onje_villa - he is picking some people consistently when he shouldn't be - Gestede for one. That's intransigence.As for the others you mention, Gabby has been injured and has not featured recently, but the others have had playing time under Sherwood and Garde, so saying the latter has brought them back into the fold is a little melodramatic. Some people amaze me, they really do.
Quote from: Chico Hamilton III on December 14, 2015, 11:32:07 AMQuote from: onje_villa on December 14, 2015, 11:28:19 AMQuote from: mr underhill on December 14, 2015, 11:09:13 AMonje_villa - he is picking some people consistently when he shouldn't be - Gestede for one. That's intransigence.As for the others you mention, Gabby has been injured and has not featured recently, but the others have had playing time under Sherwood and Garde, so saying the latter has brought them back into the fold is a little melodramatic. Some people amaze me, they really do.I'd be really interested to see who other than the choice between Gestede and Kozak, you would pick differently? Do you really think the team selection is the issue here? Which players should he be playing that he isn't? Also, don't you think 5 games is somewhat premature to judge a manager brought in to start the long process of turning round a team in monumental decline?I think that whatever team turns out for us, the absolute minimum requirement is that they run and chase and bust their guts to be competitive and I'd expect a team to start showing this after a manager has had 5 games to get this across. Didn't see it yesterday. I agree that effort should be a minimum but anyone can see that effort isn't the issue here surely. We're lambasting Hutton for being a liability not for a lack of effort, similarly most of the new players brought in are struggling to find their feet but I have absolutely no issues with the likes of Ayew and Veretout, I think they try hard and unlike others I don't hate these players. I think Remi has done the right thing with Grealish and Gabby - these are the lazy chancers that are not putting the effort in and Garde has responded to that.If we are going down, which certainly looks likely, it's not because Garde hasn't shouted enough at the team or told them to "get stuck in", it's dangerous combination of a chronic lack of confidence (losing games for 4 years will do that), allied with a worryingly lack of experience and lack of goal threat.And for the record, I for one can see small changes Garde has brought about. We definitely look to be more organised, we no longer have Sherwood's baffling selections or substitutions. But the defensive errors and lack of goal threat are chronic conditions and we will need time to overcome them.
Quote from: onje_villa on December 14, 2015, 11:28:19 AMQuote from: mr underhill on December 14, 2015, 11:09:13 AMonje_villa - he is picking some people consistently when he shouldn't be - Gestede for one. That's intransigence.As for the others you mention, Gabby has been injured and has not featured recently, but the others have had playing time under Sherwood and Garde, so saying the latter has brought them back into the fold is a little melodramatic. Some people amaze me, they really do.I'd be really interested to see who other than the choice between Gestede and Kozak, you would pick differently? Do you really think the team selection is the issue here? Which players should he be playing that he isn't? Also, don't you think 5 games is somewhat premature to judge a manager brought in to start the long process of turning round a team in monumental decline?I think that whatever team turns out for us, the absolute minimum requirement is that they run and chase and bust their guts to be competitive and I'd expect a team to start showing this after a manager has had 5 games to get this across. Didn't see it yesterday.
Quote from: mr underhill on December 14, 2015, 11:09:13 AMonje_villa - he is picking some people consistently when he shouldn't be - Gestede for one. That's intransigence.As for the others you mention, Gabby has been injured and has not featured recently, but the others have had playing time under Sherwood and Garde, so saying the latter has brought them back into the fold is a little melodramatic. Some people amaze me, they really do.I'd be really interested to see who other than the choice between Gestede and Kozak, you would pick differently? Do you really think the team selection is the issue here? Which players should he be playing that he isn't? Also, don't you think 5 games is somewhat premature to judge a manager brought in to start the long process of turning round a team in monumental decline?
At least there's a plan in place. http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/remi-garde-aston-villa-boss-10594241
I was heartened to read that Garde still wants his coaches and knows we are light without them.
There were 3 Villa players jogging instead of chasing Arsenal players for their second goal - Sanchez was the worst offender for me. Hate to agree with Shearer but he had the measure of our lack of commitment for the second goal.
A genuinely good centre forward for the team to pay off with 2 competent full backs and a good holder would help. Richards at right back would start it.
Quote from: ozzjim on December 14, 2015, 11:48:46 AMA genuinely good centre forward for the team to pay off with 2 competent full backs and a good holder would help. Richards at right back would start it.To be fair from the highlights it showed Hutton creating our two best chances second half.Didnt see the game so appreciate it probably didnt show the multiple times Hutton failed to beat the first man.For pace alone Richards needs to come back in at right back.