collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Scott Sinclair - now gone  (Read 148446 times)

Offline frankmosswasmyuncle

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6104
  • Location: The Right Side
  • GM : 05.09.2028
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #750 on: January 18, 2016, 07:50:34 PM »
Can't stand him, don't care if he leaves but we certainly need to get someone in as with Grealish and Gabby in exile we are pretty light upfront.
I'd say we were pretty heavy up front if Gabby's picked!

Online Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 41490
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #751 on: January 18, 2016, 07:53:19 PM »
He's gash and on high wages. Get rid I reckon.

And what if he turns it on there and drags them out of it?

So even though he does sweet FA for us, we should keep him just in case he does something for them? Whilst not willing to drive him there, I'll certainly pay his bus fare.

Offline frankmosswasmyuncle

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6104
  • Location: The Right Side
  • GM : 05.09.2028
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #752 on: January 18, 2016, 07:53:44 PM »
On thread: thought Sinclair would give us a lot more than he has...always looks good when he receives the ball, usually loses any momentum, runs into brick walls, gives possession away too easily.
However, I'd keep him as cover for a few others if needed...unless we get a better option in this month.

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30293
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #753 on: January 18, 2016, 08:12:28 PM »
I'm not sure i'd be selling to a relegation rival but it's in The Mirror so it may well be bollocks.

Online Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 7176
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #754 on: January 18, 2016, 08:25:15 PM »
He's gash and on high wages. Get rid I reckon.

And what if he turns it on there and drags them out of it?

What if he doesn't..?

Then that's fortunate. Unless the offer is too good to turn down we shouldn't be selling to them at this moment in time. I agree with SH, it's madness for £2m.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55207
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #755 on: January 18, 2016, 08:25:19 PM »
I'm sorry, but unless we have someone else coming in that seems very odd.

Offline Glenn Peen

  • Member
  • Posts: 366
  • Location: Having a 'sit down'
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #756 on: January 18, 2016, 08:33:34 PM »
Why was my post deleted? It was sensible.

Offline supertom

  • Member
  • Posts: 18827
  • Location: High Wycombe, just left of Paradise.
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #757 on: January 18, 2016, 08:53:13 PM »
I don't think we really have relegation rivals. We're going down. Sinclair has been poor so we should get rid. I think his attitude is shit. He's more interested in his barnet and living it up with his famous missus than delivering as a Premiership footballer.

Sell him and bring in a half reasonable winger from somewhere. I also get the impression he could be one of those who's not doing enough for Garde.

Offline aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 11763
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #758 on: January 18, 2016, 09:03:18 PM »
I thought he would do well for us but he hasn't. He's another with no real set position, kind of shite at all trades. Take the money and run.

Offline Stirchley Villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 1033
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #759 on: January 18, 2016, 09:03:33 PM »
I don't think we really have relegation rivals. We're going down. Sinclair has been poor so we should get rid. I think his attitude is shit. He's more interested in his barnet and living it up with his famous missus than delivering as a Premiership footballer.

Sell him and bring in a half reasonable winger from somewhere. I also get the impression he could be one of those who's not doing enough for Garde.

This

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55207
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #760 on: January 18, 2016, 09:04:33 PM »
The 'bring in' bit is what i'm worried about.

Offline supertom

  • Member
  • Posts: 18827
  • Location: High Wycombe, just left of Paradise.
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #761 on: January 18, 2016, 09:10:14 PM »
The 'bring in' bit is what i'm worried about.
At this stage I'd be seeing if there's a half decent winger in the championship who might fancy playing 5 months in the Prem and then helping to push us up next season. Someone with a bit of hunger and willingness to succeed. Failing that, maybe there's 1-2 lads in the Youths who might make a step up to the first team.
I really don't think Sinclair has the desire.
The sad truth is that we should be preparing for the Championship. In terms of signings we're not going to a get a decent player on a permanent. We have to go back to untried punts really. I think we can attract championship level talent. Now they may be able to step up.
I would be more than happy never to see Gabby, Sinclair and a few others in our side again. Players who probably have not helped Remi much at all.
Work your bollocks off or bugger off. Regardless of who does or doesn't come in, I'm happy to see some get fucked off now. I'm sure in our U21 side we'll have players champing at the bit to make the step up.

Offline mr underhill

  • Member
  • Posts: 8493
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #762 on: January 18, 2016, 09:11:41 PM »
we ought to be buying for the chumps league before Newcastle, Sunderland or A N Other do

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #763 on: January 18, 2016, 09:11:56 PM »


So even though he does sweet FA for us, we should keep him just in case he does something for them?

Exactly that, yes.

Offline Diablo

  • Member
  • Posts: 2171
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #764 on: January 18, 2016, 09:16:09 PM »
Just me that thinks he's decent then?

I think he's got about a 1 in 3 goal ratio (through out his career) - we need goals. Selling would be silly - unless he's that disruptive or not interested. In Remi we trust.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal