I agree with Pelty that the managerial appointments in isolation are generally defensible, except for McLeish. Lambert, who now looks like the worst in recent memory, made perfect sense at the time. I would question the lack of consistency and coherent strategy across managers though as I feel that has played a role in the lack of success.
Lerner does not even select the manager, so relax. Merely because they can say "Lerner,"and thus think that they have attained the Holy Grail of polysyllabism, all the nitwits who criticize the owner on this point just like to think of themselves as saying something meaningful. Trust me when I tell you that you have not. We get it; you think Lerner's appointments have sucked. In the case of McLeish, you are right, but the others are defensible and were never Lerner's alone anyway. You are boring; please stop wasting people's time with your drivel.
I don't see how the Lambert appointment was shit. It was almost universally well received. That it turned into shit doesn't make it a shit appointment.
Quote from: Toronto Villa on October 14, 2015, 12:59:57 PMI don't see how the Lambert appointment was shit. It was almost universally well received. That it turned into shit doesn't make it a shit appointment.Agreed, I thought we'd got a man who was capable of picking the team to suit the opposition and being able to make the correct subs, it turned out however to be the complete opposite
I liked Houllier. He was blunt and undiplomatic at times, but that wasn't specific to his time with us.He went to university and started working as a school teacher, originally, and you could see that vaguely academic nature reflected in his managerial style. Exactly the sort of thoughtful profile I would have liked to see us stick with, rather than opting for the good old-fashioned, British up and at 'em, leave-your-brain-at-the-dressing-room door approach.
Quote from: pelty on October 14, 2015, 07:35:30 AMLerner does not even select the manager, so relax. Merely because they can say "Lerner,"and thus think that they have attained the Holy Grail of polysyllabism, all the nitwits who criticize the owner on this point just like to think of themselves as saying something meaningful. Trust me when I tell you that you have not. We get it; you think Lerner's appointments have sucked. In the case of McLeish, you are right, but the others are defensible and were never Lerner's alone anyway. You are boring; please stop wasting people's time with your drivel.The arrogance of a post like this is astounding. Villa fans have had to endure a lot of shit over the last few years of Lerner's leadership. Christ, we thought Doug was bad but since the initial honeymoon period of the Lerner regime, it's been just as, if not more, trying. Saying Lerner is not to blame is like saying Sepp Blatter is blameless for FIFA's current plight. He's the owner and I'm afraid the blame lies with him. We've had crap appointment after crap appointment. We've seen our best players leave almost annually. We've seen the amount of money put into the football club decrease to the extent where it is now clear that the aim of the football club is to come 17th each year. And yet... Those who criticise Lerner are 'nitwits' who waste other people's time? Lerner has wasted a large amount of time and money of the fans who follow Villa with his lackadaisical attitude and bizarre statements. He freely admits he can no longer do the job. For what it's worth, I think Lerner had good intentions but has come up well short of what he promised. With your connections to the club I think you'd be well advised not to tell the fans who have been drained of emotion supporting the club that they are wasting people's time.
It occurs to me that O'Neill got a lot of flak for fucking off when things started to get tough.But if he had been able to find a buyer, Lerner would have done much the same.