Heroes & Villains, the Aston Villa fanzine

Heroes & Villains => Heroes Discussion => Topic started by: Toronto Villa on December 14, 2015, 05:08:18 PM

Title: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 14, 2015, 05:08:18 PM
Not claiming this one at all as it comes from a very reputable member of this parish, but Under Armour is being rumoured to be the kit supplier for next season replacing Macron. If indeed this is confirmed they are an excellent brand with some of the world's top athletes promoting their products.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: supertom on December 14, 2015, 05:13:10 PM
I thought this might be a thread to suggest some of our powder puff players play with armour on.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: preston28 on December 14, 2015, 05:16:34 PM
[img][/
 Their gear maybe quality but the shirts they have produced for Liverpool are shockers. I dread to think what abominations they would make our our claret and blue.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: itbrvilla on December 14, 2015, 05:29:03 PM
[img][/
 Their gear maybe quality but the shirts they have produced for Liverpool are shockers. I dread to think what abominations they would make our our claret and blue.
Good job they didn't make Liverpool's then
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Exeter 77 on December 14, 2015, 05:30:22 PM
New Balance supply Liverpool's kit don't they?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: preston28 on December 14, 2015, 05:42:31 PM
[img][/
 Their gear maybe quality but the shirts they have produced for Liverpool are shockers. I dread to think what abominations they would make our our claret and blue.
Good job they didn't make Liverpool's then

Ooops! Glad it's not ne balance then!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TopDeck113 on December 14, 2015, 05:58:14 PM
Not claiming this one at all as it comes from a very reputable member of this parish, but Under Armour is being rumoured to be the kit supplier for next season replacing Macron. If indeed this is confirmed they are an excellent brand with some of the world's top athletes promoting their products.

There's an open goal waiting for someone to toe poke it home if ever I saw one...
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: eamonn on December 14, 2015, 06:24:33 PM
New Balance supply Liverpool's kit don't they?

Yeah, the brand people took the piss out of you for wearing at school cos Nike were too fucking dear (see also Hi-Tec and Gola).
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TopDeck113 on December 14, 2015, 06:33:51 PM
New Balance supply Liverpool's kit don't they?

Yeah, the brand people took the piss out of you for wearing at school cos Nike were too fucking dear (see also Hi-Tec and Gola).

Whereas New Balance have had an excellent reputation amongst the running community for almost as long as I can remember.  The difference, I guess, between being fit for a specific purpose and being the tribal badge of fashion-conscious teenagers. 

Neither is their footwear particularly cheap.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Fin Feds Dad on December 14, 2015, 06:34:04 PM
Under Armour do the Spurs kit. Awful design.

Bring back Hummel - got us out of the second division last time - and we will need all the help we can get .

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on December 14, 2015, 06:36:30 PM
Give me New Balance footwear over Nike any day. Says the bloke with 5 pairs (winky thing)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 14, 2015, 06:42:14 PM
Not claiming this one at all as it comes from a very reputable member of this parish, but Under Armour is being rumoured to be the kit supplier for next season replacing Macron. If indeed this is confirmed they are an excellent brand with some of the world's top athletes promoting their products.

There's an open goal waiting for someone to toe poke it home if ever I saw one...

Well you've lost me.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: oswald funkletrumpet on December 14, 2015, 06:55:57 PM
i would like to see a decent adidas or umbro kit

under armour pppfffttt
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 14, 2015, 08:18:59 PM
i would like to see a decent adidas or umbro kit

under armour pppfffttt

Then you don't realize how good Under Armour has become as a sports clothing brand. Just look them up.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OzVilla on December 14, 2015, 08:27:28 PM
They are certainly now a big name but their quality is average and it's hideously overpriced IMO.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: oswald funkletrumpet on December 14, 2015, 08:29:54 PM
for me no contest

do i want a leisurewear with macron or under armour or adidas, nike, umbro. the same way i wouldnt wear jeans from primark

all about personal preference

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 14, 2015, 08:35:43 PM
for me no contest

do i want a leisurewear with macron or under armour or adidas, nike, umbro. the same way i wouldnt wear jeans from primark

all about personal preference



That's fine but it's not like Under Armour is Primark is it?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 14, 2015, 08:36:39 PM
They are certainly now a big name but their quality is average and it's hideously overpriced IMO.

So like every brand then? Do you remember the fiasco that was Nike when we had them and the tat they produced at the end of that deal?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Left Side on December 14, 2015, 08:42:25 PM
I thought i'd look at the spuds website as they have Under Armour and it does look good but it is bloody expensive, they have the tight sizes too so if you're carrying an extra bit of lumber that could throw you off too. FWIW I would go with Umbro as i'm a traditionalist!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pat McMahon on December 14, 2015, 10:42:52 PM
Give me New Balance footwear over Nike any day. Says the bloke with 5 pairs (winky thing)

True. Throw in Saucony too.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OzVilla on December 14, 2015, 10:49:21 PM
They are certainly now a big name but their quality is average and it's hideously overpriced IMO.

So like every brand then? Do you remember the fiasco that was Nike when we had them and the tat they produced at the end of that deal?

Yes it was crap.  Personally, I've always wanted either Umbro or Adidas but it seems they're the only two decent kit manufacturers and the 2 that we never seem to go with these days.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on December 14, 2015, 10:50:42 PM
After 4 years of this Macron tat, I'd welcome back Henson with open arms.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 14, 2015, 10:52:10 PM
I don't buy replica shirts (on account of being a grown man in my 40s, as it happens) but I think the Macron shirts have been shit ugly.

They reek of the lower leagues.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on December 14, 2015, 10:54:00 PM
I don't buy replica shirts (on account of being a grown man in my 40s, as it happens) but I think the Macron shirts have been shit ugly.

They reek of the lower leagues.

Correct. This is because they only get gigs with pub teams. Like us.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT Villan on December 15, 2015, 03:33:49 AM
Are you sure it's Under Armor and not Under Taker ?

Oh, and I'm a Merrell zero drop fan.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villafirst on December 15, 2015, 04:41:48 AM
Andy Murray wears Under Armour kit. They're a growing brand worldwide.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: nuninho on December 15, 2015, 07:11:34 AM
Andy Murray wears Under Armour kit. They're a growing brand worldwide.
Great, we'll fit in to the dour ambassadors basket for them then!!  ;-)

Don't know if its because I'm a golf fan, or if its been pushed out more generally, but first thing I think of associated with Under Armour is Jordan Speith.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: curlytailavfc on December 15, 2015, 07:23:26 AM
The way were going it should be Steptoe and Son
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: itbrvilla on December 15, 2015, 07:27:15 AM
I don't buy replica shirts (on account of being a grown man in my 40s, as it happens) but I think the Macron shirts have been shit ugly.

They reek of the lower leagues.

Correct. This is because they only get gigs with pub teams. Like us.
And paid a pretty big chunk for the privilege.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithe on December 15, 2015, 10:20:28 AM
On a US holiday in the summer I noted that Under Armour had shops in most of the malls we visited and seemed to have a visibility second only to Nike there.

I'm another one who isn't arsed either way but I think calling them second rate isn't quite accurate, at least in the American market.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Risso on December 15, 2015, 10:26:45 AM
I've got some Under Armour running gear and the quality is excellent.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Chico Hamilton III on December 15, 2015, 10:33:56 AM
The Spurs kit looks like a picture of a hangover. No thanks.

I'd rather keep the Macron rags
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: luke95 on December 15, 2015, 10:42:53 AM
Are you sure it's Under Armor and not Under Taker ?


We'll be sponsored by an Undertaker,
& New club moto we be Underachieve,
the way were going
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Chico Hamilton III on December 15, 2015, 10:48:16 AM
The Under Armour logo reminds me of the old ATV logo, if someone can be arsed to post comparative pictures
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Archbishop Herbert Cockthrottle on December 15, 2015, 10:52:47 AM
This one?

(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-S0MX0flnwLI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAsk/pyavDK7bTCI/s0-c-k-no-ns/photo.jpg)

(http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/logopedia/images/2/28/24234832357825725839725389.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20130319042203)

Sorry its black and white. We didn't have a colour telly until 1984.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Chico Hamilton III on December 15, 2015, 10:55:32 AM
That's the fella. Although I was thinking of ATV not ABC. And they're actually not that similar now you've posted them together..
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Archbishop Herbert Cockthrottle on December 15, 2015, 10:59:01 AM
For completion. And for those watching in black and white, the red is directly behind the blue.

(http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/logopedia/images/4/40/ATV_Logo_1958.svg/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/200?cb=20140828032351)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: UK Redsox on December 15, 2015, 11:06:47 AM
We had Harlech Television
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT on December 15, 2015, 08:28:15 PM
I thought UA was alright as a Brand. Certainly a step up from the crap Macron have supplied.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on December 15, 2015, 08:42:34 PM
Under Armour is a massive improvement on this current shit.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Marlon From Bearwood on December 15, 2015, 08:46:38 PM
Am I right in saying we've never had an Adidas kit? Can't be many clubs who can say that.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Jon Crofts on December 15, 2015, 08:52:08 PM
I've had a load of UA kit, running tops, leggings and jackets, always been very high quality.

Founded in Baltimore, it's all in the game yo.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: john e on December 15, 2015, 08:52:59 PM
I'd go with Fred Perry and have the team run out to 'Nothing but a heartache' by the Flirtations

Brigada's Keep the faith flag would also fit in nicely
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ozzjim on December 15, 2015, 09:53:37 PM
Under Armour are all over the shop at the moment. Every time I watch something on the old box of light there is someone with the u sign on their chest. I was actually quite surprised we seem to have got someone that is half decent. Maybe I am easily swayed.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 15, 2015, 09:58:35 PM
Under Armour are all over the shop at the moment. Every time I watch something on the old box of light there is someone with the u sign on their chest. I was actually quite surprised we seem to have got someone that is half decent. Maybe I am easily swayed.

In the US they have Jordan Speith, Tom Brady and Steph Curry. If you follow golf, the NFL and NBA you'll know they are arguably the three biggest names in their respective sports today. They've done a hell of job marketing themselves and building their brand and their clothing is very good quality.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: itbrvilla on December 15, 2015, 10:50:04 PM
I mention this to someone I believe is ITK and they said they already knew so sound likely to me.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: oswald funkletrumpet on December 16, 2015, 07:59:15 AM
I'd go with Fred Perry and have the team run out to 'Nothing but a heartache' by the Flirtations

Brigada's Keep the faith flag would also fit in nicely

you are just starting the hurt all over again. ktf
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villa in Denmark on December 16, 2015, 08:27:59 AM
I'd go with Fred Perry and have the team run out to 'Nothing but a heartache' by the Flirtations

Brigada's Keep the faith flag would also fit in nicely

you are just starting the hurt all over again. ktf

Leave Bon Jovi out of it. Things are shit enough as it is!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: aev on December 16, 2015, 09:47:32 AM
I'd go with Fred Perry and have the team run out to 'Nothing but a heartache' by the Flirtations

Brigada's Keep the faith flag would also fit in nicely

you are just starting the hurt all over again. ktf

Leave Bon Jovi out of it. Things are shit enough as it is!

We are living on a wing and a prayer.

Sorry.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: VILLA MOLE on December 16, 2015, 10:00:05 AM
I'd go with Fred Perry and have the team run out to 'Nothing but a heartache' by the Flirtations

Brigada's Keep the faith flag would also fit in nicely

you are just starting the hurt all over again. ktf

Leave Bon Jovi out of it. Things are shit enough as it is!

We are living on a wing and a prayer.

Sorry.


well we are half way there
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: mattjpa on December 16, 2015, 11:09:36 AM
I'd go with Fred Perry and have the team run out to 'Nothing but a heartache' by the Flirtations

Brigada's Keep the faith flag would also fit in nicely

you are just starting the hurt all over again. ktf

Leave Bon Jovi out of it. Things are shit enough as it is!

We are living on a wing and a prayer.

Sorry.


well we are half way there

Dont give up yet. You need to keep the faith. We need another reason to believe
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: oswald funkletrumpet on December 16, 2015, 11:16:29 AM
gabby used to work on the docks
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on December 16, 2015, 12:08:38 PM
Under Armour are all over the shop at the moment. Every time I watch something on the old box of light there is someone with the u sign on their chest. I was actually quite surprised we seem to have got someone that is half decent. Maybe I am easily swayed.

Under Armour or New Balance for me. Realistically that is. NB have done a lovely job of Stoke and Celtic's shirts this season. Liverpool's are good also.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on December 16, 2015, 12:14:27 PM
Under Armour's Sao Paulo kits:

(http://futbolfinanzas.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Under-Armour-S%C3%A3o-Paulo-1024x512.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT on December 16, 2015, 12:23:05 PM
gabby used to work on the docks

His legs have been on strike,
He's down on his luck,
It's tough....
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: oswald funkletrumpet on December 16, 2015, 12:43:41 PM
gabby used to should work on the docks

His legs have been on strike,
He's down on his luck,
It's tough....
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villa in Denmark on December 16, 2015, 01:33:14 PM
Oh god, what have I done?

Unleashed the inner poodle rocker of far too many people.  I'm sorry. Really sorry. 
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AV82EC on December 16, 2015, 01:36:43 PM
Oh god, what have I done?

Unleashed the inner poodle rocker of far too many people.  I'm sorry. Really sorry.

Hang your head in shame.

I'm sure Gabby will be trying to hold on to what he's got though.....
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Clampy on December 16, 2015, 01:38:27 PM
I know the situation looks hopeless, but take my hand, we'll make it I swear.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AV82EC on December 16, 2015, 01:40:21 PM
We are nearly half way there as well....
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tuscans on December 16, 2015, 01:53:14 PM
Under Armour do awful kits. Their designs are a mess, a lot like how Americans design their cars....and how Americans run their football clubs, a mess!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: preston28 on December 16, 2015, 02:01:05 PM
Under Armour do awful kits. They're designs are a mess, a lot like how Americans design their cars....and how Americans run their football clubs, a mess!

Does Lerner have shares in the company?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ktvillan on December 16, 2015, 02:10:06 PM
Whilst I have a preference for Adidas or Puma strips I would be happy with anyone who knows what claret and blue looks like, as opposed to the purple and lilac monstrosities inflicted upon us by some colour blind Italians at Macron.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tuscans on December 16, 2015, 02:50:09 PM
Whilst I have a preference for Adidas or Puma strips I would be happy with anyone who knows what claret and blue looks like, as opposed to the purple and lilac monstrosities inflicted upon us by some colour blind Italians at Macron.
Adidas or Puma for me too. Better quality fabrics.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Edvard Remberg on December 16, 2015, 04:32:32 PM
Under Armour's Sao Paulo kits:

(http://futbolfinanzas.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Under-Armour-S%C3%A3o-Paulo-1024x512.jpg)
Why can't we sign Ganso! (Paolo Henrique) - been in Brasil for ages - and could be on our radar.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on December 16, 2015, 05:05:29 PM
Burnley's Puma kit this year is a horror show.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: oldhill_avfc on December 16, 2015, 05:33:46 PM
Bring back Umbro and all will be forgiven.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: martin o`who?? on December 16, 2015, 05:51:56 PM
Le Coq Sportif - "when Dennis went up to lift the Eur.........the memories - I wanna cry😢😢😢
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villa in Denmark on December 16, 2015, 05:58:24 PM
Burnley's Puma kit this year is a horror show.
I know that Burnley is more relevant because of the colours, but that Watford kit is awful as well.

And for just had wrong Adidas can get it, I'd guess that last year's West Ham kit would have gone down well on here as well.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OCD on December 16, 2015, 11:23:10 PM
Under Armour's Sao Paulo kits:

(http://futbolfinanzas.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Under-Armour-S%C3%A3o-Paulo-1024x512.jpg)
Why can't we sign Ganso! (Paolo Henrique) - been in Brasil for ages - and could be on our radar.

The Great Ganso?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Edvard Remberg on December 17, 2015, 04:35:22 PM
Under Armour's Sao Paulo kits:

(http://futbolfinanzas.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Under-Armour-S%C3%A3o-Paulo-1024x512.jpg)
Why can't we sign Ganso! (Paolo Henrique) - been in Brasil for ages - and could be on our radar.

The Great Ganso?
Not sure I get that reference - but I really like how he plays.

(he is the front person on that pic)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Karl Bridges on December 18, 2015, 03:09:36 PM
These rumours started last summer.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: charlie659 on January 21, 2016, 12:30:42 PM
Under Armour will be our new kit suppliers according to the Mail:

http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/aston-villa-unveil-under-armour-10768111 (http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/aston-villa-unveil-under-armour-10768111)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Breezeblock on January 21, 2016, 01:34:05 PM
 
I've had a load of UA kit, running tops, leggings and jackets, always been very high quality.

Founded in Baltimore, it's all in the game yo.
Really? So why are they spelling "Armour" the proper way and not the septic "Armor" way? Was their founder a Brit or an Aussie?  ???
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Chris Harte on January 21, 2016, 02:58:47 PM
I've had a load of UA kit, running tops, leggings and jackets, always been very high quality.

Founded in Baltimore, it's all in the game yo.
Really? So why are they spelling "Armour" the proper way and not the septic "Armor" way? Was their founder a Brit or an Aussie?  ???
That is a curiousity I'd not previously considered. In Ameriglish it would normally be spelt "Armor."
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Dave on January 21, 2016, 03:08:22 PM
I've had a load of UA kit, running tops, leggings and jackets, always been very high quality.

Founded in Baltimore, it's all in the game yo.
Really? So why are they spelling "Armour" the proper way and not the septic "Armor" way? Was their founder a Brit or an Aussie?  ???
That is a curiousity I'd not previously considered. In Ameriglish it would normally be spelt "Armor."

(quick Google)

According to the founder he thought that the phone number 888-4ARMOUR was more memorable for people than 888-44ARMOR
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Saunders9 on January 21, 2016, 09:30:06 PM
Tom Fox admitted at the AGM that there will be a new kit supplier. Did not say who though but I believe he said it will be an increase on the current deal even if relegated
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: alftitimus on January 22, 2016, 03:48:09 AM
A kit Supplier ~~ for a Championship side, providing MORE than for a Premier team??

At WHL ~ UA ~ they flood the place out on televised matches, with banner LCDs, static billboards etc.

Because Spurs have a European as well as a Premier TV audience.

UA will not be seduced by a possible dozen TV matches, especially if the toon go down ~ they will get the most matches. We'll have Blues/Derby/Wolves...possibly Walsall as our big TV moments. UA are in the stratosphere of up-market at the mo' ~~~ we can't really expect them.

Neither can we really expect any company to pay us MORE when we are no longer a Prem side.

Unless our previous deal was cabbage shreds !

...and who negotiated that one... :D

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villa in Denmark on January 22, 2016, 07:19:28 AM
A kit Supplier ~~ for a Championship side, providing MORE than for a Premier team??

At WHL ~ UA ~ they flood the place out on televised matches, with banner LCDs, static billboards etc.

Because Spurs have a European as well as a Premier TV audience.

UA will not be seduced by a possible dozen TV matches, especially if the toon go down ~ they will get the most matches. We'll have Blues/Derby/Wolves...possibly Walsall as our big TV moments. UA are in the stratosphere of up-market at the mo' ~~~ we can't really expect them.

Neither can we really expect any company to pay us MORE when we are no longer a Prem side.

Unless our previous deal was cabbage shreds !

...and who negotiated that one... :D


I'm sure that at the time the Macron deal was reported as being financially better than the last Nike deal, so not cabbage shreds!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: oswald funkletrumpet on January 22, 2016, 08:58:57 AM
Tom Fox admitted at the AGM that there will be a new kit supplier. Did not say who though but I believe he said it will be an increase on the current deal even if relegated

i dont believe that for a minute

it has been quoted there will be a significant financial reduction if we are relegated
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villa in Denmark on January 22, 2016, 09:33:03 AM
Tom Fox admitted at the AGM that there will be a new kit supplier. Did not say who though but I believe he said it will be an increase on the current deal even if relegated

i dont believe that for a minute

it has been quoted there will be a significant financial reduction if we are relegated


A reduction in comparison to the deal if we stay up, not necessarily in relation to the existing Macron deal.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Stirchley Villain on January 22, 2016, 10:35:13 AM
I'm quite looking forward to UA. The Macron kits have been largely awful. I'm still disappointed we've never seen an Adidas Villa kit though.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ASHTONVILLA on January 22, 2016, 11:19:34 AM
I must be getting old, never heard of them. They sound like a deodorant brand.

Hopefully they will do a good job, Fox seems fine at this sort of thing, just keep him away from anything to do with the team.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: tomd2103 on January 22, 2016, 11:20:15 AM
Bring back Umbro and all will be forgiven.

I always liked our Hummel kits. Bit of a unique brand with no other clubs having it either.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: mattjpa on January 22, 2016, 11:28:05 AM
A kit Supplier ~~ for a Championship side, providing MORE than for a Premier team??

At WHL ~ UA ~ they flood the place out on televised matches, with banner LCDs, static billboards etc.

Because Spurs have a European as well as a Premier TV audience.

UA will not be seduced by a possible dozen TV matches, especially if the toon go down ~ they will get the most matches. We'll have Blues/Derby/Wolves...possibly Walsall as our big TV moments. UA are in the stratosphere of up-market at the mo' ~~~ we can't really expect them.

Neither can we really expect any company to pay us MORE when we are no longer a Prem side.

Unless our previous deal was cabbage shreds !

...and who negotiated that one... :D



I am struggling to understand but I really like this post. Its like a word connumndrum or cryptic crossword or something, ill save it for lunchtime. For what its worth I would imagine that the new deal will be heavily claused depending on us going down and when we come back up and numbered accordingly. It is easy to believe that even the bottom line of it will be more lucrative than a deal struck 4 years ago though
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: dicedlam on January 22, 2016, 12:24:11 PM
They have not long become the Wasps kit supplier. Quality gear.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on January 22, 2016, 01:30:56 PM
I have no issues with Under Armour...they do make quality sport and leisure wear.

It will be the design of the kit that may or may not bring about complaints, but I'm sure the quality will be there.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 22, 2016, 01:40:21 PM
I have no issues with Under Armour...they do make quality sport and leisure wear.

It will be the design of the kit that may or may not bring about complaints, but I'm sure the quality will be there.

Yeah they're a definite upgrade on those awful Macron rags we wear right now.
I just hope they're not plastered with those tacky advertisements that are all over shirts in the Championship next season.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: in exile on January 22, 2016, 01:46:15 PM
So you want the club to spend money but not bring any in?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 22, 2016, 01:48:50 PM
So you want the club to spend money but not bring any in?

No, it was more about us avoiding relegation at any cost.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Clampy on January 22, 2016, 01:51:47 PM
Don't know a great deal about them either. It's a case of wait and see I suppose.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villa in Denmark on January 22, 2016, 02:04:52 PM
So you want the club to spend money but not bring any in?

No, it was more about us avoiding relegation at any cost.

How about administration or insolvency?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ian. on January 22, 2016, 06:02:25 PM
I know Nike messed right up but my very understated grey Nike hoodie with the very small lion stitched on the sleeve is getting a tad worn. I hope this new Armour brand can make something as nice but simple as that top.

I loved the plain white away shirt Nike made us for one season when we had Acorns on the front.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Marlon From Bearwood on January 22, 2016, 06:39:53 PM
Spurs kits look alright to me.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villa in Denmark on January 22, 2016, 07:03:50 PM
I'm quite looking forward to UA. The Macron kits have been largely awful. I'm still disappointed we've never seen an Adidas Villa kit though.

I'm sure something like this would have gone down a storm!
(https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRLLJfl3AyoDRzEEn74kBW-8pO2btXCt3tnvebfntKcqI1VKa9C)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: villalion on January 22, 2016, 07:13:23 PM
My mrs has been sporting the under armour for years.... whacking great padlock on the front of it... thanks I'm here all week.😅
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villain1874 on January 22, 2016, 09:52:20 PM
i would like to see a decent adidas or umbro kit

under armour pppfffttt

Me too mate, I would like adidas kits or Umbro for a few seasons, I hate the Spurs design it looks shite so I would rather avoid Under Armour...

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Stirchley Villain on January 22, 2016, 10:05:48 PM
I'm quite looking forward to UA. The Macron kits have been largely awful. I'm still disappointed we've never seen an Adidas Villa kit though.

I'm sure something like this would have gone down a storm!
(https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRLLJfl3AyoDRzEEn74kBW-8pO2btXCt3tnvebfntKcqI1VKa9C)

I don't think that would be their choice of design if they made our kits now would it..?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villa in Denmark on January 22, 2016, 10:50:25 PM
Well if they could come up with it for the kit stealers, why couldn't they have done it for us.

The point is, whoever gets the honour there's always the possibility of getting dicked around (Nike) or dodgy designs (that Adidas kit, some of the Puma ones this season e.g. Watford.)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Marlon From Bearwood on January 22, 2016, 10:59:39 PM
That Adidas West Ham kit is replica of one of their kits from the 80s so we wouldn't have ended up with that design.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on January 22, 2016, 11:04:12 PM
Let's be honest, whatever kit we have next season will be shit, regardless of the supplier. For the simple reason there's a very good chance it'll have Championship logos on each sleeve.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: alftitimus on January 28, 2016, 02:01:52 AM

I am struggling to understand but I really like this post. Its like a word connumndrum or cryptic crossword or something, ill save it for lunchtime. For what its worth I would imagine that the new deal will be heavily claused depending on us going down and when we come back up and numbered accordingly. It is easy to believe that even the bottom line of it will be more lucrative than a deal struck 4 years ago though

Thank You matt...I was trying to be elusive...  :D

Fox sold Arsenal like you sell ice-cream in a heat wave. Hundreds of bidders for even the corner flag. Why get off his bottom ~~ let his PA/Secretary etc deal with it...get it on your CV when you choose the highest bidder?
 {Get Randy to think you are Brill, and suggest a couple of your "Wenger Dynasty" compatriots come along to secure Villa's future}

Now, if the reports are true, he has secured a deal that is worth more than any previous deal. And he secured it as we are a Prem Side with a global audience...etc.

WE ain't gonna be a global attraction, if the worst happens, is there a withdrawal clause for relegation? :D
A reduction/adjustment~~ as you suggest ?

If we go down, and the Toon do as well we can kiss goodbye to TV exposure.
I mean, Leeds hogged the TV in the Chumps league ~ 11 matches before Christmas~ they even went to court to stop further TV matches,their following, with the Toon and the Mackems are going to push us way down TV exposure~~~AND that is heavy factor in selling sponsorship. For shirts...and Corner Flags.

WE are not sitting here selling Ice-Cream in a  heat wave.... Fox may be right...Faulkner's deal may have been pro rata 4 years ago, but I will be amazed ~~ as you should be~~matt~~  if Fox's deal is anywhere above Brighton's, Derby's or Boro's.

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: itbrvilla on January 28, 2016, 07:37:26 AM

I am struggling to understand but I really like this post. Its like a word connumndrum or cryptic crossword or something, ill save it for lunchtime. For what its worth I would imagine that the new deal will be heavily claused depending on us going down and when we come back up and numbered accordingly. It is easy to believe that even the bottom line of it will be more lucrative than a deal struck 4 years ago though

Thank You matt...I was trying to be elusive...  :D

Fox sold Arsenal like you sell ice-cream in a heat wave. Hundreds of bidders for even the corner flag. Why get off his bottom ~~ let his PA/Secretary etc deal with it...get it on your CV when you choose the highest bidder?
 {Get Randy to think you are Brill, and suggest a couple of your "Wenger Dynasty" compatriots come along to secure Villa's future}

Now, if the reports are true, he has secured a deal that is worth more than any previous deal. And he secured it as we are a Prem Side with a global audience...etc.

WE ain't gonna be a global attraction, if the worst happens, is there a withdrawal clause for relegation? :D
A reduction/adjustment~~ as you suggest ?

If we go down, and the Toon do as well we can kiss goodbye to TV exposure.
I mean, Leeds hogged the TV in the Chumps league ~ 11 matches before Christmas~ they even went to court to stop further TV matches,their following, with the Toon and the Mackems are going to push us way down TV exposure~~~AND that is heavy factor in selling sponsorship. For shirts...and Corner Flags.

WE are not sitting here selling Ice-Cream in a  heat wave.... Fox may be right...Faulkner's deal may have been pro rata 4 years ago, but I will be amazed ~~ as you should be~~matt~~  if Fox's deal is anywhere above Brighton's, Derby's or Boro's.


I doubt it. They will pay us X amount to supply X amount of shirts. They will also be able to flog our shirts through other retailers which will be more profitable for them as club won't take a cut of that e.g. Sports direct.
 
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: chrisw1 on January 28, 2016, 11:33:57 AM

I am struggling to understand but I really like this post. Its like a word connumndrum or cryptic crossword or something, ill save it for lunchtime. For what its worth I would imagine that the new deal will be heavily claused depending on us going down and when we come back up and numbered accordingly. It is easy to believe that even the bottom line of it will be more lucrative than a deal struck 4 years ago though

Thank You matt...I was trying to be elusive...  :D

Fox sold Arsenal like you sell ice-cream in a heat wave. Hundreds of bidders for even the corner flag. Why get off his bottom ~~ let his PA/Secretary etc deal with it...get it on your CV when you choose the highest bidder?
 {Get Randy to think you are Brill, and suggest a couple of your "Wenger Dynasty" compatriots come along to secure Villa's future}

Now, if the reports are true, he has secured a deal that is worth more than any previous deal. And he secured it as we are a Prem Side with a global audience...etc.

WE ain't gonna be a global attraction, if the worst happens, is there a withdrawal clause for relegation? :D
A reduction/adjustment~~ as you suggest ?

If we go down, and the Toon do as well we can kiss goodbye to TV exposure.
I mean, Leeds hogged the TV in the Chumps league ~ 11 matches before Christmas~ they even went to court to stop further TV matches,their following, with the Toon and the Mackems are going to push us way down TV exposure~~~AND that is heavy factor in selling sponsorship. For shirts...and Corner Flags.

WE are not sitting here selling Ice-Cream in a  heat wave.... Fox may be right...Faulkner's deal may have been pro rata 4 years ago, but I will be amazed ~~ as you should be~~matt~~  if Fox's deal is anywhere above Brighton's, Derby's or Boro's.



FFS less of the smiley, bold and wavey line shite and just say what you mean please.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: oswald funkletrumpet on January 28, 2016, 12:28:55 PM

I am struggling to understand but I really like this post. Its like a word connumndrum or cryptic crossword or something, ill save it for lunchtime. For what its worth I would imagine that the new deal will be heavily claused depending on us going down and when we come back up and numbered accordingly. It is easy to believe that even the bottom line of it will be more lucrative than a deal struck 4 years ago though

Thank You matt...I was trying to be elusive...  :D

Fox sold Arsenal like you sell ice-cream in a heat wave. Hundreds of bidders for even the corner flag. Why get off his bottom ~~ let his PA/Secretary etc deal with it...get it on your CV when you choose the highest bidder?
 {Get Randy to think you are Brill, and suggest a couple of your "Wenger Dynasty" compatriots come along to secure Villa's future}

Now, if the reports are true, he has secured a deal that is worth more than any previous deal. And he secured it as we are a Prem Side with a global audience...etc.

WE ain't gonna be a global attraction, if the worst happens, is there a withdrawal clause for relegation? :D
A reduction/adjustment~~ as you suggest ?

If we go down, and the Toon do as well we can kiss goodbye to TV exposure.
I mean, Leeds hogged the TV in the Chumps league ~ 11 matches before Christmas~ they even went to court to stop further TV matches,their following, with the Toon and the Mackems are going to push us way down TV exposure~~~AND that is heavy factor in selling sponsorship. For shirts...and Corner Flags.

WE are not sitting here selling Ice-Cream in a  heat wave.... Fox may be right...Faulkner's deal may have been pro rata 4 years ago, but I will be amazed ~~ as you should be~~matt~~  if Fox's deal is anywhere above Brighton's, Derby's or Boro's.



FFS less of the smiley, bold and wavey line shite and just say what you mean please.

Seconded
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ads on January 28, 2016, 12:33:12 PM
I like the smileys and the squiggles. It distracts from all the bollocks he talks.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Edvard Remberg on January 28, 2016, 12:36:46 PM

I am struggling to understand but I really like this post. Its like a word connumndrum or cryptic crossword or something, ill save it for lunchtime. For what its worth I would imagine that the new deal will be heavily claused depending on us going down and when we come back up and numbered accordingly. It is easy to believe that even the bottom line of it will be more lucrative than a deal struck 4 years ago though

Thank You matt...I was trying to be elusive...  :D

Fox sold Arsenal like you sell ice-cream in a heat wave. Hundreds of bidders for even the corner flag. Why get off his bottom ~~ let his PA/Secretary etc deal with it...get it on your CV when you choose the highest bidder?
 {Get Randy to think you are Brill, and suggest a couple of your "Wenger Dynasty" compatriots come along to secure Villa's future}

Now, if the reports are true, he has secured a deal that is worth more than any previous deal. And he secured it as we are a Prem Side with a global audience...etc.

WE ain't gonna be a global attraction, if the worst happens, is there a withdrawal clause for relegation? :D
A reduction/adjustment~~ as you suggest ?

If we go down, and the Toon do as well we can kiss goodbye to TV exposure.
I mean, Leeds hogged the TV in the Chumps league ~ 11 matches before Christmas~ they even went to court to stop further TV matches,their following, with the Toon and the Mackems are going to push us way down TV exposure~~~AND that is heavy factor in selling sponsorship. For shirts...and Corner Flags.

WE are not sitting here selling Ice-Cream in a  heat wave.... Fox may be right...Faulkner's deal may have been pro rata 4 years ago, but I will be amazed ~~ as you should be~~matt~~  if Fox's deal is anywhere above Brighton's, Derby's or Boro's.



FFS less of the smiley, bold and wavey line shite and just say what you mean please.

Seconded
It almost made me sea sick  :o
~'-,~'-,~'-,~'-,~'-,~'-,~'-,~'-,~'-,~'-,~'-,~'-,~'-,~'-,
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villa in Denmark on January 28, 2016, 01:05:27 PM
I like the smileys and the squiggles. It distracts from all the bollocks he talks.

Miracles of modern science.  Talking bollocks. Always hanging around with a bit of a dick and always looking (for) a twat.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: paul_e on January 28, 2016, 01:14:22 PM
I'm not sure why so many people are upset with under armour.  If you look at a range of the kits they do I think most of them are good, they tend to avoid the the 'flourishes' that many kit providers insist on adding and I think it really helps.

Sao Paulo:

(http://www.uksoccershop.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Sao_Paulo_2015_home_Under_Armour.jpg)


Roma:
(http://www.designfootball.com/design-galleries/competitions/as-roma-new-kit-closed/orig-as-roma-under-armour-kit-2013-14-9801)


Hannover:
(http://cdn.football-shirts.co.uk/fans/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Hannover.jpg)


I quite like all of those.  I don't think the spurs kit is terrible either.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: richl on January 29, 2016, 02:46:03 AM
These days the kits are normally a hit or miss due to the sponsor
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Hopadop on January 29, 2016, 09:04:37 PM
I'm not normally too bothered, but I hate the current kit with a vengeance. I don't think I've liked anything that the Italian in a snood has produced.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT on February 17, 2016, 04:16:53 PM
Just a little update in this and apologies if this is old news.....

Speaking to a Macron manager this morning about kids football kits etc and just thought I'd mention the Villa.

That opened a can of worms!!

I was told Macron made two bids, one for PL status, one for Championship status. The Macron bid for the Championship status was "substantially more" than Under Armour but less for the PL equivalent.

Dear old Tom obviously felt we'd get out of trouble!!

From what I've been told today, we certainly haven't got the best deal available. Not by a long shot.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: eamonn on February 17, 2016, 05:38:09 PM
So even the kit deal, his one self-proclaimed telling contribution to the club, can be just about chalked-off...
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TopDeck113 on February 17, 2016, 05:42:00 PM
Unfortunately once this is all clouded in "commercial confidentiality" we'll never know whether this is true or not.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ads on February 17, 2016, 05:44:48 PM
They're going to get good coverage. We'll be on the box more than Man Yanited next season.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT on February 17, 2016, 05:46:39 PM
Unfortunately once this is all clouded in "commercial confidentiality" we'll never know whether this is true or not.

Very true.

The thing about this guy was that Villa wouldn't have been mentioned had it not been for me starting to talk about our shirt from last season on the wall.

I could tell, everything he said was from the heart and it was obviously a little raw too. The was nothing contrived that's for sure.

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: stuart445 on February 19, 2016, 10:35:53 AM
I suppose Villa would say it's all about the name, people won't buy macron because it's perceived as uncool whereas Under Armour have a more reputable name so people will be more willing to buy it.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: andyh on March 19, 2016, 12:27:01 PM
Just a little update in this and apologies if this is old news.....

Speaking to a Macron manager this morning about kids football kits etc and just thought I'd mention the Villa.

That opened a can of worms!!

I was told Macron made two bids, one for PL status, one for Championship status. The Macron bid for the Championship status was "substantially more" than Under Armour but less for the PL equivalent.

Dear old Tom obviously felt we'd get out of trouble!!

From what I've been told today, we certainly haven't got the best deal available. Not by a long shot.
Sorry to drag this one back out, but if this story is true, and there is no reason to believe it isn't, I hope this is one of the bullets that was loaded into the gun to shoot Fox.

It seem a shocking commercial decision to have made.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Cleybrooke on March 19, 2016, 02:17:03 PM
All depends on when the contract was negotiated...
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Man With A Stick on March 19, 2016, 03:22:37 PM
Getting rid of Macron might be good just because most of us associate them with the mediocrity of the last few years.  Clean break and all that.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: oswald funkletrumpet on March 19, 2016, 03:56:55 PM
All depends on when the contract was negotiated...

?

the under armour deal was floating about in jan and as released ay the club had a substantial reduction if we were relegated.

wouldnt have been any different if it was signed in october as ua would have relegation clause in anyway
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Risso on March 19, 2016, 04:15:18 PM
Just a little update in this and apologies if this is old news.....

Speaking to a Macron manager this morning about kids football kits etc and just thought I'd mention the Villa.

That opened a can of worms!!

I was told Macron made two bids, one for PL status, one for Championship status. The Macron bid for the Championship status was "substantially more" than Under Armour but less for the PL equivalent.

Dear old Tom obviously felt we'd get out of trouble!!

From what I've been told today, we certainly haven't got the best deal available. Not by a long shot.
Sorry to drag this one back out, but if this story is true, and there is no reason to believe it isn't, I hope this is one of the bullets that was loaded into the gun to shoot Fox.

It seem a shocking commercial decision to have made.


Be good to see the back of Macron.  Their kits have been awful, and the £2m a year income negligible.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ger Regan on March 19, 2016, 04:37:13 PM
I presume that *if* we get up at the first time of asking the money adjusts accordingly?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Steve67 on March 19, 2016, 06:21:51 PM
Be nice if we started acting like a big club again and get someone who we have heard of. Under Armour, a truly household name.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: four fornicholl on March 19, 2016, 06:29:15 PM
Who actually gets the final decision on the design of the shirt? ive often wondered this.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Risso on March 19, 2016, 06:51:20 PM
Be nice if we started acting like a big club again and get someone who we have heard of. Under Armour, a truly household name.

They're a global brand with £3bn turnover.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on March 19, 2016, 07:13:02 PM
Be nice if we started acting like a big club again and get someone who we have heard of. Under Armour, a truly household name.

You should look at their portfolio of athletes before coming to that conclusion.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT on March 19, 2016, 08:07:24 PM
Be nice if we started acting like a big club again and get someone who we have heard of. Under Armour, a truly household name.

You should look at their portfolio of athletes before coming to that conclusion.

Yep, Steph Curry and Jordan Speith are with UA. Two of the biggest names in U.S. Sport.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on March 19, 2016, 08:15:02 PM
Be nice if we started acting like a big club again and get someone who we have heard of. Under Armour, a truly household name.

You should look at their portfolio of athletes before coming to that conclusion.

Yep, Steph Curry and Jordan Speith are with UA. Two of the biggest names in U.S. Sport.

Throw in Tom Brady and Bryce Harper too. It's really impressive how they built their brand and recognition over the last few years

https://www.underarmour.com/en-us/ua-roster
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: DaveD on March 19, 2016, 08:25:24 PM
Brady ? Didn't know that. If it's good enough for the GOAT, it's good enough for me.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on March 19, 2016, 08:45:46 PM
Getting rid of Macron might be good just because most of us associate them with the mediocrity of the last few years.  Clean break and all that.

I read something about the crest changing as well.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Risso on March 19, 2016, 08:59:52 PM
Getting rid of Macron might be good just because most of us associate them with the mediocrity of the last few years.  Clean break and all that.

I read something about the crest changing as well.

I'd be very surprised at that.  He's well proud of that is Randy.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Sexual Ealing on March 19, 2016, 09:00:50 PM
Getting rid of Macron might be good just because most of us associate them with the mediocrity of the last few years.  Clean break and all that.

I read something about the crest changing as well.

I'd be very surprised at that.  He's well proud of that is Randy.

I reckon he's long past giving an eff.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Lastfootstamper on March 19, 2016, 09:03:22 PM
Be nice if we started acting like a big club again and get someone who we have heard of. Under Armour, a truly household name.

Got to admit, I was with you about this. I'd honestly never heard of them in my life until reading this thread when it appeared. I thought it was gonna be about Westwood's vest or something.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Dave on March 19, 2016, 09:07:37 PM
Brady ? Didn't know that. If it's good enough for the GOAT, it's good enough for me.

Looks like Coq Sportif to me.

(http://www.sportsmax.tv/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/field/image/goater_0.jpg?itok=nUNNrzXL)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: DaveD on March 19, 2016, 09:09:03 PM
Nice one Centurion
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Risso on March 19, 2016, 09:19:07 PM
Be nice if we started acting like a big club again and get someone who we have heard of. Under Armour, a truly household name.

Got to admit, I was with you about this. I'd honestly never heard of them in my life until reading this thread when it appeared. I thought it was gonna be about Westwood's vest or something.

Under Armour are now the second biggest sportswear firm in the US behind Nike, having moved ahead of Adidas. They're enormous, trust me.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: pelty on March 19, 2016, 10:30:03 PM
I will be interested to see the quality of their Villa kits because my sons have had several kits for their teams made by Under Armour that have been of the worst quality. Socks have developed huge holes in a only a couple of weeks, the patches and wording on the shirts have fallen off, etc. Hopefully, they will step up their game for a professional (or, should I say, "professional") club, but we shall see.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Steve67 on March 19, 2016, 10:30:33 PM
Risso, I trust you! I hope the financial package for Villa is in keeping with where I think Villa should be pitching.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on March 19, 2016, 10:33:58 PM
Be nice if we started acting like a big club again and get someone who we have heard of. Under Armour, a truly household name.

Got to admit, I was with you about this. I'd honestly never heard of them in my life until reading this thread when it appeared. I thought it was gonna be about Westwood's vest or something.

Under Armour are now the second biggest sportswear firm in the US behind Nike, having moved ahead of Adidas. They're enormous, trust me.

This. They're just not big in this country.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: David_Nab on March 19, 2016, 11:46:13 PM
Andy Murray is with Under Armour as well switched from Addidas bout a year ago they are big just not had much exposure in Uk.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT Villan on March 20, 2016, 02:35:48 AM
They're just not big in this country.

Well they are about to get massive exposure in Huddersfield, Rotherham, Brentford and Preston, to name but a few.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on March 20, 2016, 03:31:50 AM
Maybe someone should go onto a Spurs site and ask them how the quality of their stuff is.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Risso on March 20, 2016, 04:57:49 AM
Risso, I trust you! I hope the financial package for Villa is in keeping with where I think Villa should be pitching.

Well, the bar isn't set very high. We're miles behind a lot of other PL clubs.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Axl Rose on March 20, 2016, 06:28:25 AM
Be nice if we started acting like a big club again and get someone who we have heard of. Under Armour, a truly household name.

Got to admit, I was with you about this. I'd honestly never heard of them in my life until reading this thread when it appeared. I thought it was gonna be about Westwood's vest or something.

Under Armour are now the second biggest sportswear firm in the US behind Nike, having moved ahead of Adidas. They're enormous, trust me.

This. They're just not big in this country.

And they're big here in Japan. But then again, so are New Balance. It's been so long since I've lived in Europe, but are New Balance popular in the UK/Europe?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: MillerBall on March 20, 2016, 08:34:58 AM
Given the appalling players that infest our squad I would suggest a deal with a supplier called "Undies Aroma" would be far more appropriate.

The abject poverty of our performances this season is such that Villa need full body armour never mind just an Under Armour.

I suppose we could be sponsored by "No Balance" (given the mess the team is in)  or "Nuke", "Dire Dora" or even  "No chance of a Gola" as for the goalkeeper he can be sponsored by AdiBadAss. There should be good sponsorship opportunities for Gazzoons gloves given the amount of times his hands are both clasped to the top of his head in the Camera shots.





Essentially the players are crap regardless of what kit they wear; you would have thought that the simple process of passing to colleagues who are wearing the same colour shirt would not be quite as complicated as our team have made it.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wince on March 20, 2016, 08:38:20 AM
Given the appalling players that infest our squad I would suggest a deal with a supplier called "Undies Aroma" would be far more appropriate.

The abject poverty of our performances this season is such that Villa need full body armour never mind just an Under Armour.

I suppose we could be sponsored by "No Balance" (given the mess the team is in)  or "Nuke", "Dire Dora" or even  "No chance of a Gola" as for the goalkeeper he can be sponsored by AdiBadAss. There should be good sponsorship opportunities for Gazzoons gloves given the amount of times his hands are both clasped to the top of his head in the Camera shots.

Under Achievers seems a better fit



Essentially the players are crap regardless of what kit they wear; you would have thought that the simple process of passing to colleagues who are wearing the same colour shirt would not be quite as complicated as our team have made it.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: olaftab on March 20, 2016, 08:41:33 AM
Does it matter who the kit supplier is as long as we get enough money? I am sure most can stitch together a shirt in Bangladesh.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: MillerBall on March 20, 2016, 08:43:16 AM
"Under Achievers" is a good one but on a more serious note is this squad of players really fit for Premiership Purpose and whilst I agree they probably could achieve more; I suspect it would be "not a lot more."

I suppose if somebody actually put in a bid to buy the club we could wear "Under Offer."
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on March 20, 2016, 12:58:18 PM
Be nice if we started acting like a big club again and get someone who we have heard of. Under Armour, a truly household name.

Got to admit, I was with you about this. I'd honestly never heard of them in my life until reading this thread when it appeared. I thought it was gonna be about Westwood's vest or something.

Under Armour are now the second biggest sportswear firm in the US behind Nike, having moved ahead of Adidas. They're enormous, trust me.

This. They're just not big in this country.

And they're big here in Japan. But then again, so are New Balance. It's been so long since I've lived in Europe, but are New Balance popular in the UK/Europe?

I'd say they're an average sized brand here, bigger than Errea but smaller than Reebok. The trainers are popular with some people, usually the sorts who shop in Size and like Air Max, and I've seen them a lot in pubs. As a kit manufacturer they're getting more popular, Celtic, Liverpool and Stoke use their stuff.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on March 20, 2016, 01:02:34 PM
You are going to see them a lot more in golf this season with their partnership with Jordan Speith. They are big in the US across the major sports, and it's only a matter of time before they secure some prominent footballers in Europe.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Risso on March 20, 2016, 01:09:58 PM
I was quite happy with the quality of their gear too, but I've got a compression running top that has basically fallen apart. It looks like it's glued rather than stitched, and the arms have come off at the shoulders.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: MillerBall on March 20, 2016, 01:27:23 PM
Given the fact that Villa have well and truly fallen apart this season (after having looked threadbare for several years) it would appear that the link with Under Armour would be a match made in heaven (or perhaps a second hand clothes shop) if it is the case that some of their garments do not last the course.

Would Under Armour be able to supply a shirt that would fit Mr Agbonlahor? Mind you Gabby would not really need "running" kit after his performance at Man City a few weeks ago.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: placeforparks on April 19, 2016, 03:39:47 PM
on a related note, under armour announced a 7-year deal with southampton last week.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villain1874 on April 19, 2016, 04:44:07 PM
Not a fan of Under Armour, I honesty think Spurs kit design is absolutely horrendous..
Would have preferred adidas or umbro but it's not to be, not that I will buy any of them anyway under current circumstances...
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Left Side on April 19, 2016, 08:59:15 PM
Has it been officially announced yet?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on April 19, 2016, 09:00:49 PM
No, the bloke who was doing the announcement has been laid off.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Left Side on April 19, 2016, 09:22:21 PM
Sounds about right
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pete3206 on April 19, 2016, 09:39:24 PM
Be nice if we started acting like a big club again and get someone who we have heard of. Under Armour, a truly household name.

Is this a joke?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: itbrvilla on April 19, 2016, 10:04:20 PM
Has it been officially announced yet?
Definitely happening though. Will also be worth less than it would of been now we've been relegated. I believe that we have a better deal in the championship with UA that we would of done had we stayed with Macron.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: HolmesyVilla on April 20, 2016, 10:46:24 AM
Be nice if we started acting like a big club again

 but are New Balance popular in the UK/Europe?

New balance more popular with athletics in sunny England mate but they sell well/popular in Europe.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villa in Denmark on May 25, 2016, 07:02:17 PM
Just he this little snippet about our rumoured kit supplier turn up on one of my news feeds.

Under Armour sign record college sports kit deal with UCLA. (http://www.latimes.com/sports/ucla/la-sp-0525-ucla-under-armour-20160525-snap-story.html)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: avfcpg on May 25, 2016, 07:26:57 PM
Under Armour gear is decent, one of the more well known brands in the sports and fitness industry (behind Nike and Adidas) but is generally pricey. Be interested to see what the shirt will cost..probably about £60. Hope the design is ok though. They have some decent kits out there but also some absolute shockers. 
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on May 25, 2016, 07:37:42 PM
Just he this little snippet about our rumoured kit supplier turn up on one of my news feeds.

Under Armour sign record college sports kit deal with UCLA. (http://www.latimes.com/sports/ucla/la-sp-0525-ucla-under-armour-20160525-snap-story.html)

Under Armour have become huge in North America. Like I said at the start of all of this is just look at their stable of US sports athletes. They are becoming a serious rival to Nike out here. And college sports is arguably every bit as big as professional sports in the US.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TopDeck113 on May 25, 2016, 07:42:55 PM
Just he this little snippet about our rumoured kit supplier turn up on one of my news feeds.

Under Armour sign record college sports kit deal with UCLA. (http://www.latimes.com/sports/ucla/la-sp-0525-ucla-under-armour-20160525-snap-story.html)

Before our resident experts on all-things to do with American sport turn on me, I know that U.S. collegiate sport is a completely different animal to the one we're used to over here, but nonetheless that figure is an eye-watering amount to pay for the privilege of students wearing your kit.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OCD on May 25, 2016, 11:54:42 PM
For me, Under Armour are what Nike used to be.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Hookeysmith on May 26, 2016, 01:14:09 PM
For me, Under Armour are what Nike used to be.

Manufactured by 6 year old Vietnamese children?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on May 26, 2016, 03:09:49 PM
For me, Under Armour are what Nike used to be.

Manufactured by 6 year old Vietnamese children?

No that's still the case for Nike, and Adidas and Puma and Reebok etc etc. Let alone all your other designer brand clothing lines. And about a billion other things...
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: MonsXI on June 01, 2016, 07:08:38 PM
Any idea when the Under Armour contract starts?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ExclDawg on June 01, 2016, 07:57:04 PM
For me, Under Armour are what Nike used to be.

That's pretty much true.  They've also had the Midas touch these last few years.  They signed Steph Curry to a big multi-year contract the year before he blew up and became the most popular guy in the NBA.  They signed Jordan Speith right before he turned into Tiger Woods 2 and won a bunch of majors.

Hopefully they have the same effect on Villa.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: spangley1812 on June 02, 2016, 04:56:32 AM
Any idea when the Under Armour contract starts?

1st of July............
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Laughing Policeman on June 02, 2016, 12:15:26 PM
I've noticed that Andy Murray has changed from Addidas to Under Armour. Not sure if that helps the fashion conscious among us decide whether or not they are good.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villa in Denmark on June 02, 2016, 12:46:16 PM
I've noticed that Andy Murray has changed from Addidas to Under Armour. Not sure if that helps the fashion conscious among us decide whether or not they are good.

They'll suit us down to the ground.

Grumpy bastards of the world unite.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wozwebs on June 03, 2016, 04:43:39 AM
Here in Orlando at the moment and all the Americans seem to be wearing Under Armour gear, T-shirts and trainers. Went to their outlet shop and 2 polo shirts were $80 and thats in an outlet. Seems quality stuff though to be fair. Certainly has overtaken Nike here.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on June 03, 2016, 09:30:58 AM
I'm waiting for this year's shirt to get slashed to a tenner.  They'd best hurry up!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: darren woolley on June 03, 2016, 02:51:47 PM
I'm waiting for this year's shirt to get slashed to a tenner.  They'd best hurry up!

I'll be just behind you with my tenner.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Stirchley Villain on June 03, 2016, 09:45:41 PM
I want to see some more high quality mock ups. It helps to lessen the disappointment when the actual kit comes out.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT on June 03, 2016, 10:05:34 PM
I'm waiting for this year's shirt to get slashed to a tenner.  They'd best hurry up!

I'll be just behind you with my tenner.

I'll be third in your little queue.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: dave.woodhall on June 03, 2016, 10:42:00 PM
I want to see some more high quality mock ups. It helps to lessen the disappointment when the actual kit comes out.

And today's 'Little Ray of Sunshine' award goes to...
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Deano's Mullet on June 03, 2016, 11:04:41 PM
I always go on about wanting another variation of the the hoop collar/bootlace but if we didnt get it i'd be quite happy of an update of the 1970-75 home kit, blue collar with an upside down triangle beneath the neck. Simple but classic design. I'm too young but i always associate Brian Little in that kit, hes the player i usually see photographed in that one.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OCD on June 04, 2016, 11:37:46 PM
Here in Orlando at the moment and all the Americans seem to be wearing Under Armour gear, T-shirts and trainers. Went to their outlet shop and 2 polo shirts were $80 and thats in an outlet. Seems quality stuff though to be fair. Certainly has overtaken Nike here.

I was at a Personal Trainers seminar last Saturday and UA were all over the place.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: adrenachrome on June 05, 2016, 12:37:14 AM
Here in Orlando at the moment and all the Americans seem to be wearing Under Armour gear, T-shirts and trainers. Went to their outlet shop and 2 polo shirts were $80 and thats in an outlet. Seems quality stuff though to be fair. Certainly has overtaken Nike here.

I was at a Personal Trainers seminar last Saturday and UA were all over the place.

Figuratively, or dare I say it, literally?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wozwebs on June 05, 2016, 04:37:21 AM
Might get some of it while I'm here. Does look good quality and almost like a premium sports brand above the likes of Nike and Adidas. If they start selling our kits in the US it might help our profile too. World of soccer yesterday had Man U, City, Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal kits. No sign of Villa and indeed Leicester City, the champions.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OCD on June 05, 2016, 10:08:39 AM
Here in Orlando at the moment and all the Americans seem to be wearing Under Armour gear, T-shirts and trainers. Went to their outlet shop and 2 polo shirts were $80 and thats in an outlet. Seems quality stuff though to be fair. Certainly has overtaken Nike here.

I was at a Personal Trainers seminar last Saturday and UA were all over the place.

Figuratively, or dare I say it, literally?

Lots of the people attending were wearing Under Armour clothing.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on June 05, 2016, 06:28:10 PM
From someone on Twitter so may well not be the new shirts but must admit I quite like them.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkMj51zWsAAY2IX.jpg)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkMj513WgAEP26A.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on June 05, 2016, 06:31:49 PM
Both very nice and the away kit is lovely.

Is the shade of claret correct?*

*sits back, opens popcorn
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TopDeck113 on June 05, 2016, 06:37:19 PM
Having no blue sleeves is always wrong.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Zouch Villa on June 05, 2016, 06:37:44 PM
Is it just me that thinks the home shirt has more of a West Ham look about it? Also, whilst the tight fit shirts look great on today's well toned footballer, I'm not looking forward to the sight of the many middle aged beer bellies squeezed in to next seasons shirts.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TopDeck113 on June 05, 2016, 06:42:54 PM
Is it just me that thinks the home shirt has more of a West Ham look about it? Also, whilst the tight fit shirts look great on today's well toned footballer, I'm not looking forward to the sight of the many middle aged beer bellies squeezed in to next seasons shirts.

Another reason why we need to get shot of Gabby before the start of next season.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: exiled on the wirral! on June 05, 2016, 06:57:48 PM
Love the Away kit..home kit must have blue sleeves, anything else is unacceptable.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on June 05, 2016, 06:59:08 PM
The sponsors logo is just way too big.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TheMalandro on June 05, 2016, 07:02:01 PM
Is it just me that thinks the home shirt has more of a West Ham look about it? Also, whilst the tight fit shirts look great on today's well toned footballer, I'm not looking forward to the sight of the many middle aged beer bellies squeezed in to next seasons shirts.

I think Burnley had a similar design
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ian. on June 05, 2016, 07:08:58 PM
That's really smart. Very fitted and cool.
I hope I don't see too many over 40's with a little timber around the waistline wearing that, or Gabby for that matter, that won't look cool.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: saunders_heroes on June 05, 2016, 09:46:47 PM
Those kits are very smart, and the best Villa kits in years in my humble opinion. I hope they're the real deal and not some fan's mock-up.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Duncan Shaw on June 05, 2016, 09:48:50 PM
Love the Away kit..home kit must have blue sleeves, anything else is unacceptable.
We didn't have blue sleeves last time we were in the 2nd division (Hummel) and went straight up so I'll forgive it for one season!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pete3206 on June 05, 2016, 10:02:58 PM
Jesus, that home shirt looks abysmal.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: mattjpa on June 05, 2016, 10:22:37 PM
I love them both. I hope that we get something different ie no blue sleeves, we need to distance ourselves from the villa of last season. I'm afraid these have the feel of a fan mock up though. Shame because they are really nice
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: MonsXI on June 05, 2016, 10:23:27 PM
With light blue shorts and white socks the home top would look good. Id wear both at home and to gym.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: pauliewalnuts on June 05, 2016, 10:29:02 PM
Very nice.

Straight away they're an improvement on Macron for not looking like a sort of championship club Poundland top. Which is ironic now that we actually are a championship club.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: FatSam on June 05, 2016, 10:30:09 PM
Love the Away kit..home kit must have blue sleeves, anything else is unacceptable.
Agreed. Don't f*ck with the blue sleeves.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: avfcpg on June 05, 2016, 11:35:21 PM
Love the home one...actually love them both. About time we had something different for a season or two..going without blue sleeves won't kill us.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OCD on June 05, 2016, 11:44:47 PM
It reminds me of the Diadora one we wore in '01/02 which had claret sleeves too. No idea whether it's real or a fan's effort but it still feels like a Villa kit to me and every new designer seems be trying to do something a little different to distinguish their home kit from others.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: junxs on June 06, 2016, 12:33:43 AM
These kits are fan made by someone on Villa Talk, not going to be the official kits.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: robbo1874 on June 06, 2016, 04:19:25 AM
It reminds me of the Diadora one we wore in '01/02 which had claret sleeves too. No idea whether it's real or a fan's effort but it still feels like a Villa kit to me and every new designer seems be trying to do something a little different to distinguish their home kit from others.
i really liked that Diadora '02 shirt.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wozwebs on June 06, 2016, 04:45:06 AM
Look good those, especially the away. Any adult over 35 shouldn't be wearing one anyway, I thought that was an unwritten rule? Retro kits fine.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: FatSam on June 06, 2016, 08:49:09 AM
I think we should be trying to reinforce our identity, not dilute it. If we're not careful, claret shirts, blue sleeves will become more synonymous with West Ham and Burnley than with us. Other than their 'final season at Highbury' shirt, Arsenal have not tinkered with their format, and I don't think we should either. I'm not a marketing expert, but I can't help thinking that if we'd had a more concerted effort during the 90s, in the same way that Man Utd did, and didn't vary our shirt format, then we would have a bigger international profile now.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on June 06, 2016, 08:50:40 AM
I also read that they are mock ups but wouldn't expect them much different
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Deano's Mullet on June 06, 2016, 11:38:07 AM
Hate the home, love the away. Least they can give us is a shirt with blue sleeves. If this is indeed the shirt I am v v disappointed. We are villa ffs
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: darren woolley on June 06, 2016, 01:44:20 PM
I really like them I wouldn't mind if they were the official shirts.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on June 06, 2016, 02:00:05 PM
From someone on Twitter so may well not be the new shirts but must admit I quite like them.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkMj51zWsAAY2IX.jpg)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkMj513WgAEP26A.jpg)

Someone on VT did them, they're mock ups. But yeah they are nice.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: peter w on June 06, 2016, 02:34:57 PM
Well, nice if you support Burnley. The away one is ace, though. I'd like to stay in yellow though this season's away was brilliant.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Edvard Remberg on June 06, 2016, 03:04:13 PM
From someone on Twitter so may well not be the new shirts but must admit I quite like them.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkMj51zWsAAY2IX.jpg)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkMj513WgAEP26A.jpg)

Someone on VT did them, they're mock ups. But yeah they are nice.
They look like something Wallace and Gromit would wear
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villa in Denmark on June 06, 2016, 03:25:14 PM
From someone on Twitter so may well not be the new shirts but must admit I quite like them.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkMj51zWsAAY2IX.jpg)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkMj513WgAEP26A.jpg)

Someone on VT did them, they're mock ups. But yeah they are nice.
They look like something Wallace and Gromit would wear

Makes a change from the 5 pairs of Beavis and Butthead we'd got on the pitch last season.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on June 06, 2016, 04:13:27 PM
When are the new kits released? Isn't it usually around Father's Day?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Mossie Hennebry on June 06, 2016, 04:40:09 PM
There is no way I could wear them. Are they actually designed to accentuate the over-40 waistline?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: spangley1812 on June 06, 2016, 04:42:32 PM
When are the new kits released? Isn't it usually around Father's Day?

Under Armour take over on the 1st of July
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villa in Denmark on June 06, 2016, 04:43:07 PM
There is no way I could wear them. Are they actually designed to accentuate the over-40 waistline?

Depends on how elasticated they are.  If they get the tension just wrong, I could end up looking like I've got flatter stomach than at any time since I was about 20, but with bigger tits than an 20 year old Sam Fox!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: VILLA MOLE on June 06, 2016, 04:49:24 PM
There is no way I could wear them. Are they actually designed to accentuate the over-40 waistline?

Depends on how elasticated they are.  If they get the tension just wrong, I could end up looking like I've got flatter stomach than at any time since I was about 20, but with bigger tits than an 20 year old Sam Fox!

ha ha love it
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: tomd2103 on June 06, 2016, 06:57:32 PM
There is no way I could wear them. Are they actually designed to accentuate the over-40 waistline?

Depends on how elasticated they are.  If they get the tension just wrong, I could end up looking like I've got flatter stomach than at any time since I was about 20, but with bigger tits than an 20 year old Sam Fox!

Ha!  I remember when at the Welsh rugby team had Under Armour kits.  They had a replica match kit with the figure hugging design, but they also had a supporters version for the more well fed fans!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: b23 on June 06, 2016, 10:14:37 PM
From someone on Twitter so may well not be the new shirts but must admit I quite like them.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkMj51zWsAAY2IX.jpg)(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkMj513WgAEP26A.jpg)

Someone on VT did them, they're mock ups. But yeah they are nice.

That white shirt is great. I like a plain white Villa away shirt.

Reminds me of Leonard, Little, Phillips et al

Under Armour = ATV

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pat McMahon on June 06, 2016, 11:49:44 PM
The away shirt is fine but the home shirt should have blue sleeves. We had all claret shirts in 1970 and 1987 and got relegated
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Gregorys Boy on June 07, 2016, 12:25:28 AM
The kits look alright to me. I don't care about things like kits and sponsors etc.. I just care about on field issues, and the running of the club etc.. Its those things which will decide how successful Villa are.  Besides which I hate modern Football kit sponsors.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Russ aka Big Nose on June 07, 2016, 08:48:12 AM
If these images are accurate then I think the 'claret' shirt is likely to be a training top rather than the matchday shirt - I doubt there has been anyone at the club senior enough or sufficiently focused on issues like kit designs to sanction a move away from blue sleeves. UTV
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: mattjpa on June 07, 2016, 09:13:01 AM
If these images are accurate then I think the 'claret' shirt is likely to be a training top rather than the matchday shirt - I doubt there has been anyone at the club senior enough or sufficiently focused on issues like kit designs to sanction a move away from blue sleeves. UTV
To be fair, they are about 30% blue.....
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: paul_e on June 07, 2016, 09:54:02 AM
I personally don't understand the obsession with blue sleeves.  For me so long as Claret is the main colour on the body and there's a decent amount of blue in there then I'm ok with it.  Tradition is important but I think sometimes football fans get hung up on traditions and refuse to consider any changes.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: in exile on June 07, 2016, 10:45:53 AM
...Id wear both at home and to gym.
Lah-de-dah
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on June 07, 2016, 11:21:07 AM
I personally don't understand the obsession with blue sleeves.  For me so long as Claret is the main colour on the body and there's a decent amount of blue in there then I'm ok with it.  Tradition is important but I think sometimes football fans get hung up on traditions and refuse to consider any changes.

I agree mate. What people don't realise is there is nothing you can do with a kit for the most part if you can't change the design about a bit. If you change it too much people mention tradition. If you stick to the template it looks no different to last year.

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: edgysatsuma89 on June 07, 2016, 12:00:26 PM
I personally don't understand the obsession with blue sleeves.  For me so long as Claret is the main colour on the body and there's a decent amount of blue in there then I'm ok with it.  Tradition is important but I think sometimes football fans get hung up on traditions and refuse to consider any changes.

I agree mate. What people don't realise is there is nothing you can do with a kit for the most part if you can't change the design about a bit. If you change it too much people mention tradition. If you stick to the template it looks no different to last year.

I agree. For those that buy the shirt every season I would want something different. You may as well just buy one shirt a decade otherwise. I rarely buy it but when I do I pretty much always buy the away shirt because it's different. Also we don't always have just blue sleeves, it's not like a complete anomaly. Admittedly since the 20th century it's something like a bit under 8-10% of the time we've had something other than completely blue sleeves. Rises to around the 20% mark if I remember correctly if you go back to the start. So it isn't a completely new thing.

P.S. I remember roughly figuring it out from looking at the historical kits website a couple of years ago. I obviously had nothing better to do. I'm think that's roughly what it was anyway, eitherway check the site out. I like it.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: FatSam on June 07, 2016, 12:36:54 PM
For me it's about wanting some surety about what we stand for and who we are - what our identity is. It's all wrapped up with wanting the players, managers, and even administrators who represent us to have the right principles. Of course you can say that what the kit looks like doesn't affect this, but I just think it does. I appreciate its extreme, but I see us at one end of the scale, and MK Dons at the other. Also for me it's ultimately more important than being fantastically successful. Of course I want success, but I don't want it at any price, or in a kit that I don't recognise.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: mattjpa on June 07, 2016, 12:44:50 PM
Well either way, those kits were designed by someone on villatalk so will not be the kit next year, Ive even seen the same design with the old badge on it. So all the blue sleeve old fart brigade can go back to grumbling about the weather now ;)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ChicagoLion on June 07, 2016, 01:32:40 PM
Every time they redesign the kit it just gets a little bit worse.
Vill play in claret shirts with light blue sleeves and anything else does not look like a Villa shirt.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: FatSam on June 07, 2016, 01:39:04 PM
Well either way, those kits were designed by someone on villatalk so will not be the kit next year, Ive even seen the same design with the old badge on it. So all the blue sleeve old fart brigade can go back to grumbling about the weather now ;)
Nothing passes the time like complaining about something that hasn't happened yet!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: chrisw1 on June 07, 2016, 01:50:37 PM
I personally don't understand the obsession with blue sleeves.  For me so long as Claret is the main colour on the body and there's a decent amount of blue in there then I'm ok with it.  Tradition is important but I think sometimes football fans get hung up on traditions and refuse to consider any changes.

I agree mate. What people don't realise is there is nothing you can do with a kit for the most part if you can't change the design about a bit. If you change it too much people mention tradition. If you stick to the template it looks no different to last year.


I love tradition and generally would want a long term theme of claret body and blue sleeves.  But this has by no means always been the way and I would also like an occaisional change.  In particular I love the 1957 FA cup final shirt and think that would be great as a one off.

(https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2594/4113729024_af11632bc7.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ian. on June 07, 2016, 01:51:55 PM
Yep, the '57 kit is a classic. I love it too.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ChicagoLion on June 07, 2016, 01:55:51 PM
Yep, the '57 kit is a classic. I love it too.
yes me too.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Chico Hamilton III on June 07, 2016, 01:56:09 PM
The '57 kit was our away kit
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ian. on June 07, 2016, 01:57:22 PM
Was it? I never knew that.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: darren woolley on June 07, 2016, 02:00:57 PM
Hello Chico I also never knew that.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: chrisw1 on June 07, 2016, 02:06:18 PM
The '57 kit was our away kit
I'm no kit historian an will bow to greater knowledge on this, but this site suggests it was a one off, albeit there was one with broader stripes in 55-57
http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/Aston_Villa/Aston_Villa-change-kits.html

Either way, I think it would make a great one off home kit.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ChicagoLion on June 07, 2016, 02:09:09 PM
We have had some shocking away kits in recent times.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: chrisw1 on June 07, 2016, 02:15:21 PM
We have had some shocking away kits in recent times.

the 1884-86 home is the pick of the bunch

(http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/Aston_Villa/images/aston-villa-1885.gif)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pat McMahon on June 07, 2016, 02:56:52 PM
The '57 kit was our away kit

Yup yup. Both teams played in their away kit in the final.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: dave.woodhall on June 07, 2016, 03:23:49 PM
The '57 kit was our away kit

Yup yup. Both teams played in their away kit in the final.

Not exactly. Ours was a one-off.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Dr Butler on June 07, 2016, 03:29:44 PM
The '57 kit was our away kit

Yup yup. Both teams played in their away kit in the final.

Not exactly. Ours was a one-off.

according the notes underneath it, a one off indeed...

In December 1956 a new sky blue shirt was introduced. This was the first season that the club badge was worn on the shirts and culminated in an FA Cup win in 1957 when the team wore a dramatic pin striped shirt - apparently to provide sufficient contrast for TV coverage.


UTV
The Doc
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Chico Hamilton III on June 07, 2016, 03:31:56 PM
The '57 kit was our away kit

Yup yup. Both teams played in their away kit in the final.

Not exactly. Ours was a one-off.

A one-off away kit, if there's such a thing. in 56, Blues and Man City both wore away kits in the final. As did Everton and Albion in 68

FA rules stated that, if there was a colour clash, both sides would have to wear away kits
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: dave.woodhall on June 07, 2016, 03:39:38 PM
Our away kit at the time was light blue. There was some disagreement so we wore a completely different design.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: chrisw1 on June 07, 2016, 04:53:37 PM
which was utterly beautiful and I would love it if we could repeat it as a one off seasons home kit.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Charmer on June 07, 2016, 05:23:35 PM
which was utterly beautiful and I would love it if we could repeat it as a one off seasons home kit.

I agree.

Trouble is, I would want to be sure that the team were going to worthy of the honour of wearing such an iconic shirt from our history and were capable of storming up & out of the second division.
The thought of some of last season's wasters tainting it would make me very sad indeed.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ChicagoLion on June 07, 2016, 05:26:11 PM
I think we should wait for the 2017 cup final
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Louzie0 on June 07, 2016, 05:34:42 PM
I think we should wait for the 2017 cup final
That's the spirit!
So do I
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: cdbearsfan on June 07, 2016, 05:36:50 PM
Claret shirt, blue sleeves or GTF.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on June 07, 2016, 07:20:06 PM
Kits are so spoilt with the sponsors name. That 57 kit would be butchered if we had to put our current sponsor all over it.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villa in Denmark on June 07, 2016, 07:24:47 PM
Claret shirt, blue sleeves or GTF.

Is the correct answer.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ChicagoLion on June 07, 2016, 07:40:12 PM
Claret shirt, blue sleeves or GTF.

Is the correct answer.
if I knew what GTF meant.
WTF
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: London Villan on June 07, 2016, 07:44:01 PM
Our away kit at the time was light blue. There was some disagreement so we wore a completely different design.

It was probably due to the TV coverage of the time. Both having light coloured shirts could have been problem to see on 1950s black and white TVs, so stripes were added to ours to make them look different.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: eamonn on June 07, 2016, 07:50:53 PM
which was utterly beautiful and I would love it if we could repeat it as a one off seasons home kit.

Pics or it didn't happen.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villa in Denmark on June 07, 2016, 07:55:11 PM
Claret shirt, blue sleeves or GTF.

Is the correct answer.
if I knew what GTF meant.
WTF

Urban Dictionary (http://da.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=GTF&defid=4511684)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pat McMahon on June 07, 2016, 11:08:31 PM
The '57 kit was our away kit

Yup yup. Both teams played in their away kit in the final.

Not exactly. Ours was a one-off.

A one-off away kit, if there's such a thing. in 56, Blues and Man City both wore away kits in the final. As did Everton and Albion in 68

FA rules stated that, if there was a colour clash, both sides would have to wear away kits

I had never bothered to think why Albion and Everton both wore away kits in 1968.. Also had always assumed our cup final kit was the regular away kit.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pete3206 on June 08, 2016, 12:37:13 AM
which was utterly beautiful and I would love it if we could repeat it as a one off seasons home kit.

Pics or it didn't happen.

http://www.avfc.co.uk/page/HistoryKits/
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: itbrvilla on June 08, 2016, 08:02:59 AM
The club provide a huge pack about colours and brand identity to the kit supplier and have done as far as I am aware since agreeing on the exact colours during the rebranding with Nike. Not sure how much leeway they get with it though but I liked the macron colours.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: chrisw1 on June 08, 2016, 08:25:19 AM
which was utterly beautiful and I would love it if we could repeat it as a one off seasons home kit.

Pics or it didn't happen.
(https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2594/4113729024_af11632bc7.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on June 08, 2016, 08:38:01 AM
which was utterly beautiful and I would love it if we could repeat it as a one off seasons home kit.

Pics or it didn't happen.

http://www.avfc.co.uk/page/HistoryKits/

We basically played in Queens Park's kit for a season then.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: greenwichvilla on June 08, 2016, 12:18:10 PM
The '57 kit was our away kit

Yup yup. Both teams played in their away kit in the final.

Not exactly. Ours was a one-off.

according the notes underneath it, a one off indeed...

In December 1956 a new sky blue shirt was introduced. This was the first season that the club badge was worn on the shirts and culminated in an FA Cup win in 1957 when the team wore a dramatic pin striped shirt - apparently to provide sufficient contrast for TV coverage.


UTV
The Doc

AGAINST MODERN FOOTBALL
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: edgysatsuma89 on June 08, 2016, 12:40:56 PM
Like the way you pay per letter for someone's name on your shirt, you should be able to pay to have the fucking sponsor removed. It's one of the biggest reasons I rarely buy them. You can have a really decent looking kit and then you have the shittest eyesore possible. Sponsors like Flamingo Land on Hull's kit in massive letters. That must be a real downer.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: paul_e on June 08, 2016, 12:48:43 PM
Like the way you pay per letter for someone's name on your shirt, you should be able to pay to have the fucking sponsor removed. It's one of the biggest reasons I rarely buy them. You can have a really decent looking kit and then you have the shittest eyesore possible. Sponsors like Flamingo Land on Hull's kit in massive letters. That must be a real downer.

The only kit I've bought for the last few years is the checked one and it's because I managed to get a version without the sponsor, looks much better without the genting logo across it.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: edgysatsuma89 on June 08, 2016, 12:51:41 PM
Like the way you pay per letter for someone's name on your shirt, you should be able to pay to have the fucking sponsor removed. It's one of the biggest reasons I rarely buy them. You can have a really decent looking kit and then you have the shittest eyesore possible. Sponsors like Flamingo Land on Hull's kit in massive letters. That must be a real downer.

The only kit I've bought for the last few years is the checked one and it's because I managed to get a version without the sponsor, looks much better without the genting logo across it.

How did you manage to get one without the sponsor?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: cdbearsfan on June 08, 2016, 12:58:36 PM
Maybe he washed it loads of times?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: edgysatsuma89 on June 08, 2016, 01:00:50 PM
Maybe he washed it loads of times?

Ha. Tru say dat. I wonder if there is a decent way of removing it without leaving any marks? Steam the shit out of it?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Richard E on June 08, 2016, 01:03:56 PM
Maybe he washed it loads of times?

Or even just once, if we are talking about the white and blackcurrant number from a couple of years ago.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: mattjpa on June 08, 2016, 01:16:23 PM
Like the way you pay per letter for someone's name on your shirt, you should be able to pay to have the fucking sponsor removed. It's one of the biggest reasons I rarely buy them. You can have a really decent looking kit and then you have the shittest eyesore possible. Sponsors like Flamingo Land on Hull's kit in massive letters. That must be a real downer.

The only kit I've bought for the last few years is the checked one and it's because I managed to get a version without the sponsor, looks much better without the genting logo across it.

How did you manage to get one without the sponsor?

I was just about to say the same thing. It was the nike away checked one and there was about 3 weeks difference between the kit release date and the appointment of the sponsor (Genting at the time, i think) Eitherway, they ran a limited production at sports direct which you could then go and take to the club shop after and have the sponsor put on it, I would be gobsmacked if anyone did.

Heres an idea, they should offer a sponsorless shirt at a £10 premium. All extra over proceeds should be given back to quickbooks to give to their appointed charity. The extra good publicity generated would probably outweigh that gained from the logo on the shirt. Id certainly pay it anyway.

I may email the villa with that one..
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Rioch is King on June 08, 2016, 01:18:51 PM
'Acorns' looked good on the kit.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: dave.woodhall on June 08, 2016, 01:25:58 PM
You'd be amazed - or probably not - how many people don't think something's official, and therefore won't buy it, if it doesn't come plastered with adverts.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ChicagoLion on June 08, 2016, 01:28:07 PM
The tatoo generation like surfaces covered with crap.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ian. on June 08, 2016, 01:34:41 PM
I remember thinking when I was a wee lad that Mita was actually something quite important to Aston Villa. I didn't realise it was only a sponsor.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Richard E on June 08, 2016, 01:47:14 PM
I remember thinking when I was a wee lad that Mita was actually something quite important to Aston Villa. I didn't realise it was only a sponsor.

You're obviously too young to remember Dave Mita's brilliant hat-trick at St Andrews which sent Small Heath down. What a game that was. All 3 assists from Andrew Greaves. 
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ian. on June 08, 2016, 01:52:09 PM
I remember thinking when I was a wee lad that Mita was actually something quite important to Aston Villa. I didn't realise it was only a sponsor.

You're obviously too young to remember Dave Mita's brilliant hat-trick at St Andrews which sent Small Heath down. What a game that was. All 3 assists from Andrew Greaves. 
I was, and if I was aware of that in the early 80's I would have thought our shirt was dedicated to our hat-trick hero Dave Mita.
That story actually sounds like folklore, a Mita hat-trick with 3 assists by Greaves.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: cdward on June 08, 2016, 01:53:11 PM
Late 90s i was in the club shop browsing the sale rail, and bought a nice navy blue Reebok tracksuit with the club badge, but the awful AST logo plastered all across the back of it.
Took it home and decided to try and peel the logo off. It came off really easily like peeling PVA glue off your hands. Ended up with a perfectly good tracksuit for the gym and footy training which didn't age with time. Thank God for shitty quality merchandise
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: FatSam on June 08, 2016, 01:58:13 PM
I remember thinking when I was a wee lad that Mita was actually something quite important to Aston Villa. I didn't realise it was only a sponsor.

How could Mita not be something important, when so prominent on the official photo:
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v436/EnglishPride2004/mita_zpsb5ac06d8.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: paul_e on June 08, 2016, 02:01:01 PM
Like the way you pay per letter for someone's name on your shirt, you should be able to pay to have the fucking sponsor removed. It's one of the biggest reasons I rarely buy them. You can have a really decent looking kit and then you have the shittest eyesore possible. Sponsors like Flamingo Land on Hull's kit in massive letters. That must be a real downer.

The only kit I've bought for the last few years is the checked one and it's because I managed to get a version without the sponsor, looks much better without the genting logo across it.

How did you manage to get one without the sponsor?

I was just about to say the same thing. It was the nike away checked one and there was about 3 weeks difference between the kit release date and the appointment of the sponsor (Genting at the time, i think) Eitherway, they ran a limited production at sports direct which you could then go and take to the club shop after and have the sponsor put on it, I would be gobsmacked if anyone did.

Heres an idea, they should offer a sponsorless shirt at a £10 premium. All extra over proceeds should be given back to quickbooks to give to their appointed charity. The extra good publicity generated would probably outweigh that gained from the logo on the shirt. Id certainly pay it anyway.

I may email the villa with that one..

Yeah, this can't remember if it was sports direct but I'd had no plans to buy it because generally I don't like paying to advertise for soemthing I disagree with and then got sent a link to the version without a sponsor and ordered one straight away.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on June 08, 2016, 02:07:01 PM
Wasn't there a situation one year with a sponsors logo that we were asked by the league to reduce the font size or something on the kit? I'm thinking it was Mita or Muller. No such rule it seems now with the way the current sponsor is plastered all over unfortunately.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Drummond on June 08, 2016, 02:26:14 PM
I remember thinking when I was a wee lad that Mita was actually something quite important to Aston Villa. I didn't realise it was only a sponsor.

How could Mita not be something important, when so prominent on the official photo:
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v436/EnglishPride2004/mita_zpsb5ac06d8.jpg)

Could have been worse, it might have been Acme Staplers and we'd have had a couple of their products on the pitch too
...
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: peter w on June 08, 2016, 02:56:27 PM
Wasn't there a situation one year with a sponsors logo that we were asked by the league to reduce the font size or something on the kit? I'm thinking it was Mita or Muller. No such rule it seems now with the way the current sponsor is plastered all over unfortunately.

Wasn't it the dot on the i made it too big?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT on June 08, 2016, 03:25:32 PM
Wasn't there a situation one year with a sponsors logo that we were asked by the league to reduce the font size or something on the kit? I'm thinking it was Mita or Muller. No such rule it seems now with the way the current sponsor is plastered all over unfortunately.

Wasn't it the dot on the i made it too big?

Think that was it was - definitely Mita and possibly before the Liverpool game on the Friday at VP. (Freezing, lost 3-1)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ian. on June 08, 2016, 06:02:21 PM
I remember thinking when I was a wee lad that Mita was actually something quite important to Aston Villa. I didn't realise it was only a sponsor.

How could Mita not be something important, when so prominent on the official photo:
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v436/EnglishPride2004/mita_zpsb5ac06d8.jpg)


Blimey, they milked the sponsorship for that team snap!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ian. on June 08, 2016, 06:10:04 PM
Wasn't there a situation one year with a sponsors logo that we were asked by the league to reduce the font size or something on the kit? I'm thinking it was Mita or Muller. No such rule it seems now with the way the current sponsor is plastered all over unfortunately.

Wasn't it the dot on the i made it too big?

Think that was it was - definitely Mita and possibly before the Liverpool game on the Friday at VP. (Freezing, lost 3-1)
Or was it when the 'd' looked like a 'o' and we had Cows?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TopDeck113 on June 08, 2016, 06:28:18 PM
You can have a really decent looking kit and then you have the shittest eyesore possible. Sponsors like Flamingo Land on Hull's kit in massive letters. That must be a real downer.

If a shirt must be an advertising hoarding, I'd much rather it be a local-ish business relevant to many of the fanbase and one that doesn't come with too many moral dilemmas.  Given the choice of something equivalent to Flamingo Land, let's say Drayton Manor Park, or an online gambling concern, I'd want the former. 
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: leylandalbion on June 08, 2016, 06:37:32 PM
Try and start the negotiation a bit lower please  ;)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: FatSam on June 08, 2016, 08:00:34 PM
Blimey, they milked the sponsorship for that team snap!

Or my personal favourite:

(http://l7.alamy.com/zooms/0d771fafdc1a425a9da14a9b63a45c5e/aston-villa-football-team-club-group-1983-the-team-with-their-new-bwkypx.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: VancouverLion on June 08, 2016, 08:30:00 PM
Good old MG Maestro, I had one in the early 90's. 0-60 in 2 days and torque that couldn't pull the skin off a rice pudding!

Loved that kit and the away one!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: garyshawsknee on June 08, 2016, 08:33:24 PM
My first ever kit,plus I ended up with a two time hand me down Maestro, its probably still running to this day.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: john e on June 08, 2016, 08:35:18 PM
Blimey, they milked the sponsorship for that team snap!

Or my personal favourite:

(http://l7.alamy.com/zooms/0d771fafdc1a425a9da14a9b63a45c5e/aston-villa-football-team-club-group-1983-the-team-with-their-new-bwkypx.jpg)

Sorry to show my ignorance here, but who's the fella right at the far end, Curbs ?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Steve67 on June 08, 2016, 08:46:59 PM
Is it David Geddis?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: VILLA MOLE on June 08, 2016, 08:49:36 PM
cubishley then Andy Blair
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: dave.woodhall on June 08, 2016, 08:50:09 PM
It's Curbishley.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Man With A Stick on June 08, 2016, 08:59:51 PM
My Dad had a Maestro.  He got rid after it broke down on the way to the Man City game in 94.  It was snowing and I think Saunders missed a penalty.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithe on June 08, 2016, 09:01:21 PM
Good old MG Maestro, I had one in the early 90's. 0-60 in 2 days and torque that couldn't pull the skin off a rice pudding!

Loved that kit and the away one!

I remember my Dad borrowing his bosses MG Maestro for the weekend, as a youngster I was particularly taken with the digital speedometer which was unique at the time. I think we got it into double figures on one run.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: thick_mike on June 08, 2016, 09:06:52 PM
Blimey, they milked the sponsorship for that team snap!

Or my personal favourite:

(http://l7.alamy.com/zooms/0d771fafdc1a425a9da14a9b63a45c5e/aston-villa-football-team-club-group-1983-the-team-with-their-new-bwkypx.jpg)

Sorry to show my ignorance here, but who's the fella right at the far end, Curbs ?

See, that's the sort of organisation and discipline we have been lacking at Villa Park recently...look how well those cars are lined up!

Here is a photo of the latest preparations for the new kit sponsor shots...

(http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/disaters/images/6/67/Women-drivers-car-pile-up.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20101009234016)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Deano's Mullet on June 08, 2016, 10:27:06 PM
I remember for the first ten games or so of 1993-94 we had no sponsor on the striped shirts and the club still sold them sponsorless until it was announced we were going with Muller. As a kid having Mita Copiers on the shirt felt like it was part of our identity, like it was a part of Villa just as JVC was always Arsenal and Sharp was Man Yoo. The players changed, the shirt designs changed but Mita was always there.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Hopadop on June 08, 2016, 10:44:25 PM
I remember thinking when I was a wee lad that Mita was actually something quite important to Aston Villa. I didn't realise it was only a sponsor.

How could Mita not be something important, when so prominent on the official photo:
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v436/EnglishPride2004/mita_zpsb5ac06d8.jpg)


Check out the manspreading going on in the front row. Those boys were not giving an inch.

But as usual there's a price to be paid for such behaviour, and it's poor Chris Price who's paying it.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pat McMahon on June 08, 2016, 10:53:40 PM
Blimey, they milked the sponsorship for that team snap!

Or my personal favourite:

(http://l7.alamy.com/zooms/0d771fafdc1a425a9da14a9b63a45c5e/aston-villa-football-team-club-group-1983-the-team-with-their-new-bwkypx.jpg)

Sorry to show my ignorance here, but who's the fella right at the far end, Curbs ?

See, that's the sort of organisation and discipline we have been lacking at Villa Park recently...look how well those cars are lined up!

Here is a photo of the latest preparations for the new kit sponsor shots...

(http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/disaters/images/6/67/Women-drivers-car-pile-up.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20101009234016)
That just looks like a standard Chinese car park
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: john e on June 08, 2016, 11:36:27 PM
Blimey, they milked the sponsorship for that team snap!

Or my personal favourite:

(http://l7.alamy.com/zooms/0d771fafdc1a425a9da14a9b63a45c5e/aston-villa-football-team-club-group-1983-the-team-with-their-new-bwkypx.jpg)

Sorry to show my ignorance here, but who's the fella right at the far end, Curbs ?

See, that's the sort of organisation and discipline we have been lacking at Villa Park recently...look how well those cars are lined up!

Here is a photo of the latest preparations for the new kit sponsor shots...

(http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/disaters/images/6/67/Women-drivers-car-pile-up.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20101009234016)


anyone who mentions 'women drivers' can fuck right of to the Welcome thread
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: b23 on June 09, 2016, 12:40:31 AM
The tatoo generation like surfaces covered with crap.

Aye.

Tattoo sleeves. They're so indervidjewel.  ::)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Louzie0 on June 09, 2016, 12:54:20 AM
(http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/disaters/images/6/67/Women-drivers-car-pile-up.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20101009234016)

Lescott's driveway, shortly after an end of season session with The Lads.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: b23 on June 09, 2016, 01:07:49 AM
Lol.

You could be right ?

I count 25/26 cars ?

That's the first team squad.

Can anyone see a magic trouser mobile phone ?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Louzie0 on June 09, 2016, 01:49:49 AM
I've been looking for 'the car' in his original post.

Probably used the runaround that night :)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ian. on June 09, 2016, 07:36:01 AM
(http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/disaters/images/6/67/Women-drivers-car-pile-up.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20101009234016)

Lescott's driveway, shortly after an end of season session with The Lads.
It's true what they say about using your phone while driving then.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: stuart r on June 14, 2016, 10:22:39 AM
(http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/disaters/images/6/67/Women-drivers-car-pile-up.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20101009234016)

Lescott's driveway, shortly after an end of season session with The Lads.

session with The Ladas
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: somec on June 14, 2016, 11:36:55 AM
Apart from us and spuds who else do UA make kits for?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: pbavfckuwait on June 14, 2016, 11:57:58 AM
Could well be Women drivers John E , none of those cars looked reversed in.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: usav on June 14, 2016, 01:10:30 PM
Apart from us and spuds who else do UA make kits for?
My son's u12 team next season. 
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: UK Redsox on June 14, 2016, 01:53:59 PM
Apart from us and spuds who else do UA make kits for?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Under_Armour#Sponsorships

Club teams[edit]
England Tottenham Hotspur[50]
England Aston Villa[51] (Since 2016/17 season)
England Southampton[52] (Since 2016/17 season)
Germany FC St. Pauli[53] (Since 2016/17 season)
Netherlands AZ Alkmaar[54]
Brazil São Paulo[55]
Chile Colo-Colo[56]
Mexico Toluca[57]
Mexico Cruz Azul[58]
Scotland Queen's Park
United States Baltimore Bohemians[59]
United States New York Cosmos[60]
Japan Omiya Ardija
Philippines Loyola Meralco Sparks
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Louzie0 on June 15, 2016, 01:13:05 AM
(http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/disaters/images/6/67/Women-drivers-car-pile-up.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20101009234016)

Lescott's driveway, shortly after an end of season session with The Lads.

session with The Ladas
Very good!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT Villan on June 15, 2016, 03:06:39 AM
That photo made me think of this for some unknown reason...

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Louzie0 on June 19, 2016, 03:02:56 AM
That photo made me think of this for some unknown reason...



I remember that!  :)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on June 19, 2016, 07:33:29 AM
I just want to see it
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT on June 21, 2016, 09:27:47 AM
I may have missed it, but I didn't see any stretching of an UA top for Tommy's arrival.

The shots of him during the medical had him in the old Macron stuff - I'm guessing as the official handover isn't until July 1, they can't promote UA?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Duncan Shaw on June 21, 2016, 11:46:44 AM
I may have missed it, but I didn't see any stretching of an UA top for Tommy's arrival.

The shots of him during the medical had him in the old Macron stuff - I'm guessing as the official handover isn't until July 1, they can't promote UA?

Maybe, they still had Macron plastered all over the backdrop to the Dr Tone, Booby, Wyness interviews as well.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: peter w on June 21, 2016, 11:58:03 AM
I hope that the sound track to the kit unveiling is 'Oh L'Amour' by Dollar.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pete3206 on June 21, 2016, 12:18:09 PM
Thanks Peter, I now have that shit going round in my head :(
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Cleybrooke on June 21, 2016, 12:24:49 PM
One disappointment is that having chatted to the shop they're not doing a mass clear out at silly prices. Or least thats the claim.

Only every buy a shirt when it's reduced to £5...
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT on June 21, 2016, 12:38:24 PM
One disappointment is that having chatted to the shop they're not doing a mass clear out at silly prices. Or least thats the claim.

Only every buy a shirt when it's reduced to £5...

Same here - always happy to get a shirt for £10 for my lad. Either they've sold most of it or Macron won't let them do it cheap, which would be strange as it will probably never sell.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: class-of-82 on June 21, 2016, 07:40:11 PM
Not doing silly prices ?
My daughter bought me 10 pairs of first team socks @50pence each brilliant for work
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Edvard Remberg on June 22, 2016, 10:42:52 AM
10£ for 10 pairs is pretty good
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Marlon From Bearwood on June 22, 2016, 01:27:00 PM
The club shop in town is closed down and reopens on 1st July.

Maybe that coincides with binning all the Macron gear and launching UA?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Clampy on June 22, 2016, 01:40:06 PM
The club shop in town is closed down and reopens on 1st July.

Maybe that coincides with binning all the Macron gear and launching UA?

I think you may be on to something there.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: David_Nab on June 22, 2016, 04:08:24 PM
If you use the OS to sync the fixtures to your calendar for example google calendar 1st July shows Kit Launch
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on June 22, 2016, 04:27:25 PM
yep the sync feature is pretty good and very easy to do.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: GordonCowansisthegreatest on June 22, 2016, 05:12:29 PM
yep the sync feature is pretty good and very easy to do.
All I get is a Claret screen with the Villa badge on it?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: four fornicholl on June 22, 2016, 05:24:56 PM
Kit launch date will be appearing on the OS any minute now!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on June 22, 2016, 05:56:35 PM
yep the sync feature is pretty good and very easy to do.
All I get is a Claret screen with the Villa badge on it?

Really? I have an iphone and I basically just followed the instructions for syncing the games etc and it appeared in my calendar within seconds really. I'm no techy so I found it quite convenient.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: GordonCowansisthegreatest on June 22, 2016, 06:10:00 PM
yep the sync feature is pretty good and very easy to do.
All I get is a Claret screen with the Villa badge on it?

Really? I have an iphone and I basically just followed the instructions for syncing the games etc and it appeared in my calendar within seconds really. I'm no techy so I found it quite convenient.
I'm trying to do it on my PC!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 22, 2016, 06:37:11 PM
Yeah the calendar sync is really straight forward. Select which calendars you want, select your devices to sync to and enter your email address associated to your calendar. Got the fixtures synced up on my MacBook and iPhone calendars. Simples.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: GordonCowansisthegreatest on June 22, 2016, 07:13:00 PM
Yeah the calendar sync is really straight forward. Select which calendars you want, select your devices to sync to and enter your email address associated to your calendar. Got the fixtures synced up on my MacBook and iPhone calendars. Simples.
Sync won't work in Chrome! Switched to Firefox and voila, no problem.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: class-of-82 on June 24, 2016, 06:46:14 PM
Edvard remberg
10 pairs @ 50 pence each = £5 mate
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tuscans on June 24, 2016, 08:19:39 PM
It has a polo style button neck to it.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Jean Quereue-Quereue on June 25, 2016, 01:44:07 PM
'Prepared' motto, proper claret and blue and Dafabet as sponsors.  Sounds familiar?
(http://www.burnleyfootballclub.com/cms_images/kit-16-17-mee113-3153177.jpg)

(http://www.burnleyfootballclub.com/cms_images/kit-16-17-gray-close113-3153212.jpg)

(http://www.burnleyfootballclub.com/cms_images/kit-16-17-collar113-3153180.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: marshall on June 25, 2016, 01:59:23 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClzFECMWgAAXkqb.png)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 25, 2016, 02:38:28 PM
No complaints from me if it looks anything like that. May be some claret detail on the collar and it would be perfect.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: willenhall villa on June 25, 2016, 03:16:22 PM
Marshall spot on apart from the images I've seen we may have a block of claret on the collar. Looks good though.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 25, 2016, 05:00:01 PM
What images have you seen willenhall villa? I've been unable to find anything that indicates any hints to the design other than the pic on the OS.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: peter w on June 25, 2016, 07:03:16 PM
yep the sync feature is pretty good and very easy to do.
All I get is a Claret screen with the Villa badge on it?

Really? I have an iphone and I basically just followed the instructions for syncing the games etc and it appeared in my calendar within seconds really. I'm no techy so I found it quite convenient.

I read a message about synching  and appearing in my calendar but i got scared and deleted it.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: nuninho on June 25, 2016, 07:26:59 PM
Just seeing the Burnley kit and the use of the word prepared makes me wonder if they'd copyrighted use of that phrase thus we had to drop from our badge?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ChicagoLion on June 26, 2016, 01:20:47 AM
Look like they got the colours right on the Burnley kit.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: robbo1874 on June 26, 2016, 01:59:27 AM
I'd be surprised if you could copyright a single word in that way. Then again, I wouldn't be, actually.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT Villan on June 26, 2016, 03:25:58 AM
Just seeing the Burnley kit and the use of the word prepared makes me wonder if they'd copyrighted use of that phrase thus we had to drop from our badge?

very much doubt it as we could easily prove that we were using it before they registered it...and it's a big if as to whether they could register it in the first place.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 26, 2016, 04:22:23 AM
You can't copyright a single word that is in the English dictionary. Also it's blatantly just being used as a slogan in the Puma/Burnley kit advertising campaign so wouldn't have any direct links to anything to do with us anyway. It's basically the same as if Adidas would use the word "shit' as their slogan to associate with the new Blose kit.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: willenhall villa on June 26, 2016, 04:17:31 PM
KRS I've seen a couple of faded background images on the villa site and another site which I can't remember the name of. I think we'll have a similar template to the new az alkmaar away shirt but without the slats on the arm.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 26, 2016, 04:31:50 PM
You could be spot on...the stitching at the base of the buttons looks identical to whats on the Villa site:

(http://img.planetafobal.com/2016/05/az-alkmaar-away-kit-under-armour-2016-2017-b.jpg)

(http://i2.wp.com/footballfashion.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/az-alkmaar-2016-2017-under-armour-away-kit-1.jpg)

More here (http://footballfashion.org/wordpress/2016/06/06/az-alkmaar-201617-under-armour-away-kit/#prettyPhoto)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on June 27, 2016, 03:04:49 PM
The new away kit might be interesting. Light blue with what appears to be a white band in the middle. At least from the teaser they have on Twitter and OS
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tuscans on June 27, 2016, 03:20:59 PM
The new away kit might be interesting. Light blue with what appears to be a white band in the middle. At least from the teaser they have on Twitter and OS
Very Argentinian looking, Messi quits international football, Xia say's we're after a striker .... hmmmmmm!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 27, 2016, 03:56:23 PM
The new away kit might be interesting. Light blue with what appears to be a white band in the middle. At least from the teaser they have on Twitter and OS
Can't see any teaser for the away kit on the OS (why do they make it so hard to find anything on there?) but looks like a v-neck in baby blue and white from the teaser gif on Twitter. Instantly reminds me of the 97-98 away shirt:

(https://www.vintagefootballshirts.com/uploads/products/images/1997-98-aston-villa-away-shirt-10505-1.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: andyh on June 27, 2016, 04:50:40 PM
It's wierd how the official site and emails still have Macron emblazoned all over them, when advertising the new kit.
I guess a new deal with a new supplier kicks in on July 1st.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: four fornicholl on June 27, 2016, 05:10:14 PM
I do like the idea of an Away strip with vertical, rather than horizontal stripes, a la Iceland,but solid claret and blue rather than fading away at the top. Im sure some teams in the seventies had that design and it would be a nice retro touch.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 27, 2016, 05:20:06 PM
There isn't any indication of vertical stripes on either of the new kits.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ad@m on June 27, 2016, 05:25:19 PM
The new away kit might be interesting. Light blue with what appears to be a white band in the middle. At least from the teaser they have on Twitter and OS
Can't see any teaser for the away kit on the OS (why do they make it so hard to find anything on there?) but looks like a v-neck in baby blue and white from the teaser gif on Twitter. Instantly reminds me of the 97-98 away shirt:

(https://www.vintagefootballshirts.com/uploads/products/images/1997-98-aston-villa-away-shirt-10505-1.jpg)

I'd forgotten what a God-awful kit that was!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 27, 2016, 05:28:03 PM
Yeah it's horrible so I hope I'm way off in my initial thoughts, but it's definitely got a light blue top half at least with a white v-neck.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: four fornicholl on June 27, 2016, 05:35:45 PM
There isn't any indication of vertical stripes on either of the new kits.
I realize that KRS, I was just thinking it may look quite cool for an oldtimer mod like myself.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 27, 2016, 05:38:07 PM
To be fair I'm not sure what kind of design you're referring to. Any examples?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: four fornicholl on June 27, 2016, 05:42:31 PM
To be fair I'm not sure what kind of design you're referring to. Any examples?
Like the Iceland design but a white shirt with a claret and blue stripe down one side, I think Barcelona played in a yellow version in the early eighties? and im sure some English clubs wore similar in the seventies but I cant for the death of me remember who.May have to start trolling classic kit websites unless you can help me out.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Salsa Party Animal on June 27, 2016, 05:43:30 PM
Any photos of other teams in 2016-17 kits, to give us an idea where it is going. Companies like Nike are boring as they do a template and make all team fit to it ie England, France, Portugal.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 27, 2016, 05:51:59 PM
To be fair I'm not sure what kind of design you're referring to. Any examples?
Like the Iceland design but a white shirt with a claret and blue stripe down one side, I think Barcelona played in a yellow version in the early eighties? and im sure some English clubs wore similar in the seventies but I cant for the death of me remember who.May have to start trolling classic kit websites unless you can help me out.
You mean something like this...
(http://www.prodirectsoccer.com/productimages/V3_1_Main/131863.jpg)

...or like this (apologies for using Man City as an example):
(http://cdn2.uksoccershop.com/images/man-city-3rd-shirt-2013-14.jpg)

...or the Barcelona version that you referred to:
(https://madridgalacticos.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/9002.jpg)

If so, I would agree that it would be pretty awesome...particularly if we had our old circular badge back.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: four fornicholl on June 27, 2016, 05:59:33 PM
Exactly that City one but only as an away. Well found KRS, you obviously have a keen interest in kits as I always used to have, could you find me the seventies version im thinking of, its annoying me now, I think one of the stripes may have been yellow?? Yours in anticipation :)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TopDeck113 on June 27, 2016, 06:06:33 PM
A lad in my school back in the late 70s was a Cardiff fan and wore this kit for kick arounds on the local park. 
(http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/Cardiff_City/images/cardiff_city_1975-1977-ah.gif)

Back then I thought it was quite a cool design.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TopDeck113 on June 27, 2016, 06:10:36 PM
When I was looking for the Cardiff kit I came across this classic from the same era.  Anyone fancy replacing the Y for York with a V for Villa?  No?  Thought not.

(http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/York_City/images/york_city_1975-1976-1.gif)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TopDeck113 on June 27, 2016, 06:15:14 PM
Anyway we'd be copying Burnley...

(http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/Burnley/images/burnley_1975-1979.gif)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OCD on June 27, 2016, 06:15:19 PM
A white away shirt with Claret and Blue vertical stripes (similar to the Man City one) would look really nice.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: spangley1812 on June 27, 2016, 06:19:19 PM
A white away shirt with Claret and Blue vertical stripes (similar to the Man City one) would look really nice.

Its not got any stripes
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: four fornicholl on June 27, 2016, 06:22:31 PM
Got it KRS!!!!!! Torquay United, but not exactly as I remembered it,Luton Towns was of a similar design too. I will sleep tonight now.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 27, 2016, 06:26:23 PM
I would never have thought of that...I've been trying to think of what decent teams in the 70s and 80s would wear a yellow stripe! lol
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tuscans on June 27, 2016, 06:33:03 PM
yep the sync feature is pretty good and very easy to do.
All I get is a Claret screen with the Villa badge on it?

Really? I have an iphone and I basically just followed the instructions for syncing the games etc and it appeared in my calendar within seconds really. I'm no techy so I found it quite convenient.
I'm trying to do it on my PC!
It's a GIF, just wait for it to change ... its like a 2 second video on repeat.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OCD on June 27, 2016, 06:58:28 PM
A white away shirt with Claret and Blue vertical stripes (similar to the Man City one) would look really nice.

Its not got any stripes

Yeah, I saw someone say that. I'm just saying what I would have liked.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: marshall on June 27, 2016, 07:34:50 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl-iZSoWQAAHD32.png)

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 27, 2016, 07:42:09 PM
Looks to me as if the light blue would extend all the way to the shoulder.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Stirchley Villain on June 27, 2016, 09:35:12 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cl-iZSoWQAAHD32.png)

Nice
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pete3206 on June 27, 2016, 11:36:46 PM
Lose the sky blue thing and you got a nice top there
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT Villan on June 28, 2016, 12:58:43 AM
I think Barcelona played in a yellow version in the early eighties?

They were certainly wearing something like it when they were crushed by the mighty Aston Villa at VP in the '83 Super Cup  ;D
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: marshall on June 28, 2016, 11:04:17 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmB47OGXIAQ2kkP.png)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmBZHI7WAAElzSX.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: darren woolley on June 28, 2016, 12:42:59 PM
Please let that be the new kit I like it.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Hookeysmith on June 28, 2016, 12:50:58 PM
The image on the big screen looks like buttons down the front

can some clever person adapt Marshalls image
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: marshall on June 28, 2016, 01:14:43 PM
The image on the big screen looks like buttons down the front

can some clever person adapt Marshalls image

It has buttons they are just the same colour
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 28, 2016, 02:06:51 PM
A very clean and simple design. Like it.

Hope the training kits, casual wear and merchandise is of similar quality.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Hookeysmith on June 28, 2016, 02:32:24 PM
The image on the big screen looks like buttons down the front

can some clever person adapt Marshalls image

It has buttons they are just the same colour

I must be blind then as I cannot for the life of me see them :(
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Hookeysmith on June 28, 2016, 02:38:04 PM
I cannot find a single shirt either past or present image where they have colours and button down front

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=under+armour+current+soccer+uniforms&biw=1670&bih=837&tbm=isch&imgil=whMxIAU5hnBxeM%253A%253BfrDcCh1ugIY-UM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Ffootballfashion.org%25252Fwordpress%25252F2015%25252F05%25252F05%25252Fsao-paulo-fc-201516-under-armour-home-and-away-kits%25252F&source=iu&pf=m&fir=whMxIAU5hnBxeM%253A%252CfrDcCh1ugIY-UM%252C_&usg=__Hd8GwFNmKKiWENukQX1oQSzxfj0%3D&dpr=1.15&ved=0ahUKEwiz3qHy6srNAhVHAsAKHR6oAHYQyjcIaQ&ei=onxyV7OFJseEgAae0IKwBw#imgrc=wm_zRs0m4SQcKM%3A

Nice to know we are not just a template kit like so many of the Nike versions
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Deano's Mullet on June 28, 2016, 02:46:35 PM
Claret shirt, blue sleeves so  I think I'll be happy. Collar reminds me of the West Ham 1995-97 home top. Probably wont be a million miles from last seasons if that mock p is anything to go by. Just hope we stick with blue socks too, not really a fan when we go claret although I did like black socks in the McCleish season.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: marshall on June 28, 2016, 03:06:13 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmCqsRkWgAAn-Ra.png)

Darker Claret
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 28, 2016, 03:17:45 PM
I cannot find a single shirt either past or present image where they have colours and button down front

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=under+armour+current+soccer+uniforms&biw=1670&bih=837&tbm=isch&imgil=whMxIAU5hnBxeM%253A%253BfrDcCh1ugIY-UM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Ffootballfashion.org%25252Fwordpress%25252F2015%25252F05%25252F05%25252Fsao-paulo-fc-201516-under-armour-home-and-away-kits%25252F&source=iu&pf=m&fir=whMxIAU5hnBxeM%253A%252CfrDcCh1ugIY-UM%252C_&usg=__Hd8GwFNmKKiWENukQX1oQSzxfj0%3D&dpr=1.15&ved=0ahUKEwiz3qHy6srNAhVHAsAKHR6oAHYQyjcIaQ&ei=onxyV7OFJseEgAae0IKwBw#imgrc=wm_zRs0m4SQcKM%3A

Nice to know we are not just a template kit like so many of the Nike versions
How about this one:
(http://i2.wp.com/footballfashion.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/az-alkmaar-2016-2017-under-armour-away-kit-1.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tuscans on June 28, 2016, 04:22:55 PM
A little teaser video has gone up ... at the beginning you get John Hartson going for a swim. Make of that what you will.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 28, 2016, 04:37:27 PM
Not sure what to make of that teaser video but could be more related to the training kits that are also released on the same day...

The guy in the pool...may be a hidden message in his tattoos...one clearly says "I am..."
The guy on the training field...a hint to the training wear and kit manufacturer which looks to carry the Under Armour brand on the white long sleeve (which is a common trait for Under Armour items).
The girl on the training field...looks to be wearing a similar design to the suggested away kit but with a dark blue colour and the light blue section appears to go to the shoulder.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: itbrvilla on June 28, 2016, 04:54:43 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmCqsRkWgAAn-Ra.png)

Darker Claret
I doubt it will be. The club give out a brochure about the 'Brand'  and has very specific requirements regarding colour use. The person that told me said what they saw from Villas requirements you don't often seen for many other clubs.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: SamTheMouse on June 28, 2016, 05:10:33 PM
A little teaser video has gone up ... at the beginning you get John Hartson going for a swim. Make of that what you will.

Ah! I couldn't work out who it was. Bit random, isn't it?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Mr Speedy H on June 28, 2016, 05:11:28 PM
It's been a slow day.

So this definitely proves Under Armour as the supplier. If you take a look at the young lady dribbling you can see the UA logo on her shorts:

(http://i.imgur.com/eT43xKS.png)

Not that this is a breakthrough... It's probably one of the worst kept secrets in a while.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Clampy on June 28, 2016, 05:20:33 PM
The video is great because it makes no sense whatsoever.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: FiveKenMcNaughts on June 28, 2016, 05:34:12 PM
It's been a slow day.

So this definitely proves Under Armour as the supplier. If you take a look at the young lady dribbling you can see the UA logo on her shorts:

(http://i.imgur.com/eT43xKS.png)

Not that this is a breakthrough... It's probably one of the worst kept secrets in a while.

The Middlesboro' tickets have the under-armour logo on them.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: sirlordbaltimore on June 28, 2016, 05:37:10 PM


where is this teaser video ?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: marshall on June 28, 2016, 05:39:10 PM
Is this the kit or training wear

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmDUqD1XEAAKp8Y.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 28, 2016, 05:55:10 PM
I would say both kits featured are UA training wear. For a start, the girl appears to be wearing a shirt with a dark blue collar as opposed to the white collar featured on the away shirt, and the claret top with blue/white sleeves also has a white collar.

