collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Boxing thread 2016  (Read 51887 times)

Offline PGW

  • Member
  • Posts: 6978
  • Age: 71
  • Location: Selly Oak
  • Villan, Bear and now Cancer Warrior
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #225 on: May 05, 2016, 08:02:03 PM »
I'm very curious about the Khan vs Canelo fight. Khan has been written off in places, but he's talking about the fight in the right way. If he can keep his bravery in check he can definitely win the fight.
Yes i'm looking forward to this one. 05:00 start time according to BoxNation.

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #226 on: May 06, 2016, 10:15:32 AM »
It's a big ask to step up two weight divisions though.

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #227 on: May 06, 2016, 12:35:34 PM »
It is but when you think about it it is only, what, a stone? Yes it does make a difference in boxing but shouldn't in terms of being able to beat someone over the distance.

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #228 on: May 06, 2016, 01:31:48 PM »
And yet very few boxers manage it successfully.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63357
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #229 on: May 07, 2016, 10:10:47 PM »
It'll be closer to two stone by the time the fight starts.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #230 on: May 08, 2016, 03:56:25 AM »
Morning all.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #231 on: May 08, 2016, 04:11:01 AM »
Whoever wins rounds 1-4 wins the fight.Khan to lose on points for me.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #232 on: May 08, 2016, 04:34:07 AM »
After 4 rounds Khan 3 up for me.He could do this.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #233 on: May 08, 2016, 04:41:52 AM »
Khan down and out round 6.what a punch.

Offline Goldie.7

  • Member
  • Posts: 5256
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #234 on: May 08, 2016, 04:55:37 AM »
Khan was all fucked up at the end there. :o

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55130
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #235 on: May 08, 2016, 08:09:49 AM »
Shame that because he was winning the fight.

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #236 on: May 08, 2016, 08:21:44 PM »
There you go, that's the reason why it's so hard to step up weight divisions. Khan will have rarely been hit with that sort of power.

Offline JD

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10217
  • Location: Canterbury NZ
  • Stay Free
  • GM : 19.01.2026
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #237 on: May 09, 2016, 09:33:09 AM »
That was some punch.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63357
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #238 on: May 14, 2016, 09:53:36 PM »
Lee Haskins or Eurovision???

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63357
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #239 on: May 14, 2016, 11:48:12 PM »
It wasn't exactly worth turning over for.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal