Quote from: Tokyo Sexwhale on March 02, 2016, 10:22:54 PMQuote from: Witton Warrior on March 02, 2016, 08:12:29 PMQuote from: Dave on March 02, 2016, 08:08:28 PMQuote from: class-of-82 on March 02, 2016, 08:07:57 PMstill think for his tactical shortcomings he would have of turned it roundBut we will never knowHe definitely, definitely wouldn't. He may have convinced a couple of mercenaries to join in January but we would still be as stuffed as we are now IMHOI don't know - I somehow think he might have eked out a couple more wins than Garde has done. 2 more wins, or the equivalent in points, would mean we're still in the mix.What maths have you used there considering the run we were on before Garde was appointed?
Quote from: Witton Warrior on March 02, 2016, 08:12:29 PMQuote from: Dave on March 02, 2016, 08:08:28 PMQuote from: class-of-82 on March 02, 2016, 08:07:57 PMstill think for his tactical shortcomings he would have of turned it roundBut we will never knowHe definitely, definitely wouldn't. He may have convinced a couple of mercenaries to join in January but we would still be as stuffed as we are now IMHOI don't know - I somehow think he might have eked out a couple more wins than Garde has done. 2 more wins, or the equivalent in points, would mean we're still in the mix.
Quote from: Dave on March 02, 2016, 08:08:28 PMQuote from: class-of-82 on March 02, 2016, 08:07:57 PMstill think for his tactical shortcomings he would have of turned it roundBut we will never knowHe definitely, definitely wouldn't. He may have convinced a couple of mercenaries to join in January but we would still be as stuffed as we are now IMHO
Quote from: class-of-82 on March 02, 2016, 08:07:57 PMstill think for his tactical shortcomings he would have of turned it roundBut we will never knowHe definitely, definitely wouldn't.
still think for his tactical shortcomings he would have of turned it roundBut we will never know
I'm guessing the doctrinal differences within the group?
Quote from: Dante Lavelli on March 02, 2016, 10:38:05 PMQuote from: Tokyo Sexwhale on March 02, 2016, 10:22:54 PMQuote from: Witton Warrior on March 02, 2016, 08:12:29 PMQuote from: Dave on March 02, 2016, 08:08:28 PMQuote from: class-of-82 on March 02, 2016, 08:07:57 PMstill think for his tactical shortcomings he would have of turned it roundBut we will never knowHe definitely, definitely wouldn't. He may have convinced a couple of mercenaries to join in January but we would still be as stuffed as we are now IMHOI don't know - I somehow think he might have eked out a couple more wins than Garde has done. 2 more wins, or the equivalent in points, would mean we're still in the mix.What maths have you used there considering the run we were on before Garde was appointed?1. Sherwood has shown he can win games in the Premier League.2. I think nearly all the games we lost this season (under Sherwood) were by 1 goal margins; where we lost the game due to an individual error.3. When Garde came in he had to start all over again. We didn't even get a new manager bounce.4. The English players/Guzan have arguably been worse than the foreigners, they don't have the excuse of being new to the Premier League. Sherwood might have gotten more out of them.
We couldn't be any worse off if we'd kept Sherwood. And I really didn't like him and wanted him sacked. We were actually unfortunate in a couple of games earlier this season, and I felt we deserved more points than we picked up (against Sunderland at home for example) Sherwood lost his bottle and started trying to force those results by making random changes and then the momentum worked on our fragile confidence and dragged us down. But there's no guarantee that we would have carried on in the same tailspin if we'd stuck with Sherwood, whereas we have continued the tailspin under Garde.I was embarrassed that Sherwod was our manager and I was pleased that we were replacing him with someone more eloquent and with a continental approach. But it's been a disaster.
Quote from: django on March 04, 2016, 12:07:50 AMWe couldn't be any worse off if we'd kept Sherwood. And I really didn't like him and wanted him sacked. We were actually unfortunate in a couple of games earlier this season, and I felt we deserved more points than we picked up (against Sunderland at home for example) Sherwood lost his bottle and started trying to force those results by making random changes and then the momentum worked on our fragile confidence and dragged us down. But there's no guarantee that we would have carried on in the same tailspin if we'd stuck with Sherwood, whereas we have continued the tailspin under Garde.I was embarrassed that Sherwod was our manager and I was pleased that we were replacing him with someone more eloquent and with a continental approach. But it's been a disaster.Far too many factors in play here to say that Garde is at fault and Sherwood would have done better. I doubt many managers would have faired much better with this bunch of players and this board not prepared to invest. Certainly not tactics Tim. The turning point for two teams this season came in the one game at the King Power Station. The change that allowed Mahrez the freedom of Leicester. That can be attributed to no one else other than Sherwood. From then on he was exposed for what he is/was, a media tart with little tactical knowledge. An inability to recognise his mistakes, an inability to pick a side and a system that he trusted, 4 points in 12 games.The confidence dipped, we lost games that we should have had a point out of at least, we became every struggling striker/managers dream opponents. Brendan Rodgers was glad we turned up as were Chelsea, Swansea, Stoke, even the lot from across the city in the first half. The writing was on the wall when Garde arrived. The boost that the club actually believed it could fight to stay in the division went out the January window. The [slight] improvement in form seen until the end of January and then the total collapse demonstrates that.
Take your points django but I stand by my charge of sabotage by the hardcore trouble makers. I am not saying it was premeditated Grobbelar style sabotage but when you see, for example, Richards wilfully and persistently roaming all over the pitch regardless of his defensive responsibilities and consequent match losing soft goals being conceded, I regard that as sabotage by negligence. Likewise Guzan constantly allowing crosses and corners to get no response from him. Likewise Gabby at 29 bloating up in size when the team needs him to be lean and quick. Sabotage by negligence.
Quote from: brian green on March 04, 2016, 08:41:18 AMTake your points django but I stand by my charge of sabotage by the hardcore trouble makers. I am not saying it was premeditated Grobbelar style sabotage but when you see, for example, Richards wilfully and persistently roaming all over the pitch regardless of his defensive responsibilities and consequent match losing soft goals being conceded, I regard that as sabotage by negligence. Likewise Guzan constantly allowing crosses and corners to get no response from him. Likewise Gabby at 29 bloating up in size when the team needs him to be lean and quick. Sabotage by negligence.I don't disagree but I think they are different points. Yes the senior players have been difficult (but similar to Clampy not sure if this quite counts as sabotage). But those are the players we have, and the discussion is which manager would have got the best out of them (a relative term ...)Sherwood was poor, but Garde has been a disaster. Sherwood had a very clear new manager bounce last year which saved our season, Garde has had none. We were competitive in games under Sherwood, much less of the white flag than under Garde. And he at least seemed to be able to motivate some of the players.