The Twitter feed also states..."Not long left to wait…New kits and training wear revealed 01/07/16"...so it kind of makes sense that the third teaser on a training ground is for the training wear.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: marshall on June 28, 2016, 06:00:17 PM
(https://d22k6u99ay5z2k.cloudfront.net/monthly_2016_06/5772a9b59a015_aston-villa-16-17-kits(2).jpg.87b715ecc1a81aaa341e87435e74bbd9.jpg)

(https://d22k6u99ay5z2k.cloudfront.net/monthly_2016_06/5772a9b4c443f_aston-villa-16-17-kits(3).jpg.74aae440e3b2bdbd7cfd30d31fe51ae9.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tuscans on June 28, 2016, 06:03:48 PM
(https://d22k6u99ay5z2k.cloudfront.net/monthly_2016_06/5772a9b59a015_aston-villa-16-17-kits(2).jpg.87b715ecc1a81aaa341e87435e74bbd9.jpg)

(https://d22k6u99ay5z2k.cloudfront.net/monthly_2016_06/5772a9b4c443f_aston-villa-16-17-kits(3).jpg.74aae440e3b2bdbd7cfd30d31fe51ae9.jpg)
Do Porsche design Villa kits because they always look the same every season. A little imagination once in a while wouldn't go amiss.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 28, 2016, 06:13:17 PM
Looks like the girl in the video could be wearing the away kit then with the dark colour on the back half of the collar. The back of the home shirt could have that blue at the back of the neck, but would be a strange design feature to have the reverse of the collar being white and the long sleeve version to having white sleeves.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Left Side on June 28, 2016, 06:45:32 PM
We had a white away kit in the 2nd Division in 87/88, so hopefully that's a lucky omen... plucking at straws I know.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Clampy on June 28, 2016, 06:48:50 PM
Is it me or do the sponsor's logo look a bit on the huge side?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: villadelph on June 28, 2016, 06:51:46 PM
That away shirt looks like a training top..
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 28, 2016, 07:03:00 PM
The new away shirt is based on the 97/98 away shirt...but not as shit.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Risso on June 28, 2016, 07:12:15 PM
The new away shirt is based on the 97/98 away shirt...but not as shit.

Yep, looks like the Collymore era AST kit, only that had blue sleeves as well.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on June 28, 2016, 07:16:00 PM
I like the away kit, it's a bit different and a bit of a throwback and the home kit is traditional. As it should be. And the sponsor is way too big but that's what we have and has been agreed.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Deano's Mullet on June 28, 2016, 07:25:24 PM
Blue socks and that home kit will be great. Hate claret socks.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tuscans on June 28, 2016, 08:14:41 PM
I dislike both. The away top looks really cheap to me, hardly any thought has gone into it and the two-tone collar seems naff.

The home top, well it's claret and blue and that's it.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: spangley1812 on June 28, 2016, 08:23:20 PM
I dislike both. The away top looks really cheap to me, hardly any thought has gone into it and the two-tone collar seems naff.

The home top, well it's claret and blue and that's it.

So if you dont want a claret and Blue Aston Villa home shirt what colour do you want????
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: charleeco7 on June 28, 2016, 08:24:32 PM
Funny that seeing as we play in claret and blue.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Steve67 on June 28, 2016, 08:25:43 PM
I like both. Away kit is great.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tuscans on June 28, 2016, 08:29:21 PM
I dislike both. The away top looks really cheap to me, hardly any thought has gone into it and the two-tone collar seems naff.

The home top, well it's claret and blue and that's it.

So if you dont want a claret and Blue Aston Villa home shirt what colour do you want????
I'm not saying that but design wise it just kinda feels like the same shirt every season. I like the collar on the home top, adds a bit of class compared to the away one. That one reminds me of clubbing in the 90's and seeing your mate wearing a white t-shirt with a tank top over it.

I wouldn't mind for the 145/ 150 year anniversary of the club for maybe one season a limited edition chocolate and blue kit, just a one off or something.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on June 28, 2016, 08:30:41 PM
Don't like the away kit, probably because I didn't like the original.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on June 28, 2016, 08:32:44 PM
(https://cdn.pastemagazine.com/www/system/images/photo_albums/epl-90s-jerseys/large/aston-villa-97-away-pp-1.jpg?1384968217)

I did like this one though a couple of years later, even though it was a bit 80s Palace I still liked it.

(http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/KLIAAOSw0JpV3eWF/s-l300.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tuscans on June 28, 2016, 08:37:39 PM
(http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/Aston_Villa/images/aston-villa-1997-1998-change.gif)

I did like this one though a couple of years later, even though it was a bit 80s Palace I still liked it.

(http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/Aston_Villa/images/aston-villa-1999-2000-change.gif)
Broken images.

How do you actually upload a picture, says I need to enable attachments here but can't find where you do that.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: N'ZMAV on June 28, 2016, 08:39:22 PM
Blue socks and that home kit will be great. Hate claret socks.
Yes, I agree
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: marshall on June 28, 2016, 08:42:29 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmD03PxXEAAcXIZ.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmD03PuWAAACyVn.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: VinnieChase84 on June 28, 2016, 08:44:28 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmD03PxXEAAcXIZ.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmD03PuWAAACyVn.jpg)
Both gorgeous 👍🏻
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Dazvillain on June 28, 2016, 08:58:10 PM
I thought last years sponsors contract had run out ? Was expecting something Far East !
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: andyh on June 28, 2016, 09:05:27 PM
Both appear pretty lovely
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 28, 2016, 09:05:29 PM
The only thing I don't really like is the ridiculously oversized sponsor logo (as it was last season too). I'd imagine that was the contracted agreement that Fox put in place so probably nothing we can do about it until the sponsor term ends.

The collar on the home kit doesn't look quite right with the blue behind the claret button, but unlikely anyone will have that buttoned up so need to see what its like open.

Under Armour generally produce quality clothing so it will be interesting to see how these kits, the training kits and the causal range look and feel.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: VancouverLion on June 28, 2016, 09:06:42 PM
I like both of them, a lot!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on June 28, 2016, 09:07:18 PM
Broken images.

How do you actually upload a picture, says I need to enable attachments here but can't find where you do that.

I always forget Historical Kits doesn't work as a link. Added different images now.

If you CLICK ME (http://www.heroesandvillains.info/forumv3/index.php?topic=49988.0) it will take you to the "How To" thread we have.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: exiled on the wirral! on June 28, 2016, 09:23:48 PM
Really like both designs. .just hope the quality is just as good
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: andyh on June 28, 2016, 09:24:44 PM
The only thing I don't really like is the ridiculously oversized sponsor logo (as it was last season too). I'd imagine that was the contracted agreement that Fox put in place so probably nothing we can do about it until the sponsor term ends.

The collar on the home kit doesn't look quite right with the blue behind the claret button, but unlikely anyone will have that buttoned up so need to see what its like open.

Under Armour generally produce quality clothing so it will be interesting to see how these kits, the training kits and the causal range look and feel.

I' m pretty sure there are rules over the maximum size of adverts/logos on shirts so I don't think they are necessarily oversized.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Nelly on June 28, 2016, 09:32:32 PM
Those kits look great to me, away kit reminds me of better times in the 90s!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tuscans on June 28, 2016, 09:37:11 PM
Broken images.

How do you actually upload a picture, says I need to enable attachments here but can't find where you do that.

I always forget Historical Kits doesn't work as a link. Added different images now.

If you CLICK ME (http://www.heroesandvillains.info/forumv3/index.php?topic=49988.0) it will take you to the "How To" thread we have.
Cheers
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Man With A Stick on June 28, 2016, 09:42:47 PM
Like the away shirt but not that daft little collar on the home one.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: eamonn on June 28, 2016, 10:07:49 PM
I loved the "Collymore" away 97/98 shirt and remember us wearing it in some memorable Uefa Cup matches that season. Anything similar would be boss. Don't shy away from blue cos of them lot across town.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: villadelph on June 28, 2016, 11:23:52 PM
Under Armor makes good stuff.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wozwebs on June 28, 2016, 11:24:43 PM
Was going to pop up the weekend to get my lad the kit but noticed this on the website:

We are sorry to announce that due to technical difficulties in manufacturing, there has been a delay with the youth shirt in sizes XSJ, SJ and MJ.
Sign up for the 'email me' option to be notified of when we have stock.

New date: 1 September
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: tomd2103 on June 28, 2016, 11:55:52 PM
Under Armor makes good stuff.

Yeah.  The training tops, hoodies etc. are normally decent.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pete3206 on June 29, 2016, 12:02:00 AM
Home shirt OK
Away shirt is ghastly
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tuscans on June 29, 2016, 12:34:24 AM
(http://www.thevintageknittinglady.co.uk/images/13jan11/bestway3536.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: saunders_heroes on June 29, 2016, 07:26:11 AM
Decent looking kits, and immensely better than any of the shite Macron ever come up with.
I wonder why they copied the away kit from the late '90s?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: mattjpa on June 29, 2016, 07:48:20 AM
Absolutely love the home shirt. Smart collar, plain sleeves, no toilet men all over it. Nice shade of claret as well. UnderArmour appear to have done what Macron failed to do and bridged the gap between casual sportswear and football shirts. Other clubs have done this previously, Arsenal and United to name a couple of notable ones. Provided this is a nice cut and good quality i will def be buying it
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Duncan Shaw on June 29, 2016, 09:50:06 AM
As said a few times on here, UA kit is normally excellent quality.  I've had a base layer for 8 years that has been used for rugby coaching, skiing, cycling and runnning and is still as good now as the day I bought it.  My lad has one of their "Storm" water resistant hoodies and it is also superb.  That said they can be a bit on the expensive side, but you're paying for quality.
These kits are lovely as well!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Hookeysmith on June 29, 2016, 10:10:19 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmD03PxXEAAcXIZ.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmD03PuWAAACyVn.jpg)
Both gorgeous 👍🏻

Home kit
Simple, right mix of colours and I like the collar

Away kit
Absolutely love it - will be the first time in years I will actually buy one
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: darren woolley on June 29, 2016, 10:32:59 AM
I really like both of them smart kits.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: garyshawsknee on June 29, 2016, 10:35:45 AM
I like both too, just dislike the sponsor on it, far too much distraction on the shirt.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: JJ-AV on June 29, 2016, 10:41:40 AM
Really nice. Like them both a lot. Especially the home.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on June 29, 2016, 11:17:42 AM
We are finally free of Macron  8)

I like them both.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: leylandalbion on June 29, 2016, 12:10:18 PM
Was going to pop up the weekend to get my lad the kit but noticed this on the website:

We are sorry to announce that due to technical difficulties in manufacturing, there has been a delay with the youth shirt in sizes XSJ, SJ and MJ.
Sign up for the 'email me' option to be notified of when we have stock.

New date: 1 September
Tell me your joking...
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: willenhall villa on June 29, 2016, 12:20:35 PM
Very impressed for a first go at them. Hopefully we don't go all fancy in the future. For a first time in many seasons I think I'll be purchasing both.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: leylandalbion on June 29, 2016, 12:24:11 PM
Was going to pop up the weekend to get my lad the kit but noticed this on the website:

We are sorry to announce that due to technical difficulties in manufacturing, there has been a delay with the youth shirt in sizes XSJ, SJ and MJ.
Sign up for the 'email me' option to be notified of when we have stock.

New date: 1 September
Tell me your joking...
No your not - but it looks like its just for the home kit - not away or gk
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on June 29, 2016, 12:24:14 PM
The only thing that could make these kits better is an embroidered gold lion rampant as the crest, like these:

(http://www.designboom.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/NIKE-soccer-2016-football-kits-revealed-england-brazil-france-USA-designboom-12.jpg)

(http://assets.lfcimages.com/v2/uploads/media/default/0001/21/thumb_20912_default_news_size_5.jpeg)

(http://www.prodirectsoccer.com/productimages/V3_1_Main/110295.jpg)



Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: sirlordbaltimore on June 29, 2016, 12:46:52 PM


Both look fine to me, mind you so did all the Macron kits. As a 45 year old chubby fucker they're not really marketed at me though

The nephew likes them both as well, and he's the teen market they're aimed at i'm sure

Thumbs up
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on June 29, 2016, 05:08:25 PM
OT but have a look at the Aberdare Athletic kit 1921-23.

http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/Aberdare_Athletic/Aberdare_Athletic.htm
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on June 29, 2016, 05:12:40 PM
If the sponsor logo was just the QB it would be so much better. The designs ignoring the sponsor are both nice.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: SteveN on June 29, 2016, 08:32:54 PM
Each to their own but I think that away kit is horrible.  Like the home kit though.



Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: in exile on June 29, 2016, 09:09:45 PM
For what it's worth, I like both
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: eamonn on June 30, 2016, 12:49:13 AM
Are these definitely legit?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 30, 2016, 12:50:52 AM
I'm 99.9% certain they are both legit.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Louzie0 on June 30, 2016, 12:53:38 AM
You haven't seen the orange away kit, then.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on June 30, 2016, 02:08:00 AM
Nope but I've seen the white socks with claret and blue trim in the latest Twitter teaser video.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TopDeck113 on June 30, 2016, 05:24:04 AM
Are Football League clubs allowed larger sponsors logos than they are in the Premier League?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: adamski villa on June 30, 2016, 06:49:22 AM
Under Armour boss on Linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/thrive-under-armour-you-have-answer-kevin-planks-three-suzy-welch?trk=li_fb_namer_mmc_TOPATT_ed3&utm_campaign=TOPATT&utm_medium=social&utm_source=Facebook&utm_content=ed3
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: adamski villa on June 30, 2016, 06:49:56 AM
.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: spangley1812 on June 30, 2016, 03:06:19 PM
From PRAVDA

Brian Little and Ian Taylor will be at Villa Park on Friday to open the new store – and unveil our new kits.

Our Villa Park main shop has been fully refurbished inside and outside and you’ll get a chance to see the results from 12noon, when Little and Taylor cut the ribbon.

Not only will there be a new ‘look and feel’ to the shop, it will also be full of our 2016/17 home, away and goalkeeping kits.

Add to that, training wear - and a comprehensive range of other items - and we’re sure you’d agree that it’s worth visiting.

Our City Centre shop will also open at 12noon after a similar revamp – and will also feature a huge selection of new claret and blue merchandise.

Kate Sharp, Head of Retail, said: “It’s an exciting day for us as we not only show off our new-look store – but also unveil our new kits for the 2016/17 season.

“It’s always an exciting time of year for us as we look ahead to a new season and we hope the store and kit will really heighten the anticipation for the upcoming campaign.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: marshall on July 01, 2016, 08:37:27 AM
Quote
Under Armour UK ‏@UnderArmourUK  222 minutes ago
Welcome to the family, @AVFCOfficial.
#FightLikeLions #IWILL

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmQwUL2VUAAVyxS.jpg) (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmQwUMAUsAAp5nM.jpg)

5 year deal so a long time
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Richard E on July 01, 2016, 08:50:49 AM
Quote
Under Armour UK ‏@UnderArmourUK  222 minutes ago
Welcome to the family, @AVFCOfficial.
#FightLikeLions #IWILL

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmQwUL2VUAAVyxS.jpg) (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmQwUMAUsAAp5nM.jpg)

5 year deal so a long time

There will be a second silver star on the badge by the end of this deal!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Cleybrooke on July 01, 2016, 10:09:49 AM
"Pride, Passion, Purpose" - apparently stitched in to the shirt.

Great words and something our players should have. But I thought our moto was "Prepared"

Thoughts?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: cdward on July 01, 2016, 10:25:02 AM
It makes me think of Pride and Prejudice when i read it. It's just another Proud History, Bright Future tag line that has now been attached to the club.
In the big scheme of things it doesn't really matter, it's on the pitch that matters.
But i would like us to keep Prepared. It is part of Aston Villa, and should be prominent, i don't want to see it discarded.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: chrisw1 on July 01, 2016, 12:14:46 PM
Video here

https://www.facebook.com/avfcofficial/videos/1217259794984754/

Jonathan Fear starring?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AlexAlexCropley on July 01, 2016, 12:18:23 PM
Was going to get some shorts for my hols but £26????
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: saunders_heroes on July 01, 2016, 12:20:05 PM
Very nice kits. Now give us a team to match...
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on July 01, 2016, 12:30:44 PM
At least now the blue in the badge matches the blue in the rest of the kit
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on July 01, 2016, 12:37:20 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmRmjoQXgAAlyEj.jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmRnTH6W8AAtclY.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmRqRo5XgAAXzBj.jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmRqSkQXEAAH45S.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on July 01, 2016, 12:41:32 PM
I see the goalkeeper kits are bigger than the outfield kits. Maybe we are signing the BFG this summer to play in net.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Stirchley Villain on July 01, 2016, 12:45:19 PM
Seen better... had worse.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: amfy on July 01, 2016, 12:52:21 PM
I went to an event at Bodymoor Heath last night where we had to try out the new training kit doing a session with some of the coaches! Great fun!
Can't write much now cos I'm at work, but suffice to say this is really nice kit. Anyone who uses Villa kit for training will love it. Proper light technical fabrics - no horrible scratchy nylon!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: cdbearsfan on July 01, 2016, 01:11:36 PM
Looks good to me.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: darren woolley on July 01, 2016, 01:18:23 PM
Looks good to me.

Me too.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Clampy on July 01, 2016, 01:24:49 PM
Just been to have a browse in the shop in town. They look better in the pictures I thought and they're a tad small.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ktvillan on July 01, 2016, 01:25:27 PM
I like the designs but if the official site photos are anything to go by the shade of blue used is still all wrong except on the socks.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AVH87 on July 01, 2016, 01:27:50 PM
£50 is a lot of money to spend on a sports top, regardless of how nice you might think either kit is.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: kieron on July 01, 2016, 01:32:19 PM
£50 is a lot of money to spend on a sports top, regardless of how nice you might think either kit is.

I think what takes the piss even more than that is that the kids tops are £42.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: dave.woodhall on July 01, 2016, 01:34:03 PM
£50 is a lot of money to spend on a sports top, regardless of how nice you might think either kit is.

I think what takes the piss even more than that is that the kids tops are £42.

And we all know what their answer is.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ian. on July 01, 2016, 01:36:59 PM
They look really good. Best looking for years.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: amfy on July 01, 2016, 01:36:59 PM
Kit like this is over £30 when it's not a football shirt.
I know you still wonder where the other £20 comes from, but they've charged iro £50 for years and the basic product hadn't been this good.
Football shirts are a stupid price. I am no longer shocked.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: amfy on July 01, 2016, 01:38:31 PM
The kids tops prices are daft. They definitely have no need of technical fabrics! And they don't really need quality either as they have grown out of them in 6 months!

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tuscans on July 01, 2016, 01:43:37 PM
So who is going to upload the first picture of themselves donning the new ( preferably ) the home kit. All these images so far look almost slightly computer generated. You are allowed to go full kit wanker as this is for consumer research.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Duncan Shaw on July 01, 2016, 01:48:07 PM
£50 is a lot of money to spend on a sports top, regardless of how nice you might think either kit is.

I think what takes the piss even more than that is that the kids tops are £42.

And we all know what their answer is.

I said a couple of pages back that UA kit is quality stuff, but expensive and this seems to baclk that up!!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Duncan Shaw on July 01, 2016, 01:50:17 PM
So who is going to upload the first picture of themselves donning the new ( preferably ) the home kit. All these images so far look almost slightly computer generated. You are allowed to go full kit wanker as this is for consumer research.

It's interesting that its all been graphics and no players at all wearing it as in previous years.  Tells me that they really don't know whos going to be here or gone come the season, so not using anyone to model it after the Benteke episode last year.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: peter w on July 01, 2016, 01:53:10 PM
Just been to have a browse in the shop in town. They look better in the pictures I thought and they're a tad small.

try the larger size you fat f*ck
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: bodkins14 on July 01, 2016, 02:10:07 PM
I really like the look of the training stadium jacket but bloody hell £100, we are looking at some serious cash.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: go on the dog on July 01, 2016, 02:27:04 PM
Not a chance they will get £50 from me, Back to the cheap retro gear from ebay.

BTW Training gear looks naff to me
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on July 01, 2016, 04:24:08 PM
£100! Does it have a solid gold lining!

(http://d2hatremgvh27k.cloudfront.net/cms_media/images/380x450_fitbox-resize_master.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Salsa Party Animal on July 01, 2016, 04:30:07 PM
I would like to see the stadium jacket in flesh and see how it fit and feel. I think 100 pounds is a lot of money for one.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Hopadop on July 01, 2016, 04:58:18 PM
Just been to have a browse in the shop in town. They look better in the pictures I thought and they're a tad small.

try the larger size you fat f*ck

Never mind 'Fight Like Lions' or whatever, I'd love it if that was the strapline.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ciggiesnbeer on July 01, 2016, 04:59:21 PM
£100! Does it have a solid gold lining!

(http://d2hatremgvh27k.cloudfront.net/cms_media/images/380x450_fitbox-resize_master.jpg)

Looks sweet though.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Jon Crofts on July 01, 2016, 05:00:33 PM
£100! Does it have a solid gold lining!

(http://d2hatremgvh27k.cloudfront.net/cms_media/images/380x450_fitbox-resize_master.jpg)

These kids in sweatshops don't work for minimum wage these days.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: peter w on July 01, 2016, 05:32:16 PM
£100! Does it have a solid gold lining!

(http://d2hatremgvh27k.cloudfront.net/cms_media/images/380x450_fitbox-resize_master.jpg)

Looks nice though
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: class-of-82 on July 01, 2016, 05:41:34 PM
The light blue training top is the dogs bollocks just ordered it
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ChicagoLion on July 01, 2016, 05:42:19 PM
Not sure about those sleeves
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wittonwarrior on July 01, 2016, 06:05:59 PM
All round and with special mention to an outstanding looking away kit - Under Armour have exceeded expectations in terms of product.  However the prices are outrageous  which is unfortunate as this aspect will curtail sales.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on July 01, 2016, 06:28:34 PM
Strange that they haven't got any Under Armour hoodies. A bit underwhelmed by the casual wear available.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: amfy on July 01, 2016, 07:07:43 PM
They take feedback in order to meet customer expectations apparently.

☆ this probably doesn't include the price.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: villadelph on July 01, 2016, 09:02:06 PM
Has anyone seen a picture of the long sleeve away?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on July 01, 2016, 09:15:16 PM
Nope. Havent seen long sleeve versions of either kit.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT on July 01, 2016, 10:05:35 PM
Strange that they haven't got any Under Armour hoodies. A bit underwhelmed by the casual wear available.

Same here.

I do like UA stuff, but blimey those prices....£26 for a pair of football shorts?!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wittonwarrior on July 01, 2016, 10:40:37 PM
For season ticket holders wish we had the choice of first cup game or a shirt
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Stirchley Villain on July 01, 2016, 10:43:01 PM
Strange that they haven't got any Under Armour hoodies. A bit underwhelmed by the casual wear available.

Same here.

I do like UA stuff, but blimey those prices....£26 for a pair of football shorts?!

No one over16 will be buying the shorts obviously..?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on July 01, 2016, 11:47:24 PM
Isn't it possible that some of that stuff will be added to the collection over time? It's a five year deal so they might just have made the critical items first.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on July 02, 2016, 12:24:54 AM
Hope so TV. Under Armour do some really good training and casual gear but the offerings available at the moment are a bit...shit. Even if they just did some of their own gear in Villa colours (such as a claret Storm hoody or tech shirts) then these could sell well.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on July 02, 2016, 01:39:28 AM
Actually some of the long sleeve training gear (http://shop.avfc.co.uk/training-2016-17/adult-training/sweatshirts-tops/index.html?via=navflood) isn't too bad. Might pick one up for mountain biking (once I've bought a new bike!).

They also need to sort out the menus as some items such as this claret and blue 1/4 zip training top (http://shop.avfc.co.uk/shop/aston-villa-adult-1-4-zip-training-sweatshirt-claret/index.html) don't appear where they should do.

I'd also like to see more Under Armour items with just the subtle new lion rather than the full badge.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: saunders_heroes on July 02, 2016, 07:29:55 AM
Video here

https://www.facebook.com/avfcofficial/videos/1217259794984754/

Jonathan Fear starring?

How did he get that gig??
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Mister E on July 02, 2016, 08:03:01 AM
Away kit looks a bit Spammer, to me.
I like the home kit and the training sweatshirts are good.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Duncan Shaw on July 02, 2016, 09:49:43 AM
I'd buy a storm hoodie if they did one.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wozwebs on July 02, 2016, 12:01:51 PM
Video here

https://www.facebook.com/avfcofficial/videos/1217259794984754/

Jonathan Fear starring?

How did he get that gig??
Not sure, but will we hear the end of it?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Stirchley Villain on July 02, 2016, 02:43:57 PM
I looked at the shirts today as I walked past the club shop. They look and feel cheap. I'm quite disappointed as I thought UA stuff would be better quality.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: villadelph on July 02, 2016, 03:09:03 PM
I looked at the shirts today as I walked past the club shop. They look and feel cheap. I'm quite disappointed as I thought UA stuff would be better quality.

HeatGear feels cheap?! No way.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on July 02, 2016, 03:15:07 PM
I'd buy a storm hoodie if they did one.
Most of the long sleeve training gear uses Storm tech materials if that's a reasonable compromise for now.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on July 02, 2016, 03:21:05 PM
Had a look at the new stuff in the shop in town. Looks nice and seems decent quality. Prices are ridiculous though.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tom_Mc9? on July 02, 2016, 03:53:03 PM
Isn't 'football shirts feel cheap' the way they always are? Whatever they're made out of, they're never worth £50 so it's always a rip off.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: willenhall villa on July 02, 2016, 04:22:07 PM
Club shop was the busiest I've seen it on a non match day for a good while. Usual comments about the shade of claret and the shade of blue. Purchased mine anyway, and a season ticket to boot!!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT on July 02, 2016, 04:49:36 PM
Isn't 'football shirts feel cheap' the way they always are? Whatever they're made out of, they're never worth £50 so it's always a rip off.

I remember the Reebok kit of 1996, nice quality - mate of mine worked at a golf club who had a contract with Reebok and he ordered two shirts for us. The cost the Golf club £9 each. Even then they were selling for £35. I dread to think what the actual worth of them was, I'm guessing it's still as cheap as today.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: class-of-82 on July 02, 2016, 05:01:45 PM
Anyone else had probs using online store?
Tells me next day delivery £6.95 yet when I click on delivery options only 3-4 days delivery at £4.95 there
Also can't see an option to use my villa cash even though I have updated my account with my client ref number
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on July 02, 2016, 11:10:10 PM
The prices for kids stuff is nuts. And why does it have the main sponsor on it and not Acorns? I get it as an adult, but surely we can spare the kids having to be walking billboards for QB?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Stirchley Villain on July 02, 2016, 11:39:58 PM
I looked at the shirts today as I walked past the club shop. They look and feel cheap. I'm quite disappointed as I thought UA stuff would be better quality.

HeatGear feels cheap?! No way.

Well whatever "HeatGear" is it feels like an old lady's nightie.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tuscans on July 02, 2016, 11:54:04 PM
Are these Premier League prices for a club in the Championship? I'm sure most clubs are selling their's at £45.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wozwebs on July 03, 2016, 12:12:36 AM
The prices for kids stuff is nuts. And why does it have the main sponsor on it and not Acorns? I get it as an adult, but surely we can spare the kids having to be walking billboards for QB?

Had Acorns on kids shirts because couldn't have betting sponsors on them
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on July 03, 2016, 12:55:28 AM
The prices for kids stuff is nuts. And why does it have the main sponsor on it and not Acorns? I get it as an adult, but surely we can spare the kids having to be walking billboards for QB?

Had Acorns on kids shirts because couldn't have betting sponsors on them

Yes I realise that but it would have been nice to have continued that as opposed to the main sponsor. That or nothing at all.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wittonwarrior on July 03, 2016, 08:35:53 AM
feel like starting a justgiving page - just to afford one of the kits.  Vastly overpriced.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: exiled on the wirral! on July 03, 2016, 09:00:12 AM
I only buy long sleeved shirts..are they selling them because there not on the website to buy?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PROVERBS1966 on July 03, 2016, 09:48:55 AM
Has anyone seen a picture of the home shorts and socks ?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: in exile on July 03, 2016, 10:56:43 AM
I looked at the shirts today as I walked past the club shop. They look and feel cheap. I'm quite disappointed as I thought UA stuff would be better quality.

HeatGear feels cheap?! No way.

Well whatever "HeatGear" is it feels like an old lady's nightie.

I can't be the only one thinking it but I'm not going to be the one to ask him
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: four fornicholl on July 03, 2016, 11:03:11 AM
I looked at the shirts today as I walked past the club shop. They look and feel cheap. I'm quite disappointed as I thought UA stuff would be better quality.

HeatGear feels cheap?! No way.

Well whatever "HeatGear" is it feels like an old lady's nightie.

I can't be the only one thinking it but I'm not going to be the one to ask him
I know which one ill be having a feel of first.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on July 03, 2016, 02:10:23 PM
Has anyone seen a picture of the home shorts and socks ?

(http://shop.avfc.co.uk/cms_media/images/380x905_fitbox-c13003075_h2.jpg)(http://shop.avfc.co.uk/cms_media/images/380x905_fitbox-c13003075_033.jpg)

(http://shop.avfc.co.uk/cms_media/images/380x905_fitbox-cc13003077_h2.jpg)(http://shop.avfc.co.uk/cms_media/images/380x905_fitbox-cc13003077_r2.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: VILLA MOLE on July 03, 2016, 02:19:27 PM
I looked at the shirts today as I walked past the club shop. They look and feel cheap. I'm quite disappointed as I thought UA stuff would be better quality.

HeatGear feels cheap?! No way.

Well whatever "HeatGear" is it feels like an old lady's nightie.

I can't be the only one thinking it but I'm not going to be the one to ask him
I know which one ill be having a feel of first.


takes all sorts ask Wayne Rooney
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: VancouverLion on July 04, 2016, 03:36:58 AM
Proper Villa socks, finally!!!  :D
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Axl Rose on July 04, 2016, 03:46:37 AM
Are these Premier League prices for a club in the Championship? I'm sure most clubs are selling their's at £45.

I walked into one of the main football shops in Tokyo, yesterday. They weren't selling anything Villa related, but you could buy a Hull home shirt for 11,000 Yen(about £80). Insanity!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: tomd2103 on July 04, 2016, 10:56:48 AM
They look really good. Best looking for years.

Minor grumble, but the only thing I don't like is the collar on the home shirt.  Really like the away kit though.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: peter w on July 04, 2016, 11:29:18 AM
That's the best bit for me, the collars. As well as the colours obviously.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Dave Cooper please on July 04, 2016, 01:17:08 PM
Seen better... had worse.

Story of my life.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ktvillan on July 04, 2016, 05:07:29 PM
Went to buy a couple of home shirts for my kids today but they 'd had to send them all back as they had been marked with the wrong sizes.  Won't be available until September apparently.   In any case I decided I wouldn't pay 84 quid for two shirts that aren't even in Villa colours.   I held one next to the retro shirts from the 60s 70s and 80s and there is no comparison. The latter are a lovely rich shade of proper claret, and a deep shade of sky blue on the sleeves.  The new ones are purple and lilac West Ham looking tat.   Avoid.  Anyone know where I can retro shirts for small kids?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on July 04, 2016, 07:36:24 PM
All the pictures of the "claret" training kit so far look more purple-ish than claret...is the colour on the training kits the same as the home kit?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TopDeck113 on July 04, 2016, 08:03:19 PM
Re: "heatgear" - I really like my new running gear made from this material.  I only bought it because of the Villa association, so a bit of ancillary business that UA have got on the back of the Villa deal.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tuscans on July 04, 2016, 11:03:53 PM
Are these Premier League prices for a club in the Championship? I'm sure most clubs are selling their's at £45.

I walked into one of the main football shops in Tokyo, yesterday. They weren't selling anything Villa related, but you could buy a Hull home shirt for 11,000 Yen(about £80). Insanity!
That's a two-up two-down in Hull.

Pop over the road, how are all those Villa shirts selling in China?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: villadelph on July 05, 2016, 06:10:15 PM
Southampton's kits are awful!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Duncan Shaw on July 05, 2016, 07:13:28 PM
All the pictures of the "claret" training kit so far look more purple-ish than claret...is the colour on the training kits the same as the home kit?
i was thinking that, hopefully not!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on July 05, 2016, 07:48:53 PM
Southampton's kits are awful!

You're not wrong there. Reminiscent of Sheffield United back in the drug-fuelled 90s
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: avfcpg on July 05, 2016, 10:30:31 PM
Haven't bought a home shirt for years as not all that impressed with them lately but have bought this one, came today and love it. Collar looks great imo and there's just something very nostalgic and historic about it.. it's very "Aston Villa".
Quality is good as you would expect from UA. It's lightweight yes, but that's what sportswear is...Good job UA / AVFC
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Duncan Shaw on July 06, 2016, 09:34:39 AM
And is the colour good avfcpg?  Not the purple we see on the pics of the training kit?  Haven't managed to see it in the flesh myself yet.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: itbrvilla on July 06, 2016, 10:01:19 AM
And is the colour good avfcpg?  Not the purple we see on the pics of the training kit?  Haven't managed to see it in the flesh myself yet.
It should be fine as the club give a detailed brand guide to those making things for the club with specific colour criteria used for kits.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: avfcpg on July 06, 2016, 11:26:32 AM
And is the colour good avfcpg?  Not the purple we see on the pics of the training kit?  Haven't managed to see it in the flesh myself yet.

I've got the 1980/81 retro home shirt and both the claret and the blue are lighter shades on the new UA kit. Still, looks great though I think.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Axl Rose on July 06, 2016, 11:36:04 AM
Are these Premier League prices for a club in the Championship? I'm sure most clubs are selling their's at £45.

I walked into one of the main football shops in Tokyo, yesterday. They weren't selling anything Villa related, but you could buy a Hull home shirt for 11,000 Yen(about £80). Insanity!
That's a two-up two-down in Hull.

Pop over the road, how are all those Villa shirts selling in China?


Haha. I'll be asking a few mates to check this out for me!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CJ on July 06, 2016, 12:47:41 PM
Wonder when/whether they'll be adding more to the 'fashion' range. I'm too old and fat to be seen wearing a replica shirt in public so I usually wear a polo shirt - my current one is starting to show signs of wear (as well as shrinking while it was in the wardrobe for the past couple of months) and the only UA one they've got at the minute is a drab grey one at £44.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ktvillan on July 06, 2016, 01:02:05 PM
And is the colour good avfcpg?  Not the purple we see on the pics of the training kit?  Haven't managed to see it in the flesh myself yet.
It should be fine as the club give a detailed brand guide to those making things for the club with specific colour criteria used for kits.

Unfortunately somewhere along the line between Nike and Macron, and on to UA,  the specific colour criteria provided do not reflect traditional Aston Villa colours.  As a result the colour is far from fine.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on July 06, 2016, 01:02:59 PM
I just been to the club shop I can confirm that it's plum/purple
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: sirlordbaltimore on July 06, 2016, 01:04:16 PM
I just been to the club shop I can confirm that it's plum/purple

This
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: in exile on July 06, 2016, 01:12:33 PM
Southampton's kits are awful!

You're not wrong there. Reminiscent of Sheffield United back in the drug-fuelled 90s

I just had a look. Under Armour have done a really good job for us by the look of it
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Proposition Joe on July 06, 2016, 01:12:46 PM
As purple as the Diadora NTL JPA-era shirt?

Is it like, how much more purple can it be and is the answer none, none more purple?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Quiet Lion on July 06, 2016, 01:18:02 PM
Got my training stuff through today, seems a really good quality.

I will be the best dressed person down the gym tonight.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: nodge on July 06, 2016, 02:10:35 PM
As purple as the Diadora NTL JPA-era shirt?

Is it like, how much more purple can it be and is the answer none, none more purple?

Or, as purple as purpletrousers' trousers?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: stuart r on July 06, 2016, 03:56:14 PM
As purple as the Diadora NTL JPA-era shirt?

Is it like, how much more purple can it be and is the answer none, none more purple?

Or, as purple as purpletrousers' trousers?

Would Prince (RIP) have liked it? He loved purple. Is it that purple? Villa should walk out to 'Purple Rain' purple?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Clampy on July 06, 2016, 05:19:21 PM
I just been to the club shop I can confirm that it's plum/purple

They had to refurbish it in some colour I suppose.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on July 06, 2016, 05:32:50 PM
I just been to the club shop I can confirm that it's plum/purple

This
Bumped into a lad wearing the new shirt at the Doc's in Kiddy last night.
It's that funny WHam purple, not "claret" imho.


The claret - and blue - on the ACORNS shirt was our best I reckon.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on July 06, 2016, 07:21:46 PM
I just been to the club shop I can confirm that it's plum/purple

They had to refurbish it in some colour I suppose.

Ha ha was the one in town though
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: villadelph on July 08, 2016, 02:45:19 AM
Are there little stick figures in the numbers?

Still no long sleeve..?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: villabear on July 08, 2016, 06:46:58 AM
I've not been anywhere yet to look at the new kit or training gear but on all the images especially yesterday when the team were travelling it all looked a bit purple to me.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wozwebs on July 08, 2016, 08:14:58 AM
Are there little stick figures in the numbers?

Still no long sleeve..?

Stick figures are for Prostate Cancer charity
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Witton Warrior on July 08, 2016, 08:16:54 AM
My mate brought in the new kit to show me (he works for Villa Ladies) and I was stunned at the prices - Rucksack £42, gloves £20, hat £20, shorts £32, t-shirt £50, training shirt (long-sleeved thing with a zip) £80, trackie bottoms £50 (may have been more) - a total of £294! He is collecting his stadium jacket £100 and bench coat £150 next week - that's the price of a Season Ticket!!!

He used to get me the odd shirt for my lad but there won't be anything this year for sure...
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Witton Warrior on July 08, 2016, 08:17:48 AM
Forgot the socks at £16 ;-)

And yes, it's purple....
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: villabear on July 08, 2016, 08:58:29 AM
1980/81 Shirt colour next time please
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Steve67 on July 08, 2016, 09:04:05 AM
The more I see the new clobber, the more I like it.  The track suits are really smart.  Might buy one.  I'm not so keen on the home kit, love the away one though.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Chico Hamilton III on July 08, 2016, 09:07:30 AM
The prices really are taking the piss out of supporters. Both for the kit and the training stuff.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Bottom Right 89 on July 08, 2016, 09:26:04 AM
Suggestion for the new owners to endere themselves to our supporters - Free shirt at the first home game of the season.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: avfcpg on July 08, 2016, 10:56:57 AM
And yet if it's to be believed, the opening day sales were up 214%.
Maybe the lure of Under Armour and a decent design...even if the colours are not absolutely to the liking of many on here.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ktvillan on July 08, 2016, 11:19:32 AM
I think the design is pretty good and it would be a decent kit if not for the colour issue.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Stirchley Villain on July 08, 2016, 11:36:56 AM
Suggestion for the new owners to endere themselves to our supporters - Free shirt at the first home game of the season.
And wipe out nearly all of their shirt revenue??!!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: pauliewalnuts on July 08, 2016, 03:02:40 PM
I like the away one a lot. The home one less so.

At least they're not plastered with all those non-needed extra details the Macron shirts were.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ChicagoLion on July 09, 2016, 09:47:24 AM
Checked them out in the City Centre shop, the home shirt is a decent design but the colour is more cerise than claret.
Even the replica shirts are of poor quality.
It is a real shame that our merchandise is generally crap and cheap looking.
Did not buy anything.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on July 09, 2016, 10:05:15 AM
I don't think they are cheap Just the way they are made. My personal opinion anyway
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wittonwarrior on July 09, 2016, 05:31:48 PM
The colour on the home shirts :-[

Its not Villa.  Who ever rubber stamped the production of the home shirt needs sacking.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: VILLA MOLE on July 09, 2016, 05:36:00 PM
The colour on the home shirts :-[

Its not Villa.  Who ever rubber stamped the production of the home shirt needs sacking.

that bloody tom  fox
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wittonwarrior on July 09, 2016, 05:37:14 PM
its just wrong.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: tomd2103 on July 09, 2016, 07:43:10 PM
The colour on the home shirts :-[

Its not Villa.  Who ever rubber stamped the production of the home shirt needs sacking.

Saw someone wearing one while I was out earlier.  The blue on the sleeves is very pale blue, but it is a nice shirt.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Duncan Shaw on July 10, 2016, 09:08:39 PM
They are great looking shirts, the pics from the first game confirm that, but the colours, I just can't understand how they got OK'd.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: oswald funkletrumpet on July 11, 2016, 08:29:18 PM
kitbag have got the colour sussed

 
Aston Villa Home Shirt 2016-17 Purple
£54.99
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: olaftab on July 11, 2016, 08:39:27 PM
Like the design. Blue is not blue enough on home shirt. Away looks good but of course I won't buy one with that horrific Quickbooks logo on it!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: olaftab on July 11, 2016, 08:40:18 PM
I also like the new Villa website. Very smooth.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pete3206 on July 12, 2016, 07:47:07 PM
Humble Jonathan (https://www.avfc.co.uk/News/2016/07/12/kit-launch-jonathan-fear-story)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: four fornicholl on July 12, 2016, 07:54:51 PM
The OS seems to have also joined in with the claret and blue bandwagon.
One of the problems with this is, the new home shirt isn't fucking claret! Nowhere near!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on July 14, 2016, 12:54:12 PM
Is any more stuff going to come out? Doesn't seem much in the way of polo shirts? Just been down shop in town. They don't have anything. All I can find online is that Grey one
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on July 14, 2016, 02:00:24 PM
The jacket RDM has been wearing is nice.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Walmley_Villa on July 14, 2016, 04:39:08 PM
Nice to see the Villa gear in JD in the BHX departure lounge - note also cheaper than at VP etc...
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: UK Redsox on July 15, 2016, 08:09:04 AM
Time to stop the moaning, things could be worse

(http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/onesport/cps/624/cpsprodpb/536F/production/_90395312_hearts_kit1_twitter.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT on July 15, 2016, 08:51:48 AM
Time to stop the moaning, things could be worse

(http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/onesport/cps/624/cpsprodpb/536F/production/_90395312_hearts_kit1_twitter.jpg)

That's like the old Fruit salad wrapper.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on July 15, 2016, 08:54:18 AM
They took inspiration for the colours from a Battenberg cake
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: villabear on July 15, 2016, 09:06:16 AM
Time to stop the moaning, things could be worse

(http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/onesport/cps/624/cpsprodpb/536F/production/_90395312_hearts_kit1_twitter.jpg)

That's like the old Fruit salad wrapper.

That background colour looks a bit nearer the colour our home shirts should be. Not plummy purple.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Hillbilly on July 15, 2016, 11:27:49 AM
Time to stop the moaning, things could be worse

(http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/onesport/cps/624/cpsprodpb/536F/production/_90395312_hearts_kit1_twitter.jpg)
Scotland sometimes play in pink and yellow so not totally without precedent.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on July 15, 2016, 11:42:02 AM
He looks fucking thrilled to be the wanker chosen to model that abomination.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ricky on July 15, 2016, 11:46:38 AM
An homage to the 5th Earl of Rosebery apparently.  Plenty about it on the Jambo's website.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ad@m on July 15, 2016, 02:16:50 PM
How the fuck did they get Puma to agree to make that?!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: in exile on July 15, 2016, 04:03:38 PM
Tom Fox probably advised them
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Left Side on July 15, 2016, 04:22:17 PM
Looks like Mr.Blobby's football kit.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on July 15, 2016, 06:05:31 PM
They took inspiration for the colours from a Battenberg cake

Mr Kipling makes exceedingly bad kits.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: oswald funkletrumpet on July 15, 2016, 07:19:09 PM
Time to stop the moaning, things could be worse

(http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/onesport/cps/624/cpsprodpb/536F/production/_90395312_hearts_kit1_twitter.jpg)

new shirt wanker
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on July 15, 2016, 09:00:53 PM
I quite fancy a Trebor fruit salad now
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: adrenachrome on July 15, 2016, 11:47:43 PM
I quite fancy a Trebor fruit salad now

(http://waytofamous.com/images/kenneth-williams-06.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on July 16, 2016, 06:30:44 AM
Is any more stuff going to come out? Doesn't seem much in the way of polo shirts? Just been down shop in town. They don't have anything. All I can find online is that Grey one
There are a couple of Under Armour polo shirts (http://shop.avfc.co.uk/training-2016-17/adult-training/t-shirts-polos/index.html?via=navflood)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: in exile on July 16, 2016, 09:17:03 AM
You had better hurry up and get one or two Phil.
At those prices they will fly off the shelf
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: amfy on July 16, 2016, 11:01:55 AM
Has anyone else noticed that in all the pictures of pre-season, the squad are all wearing matching kit?

No matter whether they are playing, out cycling, having a karaoke session in the evening, they are all dressed the same - All in the same raglan sleeved T shirt, or all in the same polo shirt.

It not only looks really smart, I think it is a tactic in building the sense of 'team' we were missing last season, and making them feel like a unit. There's no, choosing from the overall range and 'finding your own style' - you're in the army now boys!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on July 16, 2016, 03:01:09 PM
Has anyone else noticed that in all the pictures of pre-season, the squad are all wearing matching kit?

No matter whether they are playing, out cycling, having a karaoke session in the evening, they are all dressed the same - All in the same raglan sleeved T shirt, or all in the same polo shirt.

It not only looks really smart, I think it is a tactic in building the sense of 'team' we were missing last season, and making them feel like a unit. There's no, choosing from the overall range and 'finding your own style' - you're in the army now boys!

It appears to be having the desired affect too. Everything also is a lot more structured and there seems to be much more discipline. I suppose that comes from manager down but importantly by having two very established coaches on the staff that know the domestic game and two coaches from Italy who have also operated at the highest level. It also helps that all of the background noise and bullshit has gone. We actually have a board that understands the game and have been around it for a long time. At least on the surface it feels the most settled pre season preparation for a long time. That can only help matters going into the season.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on July 16, 2016, 03:07:48 PM
You had better hurry up and get one or two Phil.
At those prices they will fly off the shelf

And 40 sheets for a training t shirt. Are Sheffield Wednesday pricing this gear up for us?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Dave Wall on July 16, 2016, 07:35:42 PM
Been in club shop today it's quality stuff well made I think
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Salsa Party Animal on July 16, 2016, 08:21:02 PM
Saw the new home shirt, look nice and good quality, but it should be proper claret not purple/claret Why do the club keep getting the colours wrong.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AlexAlexCropley on July 16, 2016, 08:24:25 PM
With this new top, what's the fitting like under the arms?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on July 16, 2016, 08:26:51 PM
You had better hurry up and get one or two Phil.
At those prices they will fly off the shelf

I know ha.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: MonsXI on July 16, 2016, 08:27:15 PM
The home shirt is claret ffs!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: oswald funkletrumpet on July 16, 2016, 09:00:40 PM
The home shirt is claret ffs!

it really isnt
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on July 16, 2016, 09:04:29 PM
I assume UA were provided with a Pantone colour to match and that would have been the official club standard.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Lastfootstamper on July 16, 2016, 09:06:45 PM
The home shirt is claret ffs!

it really isnt

When I first saw it on the OS, I wondered what all the fuss was about, it looked claret.

Now, having seen pictures of it being worn in the friendlies, it does appear to have a distinct purpleness.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on July 16, 2016, 09:33:10 PM
The home shirt is claret ffs!
From the pictures I've seen all over the interwebs and from our friendlies in particular, the home shirt definitely isn't claret by any stretch of the imagination. I still need to go down the Villa shop and see it for myself to be fair.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on July 16, 2016, 09:52:04 PM
It does look purple to me
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on July 16, 2016, 09:55:46 PM
It's definitely not our traditional claret. It's not purple either. It's clarple.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OCD on July 16, 2016, 10:16:24 PM
Robbie Di Matteo's Clarple and Blue army.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Salsa Party Animal on July 17, 2016, 01:04:12 AM
Then we need to have a word with the club and tell them we want proper claret not clarple ;)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wittonwarrior on July 17, 2016, 10:57:12 AM
It's definitely not our traditional claret. It's not purple either. It's clarple.

I think that's stating the obvious.  Could be the best made shirt in the world  but the colour is wrong. Have a good day  :)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pete3206 on July 17, 2016, 12:29:15 PM
Look at a Burnley shirt. That is claret.

Not difficult UA

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ChicagoLion on July 17, 2016, 01:17:53 PM
Look at a Burnley shirt. That is claret.

Not difficult UA
exactly.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: cdbearsfan on July 17, 2016, 01:54:51 PM
Every year people moan about the shade of claret. It's perfectly fine. Some people just like moaning.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pete3206 on July 17, 2016, 02:28:56 PM
Every year people moan about the shade of claret. It's perfectly fine. Some people just like moaning.

I reserve the right to quibble over inconsequential details in less than serious topics.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: pauliewalnuts on July 17, 2016, 08:26:29 PM
Every year people moan about the shade of claret. It's perfectly fine. Some people just like moaning.

Maybe people just disagree with you? That doesn't make it moaning. "It's perfectly fine" is a subjective statement.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: cdbearsfan on July 17, 2016, 08:35:45 PM
I think you'll find I'm an authority on moaning!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Si on July 18, 2016, 08:34:22 PM
In Birmingham today, popped into the Villa Park shop to buy the claret polo shirt. Out of stock. Assistant had no idea  when more would be in. Disappointed when half the shop is full of replica kit. Some of us oldies don't want to buy replica kit, so a good stock level of training kit  would surely make sense. For the record first time I have seen the shirt in the flesh. The claret is fine, but the blue is too pale.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: stuart r on July 27, 2016, 12:22:04 PM
Just saw the new home shirt 'live' for the first time. Very nice top. Is it available in Villa colours?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Deano's Mullet on July 27, 2016, 04:21:36 PM
Every photo I see from these pre season friendlies it looks a very light plum colour. Doesn't look right at all.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: mattjpa on July 27, 2016, 04:27:44 PM
The claret on the home shirt may not be the right claret according to traditionalists but its a nice sharp colour. I think its more fashionable than the traditional colour. The shirt is really good quality, nice thin, light material. Shame about the away one, I think they over complicated the collar area but I guess they will capture most peoples tastes across the two. I also fit in the small shirt which is a bonus! The proof will be its lastability though, Ive still got Nike shirts that have lasted better than the Macron ones....
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on July 27, 2016, 04:32:58 PM
Look at a Burnley shirt. That is claret.

Not difficult UA
exactly.
Agree.

Just been on their site...they look like us! Except they have proper footballers... they are using "Prepared" as their "slogan"...have they always? Just this season? Have we let them borrow it for a bit until we're back in the Prem?

Cheeky feckers!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ktvillan on July 27, 2016, 06:51:00 PM
The claret on the home shirt may not be the right claret according to traditionalists but its a nice sharp colour. I think its more fashionable than the traditional colour. The shirt is really good quality, nice thin, light material. Shame about the away one, I think they over complicated the collar area but I guess they will capture most peoples tastes across the two. I also fit in the small shirt which is a bonus! The proof will be its lastability though, Ive still got Nike shirts that have lasted better than the Macron ones....

I doubt Arsenal, Liverpool or Man Yoo fans would be content with a nice sharp shade of pink just because it's fashionable, or Everton, Chelsea and Leicester fans would be happy if their traditional blue suddenly developed more than a hint of purple or turquoise.  Bollocks to fashion, we're Villa and we play in claret and blue and this shirt aint claret and blue.  And neither were the Macron atrocities.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: stuart445 on July 27, 2016, 07:21:44 PM
I'm beginning to think Claret doesn't exist as regardless of what design / make we have it's never right. If this shirt was a different shade someone on here would be saying it isn't Claret 
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ting Tong Tony on July 29, 2016, 09:16:14 AM
Would be great if we could get Umbro back in the future, As Mary Hopkins once sang " Those where the days my friend..." Andy Lochead, Chico, Willie Anderson to name but a few.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: exigo on July 29, 2016, 01:22:01 PM
It's perfectly possible that the claret and blue Pantone references have been changed as part of the new brand update. Everything else will then change to match them. These are the old colourways from the Villa brand guidelines 2014.

(http://i577.photobucket.com/albums/ss215/andypowell74/Screen%20Shot%202016-07-29%20at%2013.17.29_zpsft1ndb18.png) (http://s577.photobucket.com/user/andypowell74/media/Screen%20Shot%202016-07-29%20at%2013.17.29_zpsft1ndb18.png.html)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on July 29, 2016, 01:30:21 PM
Would be great if we could get Umbro back in the future, As Mary Hopkins once sang " Those where the days my friend..." Andy Lochead, Chico, Willie Anderson to name but a few.

...not to mention Gary Penrice, Andy Comyn and Paul Mortimer
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AV82EC on July 29, 2016, 01:34:54 PM
It's perfectly possible that the claret and blue Pantone references have been changed as part of the new brand update. Everything else will then change to match them. These are the old colourways from the Villa brand guidelines 2014.

(http://i577.photobucket.com/albums/ss215/andypowell74/Screen%20Shot%202016-07-29%20at%2013.17.29_zpsft1ndb18.png) (http://s577.photobucket.com/user/andypowell74/media/Screen%20Shot%202016-07-29%20at%2013.17.29_zpsft1ndb18.png.html)

My view is that's too "red" but not being anything like a colours expert I don't know what you'd have to do to make it more claret? Can someone not dig out an old late 70s Umbro shirt and just match it? My recollection is that it was darker than this....
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ktvillan on July 29, 2016, 02:19:28 PM
It's perfectly possible that the claret and blue Pantone references have been changed as part of the new brand update. Everything else will then change to match them. These are the old colourways from the Villa brand guidelines 2014.

(http://i577.photobucket.com/albums/ss215/andypowell74/Screen%20Shot%202016-07-29%20at%2013.17.29_zpsft1ndb18.png) (http://s577.photobucket.com/user/andypowell74/media/Screen%20Shot%202016-07-29%20at%2013.17.29_zpsft1ndb18.png.html)

My view is that's too "red" but not being anything like a colours expert I don't know what you'd have to do to make it more claret? Can someone not dig out an old late 70s Umbro shirt and just match it? My recollection is that it was darker than this....

Those colours look pretty good to me in terms of the Villa colours I grew up with.  They are close to both the retro shirt in the Villa shop and the recent Nike strips. 
 
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pat McMahon on July 29, 2016, 02:33:49 PM
Look at a Burnley shirt. That is claret.

Not difficult UA



Agreed - our kit just doesn't look right, whereas Burnley seem to consistently get it right. I haven't really liked our home kits since the Nike Acorns version.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on July 29, 2016, 08:14:46 PM
Look at a Burnley shirt. That is claret.

Not difficult UA



Agreed - our kit just doesn't look right, whereas Burnley seem to consistently get it right. I haven't really liked our home kits since the Nike Acorns version.

This one was a belter.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-TtQ3xy9fhgc/TimdGsrHlmI/AAAAAAAAADk/GMD45jm8AIY/s1600/Aston+Villa+Home+Kit+2011-12.jpg

I wish we went back to black socks again.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: stuart445 on July 30, 2016, 02:06:32 AM
It's perfectly possible that the claret and blue Pantone references have been changed as part of the new brand update. Everything else will then change to match them. These are the old colourways from the Villa brand guidelines 2014.

(http://i577.photobucket.com/albums/ss215/andypowell74/Screen%20Shot%202016-07-29%20at%2013.17.29_zpsft1ndb18.png) (http://s577.photobucket.com/user/andypowell74/media/Screen%20Shot%202016-07-29%20at%2013.17.29_zpsft1ndb18.png.html)

My view is that's too "red" but not being anything like a colours expert I don't know what you'd have to do to make it more claret? Can someone not dig out an old late 70s Umbro shirt and just match it? My recollection is that it was darker than this....

