collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Other Games 2025-26 by Dave
[Today at 02:46:12 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by jwarry
[Today at 02:37:14 PM]


Leon Bailey (out on loan to AS Roma?) by richardb
[Today at 02:02:32 PM]


Kits 25/26 by Drummond
[Today at 01:44:42 PM]


Leander Dendoncker by eamonn
[Today at 01:27:31 PM]


GUESS THE GOAL R1: Brentford v ASTON VILLA, Saturday 23rd August! 🥅 by Fasth56
[Today at 01:26:23 PM]


The Barton's Arms by Towser
[Today at 01:19:58 PM]


FFP by ozzjim
[Today at 01:16:21 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Cricket Thread 2016  (Read 500532 times)

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4935 on: July 15, 2016, 04:53:33 PM »
So many of the wickets just needlessly given away

Offline PGW

  • Member
  • Posts: 6978
  • Age: 71
  • Location: Selly Oak
  • Villan, Bear and now Cancer Warrior
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4936 on: July 15, 2016, 04:54:44 PM »
Terrible shot from Bairstow there....193/6.

I was about to say where will all this end.....

Probably very soon....Yasir with more than a few.
Come on now CW do it with bat as well as ball.

Well he's got at least 4

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4937 on: July 15, 2016, 04:58:42 PM »
Shah has been gifted 3 wickets. Poor stuff from the batsmen, extremely poor

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55119
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4938 on: July 15, 2016, 05:02:29 PM »
This has been a pretty dire effort from the top and middle order as a unit.

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4939 on: July 15, 2016, 05:07:05 PM »
This has been a pretty dire effort from the top and middle order as a unit.

Yep, Pakistan haven't needed to bowl remotely well

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55119
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4940 on: July 15, 2016, 05:08:31 PM »
The top order other than Cook have all failed, but I feel like Ballance being selected is a mistake. Not that I don't rate him, but I've not seen anything since he was dropped to suggest he's really addressed his problems.

Online Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13936
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4941 on: July 15, 2016, 05:38:59 PM »
The top order other than Cook have all failed, but I feel like Ballance being selected is a mistake. Not that I don't rate him, but I've not seen anything since he was dropped to suggest he's really addressed his problems.

His coaches at Yorkshire felt that given his high career average his technique didn't need any work, which quite frankly is an arrogant and pretty stupid approach. I hope he succeeds, I like him as a player but when the very people you turn to when your confidence and parts of your technique are shot tell you that there's nothing wrong then you have to ask if Yorkshire are putting their own interests first. His technique will not be tested by county attacks but top quality international attacks will thoroughly examine his technique and have worked out how to get him out.


Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4942 on: July 15, 2016, 05:43:10 PM »
Ballance was a strange selection. He really struggled against Left arm seamers last summer in Test's, and the first match they bring him back into is one where he would face 3 of them.

Granted he got out to a good ball from the spinner today

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4943 on: July 15, 2016, 05:45:49 PM »
Another wicket thrown away

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4944 on: July 15, 2016, 05:49:07 PM »
We look fucking shambolic against a little bit of spin.

I thought those days were meant to be in the past

Offline PGW

  • Member
  • Posts: 6978
  • Age: 71
  • Location: Selly Oak
  • Villan, Bear and now Cancer Warrior
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4945 on: July 15, 2016, 05:55:27 PM »
We look fucking shambolic against a little bit of spin.

I thought those days were meant to be in the past
I think Ali was somewhat unfortunate there, for there to be '2 Umpire Calls' categories,

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4946 on: July 15, 2016, 06:02:58 PM »
We look fucking shambolic against a little bit of spin.

I thought those days were meant to be in the past
I think Ali was somewhat unfortunate there, for there to be '2 Umpire Calls' categories,

Yeah I agree, Not quite sure how the umpire gave it out initially.

Not a good shot though

Online Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13936
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4947 on: July 15, 2016, 06:41:24 PM »
We are so poor against quality spin. It's so frustrating. Pakistan are favourites from here, batting 4th again Yasir will be tough on an ageing wicket.

If we can eek out another 50 runs then we are still in it but I don't have confidence in our batsman picking their leggie so another 50 runs is a huge ask.

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4948 on: July 15, 2016, 06:43:38 PM »
We are so poor against quality spin. It's so frustrating. Pakistan are favourites from here, batting 4th again Yasir will be tough on an ageing wicket.

If we can eek out another 50 runs then we are still in it but I don't have confidence in our batsman picking their leggie so another 50 runs is a huge ask.

The pitch will not factor into it. There was little to no spin and I don't think that will change all that much.

Of his 5 wickets, the ball to ballance was good, and the one that got Vince was ok, although Vince should never be out to that.

The other 3? Horrific shots

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55119
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4949 on: July 15, 2016, 06:46:39 PM »
Excellent from Woakes today. Those who failed need to learn if you're unsure on leg spin don't play across the line.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal