Quote from: ozzjim on March 07, 2015, 10:05:22 PMYes for about 2.5 million which watching him would be a real snip. Right now Cleverley on a free and Sinclair for that would be astonishing business.
Yes for about 2.5 million which watching him would be a real snip.
I thought he looked decent in the first half, even when the rest of the team looked awful, but he was very impressive in the second.
Yeah Cleverley played well too once he settled after the first 20 mins or so. Again on that evidence i'd try to get him permanently, but would want to see a bit more yet considering how shit he was under Lambert.
Quote from: Somniloquism on March 07, 2015, 07:43:48 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on March 07, 2015, 07:34:52 PM3 goals since he joined the club, could have been more. He has looked lively and so much like the player he was promising to be before his move to Man City. Sign him is my only suggestion.All three goals under Sherwood, and Cleverley, (also mentioned above as "not playing for us), is playing better as well. I might have to deduce that Sherwood has something about him. (Or at least is 10x better the Lambert ended up like).maybe a little bit generous to give him the first under Sherwood, but your point is still very valid. The midfield are so much more involved now.
Quote from: Toronto Villa on March 07, 2015, 07:34:52 PM3 goals since he joined the club, could have been more. He has looked lively and so much like the player he was promising to be before his move to Man City. Sign him is my only suggestion.All three goals under Sherwood, and Cleverley, (also mentioned above as "not playing for us), is playing better as well. I might have to deduce that Sherwood has something about him. (Or at least is 10x better the Lambert ended up like).
3 goals since he joined the club, could have been more. He has looked lively and so much like the player he was promising to be before his move to Man City. Sign him is my only suggestion.