And I think that is my point proven
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ktvillan on July 30, 2016, 12:24:18 PM
On my work pc yesterday the colours posted looked fine, today on my personal laptop the claret looks more purple. 
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wittonwarrior on July 30, 2016, 12:44:08 PM
The colours on the kits are hidieous. Definitely not claret and the blue is so light. Photos of the kits are the best propaganda ever ps even the villa shop in town needs re planning set out all over the place like a mini sports direct
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Chico Hamilton III on July 30, 2016, 06:04:34 PM
Kids' shirts not available yet? Just tried to order one from the website. Summer holidays must be the optimum time to flog new shirts? Not a great start. Due to the inconvenience, they have reduced the price on pre order to £37.50 for a youth size. Cheers.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT Villan on July 30, 2016, 07:49:44 PM
On my work pc yesterday the colours posted looked fine, today on my personal laptop the claret looks more purple. 

If your monitors aren't calibrated then you may not be seeing true color reproduction on them. I have two different brands of monitor that I have somewhat manually calibrated and I still see differences in color rendition between the two.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Stirchley Villain on July 30, 2016, 08:22:14 PM
I would describe the colour as washed purple.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Pat McMahon on August 05, 2016, 02:20:10 PM
I was drinking around Kings Cross station last night and hordes of West Ham fans were returning from the stadium. Unlike our shirts their claret looks about right but their sleeves are abysmal, a sort of aqua blue.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: villadelph on August 05, 2016, 02:57:41 PM
Do we get long sleeves this year or what?!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: amfy on February 16, 2017, 08:22:22 PM
I wasn't sure whether to use this or start a new thread as this is a slight departure.

I have just read that under armour support trophy killing of animals via the hashtag #uahunt

There is a petition about a boycott until they stop it. I have signed. I haven't got a link though because I'm not sure how to get it from Facebook and Twitter to here in my iPad.

I wish I had known about this before the fan consultation yesterday because I would have wanted to ask the club about it and see what pressure they can exert.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on February 16, 2017, 09:18:44 PM
I wasn't sure whether to use this or start a new thread as this is a slight departure.

I have just read that under armour support trophy killing of animals via the hashtag #uahunt

There is a petition about a boycott until they stop it. I have signed. I haven't got a link though because I'm not sure how to get it from Facebook and Twitter to here in my iPad.

I wish I had known about this before the fan consultation yesterday because I would have wanted to ask the club about it and see what pressure they can exert.

Under Armour CEO Kevin Plank (appropriate name), also suggested Donald Trump was good for the US economy and businesses which basically caused many of the key athletes they promote to blast him publicly. Plank had to retract his position very quickly. But then again the above is hardly surprising combined with the Trump thing when you look at these two fucking wankers:

(http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.2308096.1438190981!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_750/hunt30n-8-web.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OzVilla on February 16, 2017, 09:22:10 PM
What a c#%t.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ChicagoLion on February 16, 2017, 09:26:15 PM
Disgusting to kill such a beautiful animal for pleasure, what absoloutely xxxts
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: itbrvilla on February 16, 2017, 09:28:55 PM
I won't be bothering with any of their gear.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: andyh on February 16, 2017, 10:45:51 PM
Fucking wankers.

Bigger ****** than their orange dad
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: devilla on February 16, 2017, 10:59:41 PM
I won't be bothering with any of their gear.

Me neither. Here's a link to the petition:

https://www.change.org/p/please-take-the-pledge-not-to-purchase-under-armour-products-until-they-stop-endorsing-trophy-killers-and-profiting-off-the-blood-of-the-innocent (https://www.change.org/p/please-take-the-pledge-not-to-purchase-under-armour-products-until-they-stop-endorsing-trophy-killers-and-profiting-off-the-blood-of-the-innocent)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OzVilla on February 16, 2017, 11:06:46 PM
Thanks devilla.  All signed and my disgust has been lodged.

I truly do hate these people.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ACVilla on February 16, 2017, 11:16:04 PM
Signed.

Disgusted of Shenstone.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: in exile on February 17, 2017, 08:56:19 AM
I've signed also.
Thanks devilla
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Axl Rose on February 17, 2017, 09:06:13 AM
******. I haven't bought any of their overpriced crap, and won't ever be doing so.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Rotterdam on February 17, 2017, 09:10:10 AM
Signed.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AV82EC on February 17, 2017, 09:11:51 AM
Signed.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: sid1964 on February 17, 2017, 09:15:11 AM
That is horrifying.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Hookeysmith on February 17, 2017, 10:20:04 AM
signed

And I hope our marketing dept take note of peoples disgust at the association
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on February 17, 2017, 10:30:16 AM
Wankers!


signed!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Villan For Life on February 17, 2017, 10:38:38 AM
Some of my gym kit is UA. I won't be wearing it any longer. Bastards.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: simon ward 50 on February 17, 2017, 11:22:27 AM
Signed!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OzVilla on February 17, 2017, 11:55:14 AM
It's overpriced shit anyway. GymShark is miles better quality and it's owned by a Villa fan.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PGW on February 17, 2017, 12:01:11 PM
signed
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Dave Wall on February 17, 2017, 12:54:58 PM
Signed.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: E I Adio on February 17, 2017, 01:04:57 PM
Signed.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: cdbearsfan on February 17, 2017, 01:39:14 PM
Scum of the highest order. I hope our partnership ends with them after this season.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ian. on February 17, 2017, 01:49:22 PM
Signed last night as well.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: eamonn on February 17, 2017, 02:01:38 PM
It's overpriced shit anyway. GymShark is miles better quality and it's owned by a Villa fan.

Oh? Who?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Cleybrooke on February 17, 2017, 02:26:04 PM
Mr Plank played American Football with Phil Robertson (The Dad) from Duck Dynasty.  They remained friends and from that UA developed the DPM kit.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Left Side on February 17, 2017, 03:33:59 PM
Signed too
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ad@m on February 17, 2017, 04:29:34 PM
Whilst I agree with the principle of that petition it was set up in 2015 and it appears to have had no effect as of 2017.

Has anyone with a Twitter account pointed this issue out to the Villa's Twitter account?  I don't use Twitter but it seems to be the way to get an immediate reaction from organisations these days.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: tomd2103 on February 17, 2017, 04:36:40 PM
Disgusting to kill such a beautiful animal for pleasure, what absoloutely xxxts

I've never understood how anyone can derive any type of pleasure from killing a defenceless animal and how it can be referred to as being a sport. 
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ChicagoLion on February 17, 2017, 04:40:29 PM
Disgusting to kill such a beautiful animal for pleasure, what absoloutely xxxts

I've never understood how anyone can derive any type of pleasure from killing a defenceless animal and how it can be referred to as being a sport.
Sport would be to see that pair of c**** in a cage with a couple of those cats, now I would pay to see that.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AV82EC on February 17, 2017, 04:44:00 PM
Disgusting to kill such a beautiful animal for pleasure, what absoloutely xxxts

I've never understood how anyone can derive any type of pleasure from killing a defenceless animal and how it can be referred to as being a sport.

If you're going to eat it then fair enough (deer, bison etc) but do people eat some of these things they kill it's utterly bizarre. I mean do we need to kill mountain lions for food?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ChicagoLion on February 17, 2017, 04:48:09 PM
Disgusting to kill such a beautiful animal for pleasure, what absoloutely xxxts

I've never understood how anyone can derive any type of pleasure from killing a defenceless animal and how it can be referred to as being a sport.
A lot of big cats are endangered and these. Cxxxxx mentality is to make sure they get to kill one before they run out.
If you're going to eat it then fair enough (deer, bison etc) but do people eat some of these things they kill it's utterly bizarre. I mean do we need to kill mountain lions for food?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AV82EC on February 17, 2017, 04:56:30 PM
True CL hadn't thought of the scarcity angle.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Man With A Stick on February 17, 2017, 05:06:18 PM
Thunderc**ts.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Brend'Watkins on February 17, 2017, 05:07:17 PM
Leopards are an endangered species. These people continue to prosper. Maybe we could help the former to thrive By educating the latter.....with a whip.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: amfy on February 17, 2017, 05:24:09 PM
Whilst I agree with the principle of that petition it was set up in 2015 and it appears to have had no effect as of 2017.

Has anyone with a Twitter account pointed this issue out to the Villa's Twitter account?  I don't use Twitter but it seems to be the way to get an immediate reaction from organisations these days.

I didn't notice it had been going for that long and it's a shame not to have noticed this before in that case.

Still maybe if we can get biggish partners such as ourselves and Spurs on their case, to possibly make an impact on their perceived customer base, then maybe we can make a difference.

If we are more valuable to under armour than the trophy killers, and then they will drop the trophy killers, if we are not, they'll drop us - from where I sit, that is almost a win/win.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: FatSam on February 17, 2017, 08:44:07 PM
Signed.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Grande Pablo on February 17, 2017, 09:06:23 PM
St Pauli who are never backwards in coming forwards unhappy with UA CEO blessing Trump policy

http://www.goal.com/en/news/725/bundesliga/2017/02/10/32546162/st-pauli-hit-out-at-their-own-kit-manufacturer-after-trump
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OzVilla on February 17, 2017, 09:14:16 PM
It's overpriced shit anyway. GymShark is miles better quality and it's owned by a Villa fan.

Oh? Who?

www.gymshark.com

Company is based out of Redditch and was started by a former Aston Uni lad, Ben Francis, who happens to come from a staunchly Villa family. One to watch these.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: UK Redsox on February 17, 2017, 09:55:27 PM
It's overpriced shit anyway. GymShark is miles better quality and it's owned by a Villa fan.

Oh? Who?

www.gymshark.com

Company is based out of Redditch and was started by a former Aston Uni lad, Ben Francis, who happens to come from a staunchly Villa family. One to watch these.


Their shirts only go up to XL. Bloody sizeists.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: adrenachrome on February 17, 2017, 09:59:52 PM
It's overpriced shit anyway. GymShark is miles better quality and it's owned by a Villa fan.

Oh? Who?

www.gymshark.com

Company is based out of Redditch and was started by a former Aston Uni lad, Ben Francis, who happens to come from a staunchly Villa family. One to watch these.


Their shirts only go up to XL. Bloody sizeists.

As a matter of interest, UKR, how many Xs would satisfy the requirements of your substantial girth?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OzVilla on February 17, 2017, 10:23:32 PM
It's overpriced shit anyway. GymShark is miles better quality and it's owned by a Villa fan.

Oh? Who?

www.gymshark.com

Company is based out of Redditch and was started by a former Aston Uni lad, Ben Francis, who happens to come from a staunchly Villa family. One to watch these.


Their shirts only go up to XL. Bloody sizeists.

Yes, I'm not sure they're aimed at us middle aged beer swillers for shirts. The shorts are great though and the qualitys excellent if you can carry it off.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: tomd2103 on February 17, 2017, 10:36:14 PM
Disgusting to kill such a beautiful animal for pleasure, what absoloutely xxxts

I've never understood how anyone can derive any type of pleasure from killing a defenceless animal and how it can be referred to as being a sport.

If you're going to eat it then fair enough (deer, bison etc) but do people eat some of these things they kill it's utterly bizarre. I mean do we need to kill mountain lions for food?

Sorry, but I don't think it is fair enough when pretty much every type of meat can be easily purchased by people of most means.  Those who travel thousands of miles with the purpose of killing animals like those in that picture are particularly despicable though. 
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: stubbsyandy on February 17, 2017, 10:44:58 PM
Signed obv
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on February 18, 2017, 12:00:01 AM
The very sad bit is that outside of numerous other pictures of the Trump boys larging it with various species it's more common than we'd all like to think. You do have to be a special type of ****** to engage in this.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: dave shelley on February 18, 2017, 09:47:24 AM
Signed.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: dcdavecollett on February 18, 2017, 09:13:04 PM
Signed, too.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Chico Hamilton III on April 15, 2017, 11:23:49 AM
Kids' shirts are going for12 quid at Sportsdirect.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: KRS on April 15, 2017, 11:30:38 AM
Bit late but signed the petition.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: amfy on April 15, 2017, 11:42:58 AM
I asked about this at The Trust AGM and The club did query it and got back to me.

They said that Under Armour make sports equipment for a range of sports including hunting, but only support ethical hunting.

I honestly don't know how much credence to give this, but I am pleased that the club took it seriously and contacted Under Armour to voice their concerns, and got back to me.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ChicagoLion on April 15, 2017, 12:56:34 PM
Can we play in Claret and Blue next season?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: FatSam on April 18, 2017, 06:39:25 PM
I asked about this at The Trust AGM and The club did query it and got back to me.

They said that Under Armour make sports equipment for a range of sports including hunting, but only support ethical hunting.

I honestly don't know how much credence to give this, but I am pleased that the club took it seriously and contacted Under Armour to voice their concerns, and got back to me.

It's good to know that the club took your query seriously. However, I won't be buying any UA merchandise whilst they support hunting of any kind. I appreciate this is a personal view, especially as it's even a source of disagreement within my own family.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: devilla on April 22, 2017, 12:45:52 PM
I asked about this at The Trust AGM and The club did query it and got back to me.

They said that Under Armour make sports equipment for a range of sports including hunting, but only support ethical hunting.

I honestly don't know how much credence to give this, but I am pleased that the club took it seriously and contacted Under Armour to voice their concerns, and got back to me.

It's good to know that the club took your query seriously. However, I won't be buying any UA merchandise whilst they support hunting of any kind. I appreciate this is a personal view, especially as it's even a source of disagreement within my own family.

I'd like to know what they think "ethical" hunting is. Persnally, I don't like hunting of any kind.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on April 06, 2018, 12:08:40 PM
We will moving to a new kit supplier for the 2018/19 season.

From Pravda

No more UA (https://www.avfc.co.uk/News/2018/04/06/aston-villa-under-armour-announcement)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Risso on April 06, 2018, 12:14:15 PM
Good riddance. 
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AsTallAsLions on April 06, 2018, 12:15:08 PM
Edit: disregard. Been a long morning and had forgotten about the hunting nonsense. Obviously far more significant than the colour or quality of the kits. Good riddance indeed.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Sexual Ealing on April 06, 2018, 12:15:24 PM
Clearly used the same PR person who announces manager sackings.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ad@m on April 06, 2018, 12:21:23 PM
Good riddance. 

Seconded.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AsTallAsLions on April 06, 2018, 12:31:43 PM
And on that note... some very poor taste from the Mail:

(http://image.ibb.co/bJ2nux/image.png)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: dave shelley on April 06, 2018, 12:33:46 PM
My guess is that they're too thick to realise what they've done there.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Dave P on April 06, 2018, 01:05:16 PM
^ Agreed.  Don't think that was a deliberate pun.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 06, 2018, 01:14:23 PM
Adidas/Nike/Umbro hopefully.

With crest change.

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: wittonwarrior on April 06, 2018, 01:17:55 PM
Would love relationship with Adidas as there claret and blue is the right colour but probably less chance than me becoming manager of the villa
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Left Side on April 06, 2018, 03:44:12 PM
As long as it isn't Macron, good those were dreadful years for the kit and the team.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: bodkins14 on April 06, 2018, 03:55:35 PM
Don't want nike with their generic templates. To be honest I think Puma have done a brilliant kit for Burnley.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: andyh on April 06, 2018, 03:59:27 PM
Watching those programs about when English clubs ruled Europe made me very nostalgic for the Umbro kit from back then.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on April 06, 2018, 04:03:11 PM
Let's hope that whoever it is, the new supplier comes up with a proper claret and blue home kit, is able to get stock into the shops for the summer, and can maintain supply of the kids kits until Xmas.  I know it's a big ask!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Leicester_Villian on April 06, 2018, 04:08:49 PM
We will have to wait until new season begins to be able to buy kit .....
My guess is no deal will be agreed until we know which division we will play in next season, then it will take time to manufacture etc
I am disappointed as feel the leisure wear has been great this year ...good quality and the mint colour was great
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Chris Stares on April 06, 2018, 04:18:01 PM
Very pleased to hear we're disassociating ourselves with UA.  I have refused to buy any Villa gear made by UA due to their links to, and support for, hunting, and especially sports/trophy hunting.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on April 06, 2018, 04:22:16 PM
This one is still my favourite from recent years. Simple design, right colours, great sponsor and team that players in it was pretty good too.

(http://thumb.ibb.co/fmC1Mc/3_C95_ADE2_7_BD5_4438_AA0_A_7_DE3_CC2_A4_ED8.jpg) (http://ibb.co/fmC1Mc)


Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: leylandalbion on April 06, 2018, 05:31:34 PM
Makes sense now that loads of training gear has been released on the rewards site.  I'll be stocking up for the kids!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Left Side on April 06, 2018, 05:38:42 PM
How long was the original deal with UA, I seem to think it was 4 years but not sure?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: purpletrousers on April 06, 2018, 05:40:56 PM
Very pleased to hear we're disassociating ourselves with UA.  I have refused to buy any Villa gear made by UA due to their links to, and support for, hunting, and especially sports/trophy hunting.
Indeed, never liked boycotting my own club.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Man With A Stick on April 06, 2018, 06:51:29 PM
Umbro please.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AsTallAsLions on April 06, 2018, 07:38:47 PM
Umbro please.

Agreed
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: curiousorange on April 06, 2018, 09:56:59 PM
Aren't there any nice Hummel kits knocking about these days?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 06, 2018, 10:01:19 PM
To be honest the manufacturer doesn't matter to me if the crest is still Lerner's one.

If it's changed then I'll buy a shirt again.

Otherwise no.

80s or 2000-07 crest is fine, either will do.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: curiousorange on April 06, 2018, 10:04:39 PM
I'd imagine it's a new crest as well. Absolutely no reason not to change it now. Clear the decks and let's enter the Premier League with a reborn Aston Villa.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AlexAlexCropley on April 06, 2018, 10:07:41 PM
Lotto I've heard
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 06, 2018, 10:17:30 PM
I'd imagine it's a new crest as well. Absolutely no reason not to change it now. Clear the decks and let's enter the Premier League with a reborn Aston Villa.

It will be the same crest. We'd have heard something by now if not.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: David_Nab on April 06, 2018, 10:58:40 PM
Quote
Kitted out
News of a new technical partner for our 2018/19 kits will break on club channels in the coming weeks.

Today we announced that we will be mutually ending our agreement with Under Armour, who have been with us for the past two years.

They will make way for an innovative new agreement, which will be ground-breaking within football and, more importantly, will benefit our supporters.

https://www.avfc.co.uk/News/2018/04/06/park-life-innovative-kit-partner-coming-soon-season-ticket-update-monopoly-cover
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Keeno on April 06, 2018, 11:02:16 PM
If it's innovative and 'helps supporters' I'd assume it's unlikely to be one of the Adidas/Nike/Puma triumvirate. Which is disappointing as I'd kill for an adidas villa shirt. Been a fan of the UA ones to be fair, particularly this year's.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AsTallAsLions on April 06, 2018, 11:06:46 PM
Not Umbro then 😂
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on April 06, 2018, 11:07:16 PM
If it's innovative and 'helps supporters' I'd assume it's unlikely to be one of the Adidas/Nike/Puma triumvirate. Which is disappointing as I'd kill for an adidas villa shirt. Been a fan of the UA ones to be fair, particularly this year's.

How have you come to that conclusion based on the press release?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 06, 2018, 11:07:38 PM
Innovative and ground-breaking in football?

Maybe it's not a sports manufacturer. Huawei kits? Recon?

Can't think of any other way it could be ground-breaking.

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AsTallAsLions on April 06, 2018, 11:20:06 PM
Innovative and ground-breaking in football?

Maybe it's not a sports manufacturer. Huawei kits? Recon?

Can't think of any other way it could be ground-breaking.



Virtual reality kits. The lads will play in the nip to distract the opposition, and we'll all wear goggles to view them in the Claret & Blue
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on April 06, 2018, 11:21:14 PM
This had better not be a ‘Villa Leisure’ type set up.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 06, 2018, 11:21:27 PM
Puma are very hit and miss with their kits.

Their current Rangers shirt (home) is a classic in my opinion and they've made a couple of nice ones for Arsenal, but they have a problem with trying to do too much with the design and the fit can be an issue too.

For fit, quality and design, Adidas are the best out there. They very rarely make a badly designed shirt and the quality of the material is top notch. Most of their current World Cup shirts are amazing. Spain, Belgium, Argentina, Colombia all spot on.

Umbro were reliable but I'm not sure how their stuff is since the Nike takeover and then sale but I'd still like to see an Umbro deal if not Adidas.

Nike as we know don't really give a shit and have about three templates. Quality is good though.

Getting the claret right is a minimum anyway as the last few have been purple.

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on April 06, 2018, 11:21:55 PM
It's probably Primark.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: VinnieChase84 on April 06, 2018, 11:36:59 PM
Innovative and ground-breaking in football?

Maybe it's not a sports manufacturer. Huawei kits? Recon?

Can't think of any other way it could be ground-breaking.



Recon - paying us £200m and getting around FFP!? 😉
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on April 07, 2018, 12:26:54 AM
It's probably Primark.

Nah I reckon it’s a ground breaking foray into women’s brands in men’s football. I’m going for Donna Karan, Prada or maybe Givency. Something chic.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 07, 2018, 12:36:29 AM
Prada kits would be  8)

Lacoste should make football kit. They already make tennis clothing. Why not branch out into football? It would be quite smart for the French team to wear the crocodile.

https://sports.vice.com/en_uk/article/national-kits-reimagined-with-local-fashion-brands

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on April 07, 2018, 12:48:56 AM
Prada kits would be  8)

Lacoste should make football kit. They already make tennis clothing. Why not branch out into football? It would be quite smart for the French team to wear the crocodile.

https://sports.vice.com/en_uk/article/national-kits-reimagined-with-local-fashion-brands



Haha there you go. That England top looks solid. Seriously though a fashion brand would be very unique.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: eamonn on April 07, 2018, 01:27:25 AM
Interesting that the decision to terminate the deal was mutual - didn't Macron offer more than UA at the time in the event we got relegated? Pretty sure it's been reported that our retail and commercial sales are up considerably since the new regime took over. I wonder what UA think about how the relationship has gone.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: cdbearsfan on April 07, 2018, 01:40:14 AM
Delighted to see the back of those murdering bastards.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Left Side on April 07, 2018, 03:35:26 AM
Let's just cut to the chase and go with Le Coq Sportif
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Bad English on April 07, 2018, 05:48:04 AM
I don't care. Eighty fuckng pounds for a replica shirt my arse!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: curiousorange on April 07, 2018, 11:02:07 AM
Prada kits would be  8)

Lacoste should make football kit. They already make tennis clothing. Why not branch out into football? It would be quite smart for the French team to wear the crocodile.

https://sports.vice.com/en_uk/article/national-kits-reimagined-with-local-fashion-brands



Haha there you go. That England top looks solid. Seriously though a fashion brand would be very unique.

Is it only me who thinks they all look the same?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT on April 07, 2018, 11:34:39 AM
Interesting that the decision to terminate the deal was mutual - didn't Macron offer more than UA at the time in the event we got relegated? Pretty sure it's been reported that our retail and commercial sales are up considerably since the new regime took over. I wonder what UA think about how the relationship has gone.

They certainly did Eamonn. I spoke to someone at Macron not long after, they were really disappointed - UA had made the better PL offer but Macron had a much better deal on the table for the Championship.

Having said that, Macron was rubbish too. I'd like Adidas or Puma.

If we had Lacoste, can you imagine how much our gear would cost?!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Stu on April 07, 2018, 11:41:28 AM
Prada kits would be  8)

Lacoste should make football kit. They already make tennis clothing. Why not branch out into football? It would be quite smart for the French team to wear the crocodile.

https://sports.vice.com/en_uk/article/national-kits-reimagined-with-local-fashion-brands



Haha there you go. That England top looks solid. Seriously though a fashion brand would be very unique.

You can customise LaCoste polos on their website: Villa colours (https://www.lacoste.com/on/demandware.store/Sites-GB-Site/en/CustomProduct-Show?step=STEPPER&stepName=MAIN_COLOR&allStepValidate=true&stepActive=0&lc_customsleevecolor=T01&lc_custommaincolor=476&lc_custombraidcolor=476&lc_custombuttonplacketcolor=001&lc_customcollarcolor=T01&lc_customcrocodileref=F3386_T01_30&lc_monogramPlacement=2&lc_monogramThreadColor=031&lc_monogramFont=3&lc_customcrocodileposition=1&crocoSize=30&crocoTab=Color&pid=L1212-EC&55cat=LP&55ban=fb:2A;fe:Btn1;fc:Product;fg:man;ft:Polo;fl:polo-customisation;fd:201802&lc_monogramText=)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 07, 2018, 11:45:54 AM
Smart but would not pay £100 for.

I would pay £15 maximum, including delivery.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: garyshawsknee on April 07, 2018, 11:53:30 AM
Let's just cut to the chase and go with Le Coq Sportif

I haven't bought a shirt in years, but I would if they were our makers.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TopDeck113 on April 07, 2018, 12:02:22 PM
...an innovative new agreement, which will be ground-breaking within football and, more importantly, will benefit our supporters.

Those of us of a certain age will remember similar spin from Uncle Doug that heralded Henson.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 07, 2018, 12:06:57 PM
Let's just cut to the chase and go with Le Coq Sportif

I haven't bought a shirt in years, but I would if they were our makers.

Some of their recent efforts:

(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/97/1c/ad/971cadf977c5950abeb0b16e9472818f.jpg)

(https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-2hqvjo4GOIE/VZMzwEZLe_I/AAAAAAAAgYk/Fw9jpyO4xvo/s1600/Fiorentina-15-16-Home-Kit%2B%25287%2529.png)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Martin Carruthers on April 07, 2018, 12:08:35 PM
I was about to say how nice their Fiorentina shirts are. Although it's be difficult to not make them look cool.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TopDeck113 on April 07, 2018, 12:24:26 PM
Those shirts do beg the question as to whether a new kit sees meltdown on Fiorentina forums about it being the wrong shade of violet.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: exigo on April 07, 2018, 07:12:31 PM
Let's start with the badge. This is what happens when you combine the classic version with the modern.

(http://thumb.ibb.co/m27omc/avfc_hybrid.png) (http://ibb.co/m27omc)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: stuart445 on April 07, 2018, 07:32:19 PM
Those shirts do beg the question as to whether a new kit sees meltdown on Fiorentina forums about it being the wrong shade of violet.

I hope not that is our thing.

If we released a shirt and there wasn't anyone saying it's the wrong claret, it's purple etc.... then i swear the world would stop spinning
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: villa `cross the mersey on April 07, 2018, 08:58:52 PM
Let's start with the badge. This is what happens when you combine the classic version with

(http://thumb.ibb.co/m27omc/avfc_hybrid.png) (http://ibb.co/m27omc)

Not so sure about keeping the star - looks a bit naff
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TheMalandro on April 07, 2018, 09:05:33 PM
Let's start with the badge. This is what happens when you combine the classic version with

(http://thumb.ibb.co/m27omc/avfc_hybrid.png) (http://ibb.co/m27omc)

Not so sure about keeping the star - looks a bit naff

At least we have dropped the 'prepared'. That would be absurd.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 07, 2018, 10:05:23 PM
Just use the one before Lerner or the 80s one.

Either is fine.

Just get rid of the Lerner era crest.

If we absolutely have to keep it then remove the star and put the full name on it not the initials.

Dr. Tony did say almost immediately that it would be getting changed so I can't see the Lerner one being used for much longer. Just want some sort of news. I know it's not that important but it matters to some of us.

Just my opinion.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: OzVilla on April 08, 2018, 11:30:22 AM
Let's start with the badge. This is what happens when you combine the classic version with

(http://thumb.ibb.co/m27omc/avfc_hybrid.png) (http://ibb.co/m27omc)

Not so sure about keeping the star - looks a bit naff

I love it and Gymshark to make the kit please, a Brummie company doing big things worldwide with a Villa connection.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT on April 08, 2018, 12:33:06 PM
Just use the one before Lerner or the 80s one.

Either is fine.

Just get rid of the Lerner era crest.

If we absolutely have to keep it then remove the star and put the full name on it not the initials.

Dr. Tony did say almost immediately that it would be getting changed so I can't see the Lerner one being used for much longer. Just want some sort of news. I know it's not that important but it matters to some of us.

