collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Leander Dendoncker (sold to Real Oviedo) by London Villan
[Today at 05:47:49 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Tuscans
[Today at 05:44:02 PM]


Unai Emery by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 05:31:41 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by The Edge
[Today at 05:24:45 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by eamonn
[Today at 05:24:43 PM]


Season Ticket 2025/26 by waynejames
[Today at 04:11:56 PM]


Jacob Ramsey - Gone by ChicagoLion
[Today at 04:08:06 PM]


The Barton's Arms by waynejames
[Today at 04:06:42 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Cricket Thread 2016  (Read 500773 times)

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37282
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5340 on: August 11, 2016, 12:27:10 PM »
Even though TMS say that the catch clip should be online, I can't find it.

Therefore, I don't know whether the on field decision was correct. However, the logic behind them not reversing seems pretty solid from the TMS explanation

Oh I don't disagree with at, what I'm struggling with a bit is that both umpires seemed unsure so they guessed knowing it was going to tv anyway.

Offline UK Redsox

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42873
  • Location: Forest of Dean & Fenway Park
  • GM : 10.02.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5341 on: August 11, 2016, 12:30:57 PM »
England have come over all Villa-esque as Root goes

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5342 on: August 11, 2016, 12:31:57 PM »
Really poor from England this morning. Really poor.

All 3 wickets have been so soft.

Online Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13936
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5343 on: August 11, 2016, 12:32:20 PM »
Even though TMS say that the catch clip should be online, I can't find it.

Therefore, I don't know whether the on field decision was correct. However, the logic behind them not reversing seems pretty solid from the TMS explanation

Oh I don't disagree with at, what I'm struggling with a bit is that both umpires seemed unsure so they guessed knowing it was going to tv anyway.

It's on the BBC Cricket website now:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/cricket/36840120

Still inconclusive and what's more disappointing is the lack of alternative camera angles. Surely there's enough Sky cameras in the ground to cover the whole ground? It's akin to watching the John Player League on BBC2 with one camera.

Offline UK Redsox

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42873
  • Location: Forest of Dean & Fenway Park
  • GM : 10.02.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5344 on: August 11, 2016, 12:38:58 PM »
It's akin to watching the John Player League on BBC2 with one camera.

When I was a kid, our BBC 2 signal was so bad that there was always ghosting on screen and there were two pitches and two bowlers running in

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5345 on: August 11, 2016, 12:39:08 PM »
What the fuck is going on?

Online Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13936
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5346 on: August 11, 2016, 12:39:48 PM »
74-4. Vince gone to a good ball. Pretty poor morning session for England.

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5347 on: August 11, 2016, 12:39:56 PM »
Throwing this series away at the moment. Need to show a lot of fight now

Offline UK Redsox

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42873
  • Location: Forest of Dean & Fenway Park
  • GM : 10.02.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5348 on: August 11, 2016, 12:40:40 PM »

Online Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13936
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5349 on: August 11, 2016, 12:42:00 PM »
It's akin to watching the John Player League on BBC2 with one camera.

When I was a kid, our BBC 2 signal was so bad that there was always ghosting on screen and there were two pitches and two bowlers running in

Watching the JPL on a Sunday afternoon really ignited my interest in Cricket.

Online Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13936
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5350 on: August 11, 2016, 12:44:29 PM »
There's no need to panic just yet, we do bat very deep and don't judge the match until both sides have batted.

However there is a chance our lower-middle order won't bail us out so it's an important few hours for England.

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5351 on: August 11, 2016, 12:46:25 PM »
There's no need to panic just yet, we do bat very deep and don't judge the match until both sides have batted.

However there is a chance our lower-middle order won't bail us out so it's an important few hours for England.

Just poor from the top order again though. It is becoming the exception when they do well.

Vince got a good ball, but the other 3 got themselves out again.

Online Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13936
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5352 on: August 11, 2016, 12:50:55 PM »
There's no need to panic just yet, we do bat very deep and don't judge the match until both sides have batted.

However there is a chance our lower-middle order won't bail us out so it's an important few hours for England.

Just poor from the top order again though. It is becoming the exception when they do well.

Vince got a good ball, but the other 3 got themselves out again.

The run rate before the first wicket went down was pretty healthy. Why do they have to go at over 4 an hour in the first session of the first innings of a test match? I realise that the modern trend is to go after runs but 50-0 is much better than 80-odd for 4. Build a platform FFS!

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5353 on: August 11, 2016, 12:52:30 PM »
There's no need to panic just yet, we do bat very deep and don't judge the match until both sides have batted.

However there is a chance our lower-middle order won't bail us out so it's an important few hours for England.

Just poor from the top order again though. It is becoming the exception when they do well.

Vince got a good ball, but the other 3 got themselves out again.

The run rate before the first wicket went down was pretty healthy. Why do they have to go at over 4 an hour in the first session of the first innings of a test match? I realise that the modern trend is to go after runs but 50-0 is much better than 80-odd for 4. Build a platform FFS!

Yep, I can't help but think there is an unearned arrogance with some of the batsmen

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5354 on: August 11, 2016, 12:54:56 PM »
These two need to bat until tea at least

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal