collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by olaftab
[Today at 02:50:07 PM]


Reserves and Academy 2025-26 by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 02:45:06 PM]


GUESS THE CROWD R2: ASTON VILLA v Palace, Sunday 31st August! by cdbearsfan
[Today at 02:44:20 PM]


FFP by The Edge
[Today at 02:41:57 PM]


Unai Emery by olaftab
[Today at 02:20:06 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by Dave
[Today at 01:25:27 PM]


Loanwatch 2025-26 by SaddVillan
[Today at 12:58:08 PM]


Amadou Onana by Monty
[Today at 11:53:04 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread  (Read 29390 times)

Offline aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 11776
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #105 on: January 30, 2016, 10:03:30 PM »
Yes, not resigned here either. Angry, downbeat, shocked and frustrated. This season is all the chickens of the sea of bad decisions coming home to roost. We just have to suck it up, there's no avoiding it, and learn the dozens of lessons of the last 5 years on the pitch and 10 years off it.

Offline QuintonVilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 2493
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #106 on: January 30, 2016, 10:04:49 PM »
BBC reported VP as "near empty". I actually think 23k is fairly decent considering the current situation and the fact this result was a virtual foregone conclusion.
It was shocking, but I don't blame any fans for staying away. £10-£20 against one of the best teams in the country and we had around 17,000 home fans, we got similar for a midweek replay against League Two Wycombe. Tells you everything about what Lerner and co have done to this club, apathy reigns. To put into perspective, Albion had more home fans against Peterborough today than we had.

Online olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43889
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #107 on: January 30, 2016, 10:05:50 PM »
BBC reported VP as "near empty". I actually think 23k is fairly decent considering the current situation and the fact this result was a virtual foregone conclusion.
23K was ok and probably much more than Smethwick had down the road however believe me it looked empty on three sides. The Witton End was packed to the rafters by City but Witton Lane looked like 1/3 full, the Holte had a few in centre but vast empty spaces on sides and top tier and top tier in Trinity was closed. So not a brilliant sight. We basically had 16K in space for 36K.

Offline Lky

  • Member
  • Posts: 56
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #108 on: January 30, 2016, 10:06:15 PM »
Absolute woeful. Tippy tappy football with lots of possession but no penetration and mistakes a plentiful. Just please don't keep blaming Guzan, Clark, Westwood as scapegoats. Veretout, Gil, Gana and Ayew are just as poor; they may be new signings and somehow they have more credibility with quite a few posters on here but I just don't understand why.

Offline aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 11776
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #109 on: January 30, 2016, 10:10:00 PM »
Gana has been missing for months, put a shift in for a couple of games towards the end of this month and that has been it. Ayew has a few tricks but little end product. Gil is a nothing player. Veretout is tidy but another one who doesn't track back well. For nearly £30m or whatever it's been the end product is very poor.

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #110 on: January 30, 2016, 10:10:08 PM »
Absolute woeful. Tippy tappy football with lots of possession but no penetration and mistakes a plentiful. Just please don't keep blaming Guzan, Clark, Westwood as scapegoats. Veretout, Gil, Gana and Ayew are just as poor; they may be new signings and somehow they have more credibility with quite a few posters on here but I just don't understand why.

Shows how crap everyone has been. Ayew, for instance, has shown the odd glimmer of quality but I agree he's hardly lit up the place and when we are in the Championship I'm not sure a player who was at Lorient and then the team finishing bottom of the Prem will have clubs falling over themselves to sign him up.

Offline russon

  • Member
  • Posts: 3204
  • Location: Desolation Row
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #111 on: January 30, 2016, 10:10:34 PM »
First time poster.

Personally I would have liked a cup run.  If certainly helped our league form last season, even though the final was a let down. 

The reality is that we struggle to compete with our first choice side, let alone make any changes.  For a club of our size to have this situation as scandalous and negligent.

I feel really sorry for Remi Garde.  He's clearly a decent guy, very calm and composed and definitely a very intelligent guy who knows the game well.  But you have to wonder how long he will be prepared to bang his head against a brick wall.

Yes. That's right.

Still being a big club has its ups and downs. Our rivals know we are bigger and have a wider reach than they would ever have, or could ever have combined together. Every now and then there's a blip. A little blip that we recover from. for them its what they are and who they are. And they know it. It's difficult but let them have their moment because you see, again, they have to wait for the mighty Aston Villa to fail, to trip up, to claim superiority over us. Its never anything that they have done over anyone meaningful period that allows them to think, well I'm not sure that they even really think it, that they even have any parity with us never mind supremacy.

We know, and they know, that they have to crow about it now because fast forward a few seasons and it'll be back to normal.

its painful first-timer but the mighty Aston villa have been here before and usually come back stronger than before. We're surrounded by a sea of shite and as ever the shite around us can't be the standard bearers for the area, for the Midlands. No, that's Aston Villa. Even from the Championship we'll still be the important name that the media will be talking about. That's why we're not just important for Villa fans, but for the Midlands as a whole. The Midlands needs us and the national media only care long-term about us.

