Quote from: paul_e on June 19, 2018, 10:39:28 PMThat's not quite as stupid as suggesting we sack him because of a picture of him making a sign you didn't know existed that you've decided to now be offended by.Regrettably, it is you who is being stupid or at best silly.I did not suggest we sack him nor do you know what I knew before the picture was publicised. You just added those two claims to your posts to try to add value to them.I'm personally offended by the mere mention of Mich Richards or Birmingham City. Please make sure you know that I don't need to decide that I'm offended. The two coupled together make a deadly cocktail in my mind. I know not everyone else feels as I do and quite honestly, I don't really care.
That's not quite as stupid as suggesting we sack him because of a picture of him making a sign you didn't know existed that you've decided to now be offended by.
If I had my way, Richards would be sacked on the spot for that, regardless of whether he knew what he was doing or not.
Quote from: Brassneck on June 19, 2018, 11:01:17 PMQuote from: paul_e on June 19, 2018, 10:39:28 PMThat's not quite as stupid as suggesting we sack him because of a picture of him making a sign you didn't know existed that you've decided to now be offended by.Regrettably, it is you who is being stupid or at best silly.I did not suggest we sack him nor do you know what I knew before the picture was publicised. You just added those two claims to your posts to try to add value to them.I'm personally offended by the mere mention of Mich Richards or Birmingham City. Please make sure you know that I don't need to decide that I'm offended. The two coupled together make a deadly cocktail in my mind. I know not everyone else feels as I do and quite honestly, I don't really care.Quote from: Brassneck on June 19, 2018, 08:51:33 PMIf I had my way, Richards would be sacked on the spot for that, regardless of whether he knew what he was doing or not.Tell me again how you didn't suggest we sack him.
He turns up and puts 100% into training, he is willing to play etc - so he cant be sacked. If the club have no desire to play him, then they just waste 50k per week - or they can buy out his contract to release him. However, reports I read are that he is great with the squad, offers advice, pumps them up etc. I would like to see him play(without all fans expecting a champions league player performance). I've seen Hutton have a nightmare game(more than once), yet he still gets picked. We are just cutting off our nose to spite our face. And yes, Richards will play at RB if picked - he already has. Why we bought Emo and D'laet is beyond me(just more wasted wages/trans fees on an area where we have decent enough players at this level). I understand the signing of Bree - young future talent.
Why we bought Emo and D'laet is beyond me(just more wasted wages/trans fees on an area where we have decent enough players at this level). I understand the signing of Bree - young future talent.
Quote from: Eiresvillan on June 20, 2018, 02:24:17 PMHe turns up and puts 100% into training, he is willing to play etc - so he cant be sacked. If the club have no desire to play him, then they just waste 50k per week - or they can buy out his contract to release him. However, reports I read are that he is great with the squad, offers advice, pumps them up etc. I would like to see him play(without all fans expecting a champions league player performance). I've seen Hutton have a nightmare game(more than once), yet he still gets picked. We are just cutting off our nose to spite our face. And yes, Richards will play at RB if picked - he already has. Why we bought Emo and D'laet is beyond me(just more wasted wages/trans fees on an area where we have decent enough players at this level). I understand the signing of Bree - young future talent.Richards wouldn't last 30 minutes at RB mate. He is grossly overweight. Hence his request/demand to play in the centre of defence where he doesn't have to run as much.
He turns up and puts 100% into training, he is willing to play etc - so he cant be sacked. If the club have no desire to play him, then they just waste 50k per week - or they can buy out his contract to release him. However, reports I read are that he is great with the squad, offers advice, pumps them up etc.
Quote from: Brassneck on June 20, 2018, 02:39:32 PMQuote from: Eiresvillan on June 20, 2018, 02:24:17 PMHe turns up and puts 100% into training, he is willing to play etc - so he cant be sacked. If the club have no desire to play him, then they just waste 50k per week - or they can buy out his contract to release him. However, reports I read are that he is great with the squad, offers advice, pumps them up etc. I would like to see him play(without all fans expecting a champions league player performance). I've seen Hutton have a nightmare game(more than once), yet he still gets picked. We are just cutting off our nose to spite our face. And yes, Richards will play at RB if picked - he already has. Why we bought Emo and D'laet is beyond me(just more wasted wages/trans fees on an area where we have decent enough players at this level). I understand the signing of Bree - young future talent.Richards wouldn't last 30 minutes at RB mate. He is grossly overweight. Hence his request/demand to play in the centre of defence where he doesn't have to run as much.Surely then we can prove he is not fit to do his job and we can sack him and cancel his contract ??
Quote from: Eiresvillan on June 20, 2018, 02:24:17 PMHe turns up and puts 100% into training, he is willing to play etc - so he cant be sacked. If the club have no desire to play him, then they just waste 50k per week - or they can buy out his contract to release him. However, reports I read are that he is great with the squad, offers advice, pumps them up etc. I would like to see him play(without all fans expecting a champions league player performance). I've seen Hutton have a nightmare game(more than once), yet he still gets picked. We are just cutting off our nose to spite our face. And yes, Richards will play at RB if picked - he already has. Why we bought Emo and D'laet is beyond me(just more wasted wages/trans fees on an area where we have decent enough players at this level). I understand the signing of Bree - young future talent. So he's basically a £2.5m a year version of Bez in the Happy Mondays then. Great.
He's obviously crocked. you don't go over a year not playing in a side where gabby can get a game. He'd be on loan at least. there's some major fuck up here, that no-one at the club wants to admit to. i.e. we signed a player with a pre-existing problem diagnosed at his medical and we can't pay him off because the insurance won't cover it.