent Posts

Re: FFP by Dave
[Today at 02:23:02 PM]


Re: Unai Emery by olaftab
[Today at 02:20:06 PM]


Re: FFP by cdbearsfan
[Today at 02:12:51 PM]


Re: Unai Emery by john2710
[Today at 02:09:03 PM]


Re: FFP by Dave
[Today at 02:03:19 PM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by PaulWinch again
[Today at 01:58:04 PM]


Re: Unai Emery by pauliewalnuts
[Today at 01:57:33 PM]


Re: Unai Emery by Drummond
[Today at 01:43:04 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread  (Read 29313 times)

Offline Chris Harte

  • Member
  • Posts: 12322
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #120 on: January 30, 2016, 10:24:58 PM »
Albion had 22k+ with 4k Peterborough fans so they had more home fans than us. That's what Lerner has done to us, less home fans than the fecking Albion.
On a bit of a tangent, at eight pages this thread seems rather light compared to its equivalent for other games.

Edit - nine pages still seems light.

Offline LukeJames

  • Member
  • Posts: 5377
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #121 on: January 30, 2016, 10:25:02 PM »
BBC reported VP as "near empty". I actually think 23k is fairly decent considering the current situation and the fact this result was a virtual foregone conclusion.
23K was ok and probably much more than Smethwick had down the road however believe me it looked empty on three sides. The Witton End was packed to the rafters by City but Witton Lane looked like 1/3 full, the Holte had a few in centre but vast empty spaces on sides and top tier and top tier in Trinity was closed. So not a brilliant sight. We basically had 16K in space for 36K.
Albion had 22k+ with 4k Peterborough fans so they had more home fans than us. That's what Lerner has done to us, less home fans than the fecking Albion.
Who gives a fuck? They'll probably have it on a banner.

Offline QuintonVilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 2493
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #122 on: January 30, 2016, 10:25:09 PM »
BBC reported VP as "near empty". I actually think 23k is fairly decent considering the current situation and the fact this result was a virtual foregone conclusion.
23K was ok and probably much more than Smethwick had down the road however believe me it looked empty on three sides. The Witton End was packed to the rafters by City but Witton Lane looked like 1/3 full, the Holte had a few in centre but vast empty spaces on sides and top tier and top tier in Trinity was closed. So not a brilliant sight. We basically had 16K in space for 36K.
Albion had 22k+ with 4k Peterborough fans so they had more home fans than us. That's what Lerner has done to us, less home fans than the fecking Albion.

Congratulations. You have just scraped the bottom of the barrel.
Excuse me? Olaf said probably much more than Albion had, I merely pointed out that wasn't the case, which is criminal for a club of our size. As I said though I don't blame the fans at all.

Offline spangley1812

  • Member
  • Posts: 6548
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #123 on: January 30, 2016, 10:25:28 PM »
BBC reported VP as "near empty". I actually think 23k is fairly decent considering the current situation and the fact this result was a virtual foregone conclusion.
23K was ok and probably much more than Smethwick had down the road however believe me it looked empty on three sides. The Witton End was packed to the rafters by City but Witton Lane looked like 1/3 full, the Holte had a few in centre but vast empty spaces on sides and top tier and top tier in Trinity was closed. So not a brilliant sight. We basically had 16K in space for 36K.
Albion had 22k+ with 4k Peterborough fans so they had more home fans than us. That's what Lerner has done to us, less home fans than the fecking Albion.
There are a couple of caveats that you have to bear in mind; a) The Tesco Bags tickets were cheaper than ours i.e £10:00 for an adult and there's went to general sale which ours didn't due to the potential of Citeh fans getting in the home seats 


At the same time £10 is a lot for them, you can buy a house in Smethwick for that.

Good point well made...........

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63384
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #124 on: January 30, 2016, 10:28:17 PM »
BBC reported VP as "near empty". I actually think 23k is fairly decent considering the current situation and the fact this result was a virtual foregone conclusion.
23K was ok and probably much more than Smethwick had down the road however believe me it looked empty on three sides. The Witton End was packed to the rafters by City but Witton Lane looked like 1/3 full, the Holte had a few in centre but vast empty spaces on sides and top tier and top tier in Trinity was closed. So not a brilliant sight. We basically had 16K in space for 36K.
Albion had 22k+ with 4k Peterborough fans so they had more home fans than us. That's what Lerner has done to us, less home fans than the fecking Albion.

Congratulations. You have just scraped the bottom of the barrel.
Excuse me? Olaf said probably much more than Albion had, I merely pointed out that wasn't the case, which is criminal for a club of our size. As I said though I don't blame the fans at all.

One match, possibly, for a number of reasons. Still, if it makes you happy.

Offline Des Little

  • Member
  • Posts: 12838
  • Location: A5 Ultra
  • GM : 03.05.2021
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #125 on: January 30, 2016, 10:30:01 PM »
Let's be honest - if you can afford a tenner you can afford £15. It's hardly expensive. 17k home fans for a first team game is shit.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 76079
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #126 on: January 30, 2016, 10:31:24 PM »
I'm old enough to remember when 17K was a decent crowd  :(

Online olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43885
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #127 on: January 30, 2016, 10:31:28 PM »
Albion had 22k+ with 4k Peterborough fans so they had more home fans than us. That's what Lerner has done to us, less home fans than the fecking Albion.
On a bit of a tangent, at eight pages this thread seems rather light compared to its equivalent for other games.

Edit - nine pages still seems light.
Give it time there is lot of traffic around the Internet tonight!

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63384
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #128 on: January 30, 2016, 10:32:12 PM »
Albion had 22k+ with 4k Peterborough fans so they had more home fans than us. That's what Lerner has done to us, less home fans than the fecking Albion.
On a bit of a tangent, at eight pages this thread seems rather light compared to its equivalent for other games.

Edit - nine pages still seems light.

Sorry Chris, I guess we're just not as popular as we used to be.

Offline Chris Harte

  • Member
  • Posts: 12322
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #129 on: January 30, 2016, 10:32:45 PM »
Let's be honest - if you can afford a tenner you can afford £15. It's hardly expensive. 17k home fans for a first team game is shit.
Our average of 30000+ in the PL is excellent when you consider the crap we've had to watch over the last 5 seasons.

Something was always going to give eventually.

Online olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43885
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #130 on: January 30, 2016, 10:32:58 PM »
I'm old enough to remember when 17K was a decent crowd  :(
I am old enough to remember when the opposition filled up the Witton End we had 50K in the other 3!

Online Richard E

  • Member
  • Posts: 14171
  • Age: 54
  • Location: Tipton
  • This also will pass.
  • GM : 28.02.2019
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #131 on: January 30, 2016, 10:33:26 PM »
BBC reported VP as "near empty". I actually think 23k is fairly decent considering the current situation and the fact this result was a virtual foregone conclusion.
23K was ok and probably much more than Smethwick had down the road however believe me it looked empty on three sides. The Witton End was packed to the rafters by City but Witton Lane looked like 1/3 full, the Holte had a few in centre but vast empty spaces on sides and top tier and top tier in Trinity was closed. So not a brilliant sight. We basically had 16K in space for 36K.
Albion had 22k+ with 4k Peterborough fans so they had more home fans than us. That's what Lerner has done to us, less home fans than the fecking Albion.
Who gives a fuck? They'll probably have it on a banner.

They'll erect a statue of the match ticket and have a commemorative dinner on 30th January 2051

Offline ianw3946

  • Member
  • Posts: 6
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #132 on: January 30, 2016, 10:36:05 PM »
Sinclair made Gabby look brilliant!

And why bring on Fat Gaby he offers nothing to top class football anymore.

If that was the criteria we'd only be sending out five-a-side teams.

Offline Chris Harte

  • Member
  • Posts: 12322
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #133 on: January 30, 2016, 10:36:12 PM »
Albion had 22k+ with 4k Peterborough fans so they had more home fans than us. That's what Lerner has done to us, less home fans than the fecking Albion.
On a bit of a tangent, at eight pages this thread seems rather light compared to its equivalent for other games.

Edit - nine pages still seems light.

Sorry Chris, I guess we're just not as popular as we used to be.
I'm not suggesting its about the popularity of this site. But rather the lack of interest in the fixture. In the same way that the gate was light, clearly people aren't as interested in this fixture hence the (seemingly) lower than normal post count.

Offline wittonwarrior

  • Member
  • Posts: 4610
  • Age: 65
  • Location: Knotty Ash (really)
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #134 on: January 30, 2016, 10:37:08 PM »
BBC reported VP as "near empty". I actually think 23k is fairly decent considering the current situation and the fact this result was a virtual foregone conclusion.
23K was ok and probably much more than Smethwick had down the road however believe me it looked empty on three sides. The Witton End was packed to the rafters by City but Witton Lane looked like 1/3 full, the Holte had a few in centre but vast empty spaces on sides and top tier and top tier in Trinity was closed. So not a brilliant sight. We basically had 16K in space for 36K.
Albion had 22k+ with 4k Peterborough fans so they had more home fans than us. That's what Lerner has done to us, less home fans than the fecking Albion.

Thats a frightening thought, what a state of affairs.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal