Quote from: PaulWinch again on October 30, 2016, 09:35:41 AMI think that's the end of Ballance for a while. He's offering absolutely nothing. He deserved his chance after averaging over 50 in the County Championship but as an International Test batsman he's rarely looked good enough.
I think that's the end of Ballance for a while. He's offering absolutely nothing.
Quote from: OzVilla on October 30, 2016, 10:25:18 AMQuote from: PaulWinch again on October 30, 2016, 09:35:41 AMI think that's the end of Ballance for a while. He's offering absolutely nothing. He deserved his chance after averaging over 50 in the County Championship but as an International Test batsman he's rarely looked good enough.Did he average 50 last year? I'm not disputing his original call up in his first England run, but he was justifiably dropped and I never have seen what he's done to be recalled. I think he was picked because the obvious alternative at the time was Bell. It's clear that the England management want to move on and bring in younger players. Duckett is 22, Hameed 19 and I suspect they will both feature in the coming tests. Personally I think Duckett will drop to 4 with Hameed opening if they don't try and squeeze in Buttler.
Our top/upper middle order really is too prone to collapse. Of those 4 wickets at least 2 were completely unnecessary.
What series. It's not all about England collapsing. Give Bangladesh some credit. I know they had their wicket but they battled so hard.Take today, even at 100 for 1 they never let their heads drop.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on October 30, 2016, 09:41:58 AMOur top/upper middle order really is too prone to collapse. Of those 4 wickets at least 2 were completely unnecessary.Needs a real re-think for India. If it were up to me, I would give Hameed a chance to open in India, have Hales in at three, Root at four and Duckett at five.
Quote from: tomd2103 on October 30, 2016, 03:14:53 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on October 30, 2016, 09:41:58 AMOur top/upper middle order really is too prone to collapse. Of those 4 wickets at least 2 were completely unnecessary.Needs a real re-think for India. If it were up to me, I would give Hameed a chance to open in India, have Hales in at three, Root at four and Duckett at five. Not really both Rashid and Ansari aren't good enough for test cricket Who are you dropping there? Ballance is a given but to get that second spot you're looking at 1 of the bowlers I'd guess Rashid or Ansari? Seems harsh to me.
Quote from: paul_e on October 30, 2016, 10:55:59 PMQuote from: tomd2103 on October 30, 2016, 03:14:53 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on October 30, 2016, 09:41:58 AMOur top/upper middle order really is too prone to collapse. Of those 4 wickets at least 2 were completely unnecessary.Needs a real re-think for India. If it were up to me, I would give Hameed a chance to open in India, have Hales in at three, Root at four and Duckett at five. Who are you dropping there? Ballance is a given but to get that second spot you're looking at 1 of the bowlers I'd guess Rashid or Ansari? Seems harsh to me.Not really both Rashid and Ansari aren't good enough for test cricket
Quote from: tomd2103 on October 30, 2016, 03:14:53 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on October 30, 2016, 09:41:58 AMOur top/upper middle order really is too prone to collapse. Of those 4 wickets at least 2 were completely unnecessary.Needs a real re-think for India. If it were up to me, I would give Hameed a chance to open in India, have Hales in at three, Root at four and Duckett at five. Who are you dropping there? Ballance is a given but to get that second spot you're looking at 1 of the bowlers I'd guess Rashid or Ansari? Seems harsh to me.
Quote from: The_ads on October 31, 2016, 08:26:57 PMQuote from: paul_e on October 30, 2016, 10:55:59 PMQuote from: tomd2103 on October 30, 2016, 03:14:53 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on October 30, 2016, 09:41:58 AMOur top/upper middle order really is too prone to collapse. Of those 4 wickets at least 2 were completely unnecessary.Needs a real re-think for India. If it were up to me, I would give Hameed a chance to open in India, have Hales in at three, Root at four and Duckett at five. Who are you dropping there? Ballance is a given but to get that second spot you're looking at 1 of the bowlers I'd guess Rashid or Ansari? Seems harsh to me.Not really both Rashid and Ansari aren't good enough for test cricket It's 'not really' harsh to write Ansari off as not good enough after a total of 25 overs? What would it take for you to consider dropping someone harsh? Doing it because of the way he shook hands on receiving his cap?Rashid maybe but the jury is still out for me and dropping someone when their last innings was 4/52 from 12 doesn't seem right so I'd give him 1-2 tests in India before making a call either way.In terms of chances I think Hales is further down the list than Rashid right now and on that basis I'd go Hameed for Ballance and Finn out for Broad. Then you stick with that for the first 2 unless someone completely collapses and make a decision between Rashid and Ansari dropping out for Jimmy for the 3rd test. That puts a bit of pressure on Root to come in for a few overs but I think it's very hard to drop one of our 4 frontline seamers if they're all fit and I don't think the Indian pitches will be as biased to spin as those we've just seen in Bangladesh.
Is it too late to start checking whether Mehedi Hasan has an English grandparent ?The bloke could be a star but we'll mainly see him getting tonked in ODIs and T20s. Shame that he's not from a country that plays more Tests