collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 58   Go Down

Author Topic: Under Armour  (Read 175408 times)

Online Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58518
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #465 on: July 01, 2016, 12:30:44 PM »
At least now the blue in the badge matches the blue in the rest of the kit
Logged

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75948
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #466 on: July 01, 2016, 12:37:20 PM »




Logged

Online Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58518
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #467 on: July 01, 2016, 12:41:32 PM »
I see the goalkeeper kits are bigger than the outfield kits. Maybe we are signing the BFG this summer to play in net.
Logged

Offline Stirchley Villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 1033
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #468 on: July 01, 2016, 12:45:19 PM »
Seen better... had worse.
Logged

Offline amfy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4995
  • Location: L7
  • GM : 24.07.2026
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #469 on: July 01, 2016, 12:52:21 PM »
I went to an event at Bodymoor Heath last night where we had to try out the new training kit doing a session with some of the coaches! Great fun!
Can't write much now cos I'm at work, but suffice to say this is really nice kit. Anyone who uses Villa kit for training will love it. Proper light technical fabrics - no horrible scratchy nylon!
Logged

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72712
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #470 on: July 01, 2016, 01:11:36 PM »
Looks good to me.
Logged

Offline darren woolley

  • Member
  • Posts: 36279
  • Location: London
  • GM : 12.12.2024
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #471 on: July 01, 2016, 01:18:23 PM »
Logged

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30250
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #472 on: July 01, 2016, 01:24:49 PM »
Just been to have a browse in the shop in town. They look better in the pictures I thought and they're a tad small.
Logged

Offline ktvillan

  • Member
  • Posts: 5815
  • Location: In the land of Gazi Baba, pushing water uphill wth a fork
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #473 on: July 01, 2016, 01:25:27 PM »
I like the designs but if the official site photos are anything to go by the shade of blue used is still all wrong except on the socks.
Logged

Offline AVH87

  • Member
  • Posts: 1728
  • Location: Dudley
  • GM : 13.02.2021
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #474 on: July 01, 2016, 01:27:50 PM »
£50 is a lot of money to spend on a sports top, regardless of how nice you might think either kit is.
Logged

Offline kieron

  • Member
  • Posts: 2780
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #475 on: July 01, 2016, 01:32:19 PM »
Quote from: hoyle87 on July 01, 2016, 01:27:50 PM
£50 is a lot of money to spend on a sports top, regardless of how nice you might think either kit is.

I think what takes the piss even more than that is that the kids tops are £42.
Logged

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63341
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #476 on: July 01, 2016, 01:34:03 PM »
Quote from: kieron on July 01, 2016, 01:32:19 PM
Quote from: hoyle87 on July 01, 2016, 01:27:50 PM
£50 is a lot of money to spend on a sports top, regardless of how nice you might think either kit is.

I think what takes the piss even more than that is that the kids tops are £42.

And we all know what their answer is.
Logged

Online Ian.

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15668
  • Location: Back home in the Shire
  • GM : 09.01.2026
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #477 on: July 01, 2016, 01:36:59 PM »
They look really good. Best looking for years.
Logged

Offline amfy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4995
  • Location: L7
  • GM : 24.07.2026
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #478 on: July 01, 2016, 01:36:59 PM »
Kit like this is over £30 when it's not a football shirt.
I know you still wonder where the other £20 comes from, but they've charged iro £50 for years and the basic product hadn't been this good.
Football shirts are a stupid price. I am no longer shocked.
Logged

Offline amfy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4995
  • Location: L7
  • GM : 24.07.2026
Re: Under Armour
« Reply #479 on: July 01, 2016, 01:38:31 PM »
The kids tops prices are daft. They definitely have no need of technical fabrics! And they don't really need quality either as they have grown out of them in 6 months!

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 58   Go Up
« previous next »
 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal