collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by ROBBO
[Today at 02:40:28 AM]


Brentford v Aston Villa Pre Match Thread. by PeterWithesShin
[Today at 12:01:56 AM]


International Rugby by paul_e
[August 22, 2025, 10:39:57 PM]


Matty Cash by UK Redsox
[August 22, 2025, 10:37:15 PM]


Leon Bailey (out on loan to AS Roma) by Ger Regan
[August 22, 2025, 10:23:57 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by VILLA MOLE
[August 22, 2025, 10:16:33 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Crown Hill
[August 22, 2025, 09:50:39 PM]


Kits 25/26 by AlexAlexCropley
[August 22, 2025, 09:29:21 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Scott Sinclair - now gone  (Read 147699 times)

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #330 on: February 01, 2015, 10:12:27 AM »
It's down to Sinclair now. This is last chance saloon for him at a top level club. It's a perfect fit for us , we have only borrowed him and the player needs to prove himself.
Astute signing.

Offline Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58587
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #331 on: February 01, 2015, 12:18:39 PM »
Your official website seems to claim that you signed him for a club record fee. One that surpassed the fee that you paid for Sessegnon, who was your previous record signing.

If you've only paid £2.5m for him, why is your official website lying about it?

We have a new brand swanking PR system who were probably under orders to spin it as nicely as they could.

Worth remembering the context of the situation - we had just appointed a hopeless head coach. Many fans were disgruntled that Pepe Mel had left and been replaced by somebody who had struggled in League One. Then we had the fiasco with the pin-stripe kit and the furore that created with idiots messing around with our history and tradition. Jeremy Peace and others were coming in for criticism. The club needed to create a positive headline to at least engage supporters and by suggesting we had spent £10million and broken our transfer record portrayed they were showing some ambition - something they are often questioned about.

Given how thorough they are with their scouting and how reluctant we are to spend fees then I fail to believe we spent £10million on someone like Brown Ideye.

So in other words, they lied to supporters.

which I can only assume all Albion fans saw through from the very beginning and called the club out on.

Offline Liam_Baggies

  • Member
  • Posts: 293
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #332 on: February 01, 2015, 12:48:24 PM »
So in other words, they lied to supporters.

Yes. They need to sell season-tickets.

If that is the case then the person I feel sorry for is Brown Ideye.

Offline supertom

  • Member
  • Posts: 18827
  • Location: High Wycombe, just left of Paradise.
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #333 on: February 01, 2015, 12:51:26 PM »
Could go either way this signing. He's a good player on his day. Hopefully he seizes the chance. We're a big club, currently having a bit of a kip, but still a good club for someone like him. If he does well we can make the deal permanent.

I'm glad Lambert has at least pro-actively gone about trying to address our lack of creativity this window. Gil looks very good and Sinclair adds pace. Hopefully he's not a busted flush like Zogbia, as both players have similarities in style.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 76019
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #334 on: February 01, 2015, 12:53:14 PM »
I find it hard to believe that they lied to sell a few ST. For starters he's hardly a star player that is going to shift ST because he signed, and also there will be accounts to come, tax etc and there hasn't been a sniff in the media it's a made up figure. Why would the selling club go along with a made up figure?

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63365
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #335 on: February 01, 2015, 12:56:35 PM »
Announcing a record signing that actually cost a quarter of what you said he did? That's believable.

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 33853
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #336 on: February 01, 2015, 08:08:51 PM »
Anyway...he made one great run today and generally retained possession in the final third. More than Gabby did.

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #337 on: February 01, 2015, 08:27:29 PM »
Thought he along with Gil were the only positives today .

Offline AGRIPPA

  • Member
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #338 on: February 01, 2015, 09:53:55 PM »
Announcing a record signing that actually cost a quarter of what you said he did? That's believable.

Didn't we do the same with Ivo Stas??

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63365
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #339 on: February 01, 2015, 10:15:08 PM »
Announcing a record signing that actually cost a quarter of what you said he did? That's believable.

Didn't we do the same with Ivo Stas??


No; he only cost about £250k when our record was £1.5 million.

Offline David_Nab

  • Member
  • Posts: 4285
  • Location: Luton
  • GM : 24.12.2015
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #340 on: February 01, 2015, 10:17:16 PM »
Thought he along with Gil were the only positives today .

Give it a few weeks under Lambert and they will be as hopeless as the rest of them.

Offline AGRIPPA

  • Member
  • Posts: 1057
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #341 on: February 01, 2015, 10:24:43 PM »
Announcing a record signing that actually cost a quarter of what you said he did? That's believable.

Didn't we do the same with Ivo Stas??


No; he only cost about £250k when our record was £1.5 million.

Must have him mistaken.... There was a player who we signed and the disclosed fee was about £600k but he only played a couple of times before injury forced him to retire.... I'm sure it came out that we had only paid £150k and that all the insurance company would pay out

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #342 on: February 01, 2015, 11:02:17 PM »
Thought he along with Gil were the only positives today .

Give it a few weeks under Lambert and they will be as hopeless as the rest of them.
Yup .

Offline fbriai

  • Member
  • Posts: 2630
  • Location: Italy
  • GM : 31.01.2022
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #343 on: February 02, 2015, 02:59:56 PM »
Announcing a record signing that actually cost a quarter of what you said he did? That's believable.

Didn't we do the same with Ivo Stas??


No; he only cost about £250k when our record was £1.5 million.

Must have him mistaken.... There was a player who we signed and the disclosed fee was about £600k but he only played a couple of times before injury forced him to retire.... I'm sure it came out that we had only paid £150k and that all the insurance company would pay out

Neale Cooper?

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15664
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: Scott Sinclair - now confirmed
« Reply #344 on: February 02, 2015, 04:06:50 PM »
Giving a player on loan the famous number 9 shirt is quite depressing to say the least.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal