Quote from: Dave on September 19, 2015, 09:51:22 PMQuote from: UK Redsox on September 19, 2015, 09:47:09 PMQuote from: LTA on September 19, 2015, 09:35:05 PMSherwood is getting plenty of flack here and much is deserved. And today showed why Pulis's style may be dull, but is far more likely to keep them up. Our previous two managers were both renowned "booters". Indeed McLeish had a reputation for being able to organise a defence, though I saw precious little evidence while he was here. Neither were able to do any better than Sherwood has playing better football.The Pulis style wasn't dull today.The "taking 3 minutes over every throw-in and five minutes over every goal-kick" was more dull and irritating than most things that can happen during a football match.Everyone does that when they're winning. Even us...
Quote from: UK Redsox on September 19, 2015, 09:47:09 PMQuote from: LTA on September 19, 2015, 09:35:05 PMSherwood is getting plenty of flack here and much is deserved. And today showed why Pulis's style may be dull, but is far more likely to keep them up. Our previous two managers were both renowned "booters". Indeed McLeish had a reputation for being able to organise a defence, though I saw precious little evidence while he was here. Neither were able to do any better than Sherwood has playing better football.The Pulis style wasn't dull today.The "taking 3 minutes over every throw-in and five minutes over every goal-kick" was more dull and irritating than most things that can happen during a football match.
Quote from: LTA on September 19, 2015, 09:35:05 PMSherwood is getting plenty of flack here and much is deserved. And today showed why Pulis's style may be dull, but is far more likely to keep them up. Our previous two managers were both renowned "booters". Indeed McLeish had a reputation for being able to organise a defence, though I saw precious little evidence while he was here. Neither were able to do any better than Sherwood has playing better football.The Pulis style wasn't dull today.
Sherwood is getting plenty of flack here and much is deserved. And today showed why Pulis's style may be dull, but is far more likely to keep them up. Our previous two managers were both renowned "booters". Indeed McLeish had a reputation for being able to organise a defence, though I saw precious little evidence while he was here. Neither were able to do any better than Sherwood has playing better football.
Quote from: silhillvilla on September 19, 2015, 09:55:57 PMQuote from: Stirchley Villain on September 19, 2015, 09:52:43 PMQuote from: Dave on September 19, 2015, 09:51:22 PMQuote from: UK Redsox on September 19, 2015, 09:47:09 PMQuote from: LTA on September 19, 2015, 09:35:05 PMSherwood is getting plenty of flack here and much is deserved. And today showed why Pulis's style may be dull, but is far more likely to keep them up. Our previous two managers were both renowned "booters". Indeed McLeish had a reputation for being able to organise a defence, though I saw precious little evidence while he was here. Neither were able to do any better than Sherwood has playing better football.The Pulis style wasn't dull today.The "taking 3 minutes over every throw-in and five minutes over every goal-kick" was more dull and irritating than most things that can happen during a football match.Everyone does that when they're winning. Even us...Spot on. Apart from at Leicester and palace...
Quote from: Stirchley Villain on September 19, 2015, 09:52:43 PMQuote from: Dave on September 19, 2015, 09:51:22 PMQuote from: UK Redsox on September 19, 2015, 09:47:09 PMQuote from: LTA on September 19, 2015, 09:35:05 PMSherwood is getting plenty of flack here and much is deserved. And today showed why Pulis's style may be dull, but is far more likely to keep them up. Our previous two managers were both renowned "booters". Indeed McLeish had a reputation for being able to organise a defence, though I saw precious little evidence while he was here. Neither were able to do any better than Sherwood has playing better football.The Pulis style wasn't dull today.The "taking 3 minutes over every throw-in and five minutes over every goal-kick" was more dull and irritating than most things that can happen during a football match.Everyone does that when they're winning. Even us...Spot on.
Quote from: silhillvilla on September 19, 2015, 09:41:57 PMShould of signed Austin instead of £10m on the woeful Ayew and £6m on an immobile Gestede . His naivety is being exposed and it's very scary.I was saying this very thing in the car on the way home today.
Should of signed Austin instead of £10m on the woeful Ayew and £6m on an immobile Gestede . His naivety is being exposed and it's very scary.
How come we took Gil off and put bacuna on or am i being thick
Indeed, Leicester when two up but under the cosh we opted for the classic "take off a midfielder and bring on a struggling striker" option.A classic piece of fucking idiocy.
Quote from: KRS on September 19, 2015, 08:32:37 PMFor all the criticism that TS is getting for his tactics, part of the problem today is simply that our forward options are completely and utterly shite. The backwards and sideways passing were as a direct result of no movement or runs from the forwards...what are the midfield supposed to do if the forwards just stand their marking their markers?! Then he should have signed a forward that fucking moves.
For all the criticism that TS is getting for his tactics, part of the problem today is simply that our forward options are completely and utterly shite. The backwards and sideways passing were as a direct result of no movement or runs from the forwards...what are the midfield supposed to do if the forwards just stand their marking their markers?!
Quote from: Uknowthescore on September 19, 2015, 09:49:07 PMHow come we took Gil off and put bacuna on or am i being thickDid everyone Boo when he did that?
Quote from: KRS on September 19, 2015, 08:32:37 PMSurprised no one has mentioned the penalty claim...looked well inside the box from meIt was, but he turned his back on the cross and it didn't look like it hit his hand. If we'd been penalised for that I'd have been livid.
Surprised no one has mentioned the penalty claim...looked well inside the box from me
Quote from: LukeJames on September 19, 2015, 09:40:06 PMQuote from: KRS on September 19, 2015, 08:32:37 PMFor all the criticism that TS is getting for his tactics, part of the problem today is simply that our forward options are completely and utterly shite. The backwards and sideways passing were as a direct result of no movement or runs from the forwards...what are the midfield supposed to do if the forwards just stand their marking their markers?! Then he should have signed a forward that fucking moves.Thats exactly what I'm trying to say...the problem now is that Ayew and Gestede are proving to be a waste of money, Gabby is shite, Sinclair is invisible and we have no other mobile forward options (Kozak isn't a mobile forward by any stretch of the imagination before anyone suggests Kozak is the answer to our forward options).
Quote from: Dave on September 19, 2015, 08:44:11 PMQuote from: KRS on September 19, 2015, 08:32:37 PMSurprised no one has mentioned the penalty claim...looked well inside the box from meIt was, but he turned his back on the cross and it didn't look like it hit his hand. If we'd been penalised for that I'd have been livid.What was the freekick given for then if it wasn't flagged for the handball?