still as horny as fuck Kim
As soon as the team was announced, and with the personnel on the bench, I thought it was pretty clear that we were going to lump it up to Gestede and try to use Gabby's pace as our main mode of attack. If it works then fine; if not the players are there on the bench to change it completely.And I think that's pretty much what happened.I don't think TS planned to be so shit in the first half but he may well have intended playing "predictably" so that their midfield/defence set up for it.
Quote from: BoskoDjembaSalifou on September 23, 2015, 12:43:39 PMClark in defensive midfield when Sanchez is sitting on the bench? What was that about?He wanted to give Clark 90 minutes so played him in midfield for the first half as he's played there before. Apparently it was planned to give Lescott only 45 minutes and subsequently switched Clark back to CB in the second half. It was a very odd starting line up, a formation we've never used before and we looked shite, so lets just hope he doesn't try it again.
Clark in defensive midfield when Sanchez is sitting on the bench? What was that about?
I believe the formation, lineup and tactics were intentional...the fact that we were so shit wasn't. It would have been interesting to see if he'd have changed it at half time if we'd have been winning...but I guess we'll never find out, but the plus side to that is that he'll hopefully never try it again. You can try these things and get away with it against shit teams in the cup, but not in a PL game.
I'm sure what he meant to say last night was that we played a bit more direct to play to Rudy's strengths, the idea being that Gabby and Sinclair would pick up the knock-ons, and once the game opened up in the second half, he'd bring on the likes of Grealish and Ayew, when there was more space for them to work in - which makes perfect sense.
Quote from: Ormy Droid on September 23, 2015, 07:23:41 PMI'm sure what he meant to say last night was that we played a bit more direct to play to Rudy's strengths, the idea being that Gabby and Sinclair would pick up the knock-ons, and once the game opened up in the second half, he'd bring on the likes of Grealish and Ayew, when there was more space for them to work in - which makes perfect sense.Isn't that exactly what he said but with an added dose of Timmeh so no one can really understand what he meant?
It's becoming apparent that a 3-5-2 or 3-5-1-1 formation is the way to go. That way we can incorporate Grealish, Gil and Adama into the line up. I'd really love to see that.
Quote from: Des Little on September 23, 2015, 12:42:49 PMIf that first half was planned, then I'm Kim Jong Un.I'm not, by the way.If you're Kim Wilde, pm me. Still.
If that first half was planned, then I'm Kim Jong Un.I'm not, by the way.