In other news, Leicester City post a £26m profit ...
Quote from: Ad@m on March 03, 2016, 07:44:13 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:08:35 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on March 03, 2016, 12:01:13 AMAt the moment I wouldn't be against a clean sweep. Maybe we need it. Though I would keep Garde as long as he gets everything he wants to really turn the squad over and bring in his own team. Mind you you'd have to think Villa being in the Championship makes us far less attractive to the coaches he wanted to bring in. Either way Fox simply had to go.Still not sure how Fox is guilty of doing anything apart from following ordersYou genuinely think the Chief Executive of a £100m business has absolutely no say in how things are done?I believe he just did what Lerner okayed. Like Faulkner before him
Quote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:08:35 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on March 03, 2016, 12:01:13 AMAt the moment I wouldn't be against a clean sweep. Maybe we need it. Though I would keep Garde as long as he gets everything he wants to really turn the squad over and bring in his own team. Mind you you'd have to think Villa being in the Championship makes us far less attractive to the coaches he wanted to bring in. Either way Fox simply had to go.Still not sure how Fox is guilty of doing anything apart from following ordersYou genuinely think the Chief Executive of a £100m business has absolutely no say in how things are done?
Quote from: Toronto Villa on March 03, 2016, 12:01:13 AMAt the moment I wouldn't be against a clean sweep. Maybe we need it. Though I would keep Garde as long as he gets everything he wants to really turn the squad over and bring in his own team. Mind you you'd have to think Villa being in the Championship makes us far less attractive to the coaches he wanted to bring in. Either way Fox simply had to go.Still not sure how Fox is guilty of doing anything apart from following orders
At the moment I wouldn't be against a clean sweep. Maybe we need it. Though I would keep Garde as long as he gets everything he wants to really turn the squad over and bring in his own team. Mind you you'd have to think Villa being in the Championship makes us far less attractive to the coaches he wanted to bring in. Either way Fox simply had to go.
If we were Marks and Spencer Fox would be prosecuted.
Quote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:47:55 PMQuote from: Ad@m on March 03, 2016, 07:44:13 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:08:35 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on March 03, 2016, 12:01:13 AMAt the moment I wouldn't be against a clean sweep. Maybe we need it. Though I would keep Garde as long as he gets everything he wants to really turn the squad over and bring in his own team. Mind you you'd have to think Villa being in the Championship makes us far less attractive to the coaches he wanted to bring in. Either way Fox simply had to go.Still not sure how Fox is guilty of doing anything apart from following ordersYou genuinely think the Chief Executive of a £100m business has absolutely no say in how things are done?I believe he just did what Lerner okayed. Like Faulkner before himWasn't it widely reported at the time that Fox had to convince Lerner to let him give Lambert the boot and bring in Sherwood?
Quote from: Ad@m on March 03, 2016, 07:55:00 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:47:55 PMQuote from: Ad@m on March 03, 2016, 07:44:13 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:08:35 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on March 03, 2016, 12:01:13 AMAt the moment I wouldn't be against a clean sweep. Maybe we need it. Though I would keep Garde as long as he gets everything he wants to really turn the squad over and bring in his own team. Mind you you'd have to think Villa being in the Championship makes us far less attractive to the coaches he wanted to bring in. Either way Fox simply had to go.Still not sure how Fox is guilty of doing anything apart from following ordersYou genuinely think the Chief Executive of a £100m business has absolutely no say in how things are done?I believe he just did what Lerner okayed. Like Faulkner before himWasn't it widely reported at the time that Fox had to convince Lerner to let him give Lambert the boot and bring in Sherwood?well i'm not sure that was a bad decision. The boot bit, but its clear Garde was Lerner's decison, as was TSM, as was Lambert, as was the rest, apart from MON
Quote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:58:04 PMQuote from: Ad@m on March 03, 2016, 07:55:00 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:47:55 PMQuote from: Ad@m on March 03, 2016, 07:44:13 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:08:35 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on March 03, 2016, 12:01:13 AMAt the moment I wouldn't be against a clean sweep. Maybe we need it. Though I would keep Garde as long as he gets everything he wants to really turn the squad over and bring in his own team. Mind you you'd have to think Villa being in the Championship makes us far less attractive to the coaches he wanted to bring in. Either way Fox simply had to go.Still not sure how Fox is guilty of doing anything apart from following ordersYou genuinely think the Chief Executive of a £100m business has absolutely no say in how things are done?I believe he just did what Lerner okayed. Like Faulkner before himWasn't it widely reported at the time that Fox had to convince Lerner to let him give Lambert the boot and bring in Sherwood?well i'm not sure that was a bad decision. The boot bit, but its clear Garde was Lerner's decison, as was TSM, as was Lambert, as was the rest, apart from MONWasn't Lambert's contract extension Fox's idea based on a couple of wins at the start of the season? That was mind boggling.