Stick in there first-timer. It'll be shit this season. But we are who we are and they are who they are. And they know it. Lords of all around us. And they hate it. You have to laugh, eh?
You have to laugh too when the best username it can come up with begins BC! It ought to be a private investigator with such ingenuity.

Offline QuintonVilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 2493
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #112 on: January 30, 2016, 10:13:03 PM »
BBC reported VP as "near empty". I actually think 23k is fairly decent considering the current situation and the fact this result was a virtual foregone conclusion.
23K was ok and probably much more than Smethwick had down the road however believe me it looked empty on three sides. The Witton End was packed to the rafters by City but Witton Lane looked like 1/3 full, the Holte had a few in centre but vast empty spaces on sides and top tier and top tier in Trinity was closed. So not a brilliant sight. We basically had 16K in space for 36K.
Albion had 22k+ with 4k Peterborough fans so they had more home fans than us. That's what Lerner has done to us, less home fans than the fecking Albion.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 76079
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #113 on: January 30, 2016, 10:13:53 PM »
Maybe it's Black Country? Maybe it's not a first time poster? May the force be with you. Maybe baby.

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63384
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #114 on: January 30, 2016, 10:15:43 PM »
BBC reported VP as "near empty". I actually think 23k is fairly decent considering the current situation and the fact this result was a virtual foregone conclusion.
23K was ok and probably much more than Smethwick had down the road however believe me it looked empty on three sides. The Witton End was packed to the rafters by City but Witton Lane looked like 1/3 full, the Holte had a few in centre but vast empty spaces on sides and top tier and top tier in Trinity was closed. So not a brilliant sight. We basically had 16K in space for 36K.
Albion had 22k+ with 4k Peterborough fans so they had more home fans than us. That's what Lerner has done to us, less home fans than the fecking Albion.

Congratulations. You have just scraped the bottom of the barrel.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 76079
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #115 on: January 30, 2016, 10:17:03 PM »
Bizarrely we'd probably have had more turn up if we'd been playing Peterborough.

Online BC Villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 1844
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #116 on: January 30, 2016, 10:17:53 PM »
BC is short for Black Country ☺

It's at the point where we have to have gallows humour though.  I think it's pretty clear we won't dig ourselves out of it this time.

The worry I have is can you trust the current board to sort out the mess they've got us into.

Rather like getting a plumber to sort out your plumbing and then asking him to put it right after he's buggered up and flooded the kitchen.

Offline spangley1812

  • Member
  • Posts: 6548
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #117 on: January 30, 2016, 10:19:41 PM »
BBC reported VP as "near empty". I actually think 23k is fairly decent considering the current situation and the fact this result was a virtual foregone conclusion.
23K was ok and probably much more than Smethwick had down the road however believe me it looked empty on three sides. The Witton End was packed to the rafters by City but Witton Lane looked like 1/3 full, the Holte had a few in centre but vast empty spaces on sides and top tier and top tier in Trinity was closed. So not a brilliant sight. We basically had 16K in space for 36K.
Albion had 22k+ with 4k Peterborough fans so they had more home fans than us. That's what Lerner has done to us, less home fans than the fecking Albion.
There are a couple of caveats that you have to bear in mind; a) The Tesco Bags tickets were cheaper than ours i.e £10:00 for an adult and there's went to general sale which ours didn't due to the potential of Citeh fans getting in the home seats 

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 76079
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #118 on: January 30, 2016, 10:20:56 PM »
BBC reported VP as "near empty". I actually think 23k is fairly decent considering the current situation and the fact this result was a virtual foregone conclusion.
23K was ok and probably much more than Smethwick had down the road however believe me it looked empty on three sides. The Witton End was packed to the rafters by City but Witton Lane looked like 1/3 full, the Holte had a few in centre but vast empty spaces on sides and top tier and top tier in Trinity was closed. So not a brilliant sight. We basically had 16K in space for 36K.
Albion had 22k+ with 4k Peterborough fans so they had more home fans than us. That's what Lerner has done to us, less home fans than the fecking Albion.
There are a couple of caveats that you have to bear in mind; a) The Tesco Bags tickets were cheaper than ours i.e £10:00 for an adult and there's went to general sale which ours didn't due to the potential of Citeh fans getting in the home seats 


At the same time £10 is a lot for them, you can buy a house in Smethwick for that.

Online olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43889
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: Aston Villa vs Man City Post-Match Thread
« Reply #119 on: January 30, 2016, 10:23:05 PM »
Not bizarrely really. Fans didn't turn up today because they thought we will get thrashed and .....
Against a lower league club with a good chance of winning yes I agree we would have had 26/27K.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal