What are you going on about? Maybe you're not Very bright so I'll dumb it down for you. Randy Lerner was at Remi Gardes first match
"I am disturbed by your lack of points"
Gabby the Hutt
Quote from: Rigadon on December 21, 2015, 01:51:03 PMWhat did for Lerner and MON was man city. Their wealth effectively ended our hopes of getting in the champions league. Lerner knew it and pulled the plug on spending to get in it, and refocused the spending on staying in the premier league. The shit managerial appointments since then have had an impact but in truth are a result of the limitations around budgets. I don't buy the Man City excuse sorry. If anything, it should make the top 4 slightly easier to achieve, because every year there's going to a big team like Liverpool missing out. What did for Lerner was idiocy at every key step. When you look at his tenure as a whole it's been an unmitigated disaster leading to where we are now.
What did for Lerner and MON was man city. Their wealth effectively ended our hopes of getting in the champions league. Lerner knew it and pulled the plug on spending to get in it, and refocused the spending on staying in the premier league. The shit managerial appointments since then have had an impact but in truth are a result of the limitations around budgets.
Thanks for that cheltenham.
Thanks Cheltenham very enlightening. For me it damns Lerner more for not pulling the trigger when he knew it was all over with MON. Why try and manage out a man like him, who, whether you love or hate him, has a clear gift for wily self preservation. Why not just sack him, which in this scenario would be more straightforward and dignified and with less risk of long term fallout?I mean, if MON was being asked to justify purely football related decisions (why mcgeady not player X) by Faulkner and they knew he wouldn't tolerate it, then they were in a ridiculous situation. He shouldn't have still been in the position he was. Can you then blame MON if he reacts exactly the way they expect? And if they are trying to push him out why should he resign at a convenient time for them?On the last point, sorry but that does grind my gears. Am I to be sympathetic with a billionaire who abandons us to nosedive into the championship because he has his ego bruised by his one time ally? Sorry but grow a set, randy.
Quote from: themossman on December 21, 2015, 07:02:31 PMThanks Cheltenham very enlightening. For me it damns Lerner more for not pulling the trigger when he knew it was all over with MON. Why try and manage out a man like him, who, whether you love or hate him, has a clear gift for wily self preservation. Why not just sack him, which in this scenario would be more straightforward and dignified and with less risk of long term fallout?I mean, if MON was being asked to justify purely football related decisions (why mcgeady not player X) by Faulkner and they knew he wouldn't tolerate it, then they were in a ridiculous situation. He shouldn't have still been in the position he was. Can you then blame MON if he reacts exactly the way they expect? And if they are trying to push him out why should he resign at a convenient time for them?On the last point, sorry but that does grind my gears. Am I to be sympathetic with a billionaire who abandons us to nosedive into the championship because he has his ego bruised by his one time ally? Sorry but grow a set, randy.I agree that it shows Lerner and Faulkner up as pretty poor and weak leaders. They let the scenario drag out all summer and then were eventually taken to the cleaners paying O'Neill a fortune. Saying that, thinking back to 2011, it would have been a big call at the time to sack O'Neill and wouldn't have gone down well in many quarters.