Quote from: not3bad on October 20, 2015, 09:25:40 AMQuote from: Toronto Villa on October 20, 2015, 02:48:10 AMQuote from: ROBBO on October 19, 2015, 11:50:13 PMJust watched swansea get done by stoke and both teams were terrible which indicates how crap we are. Another young manager relatively inexperienced no thanks.So you're judging Garry Monk on one game and not his entire body of work? The point was made earlier that Gary Monk has done well at Swansea because he knows the way the football club works, he's knows the players, he knows the system, he knows where he fits in and what the parameters are. Coming to Villa, with all the issues that are here, would be a totally different test. The appointment would be as risky as Sherwood's was.Monk has done well at Swansea but yes, he would be risky for us in our situation. Also, why would he leave Swansea to come to us?
Quote from: Toronto Villa on October 20, 2015, 02:48:10 AMQuote from: ROBBO on October 19, 2015, 11:50:13 PMJust watched swansea get done by stoke and both teams were terrible which indicates how crap we are. Another young manager relatively inexperienced no thanks.So you're judging Garry Monk on one game and not his entire body of work? The point was made earlier that Gary Monk has done well at Swansea because he knows the way the football club works, he's knows the players, he knows the system, he knows where he fits in and what the parameters are. Coming to Villa, with all the issues that are here, would be a totally different test. The appointment would be as risky as Sherwood's was.
Quote from: ROBBO on October 19, 2015, 11:50:13 PMJust watched swansea get done by stoke and both teams were terrible which indicates how crap we are. Another young manager relatively inexperienced no thanks.So you're judging Garry Monk on one game and not his entire body of work?
Just watched swansea get done by stoke and both teams were terrible which indicates how crap we are. Another young manager relatively inexperienced no thanks.
Quote from: ClaretAndBlueBlood on October 20, 2015, 09:37:58 AMQuote from: not3bad on October 20, 2015, 09:25:40 AMQuote from: Toronto Villa on October 20, 2015, 02:48:10 AMQuote from: ROBBO on October 19, 2015, 11:50:13 PMJust watched swansea get done by stoke and both teams were terrible which indicates how crap we are. Another young manager relatively inexperienced no thanks.So you're judging Garry Monk on one game and not his entire body of work? The point was made earlier that Gary Monk has done well at Swansea because he knows the way the football club works, he's knows the players, he knows the system, he knows where he fits in and what the parameters are. Coming to Villa, with all the issues that are here, would be a totally different test. The appointment would be as risky as Sherwood's was.Monk has done well at Swansea but yes, he would be risky for us in our situation. Also, why would he leave Swansea to come to us?Dear god that would be a disaster. The whole reason that Sherwood has failed is that does not have the experience or clout to be the centre of affairs at the club. We are in urgent need of the kind of impact that Sir Graham had; someone who like Sir Graham can arrive, will call the club for the ill-run shambles that it is and say its my way or no way. We have been floundering for too long now, testing out one approach, changing tack trying another, changing tack again and repeat ad nausea. We need stability and if it aint coming from above, then it sure as hell needs to come from the manager
Quote from: NeilH on October 20, 2015, 09:55:43 AMQuote from: ClaretAndBlueBlood on October 20, 2015, 09:37:58 AMQuote from: not3bad on October 20, 2015, 09:25:40 AMQuote from: Toronto Villa on October 20, 2015, 02:48:10 AMQuote from: ROBBO on October 19, 2015, 11:50:13 PMJust watched swansea get done by stoke and both teams were terrible which indicates how crap we are. Another young manager relatively inexperienced no thanks.So you're judging Garry Monk on one game and not his entire body of work? The point was made earlier that Gary Monk has done well at Swansea because he knows the way the football club works, he's knows the players, he knows the system, he knows where he fits in and what the parameters are. Coming to Villa, with all the issues that are here, would be a totally different test. The appointment would be as risky as Sherwood's was.Monk has done well at Swansea but yes, he would be risky for us in our situation. Also, why would he leave Swansea to come to us?Dear god that would be a disaster. The whole reason that Sherwood has failed is that does not have the experience or clout to be the centre of affairs at the club. We are in urgent need of the kind of impact that Sir Graham had; someone who like Sir Graham can arrive, will call the club for the ill-run shambles that it is and say its my way or no way. We have been floundering for too long now, testing out one approach, changing tack trying another, changing tack again and repeat ad nausea. We need stability and if it aint coming from above, then it sure as hell needs to come from the managerI'm not sure Monk is the man for us, but Sherwood has not failed due to lack of experience or clout. He's failed because he's too arrogant and he doesn't have the first clue how to organise a team.
I wouldn't want Monk.Swansea look like us under Lambert at the moment, with all the cutting edge of a butter knife. Until they play us of course, then they might find their scoring touch again.
This is turning into a car crash
I notice that there are still a significant number of people who don't want Sherwood to go, or are yet to decide.I would genuinely like to hear why they feel that way. It seems to me that we are on the highway to hell with Sherwood but maybe I'm missing something.Give me some straws to cling to!