Quote from: Toronto Villa on December 16, 2015, 11:19:43 PMLTA, I'm not engaging in a quotathon. He's complimented the supporters and repeatedly said the playing side hasn't been good enough. That isn't patronising. Randy being here or not isn't an issue. Have you noticed it is nearly 2016 and they can talk to or see Randy every day. It's not like he has to physically be at the club to influence or make decisions. What if actually does love the club and has just made a number of bad decisions? Does that make him not love it?So doesn't he fly in? Why do they have to fly out?
LTA, I'm not engaging in a quotathon. He's complimented the supporters and repeatedly said the playing side hasn't been good enough. That isn't patronising. Randy being here or not isn't an issue. Have you noticed it is nearly 2016 and they can talk to or see Randy every day. It's not like he has to physically be at the club to influence or make decisions. What if actually does love the club and has just made a number of bad decisions? Does that make him not love it?
Quote from: saunders_heroes on December 16, 2015, 11:39:42 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on December 16, 2015, 11:19:43 PMLTA, I'm not engaging in a quotathon. He's complimented the supporters and repeatedly said the playing side hasn't been good enough. That isn't patronising. Randy being here or not isn't an issue. Have you noticed it is nearly 2016 and they can talk to or see Randy every day. It's not like he has to physically be at the club to influence or make decisions. What if actually does love the club and has just made a number of bad decisions? Does that make him not love it?Christ you don't really think he loves the club do you?In truth I don't give a shit if he does or not. All I care about is that he does the right thing by it. I don't see that or his presence at the club as a topic worthy of discussion. All that matters is that he makes good decisions and over the past few years he hasn't made enough of them.
Quote from: Toronto Villa on December 16, 2015, 11:19:43 PMLTA, I'm not engaging in a quotathon. He's complimented the supporters and repeatedly said the playing side hasn't been good enough. That isn't patronising. Randy being here or not isn't an issue. Have you noticed it is nearly 2016 and they can talk to or see Randy every day. It's not like he has to physically be at the club to influence or make decisions. What if actually does love the club and has just made a number of bad decisions? Does that make him not love it?Christ you don't really think he loves the club do you?
Or alternatively how bad were we in the 50s when you could talk person to person with the Chairman any market day by simply walking up to his fish stall in the Bull Ring?
See also my comments on the same thread. Lerner bashing is not going to rewrite a single line of Aston Villa history. It is time to deal with the circumstances as they are, not how we would have liked them to be.
Quote from: brian green on December 17, 2015, 04:42:01 AMOr alternatively how bad were we in the 50s when you could talk person to person with the Chairman any market day by simply walking up to his fish stall in the Bull Ring?I think that a pre requisite for success is that the owner has to give a shit, only after that can competance come into play.See my comment on the RL thread he does not give a shit.
Quote from: ChicagoLion on December 17, 2015, 04:49:43 AMQuote from: brian green on December 17, 2015, 04:42:01 AMOr alternatively how bad were we in the 50s when you could talk person to person with the Chairman any market day by simply walking up to his fish stall in the Bull Ring?I think that a pre requisite for success is that the owner has to give a shit, only after that can competance come into play.See my comment on the RL thread he does not give a shit.If he didn't give a shit why did he reinvest the money we got for Benteke and Delph this summer? Surely if he didn't care he'd have just trousered it all to offset his losses.
Quote from: Toronto Villa on December 17, 2015, 06:53:07 AMQuote from: ChicagoLion on December 17, 2015, 04:49:43 AMQuote from: brian green on December 17, 2015, 04:42:01 AMOr alternatively how bad were we in the 50s when you could talk person to person with the Chairman any market day by simply walking up to his fish stall in the Bull Ring?I think that a pre requisite for success is that the owner has to give a shit, only after that can competance come into play.See my comment on the RL thread he does not give a shit.If he didn't give a shit why did he reinvest the money we got for Benteke and Delph this summer? Surely if he didn't care he'd have just trousered it all to offset his losses.And if he didn't give a shit, he would have sold the club earlier this year when he had the chance.
Quote from: Toronto Villa on December 17, 2015, 06:53:07 AMQuote from: ChicagoLion on December 17, 2015, 04:49:43 AMQuote from: brian green on December 17, 2015, 04:42:01 AMOr alternatively how bad were we in the 50s when you could talk person to person with the Chairman any market day by simply walking up to his fish stall in the Bull Ring?I think that a pre requisite for success is that the owner has to give a shit, only after that can competance come into play.See my comment on the RL thread he does not give a shit.If he didn't give a shit why did he reinvest the money we got for Benteke and Delph this summer? Surely if he didn't care he'd have just trousered it all to offset his losses.Because he would have been 100% guaranteed to lose the £100m+ Premiership Tv rights if he did. Pocketing £40m to lose £100m is something not even that gorm is stupid enough to do. As it was, he did the bare minimum, and that calculated gamble has spectacularly back fired in our faces with our mammoth 6 pts and certain relegation.