Quote from: Stirchley Villain on March 03, 2016, 07:49:22 PMIf we were Marks and Spencer Fox would be prosecuted.I'm not saying he's good at his job, or fit to run a newsagent but in the context of doing everything Lerner wanted, he's fullfilled his brief
Quote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:55:59 PMQuote from: Stirchley Villain on March 03, 2016, 07:49:22 PMIf we were Marks and Spencer Fox would be prosecuted.I'm not saying he's good at his job, or fit to run a newsagent but in the context of doing everything Lerner wanted, he's fullfilled his briefI think keeping us in the PL would have headed this brief.I don't. I don't think Lerner ever considered relegation when he employed him. He's American. We're spending millions more than other teams in that league even if we reduce our expenditure. How can team's with half our resources and wage bill finish above us with just decent managers and motivated players to fall back on? Impossible!
Quote from: Stirchley Villain on March 03, 2016, 08:36:59 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:55:59 PMQuote from: Stirchley Villain on March 03, 2016, 07:49:22 PMIf we were Marks and Spencer Fox would be prosecuted.I'm not saying he's good at his job, or fit to run a newsagent but in the context of doing everything Lerner wanted, he's fullfilled his briefI think keeping us in the PL would have headed this brief.I don't. I don't think Lerner ever considered relegation when he employed him. He's American. We're spending millions more than other teams in that league even if we reduce our expenditure. How can team's with half our resources and wage bill finish above us with just decent managers and motivated players to fall back on? Impossible!
Quote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 08:46:48 PMQuote from: Stirchley Villain on March 03, 2016, 08:36:59 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:55:59 PMQuote from: Stirchley Villain on March 03, 2016, 07:49:22 PMIf we were Marks and Spencer Fox would be prosecuted.I'm not saying he's good at his job, or fit to run a newsagent but in the context of doing everything Lerner wanted, he's fullfilled his briefI think keeping us in the PL would have headed this brief.I don't. I don't think Lerner ever considered relegation when he employed him. He's American. We're spending millions more than other teams in that league even if we reduce our expenditure. How can team's with half our resources and wage bill finish above us with just decent managers and motivated players to fall back on? Impossible!Dont be daft.
Quote from: Ad@m on March 03, 2016, 07:55:00 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:47:55 PMQuote from: Ad@m on March 03, 2016, 07:44:13 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:08:35 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on March 03, 2016, 12:01:13 AMAt the moment I wouldn't be against a clean sweep. Maybe we need it. Though I would keep Garde as long as he gets everything he wants to really turn the squad over and bring in his own team. Mind you you'd have to think Villa being in the Championship makes us far less attractive to the coaches he wanted to bring in. Either way Fox simply had to go.Still not sure how Fox is guilty of doing anything apart from following ordersYou genuinely think the Chief Executive of a £100m business has absolutely no say in how things are done?I believe he just did what Lerner okayed. Like Faulkner before himWasn't it widely reported at the time that Fox had to convince Lerner to let him give Lambert the boot and bring in Sherwood?well i'm not sure that was a bad decision. The boot bit, but its clear Garde was Lerner's decison, as was TSM, as was Lambert, as was the rest, apart from MON. Look at who's managed us, with the exception of Lambert it's been one wft? appointment after another. Houllier? I like him but it was leftfield. TSM - well we KNOW he was Lerner's baby. That summer of chasing OGS with private jets taking off on the hour - Lerner. Lambert, Lerner's 2nd choice but at least vaguely sane even if you were vaguely suspicious that he only got the gig because he looked like MON's retarded brother.. Sherwood, again a guy who you really didn't want managing at Villa based on his time at Spurs. Garde another WTF?. Our board just do Lerner's bidding and sacking a load of yesmen for more yes men like Hollis won't solve anything when the guy in charge is the problem
Quote from: Stirchley Villain on March 03, 2016, 08:52:22 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 08:46:48 PMQuote from: Stirchley Villain on March 03, 2016, 08:36:59 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:55:59 PMQuote from: Stirchley Villain on March 03, 2016, 07:49:22 PMIf we were Marks and Spencer Fox would be prosecuted.I'm not saying he's good at his job, or fit to run a newsagent but in the context of doing everything Lerner wanted, he's fullfilled his briefI think keeping us in the PL would have headed this brief.I don't. I don't think Lerner ever considered relegation when he employed him. He's American. We're spending millions more than other teams in that league even if we reduce our expenditure. How can team's with half our resources and wage bill finish above us with just decent managers and motivated players to fall back on? Impossible!Dont be daft.you only have to see the buoyant bolllocks fox was coming out with not long ago to see they didn't have a clue. "We're building something special" - They certainly are. That's from december last year - now if he's that in denial then, what the fuck was he like when he joined us?
Quote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:58:04 PMQuote from: Ad@m on March 03, 2016, 07:55:00 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:47:55 PMQuote from: Ad@m on March 03, 2016, 07:44:13 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:08:35 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on March 03, 2016, 12:01:13 AMAt the moment I wouldn't be against a clean sweep. Maybe we need it. Though I would keep Garde as long as he gets everything he wants to really turn the squad over and bring in his own team. Mind you you'd have to think Villa being in the Championship makes us far less attractive to the coaches he wanted to bring in. Either way Fox simply had to go.Still not sure how Fox is guilty of doing anything apart from following ordersYou genuinely think the Chief Executive of a £100m business has absolutely no say in how things are done?I believe he just did what Lerner okayed. Like Faulkner before himWasn't it widely reported at the time that Fox had to convince Lerner to let him give Lambert the boot and bring in Sherwood?well i'm not sure that was a bad decision. The boot bit, but its clear Garde was Lerner's decison, as was TSM, as was Lambert, as was the rest, apart from MON. Look at who's managed us, with the exception of Lambert it's been one wft? appointment after another. Houllier? I like him but it was leftfield. TSM - well we KNOW he was Lerner's baby. That summer of chasing OGS with private jets taking off on the hour - Lerner. Lambert, Lerner's 2nd choice but at least vaguely sane even if you were vaguely suspicious that he only got the gig because he looked like MON's retarded brother.. Sherwood, again a guy who you really didn't want managing at Villa based on his time at Spurs. Garde another WTF?. Our board just do Lerner's bidding and sacking a load of yesmen for more yes men like Hollis won't solve anything when the guy in charge is the problemwhich is why I fear you might get your wish of a obvious media type appointment next season in Pearson/Pulisno WTF appointment that would be, the pundits will say its just what we need, and we will be stuck with that for the forseableI'd rather gamble again on a WTF shot
Quote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 08:46:48 PMQuote from: Stirchley Villain on March 03, 2016, 08:36:59 PMQuote from: sickbeggar on March 03, 2016, 07:55:59 PMQuote from: Stirchley Villain on March 03, 2016, 07:49:22 PMIf we were Marks and Spencer Fox would be prosecuted.I'm not saying he's good at his job, or fit to run a newsagent but in the context of doing everything Lerner wanted, he's fullfilled his briefI think keeping us in the PL would have headed this brief.I don't. I don't think Lerner ever considered relegation when he employed him. He's American. We're spending millions more than other teams in that league even if we reduce our expenditure. How can team's with half our resources and wage bill finish above us with just decent managers and motivated players to fall back on? Impossible!Staying in the PL would have been the be all and end all until a sale was secured.