Just my opinion.

Agreed.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Louzie0 on April 08, 2018, 07:50:03 PM


Is it only me who thinks they all look the same?

Brilliant
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: amfy on April 08, 2018, 08:15:21 PM
When I had raised the trophy hunting associations with Keith Wyness he was concerned but pointed out how hard it is to find an ethical sportswear manufacturer. They all seem to have skeletons in their closets! (Nike sweatshops etc - although apparently Nike, adidas and Puma have all considerably upped their game in this regard) He also said the most intranet thing is that the players have kit that is good quality, comfortable and allows them to get on with the job.

The statement about the new manufacturer is interesting. Maybe the 'groundbreaking' side is that he has found something that has a good ethical fit but maintains good quality? Maybe something in the deal feeds into the community? No idea - just speculating.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Chris Smith on April 08, 2018, 08:51:09 PM
Let's start with the badge. This is what happens when you combine the classic version with

(http://thumb.ibb.co/m27omc/avfc_hybrid.png) (http://ibb.co/m27omc)

Not so sure about keeping the star - looks a bit naff

I love it and Gymshark to make the kit please, a Brummie company doing big things worldwide with a Villa connection.

A Bromsgrove/Redditch company.

My nephew works for them, he went to school with the lads who founded it and seems to spend his working life travelling the world. Anyway, from what I gather they don’t really have much interest in getting into football at the moment as they don’t think it suits their current brand image.

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Richard E on April 08, 2018, 09:09:05 PM
When I had raised the trophy hunting associations with Keith Wyness he was concerned but pointed out how hard it is to find an ethical sportswear manufacturer. They all seem to have skeletons in their closets! (Nike sweatshops etc - although apparently Nike, adidas and Puma have all considerably upped their game in this regard) He also said the most intranet thing is that the players have kit that is good quality, comfortable and allows them to get on with the job.

The statement about the new manufacturer is interesting. Maybe the 'groundbreaking' side is that he has found something that has a good ethical fit but maintains good quality? Maybe something in the deal feeds into the community? No idea - just speculating.

I'm sure I saw a rumour on Twitter (yes, I know) that we were going to produce our own.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: VinnieChase84 on April 08, 2018, 09:12:29 PM
When I had raised the trophy hunting associations with Keith Wyness he was concerned but pointed out how hard it is to find an ethical sportswear manufacturer. They all seem to have skeletons in their closets! (Nike sweatshops etc - although apparently Nike, adidas and Puma have all considerably upped their game in this regard) He also said the most intranet thing is that the players have kit that is good quality, comfortable and allows them to get on with the job.

The statement about the new manufacturer is interesting. Maybe the 'groundbreaking' side is that he has found something that has a good ethical fit but maintains good quality? Maybe something in the deal feeds into the community? No idea - just speculating.

I'm sure I saw a rumour on Twitter (yes, I know) that we were going to produce our own.
At a time where FFP becomes tighter then I’d be perplexed if that’s the case. For me a new brand entering UK market. Li-Ning for example
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Nastylee on April 08, 2018, 09:20:50 PM
I really don't give a shit. A kit is the least of our issues. Just get the best deal we can.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: curiousorange on April 08, 2018, 09:39:42 PM
The most important thing is whether the players can play in it. The second is whether said company can meet consumer demand.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: b23 on April 08, 2018, 10:07:42 PM
I'm sure I saw a rumour on Twitter (yes, I know) that we were going to produce our own.
[/quote]

Why not ?
Made by RECON
Sponsored by RECON
Adult size £20
Child size £10
What's not to like ?

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: brian green on April 08, 2018, 10:09:39 PM
It's made of plastic?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithe on April 08, 2018, 10:17:54 PM
When I had raised the trophy hunting associations with Keith Wyness he was concerned but pointed out how hard it is to find an ethical sportswear manufacturer. They all seem to have skeletons in their closets! (Nike sweatshops etc - although apparently Nike, adidas and Puma have all considerably upped their game in this regard) He also said the most intranet thing is that the players have kit that is good quality, comfortable and allows them to get on with the job.

The statement about the new manufacturer is interesting. Maybe the 'groundbreaking' side is that he has found something that has a good ethical fit but maintains good quality? Maybe something in the deal feeds into the community? No idea - just speculating.

I'm sure I saw a rumour on Twitter (yes, I know) that we were going to produce our own.
At a time where FFP becomes tighter then I’d be perplexed if that’s the case. For me a new brand entering UK market. Li-Ning for example

Don’t they make the Pisa shirts?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: VinnieChase84 on April 08, 2018, 10:19:46 PM
When I had raised the trophy hunting associations with Keith Wyness he was concerned but pointed out how hard it is to find an ethical sportswear manufacturer. They all seem to have skeletons in their closets! (Nike sweatshops etc - although apparently Nike, adidas and Puma have all considerably upped their game in this regard) He also said the most intranet thing is that the players have kit that is good quality, comfortable and allows them to get on with the job.

The statement about the new manufacturer is interesting. Maybe the 'groundbreaking' side is that he has found something that has a good ethical fit but maintains good quality? Maybe something in the deal feeds into the community? No idea - just speculating.

I'm sure I saw a rumour on Twitter (yes, I know) that we were going to produce our own.
At a time where FFP becomes tighter then I’d be perplexed if that’s the case. For me a new brand entering UK market. Li-Ning for example

Don’t they make the Pisa shirts?
👏🏻👏🏻
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on April 08, 2018, 10:30:36 PM
I'm sure I saw a rumour on Twitter (yes, I know) that we were going to produce our own.

Why not ?
Made by RECON
Sponsored by RECON
Adult size £20
Child size £10
What's not to like ?


[/quote]

...and they’re giving us £100m a year hopefully. Perfick
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Sexual Ealing on April 08, 2018, 10:33:38 PM
When I had raised the trophy hunting associations with Keith Wyness he was concerned but pointed out how hard it is to find an ethical sportswear manufacturer. They all seem to have skeletons in their closets! (Nike sweatshops etc - although apparently Nike, adidas and Puma have all considerably upped their game in this regard) He also said the most intranet thing is that the players have kit that is good quality, comfortable and allows them to get on with the job.

The statement about the new manufacturer is interesting. Maybe the 'groundbreaking' side is that he has found something that has a good ethical fit but maintains good quality? Maybe something in the deal feeds into the community? No idea - just speculating.

I'm sure I saw a rumour on Twitter (yes, I know) that we were going to produce our own.
At a time where FFP becomes tighter then I’d be perplexed if that’s the case. For me a new brand entering UK market. Li-Ning for example

Don’t they make the Pisa shirts?

Oh, and you have to say that's magnificent.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: andyh on April 08, 2018, 11:39:56 PM
It's made of plastic?
It won’t be the first time
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 08, 2018, 11:57:38 PM
Oh, and you have to say that's magnificent.

😂😂😂
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: b23 on April 09, 2018, 12:17:42 AM
It's made of plastic?

So many things are made of plastic.

https://resource.co/article/adidas-launch-recycled-ocean-plastic-football-kits-11466

https://www.theplasticbottlescompany.com/barcelona-football-shirts-made-from-16-recycled-bottles/
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: frank black on April 09, 2018, 07:37:07 AM
It will be bio-degradable. It will start out all starchy and uncomfortable, gradually improve and hit ‘the sweet spot’ for a couple of months. Before eventually disintegrating just as the season ends.

Seems a good fit for the Villa.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AsTallAsLions on April 09, 2018, 07:54:37 AM
It will be bio-degradable. It will start out all starchy and uncomfortable, gradually improve and hit ‘the sweet spot’ for a couple of months. Before eventually disintegrating just as the season ends.

Seems a good fit for the Villa.

Bravo
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ktvillan on April 09, 2018, 11:14:07 AM
Those shirts do beg the question as to whether a new kit sees meltdown on Fiorentina forums about it being the wrong shade of violet.

I hope not that is our thing.

If we released a shirt and there wasn't anyone saying it's the wrong claret, it's purple etc.... then i swear the world would stop spinning

It may not be the most important thing in the world but I'm sure Villa fans are not alone in wanting their team's kit to be in their traditional colours rather than some hideous facsimile of it.  I don't are who makes the kit, but I would like to have one in Villa colours.  The last few, since Macron got the gig, haven't been.  Just another thing that Lerner and his entourage of losers fucked up while in charge.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: darren woolley on April 09, 2018, 11:22:59 AM
I wish we could have Adidas they make some quality stuff instead of a Chinese company we have never heard of which after a bit will be able buy in China Town off Mr Wong as cheap as chips.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on April 09, 2018, 12:35:36 PM
I'm keen to hear how a new kit can benefit supporters.  This I have to hear!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 09, 2018, 12:48:40 PM
I'm keen to hear how a new kit can benefit supporters.  This I have to hear!

Well if it was made by Recon and the price undercut other clubs by a fair bit then that would.

You are right though I want to see what is happening.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT Villan on April 09, 2018, 01:50:52 PM
Dr Tony has found a seller on AliExpress that can do the current shirts for half the price, though we have to order now for next season as shipping takes forever.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: darren woolley on April 09, 2018, 03:39:40 PM
Dr Tony has found a seller on AliExpress that can do the current shirts for half the price, though we have to order now for next season as shipping takes forever.

Like a slow boat to China
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: villa `cross the mersey on April 09, 2018, 06:52:47 PM
It's made of plastic?
Sort of - Bri Li Ning :)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: villa `cross the mersey on April 09, 2018, 06:56:04 PM
There is also a cheap , possibly racist , gag in there about  A Chinese person and armour but I'll leave you to work that one out - suffice to say the contract was ripped up because of a weakness in it?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on April 09, 2018, 09:59:37 PM
Recon Smart Sports was formed in November.  Will that be the vehicle for shirt manufacturing?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on April 09, 2018, 10:15:34 PM
Can someone please send them the correct pantone numbers before it’s too late??
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 09, 2018, 10:55:34 PM
Recon Smart Sports was formed in November.  Will that be the vehicle for shirt manufacturing?

It's going to be Recon isn't it.

West Brom, Roma and Southampton have all manufactured their own shirts, off the top of my head.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: adrenachrome on April 10, 2018, 01:24:15 AM
Recon Smart Sports was formed in November.  Will that be the vehicle for shirt manufacturing?

Well at least it will be smart.

Maybe the shorts will transmit shocks to under performing players.   
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Russ aka Big Nose on April 10, 2018, 03:24:39 PM
Recon Smart Sports was formed in November.  Will that be the vehicle for shirt manufacturing?

It's going to be Recon isn't it.

West Brom, Roma and Southampton have all manufactured their own shirts, off the top of my head.

Bristol City too - the manufacturer logo is of 'Bristol Sport' the umbrella brand for the 'sporting club' of Bristol City, Bristol Rugby, Netball et al.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AsTallAsLions on April 10, 2018, 04:05:34 PM
Easy to laugh at the prospect of Recon making our shirts but as one other poster (at least) has mentioned, if it happens it probably would be a clever way for us to get around FFP (£85m contract, anyone?).

People would probably ask questions, but at the end of the day if Wolves can get away with being part-owned by an Agent, we can probably be forgiven for finding a smart way around FFP...
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 10, 2018, 04:16:05 PM
A successful team is the most important thing.

If it's Recon I don't mind too much. I could see Dr Tony taking fans opinions into account when it comes to design.

If they are made well then it's not a big deal.

Might even buy one if the crest was changed.

Recon  8)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: West Derby Villan on April 10, 2018, 04:49:10 PM
I wish we could have Adidas they make some quality stuff instead of a Chinese company we have never heard of which after a bit will be able buy in China Town off Mr Wong as cheap as chips.

With you all the way mate, would love Us to have an Adidas kit
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: exigo on April 10, 2018, 04:53:09 PM
Can someone please send them the correct pantone numbers before it’s too late??

It's 229C.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Drummond on April 10, 2018, 04:59:39 PM
Recon Smart Sports was formed in November.  Will that be the vehicle for shirt manufacturing?

It's going to be Recon isn't it.

West Brom, Roma and Southampton have all manufactured their own shirts, off the top of my head.

You must have a big head.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on April 10, 2018, 05:01:27 PM
Can someone please send them the correct pantone numbers before it’s too late??

It's 229C.

That's a big bra
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Drummond on April 10, 2018, 05:06:21 PM
Can someone please send them the correct pantone numbers before it’s too late??

It's 229C.

That's a big bra

Well we've a big bunch of tits.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 10, 2018, 05:16:58 PM
I wish we could have Adidas they make some quality stuff instead of a Chinese company we have never heard of which after a bit will be able buy in China Town off Mr Wong as cheap as chips.

With you all the way mate, would love Us to have an Adidas kit

Me too.

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: ChicagoLion on April 10, 2018, 05:46:39 PM
I would like a kit made out of decent material, in the correct colours with a proper badge and nothing else.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: curiousorange on April 10, 2018, 06:04:23 PM
I wish we could have Adidas they make some quality stuff instead of a Chinese company we have never heard of which after a bit will be able buy in China Town off Mr Wong as cheap as chips.

With you all the way mate, would love Us to have an Adidas kit

Me too.

The one thing that puts me off an Adidas kit is what cack they've made for West Ham over the years. I can see us with purple shirts and white piping.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 10, 2018, 06:15:01 PM
I wouldn't mind tbh. It wouldn't be purple it would be claret, but they would do stuff like have the whole shirt claret ala Diadora 2000/01.

Which I'd be OK with.

Switch it up a bit every now and then.

The Muller 90s shirt, was one of the all time great Villa shirts.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ad@m on April 10, 2018, 06:19:45 PM
The Muller 90s shirt, was one of the all time great Villa shirts.

I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that but you're flat out wrong here!!!!
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on April 11, 2018, 04:03:06 PM
Davenports all the way.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: glinch on April 11, 2018, 07:30:37 PM
The Muller 90s shirt, was one of the all time great Villa shirts.

It was a shocker. The team that wore it were good, but the shirt was terrible. Wasn't claret and blue for a starters. 
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: TopDeck113 on April 11, 2018, 07:36:21 PM
When I bought mine it was before the Muller sponsorship began.  The best things I can say about the shirt was that I didn't look like an advert and I got to wear it on a memorable day at Wembley.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Exeter 77 on April 11, 2018, 08:29:46 PM
When I bought mine it was before the Muller sponsorship began.  The best things I can say about the shirt was that I didn't look like an advert and I got to wear it on a memorable day at Wembley.
Mine also doesn't have a sponsor but it does now have Paul McGrath's autograph where the sponsor's logo should be.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Chico Hamilton III on April 11, 2018, 08:38:03 PM
When I bought mine it was before the Muller sponsorship began.  The best things I can say about the shirt was that I didn't look like an advert and I got to wear it on a memorable day at Wembley.
Mine also doesn't have a sponsor but it does now have Paul McGrath's autograph where the sponsor's logo should be.

Paul McGrath Muller
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Hookeysmith on April 11, 2018, 08:45:40 PM
When I bought mine it was before the Muller sponsorship began.  The best things I can say about the shirt was that I didn't look like an advert and I got to wear it on a memorable day at Wembley.
Mine also doesn't have a sponsor but it does now have Paul McGrath's autograph where the sponsor's logo should be.

Paul McGrath Muller

Mullered more like and sadly too often
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Richard E on April 11, 2018, 08:46:58 PM
The Muller 90s shirt, was one of the all time great Villa shirts.

I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that but you're flat out wrong here!!!!

The green and black away kit made a fantastic waistcoat
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Salsa Party Animal on April 11, 2018, 09:18:06 PM
Let hope the next home shirt is actually claret not blueish/purple crap
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Deano's Mullet on April 12, 2018, 09:54:49 AM
I loved the Asics shirts. Next season I just hope we are in claret shirts with blue sleeves. I just hope we don't  end up with a Vincent Tan situation where he changes the home colours or messes with the Villa Park name. As much as Dr Tony has been good for the club, I have to say these things do bother me.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tom_Mc9? on April 12, 2018, 10:01:40 AM
I can't see him ever changing the colours. Why would he? At least Tan could just about say that changing to red was the Welsh colour for the club in the Welsh capital. What would Tony change to? Purple for Cadbury's?

The name change of Villa Park could feasibly happen though. Look at the names of the Manchester City, Arsenal and countless other stadia. I would be astonished if the new Spurs and Chelsea grounds weren't sponsored. I don't particularly mind it because I think we'd all still call it Villa Park. I can certainly see both sides of this argument, but it's not one that upsets me too much.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ad@m on April 12, 2018, 10:34:25 AM
The name change of Villa Park could feasibly happen though. Look at the names of the Manchester City, Arsenal and countless other stadia. I would be astonished if the new Spurs and Chelsea grounds weren't sponsored. I don't particularly mind it because I think we'd all still call it Villa Park. I can certainly see both sides of this argument, but it's not one that upsets me too much.

Changing VP's name will only happen if it's done to get around FFP rules.  There'd be absolutely no value in renaming it on the open market because everyone will still call it VP.  Look what happened when that prat at Newcastle tried to change St James's Park.

It works for the ones you mentioned because they were brand new stadia so didn't have an established name already.  Spurs have already "accidentally" leaked a CGI mockup of their new stadium with "Naming Rights Here" plastered over the side of it so that'll happen.  If Chelsea move to a new ground they'll do it too.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: cheltenhamlion on April 12, 2018, 05:25:08 PM
The Muller 90s shirt, was one of the all time great Villa shirts.

I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that but you're flat out wrong here!!!!

The green and black away kit made a fantastic waistcoat

I remember those waistcoats.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on April 12, 2018, 07:10:33 PM
In case anyone has never seen them.

(https://i.ebayimg.com/thumbs/images/g/Zi0AAOSwfjRZ8kgx/s-l225.jpg)

(https://thumbs.worthpoint.com/zoom/images1/360/0913/18/aston-villa-1994-football-shirt_360_1977324d6a9ad45743f563d25ee2d06d.jpg)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tugby Villain on April 12, 2018, 07:12:13 PM
In case anyone has never seen them.

(https://i.ebayimg.com/thumbs/images/g/Zi0AAOSwfjRZ8kgx/s-l225.jpg)

(https://thumbs.worthpoint.com/zoom/images1/360/0913/18/aston-villa-1994-football-shirt_360_1977324d6a9ad45743f563d25ee2d06d.jpg)

I think they're rather dashing
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Drummond on April 13, 2018, 02:18:16 PM
Recon Villa Park

Villa Park with Recon
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AsTallAsLions on April 13, 2018, 02:20:52 PM
I loved the Asics shirts. Next season I just hope we are in claret shirts with blue sleeves. I just hope we don't  end up with a Vincent Tan situation where he changes the home colours or messes with the Villa Park name. As much as Dr Tony has been good for the club, I have to say these things do bother me.

Doesn't bother me at all if it's Recon Villa Park, he can call it the Tonybowl for all I care so long as he gets us back where we belong.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Tom_Mc9? on April 13, 2018, 02:27:07 PM
I quite like the Tonybowl.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: cannock villa on April 13, 2018, 03:47:26 PM
Wouldn't against adding a sponsors name to it as it will always be Villa Park to fans. Thinking about it, how often do you actually use the words Villa Park, usually if i'm referring to it I say going down the Villa or going to the Villa.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Chico Hamilton III on April 13, 2018, 03:50:41 PM
Wouldn't against adding a sponsors name to it as it will always be Villa Park to fans. Thinking about it, how often do you actually use the words Villa Park, usually if i'm referring to it I say going down the Villa or going to the Villa.

I still call it the Lower Grounds. It'll never be Villa Park to me...
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: rob_bridge on April 13, 2018, 03:54:01 PM
I can't see him ever changing the colours. Why would he? At least Tan could just about say that changing to red was the Welsh colour for the club in the Welsh capital. What would Tony change to? Purple for Cadbury's?

The name change of Villa Park could feasibly happen though. Look at the names of the Manchester City, Arsenal and countless other stadia. I would be astonished if the new Spurs and Chelsea grounds weren't sponsored. I don't particularly mind it because I think we'd all still call it Villa Park. I can certainly see both sides of this argument, but it's not one that upsets me too much.

10 years ago it would have - even 5 years ago but as everyone says it will still be Villa Park to us
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: chrisw1 on April 13, 2018, 04:00:03 PM
I loved the Asics shirts. Next season I just hope we are in claret shirts with blue sleeves. I just hope we don't  end up with a Vincent Tan situation where he changes the home colours or messes with the Villa Park name. As much as Dr Tony has been good for the club, I have to say these things do bother me.

Doesn't bother me at all if it's Recon Villa Park, he can call it the Tonybowl for all I care so long as he gets us back where we belong.
Nor me, if it gets us round FFP then so be it. 
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: purpletrousers on April 13, 2018, 04:35:21 PM
In case anyone has never seen them.

(https://i.ebayimg.com/thumbs/images/g/Zi0AAOSwfjRZ8kgx/s-l225.jpg)

(https://thumbs.worthpoint.com/zoom/images1/360/0913/18/aston-villa-1994-football-shirt_360_1977324d6a9ad45743f563d25ee2d06d.jpg)

I'm sure I'd seen them before, but who was it that did the converting? As you say a lovely job :)
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on April 13, 2018, 04:38:47 PM
The club sold them iirc.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: brian green on April 13, 2018, 05:37:21 PM
My mother called it the Serpentine Grounds.  Never forgave them for  not being the Perry Barr Pets.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: CT on April 13, 2018, 06:31:22 PM
I quite like the Tonybowl.

Makes me think of Kelloggs Frosties.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: PeterWithesShin on April 13, 2018, 06:35:17 PM
I quite like the Tonybowl.

Makes me think of Kelloggs Frosties.

We're grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreat.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: eamonn on April 14, 2018, 05:06:16 PM
Those waistcoats look like something straight out of Alan Partridge's wardrobe.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 14, 2018, 05:20:05 PM
I like them. I'd wear one at home.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: VinnieChase84 on April 18, 2018, 07:09:52 PM
Anyone else heard rumours our new kit maker could be GymShark?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 18, 2018, 07:59:23 PM
Only on here.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Herman on April 18, 2018, 08:43:04 PM
If Villa Park is going to be named, I reckon it will be the Villa Pak Choi Stadium
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: villa `cross the mersey on April 18, 2018, 09:03:52 PM
You made hard wok of that
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on April 18, 2018, 09:46:09 PM
A member of the Twitterati is suggesting a Luke Roper design manufactured by Nike.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: VinnieChase84 on April 18, 2018, 10:07:00 PM
A member of the Twitterati is suggesting a Luke Roper design manufactured by Nike.

Bham based company. 🤔
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Ads on April 18, 2018, 10:23:19 PM
Donate to the site and you'd have known about this sometime ago.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 18, 2018, 10:47:40 PM
Now that is interesting.

It raises a couple of questions though.

If it is manufactured by Nike, then presumably the kits will have Nike's logo on?

Secondly does that mean we will have Nike training merchandise as well? Or would that be Luke 1977?

I find it hard to believe Nike would allow production of a design that isn't one of their templates though.

But I would be so happy with kits made by Nike and if this Luke guy is a Villa fan then the kits will be immense I am sure. His clothing brand is very smart.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 18, 2018, 10:50:30 PM
Also I now see where the innovative talk came from and also how it benefits the fans. I've never heard of a sports giant teaming up with a local designer who has his own brand before.

I'd say this is true.

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Exeter 77 on April 18, 2018, 10:54:36 PM
There is a sort of precedent with Nike. The FA got Peter Saville, the erstwhile Factory Records designer among other things,to design an England kit which was then produced by Nike. It didn't sell well and was soon replaced.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 18, 2018, 10:56:14 PM
There is a sort of precedent with Nike. The FA got Peter Saville, the erstwhile Factory Records designer among other things,to design an England kit which was then produced by Nike. It didn't sell well and was soon replaced.

Was that the first home shirt? White with navy round collar?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 18, 2018, 10:58:58 PM
Just seen it was this one, 2010/11 - https://www.dezeen.com/2010/09/02/england-home-kit-by-peter-saville-for-umbro/

Umbro were owned by Nike at this point, this was before Nike sold them off.

Probably didn't sell well because of the poor World Cup performance. I actually really liked that shirt. Thought the little St. George's crosses in different colours was a nice feature.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: curiousorange on April 19, 2018, 05:57:54 PM
I've got that shirt. It's really smart.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 19, 2018, 06:52:35 PM
I've got that shirt. It's really smart.

Much better than the one before it.

Really excited for the new Villa kits.

Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: frank black on April 19, 2018, 07:17:33 PM
Sure Luke will do a good job. Quite like his stuff....interesting development
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Des Little on April 19, 2018, 10:27:28 PM
Some kind of teaser/update from the club would be good soon
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Risso on April 20, 2018, 08:52:06 AM
There is a sort of precedent with Nike. The FA got Peter Saville, the erstwhile Factory Records designer among other things,to design an England kit which was then produced by Nike. It didn't sell well and was soon replaced.

He didn’t design the whole shirt, just the crosses on the shoulders. The actual shirt was designed by a lad called Rob on Villatalk. Saville was just asked to come up with something to tart it up a bit.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Exeter 77 on April 20, 2018, 02:40:11 PM
There is a sort of precedent with Nike. The FA got Peter Saville, the erstwhile Factory Records designer among other things,to design an England kit which was then produced by Nike. It didn't sell well and was soon replaced.

He didn’t design the whole shirt, just the crosses on the shoulders. The actual shirt was designed by a lad called Rob on Villatalk. Saville was just asked to come up with something to tart it up a bit.
I didn't know that but I knew Saville was involved somewhere along the line.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 20, 2018, 02:57:44 PM
Surely we will get the vapor templates from Nike?

Can't see them giving us unique ones.

Maybe Luke is just giving them help with colours and hopefully the crest.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AsTallAsLions on April 20, 2018, 03:08:16 PM
Don't really want Nike again tbh with you. But whatever. It's hardly what matters
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Smirker on April 20, 2018, 03:21:37 PM
I want an update on the crest tbh.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: robbo1874 on April 22, 2018, 06:29:38 AM
The crest/ badge would be great if the lion was gold instead of fucking yellow.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: The Left Side on April 23, 2018, 03:32:32 AM
I see Ipswich now have 3 stars over there badge/crest, I remember we weren't allowed to get them but they have them as do Forest. The old round badge with a star would do for me.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: AsTallAsLions on April 23, 2018, 07:14:45 AM
The crest is a separate matter to the shirts as it will require significant rebranding around the stadium and elsewhere. The fact that the last 'update' to the crest still hasn't replaced the first Lerner one speaks volumes for a lot of reasons. Xia's not going to commission the rebranding until we're in a more stable position, and more importantly he would want to initiate a process of engagement and research to ensure that we will stick with what we get for the next 20+ years, otherwise it's not worth the money. Just look at Everton and Leeds to see how it can go very wrong. I know plenty of people just want the round crest back but it would require updating all the same. I would support a redesign which retained the simplicity whilst sharpening it up a bit for modern branding purposes. That said, I can guarantee someone would still be unhappy, as that's the way these things go. I wouldn't be surprised if it was another year or two before the process is kicked off.
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Deano's Mullet on April 23, 2018, 10:07:28 AM
Official site says new kit partnership with .....Lukesport? Really?
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Deano's Mullet on April 23, 2018, 10:08:42 AM
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xmZwglDT-Rw
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: VinnieChase84 on April 23, 2018, 10:12:33 AM
The Luke news was real
https://d16b4kgyytl7c7.cloudfront.net/News/2018/04/23/aston-villa-new-technical-kit-partnership-announced
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Drummond on April 23, 2018, 10:51:50 AM
I wonder when it will be on sale....
Title: Re: Under Armour
Post by: Toronto Villa on April 23, 2018, 12:39:11 PM
Prada kits would be  8)

Lacoste should make football kit. They already make tennis clothing. Why not branch out into football? It would be quite smart for the French team to wear the crocodile.

https://sports.vice.com/en_uk/article/national-kits-reimagined-with-local-fashion-brands



Haha there you go. That England top looks solid. Seriously though a fashion brand would be very unique.

Ahem...as I was saying. Fashion brand would be an interesting new idea
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal