I seem to recall one of the main arguments for getting rid of Sherwood was we had assembled a strong squad of players in the summer (a few even comparing it to BFR's business in 1991) and it was only his tactical idiocy that was holding us back.
Quote from: Jimbo on January 25, 2016, 07:51:29 PMQuote from: Legion on January 25, 2016, 07:31:52 PMQuote from: Jimbo on January 25, 2016, 07:27:09 PMQuote from: Ads on January 25, 2016, 05:40:25 PMHe's the manager we needed instead of Houllier.Fixed.Good point. Or possibly after Houllier.Houllier was a mistake, I think. He was too arrogant, didn't understand the club and was destined for another stint in hospital. Besides which, despite the revisionist view, he tried to change too much too soon, and was't very good. I don't know what his circumstances were at the time, but Garde could have followed O'Neill, I think he'd still be here now and we'd be in good health.I disagree. Houllier would have been the ideal sacrificial lamb, identifying the likes of Dunne/Collins/Gabby as old school luddites, whereas I think Garde would have been the perfect 'good cop' picking up the pieces after Houllier's abrasive style. Ultimately, I think that the club needed/needs to be broken without the boys club mentality in order to foster a better and more professional work ethic. Houllier was ideal for this and I fear Garde could lose the good will of the crowd before this process is complete.
Quote from: Legion on January 25, 2016, 07:31:52 PMQuote from: Jimbo on January 25, 2016, 07:27:09 PMQuote from: Ads on January 25, 2016, 05:40:25 PMHe's the manager we needed instead of Houllier.Fixed.Good point. Or possibly after Houllier.Houllier was a mistake, I think. He was too arrogant, didn't understand the club and was destined for another stint in hospital. Besides which, despite the revisionist view, he tried to change too much too soon, and was't very good. I don't know what his circumstances were at the time, but Garde could have followed O'Neill, I think he'd still be here now and we'd be in good health.
Quote from: Jimbo on January 25, 2016, 07:27:09 PMQuote from: Ads on January 25, 2016, 05:40:25 PMHe's the manager we needed instead of Houllier.Fixed.Good point. Or possibly after Houllier.
Quote from: Ads on January 25, 2016, 05:40:25 PMHe's the manager we needed instead of Houllier.Fixed.
He's the manager we needed instead of Houllier.
The rush to judge Garde is equally daft on both sides. He's done nothing to be called either not fit for purpose, or the next Arsene Wenger yet.
Going back to Pulis, I bet when he saw Puncheon and Bolasie on the training pitch for the first time he was violently sick but Parish told him he couldn't sell them.
Quote from: Risso on January 26, 2016, 10:08:42 AMThe rush to judge Garde is equally daft on both sides. He's done nothing to be called either not fit for purpose, or the next Arsene Wenger yet. Obviously our fortunes over the next couple of season will be how he is judged as a manager.I would though say that he has impressed me with his dealings so far. No just seems to be getting on with it, without the self serving pronouncements typical of a Pulis or an Allardyce.
Quote from: Chris Smith on January 26, 2016, 02:47:30 PMQuote from: Risso on January 26, 2016, 10:08:42 AMThe rush to judge Garde is equally daft on both sides. He's done nothing to be called either not fit for purpose, or the next Arsene Wenger yet. Obviously our fortunes over the next couple of season will be how he is judged as a manager.I would though say that he has impressed me with his dealings so far. No just seems to be getting on with it, without the self serving pronouncements typical of a Pulis or an Allardyce.He appears to be getting an improvement out of the players at last, but it's not very long since he was talking about other people at the club needing to speak out, and how he couldn't be judged on things that happened before he came etc. There have also been, and continue to be some strange team selections, eg dropping Veretout at the weekend against the bitters.
I didn't see that as strange at all, to me it was a player who has a suffered a dip in form being given a rest. He is 22 and new to the league so only to be expected.
I'll admit I was happy with the Gestede signing based more or less on reputation alone and the fact he had scored quite a few the previous season. I figured he'd bang in the goals for us.Had I actually scouted him myself - as I assume someone at the club did - I'd have been far less enthused.