Thing is, if we've decided to keep our powder dry for the January window because we're 10 points behind and couldn't attract our top choices then I'm fine with this - but ONLY if Remi Garde has understood and agreed to this policy. However, if the Club has pulled the rug from under him and changed strategy WITHOUT Remi's understanding and agreement then I think he'll walk. In fact taking off my Villa supporters hat, I think he should walk.Problem is, you could read Garde's comments a number of ways. And you could read his body language a number of ways. Pissed off yes, but pissed off at what, the general situation? the players who told him they'd come? the players agents who upped the wage demands at the last minute? the Club for not backing him? some of the above? or all of the above? It easy (too fucking easy with this mob) to immediately believe its incompetence on behalf of the transfer committee and the Board - and McGrath knows they've been culpable in the past. But let's cool down and not jump to too many conclusions until we've heard another press conference from RG. It might be as simple as us making offers for the players he really wanted and none of the fuckers wanted to sign. So we didn't want to throw money at the 2nd/3rd string options. You see, I can totally understand that. Anyway, that's my straw I'm clutching at because if we lost Garde over this - well that just cannot be allowed to happen. I do know one thing though, we need him more than he needs us right now.
Hollis is right, if the question is about the troubles of the last five years, then the answer is not just to spend money.If the question is how to get out of this mess right now, though, then he's wrong, the answer is to spend money - to strengthen the squad. Anyone who has watched us this season can see what a difference options up front would make.There's no guarantee that spending money would save us, but not spending any at all guarantees we will go down.Still, how would you expect someone who is not a football man to understand that? Why would you feel you have to persuade someone like that to take the job and then drop them in to it halfway through the window?Randy's most damaging weakness is his tendency to make awful appointments. If this mess is Hollis's doing, then he just looks like another poor appointment to me.This club is going to remain moribund and dysfunctional until the clueless chairman finds a buyer.
I like Garde, he has a dignified way about him and he has really been dumped on - as we all have.BUTbefore I get too teary eyed about him:1. He is getting paid a lot of money2. I had a quick look through his results which were:Played 15 (PL Played 12 Won 1)Won 2Drawn 7Lost 6For 11Against 23I would like him to stay bur would I be fussed if he left? No
Quote from: oswald funkletrumpet on February 02, 2016, 09:43:35 AMI like Garde, he has a dignified way about him and he has really been dumped on - as we all have.BUTbefore I get too teary eyed about him:1. He is getting paid a lot of money2. I had a quick look through his results which were:Played 15 (PL Played 12 Won 1)Won 2Drawn 7Lost 6For 11Against 23I would like him to stay bur would I be fussed if he left? NoI don't think the issues are that he is leaving surely its why? Its been proven the board are inept....Ive had enough, nothing to do with the league position but give my hard earned to those pricks running the club.