Quote from: Monty on November 03, 2015, 04:26:39 PMI keep seeing people complimenting Gestede's performance last night, from anonymous bloggers all the way up to Gary Neville on Sky. I have no idea what they saw. The guy just lurched about chaotically as usual, and even worse his heading (the only reason for picking him) was terrible - his awful flick-ons found no Villa players, his shots were terrible, he never kept the ball when it came to him, he's too slow to press effectively and missed a really good chance to make it 2-2. If he's missing that chance, and not heading the ball to team-mates or holding it up, then what's the point of him being in the team?Whilst Gestede is not one of our biggest problems, he's also not one of the answers to our problems. When he came on for the last 20 mins vs Man U I thought he looked hopeless. I gave him the benefit of the doubt but I've seen nothing since that suggests he is anything other than a big fucking lump with little or no footballing ability. Who watched him & thought he could play in the premiership? At best he's an impact player off the bench.
I keep seeing people complimenting Gestede's performance last night, from anonymous bloggers all the way up to Gary Neville on Sky. I have no idea what they saw. The guy just lurched about chaotically as usual, and even worse his heading (the only reason for picking him) was terrible - his awful flick-ons found no Villa players, his shots were terrible, he never kept the ball when it came to him, he's too slow to press effectively and missed a really good chance to make it 2-2. If he's missing that chance, and not heading the ball to team-mates or holding it up, then what's the point of him being in the team?
Again, this weird idea that good football and results are somehow incompatible. Where foes it come from? Is it some Christian guilt thing or something? Our best players are suited to passing and the practical way to play is, therefore, passing. Gestede, not being one of our better players, has no say on the matter.
I think it was Gil who led to the team looking better, not Gestede. I thought Spurs handled him with laughable ease for the most part.
GuzanHutton Okore Richards AmaviBacuna Gana Veretout Gil Sinclair AyewTwo up top with two wide players who can cross the ball and two ball midfielders who can defend.Amavi can overlap too so when Gil cuts inside amavi gets forward.Grealish can come on for Gil or play with him replacing Bacuna gana or veretout if one of middle twoBacuna can go play in middle if grealish or an impact sub comes on . traroe can play on left or right. Garde seems a 442 man but the alternate is playing with Rudy GuzanBacuna Richards okore amavi Veretout Gana SanchezSinclair Gestede Ayew
A point was made to me during last nights game. Namely that seven years ago Richardson was playing alongside Geoff Horsfield at lowly Smethwick. That he is anywhere near our first team now says a lot about us in recent times.
Subversive is the only word to describe McDonald's team selection last night; he should be kicked out as there is clearly a clique which needs to be addressed quickly by Garde, with support from above. I honestly would not have made the trip if I'd have seen the line up before I caught the coach at VP at 3.00 p.m., not returning to Shrewsbury until 2.05 a.m. this morning.
Quote from: kippaxvilla2 on November 03, 2015, 11:03:15 PMA point was made to me during last nights game. Namely that seven years ago Richardson was playing alongside Geoff Horsfield at lowly Smethwick. That he is anywhere near our first team now says a lot about us in recent times.I don't understand how that says anything about us in recent times, David Beckham played for Preston North End in Division 3 and eight years later was playing alongside Zinedine Zidane for Real Madrid having won all there is to win with Manchester United in the meantime. I'm not saying Richardson is any good but it's a strange example to use.