Stop praising him. At this rate he is going to write even longer emails!But it's good😊
Quote from: Steve R on January 14, 2016, 10:58:44 PMQuote from: Risso on January 14, 2016, 03:54:43 PMQuote from: Steve R on January 14, 2016, 02:19:33 PMDoes anyone know of an organisation that has both a chairman and a CEO? How can a CEO be a CEO when he reports to a chairman?Whatever Hollis' (and Fox's) capabilities are, we have a structure in place that lends itself to conflict and politics and not to good corporate management.They are completely different positions in most organisations, and for examples of companies having both I give you:M&SBritish AirwaysArsenalEasyjetEtc. In fact I'd be surprised if most big companies didn't have both.It has been a few years since I retired Risso, and it looks like a certain amount of job title engineering has been going on there.The 'chairman' of M&S, for example is a non executive director. It begs the question therefore of what exactly he is chairing. I can understand a role that acts as a conduit/sanity check between what the CEO is doing and what significant shareholders are comfortable with. In an age where the cost of failure is a good deal more than profits dipping by a few mil it makes sense.Getting back to my original post and the Villa, a relatively small organisation with a single shareholder, it is hard to see how a structure with an owner, a chairman and a CEO will work. If Hollis has any job to speak of, Fox loses powers that (presumably) he once held. If on the other hand he is a non exec director, Lerner's man on the spot with peripheral executive powers, he isn't going to be doing much.Lerner has previous with the Browns for setting up management structures that guarantee conflict. It did not work well.I agree this type of structure for a business the size of a football club with one shareholder is meaningless. A plc Chairman is usually in place to moniter and question the CEO on behalf of the shareholders who are widely spread . Ultimately he can act to remove the CEO but is not involved in the day to day running of the business.As many have said its just another layer of management .Ultimately Lerner still controls the club.
Quote from: Risso on January 14, 2016, 03:54:43 PMQuote from: Steve R on January 14, 2016, 02:19:33 PMDoes anyone know of an organisation that has both a chairman and a CEO? How can a CEO be a CEO when he reports to a chairman?Whatever Hollis' (and Fox's) capabilities are, we have a structure in place that lends itself to conflict and politics and not to good corporate management.They are completely different positions in most organisations, and for examples of companies having both I give you:M&SBritish AirwaysArsenalEasyjetEtc. In fact I'd be surprised if most big companies didn't have both.It has been a few years since I retired Risso, and it looks like a certain amount of job title engineering has been going on there.The 'chairman' of M&S, for example is a non executive director. It begs the question therefore of what exactly he is chairing. I can understand a role that acts as a conduit/sanity check between what the CEO is doing and what significant shareholders are comfortable with. In an age where the cost of failure is a good deal more than profits dipping by a few mil it makes sense.Getting back to my original post and the Villa, a relatively small organisation with a single shareholder, it is hard to see how a structure with an owner, a chairman and a CEO will work. If Hollis has any job to speak of, Fox loses powers that (presumably) he once held. If on the other hand he is a non exec director, Lerner's man on the spot with peripheral executive powers, he isn't going to be doing much.Lerner has previous with the Browns for setting up management structures that guarantee conflict. It did not work well.
Quote from: Steve R on January 14, 2016, 02:19:33 PMDoes anyone know of an organisation that has both a chairman and a CEO? How can a CEO be a CEO when he reports to a chairman?Whatever Hollis' (and Fox's) capabilities are, we have a structure in place that lends itself to conflict and politics and not to good corporate management.They are completely different positions in most organisations, and for examples of companies having both I give you:M&SBritish AirwaysArsenalEasyjetEtc. In fact I'd be surprised if most big companies didn't have both.
Does anyone know of an organisation that has both a chairman and a CEO? How can a CEO be a CEO when he reports to a chairman?Whatever Hollis' (and Fox's) capabilities are, we have a structure in place that lends itself to conflict and politics and not to good corporate management.
Quote from: Dave on January 14, 2016, 09:57:25 PMQuote from: kippaxvilla2 on January 14, 2016, 09:51:45 PMNo it's an Internet forum it's about opinions. This is mine. But if I've done something wrong I'm sure you'll let me know.I can't see that you've anything wrong, and it's a bit odd that you think you might have.I just assumed that if you had an opinion you might have reasons for it. If not, that's still perfectly fine, you might just want to question why you hold that opinion.Okay sorry been a long day. I was just interpreting the bit about wasting money - depends whether he will conclude whether our summer recruitment policy was a success I suppose.
Quote from: kippaxvilla2 on January 14, 2016, 09:51:45 PMNo it's an Internet forum it's about opinions. This is mine. But if I've done something wrong I'm sure you'll let me know.I can't see that you've anything wrong, and it's a bit odd that you think you might have.I just assumed that if you had an opinion you might have reasons for it. If not, that's still perfectly fine, you might just want to question why you hold that opinion.
No it's an Internet forum it's about opinions. This is mine. But if I've done something wrong I'm sure you'll let me know.
The cynic in me says Hollis is another layer of armour between Randy Lerner and what happens at the club. Another pair of hands for the buck to pass through. So long as he does not obstruct or hinder Remi Garde he can get on with, as another has said, making paper darts.
"Aston Villa are not afraid of relegation"Looks like the fight is over in some quarters then...
Quote from: Toronto Villa on January 14, 2016, 11:16:31 PMTo have a man who genuinely loves Aston Villa join the board would be brilliant. And he walks on water. I hope this is true.And for me it's like getting a bit of our club back because Brian is there.
To have a man who genuinely loves Aston Villa join the board would be brilliant. And he walks on water. I hope this is true.
Quote from: Witton Warrior on January 15, 2016, 07:51:23 AM"Aston Villa are not afraid of relegation"Looks like the fight is over in some quarters then... "We're not afraid" sounds OK to me.