I like Ali but I find it hard to believe there isn't a better spin bowler in the country than him.
Bairstow shouldn't be walking there. This is a poor show.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on August 22, 2015, 05:18:17 PMBairstow shouldn't be walking there. This is a poor show.I'm not watching but I see he was out caught, if he hit it and it was caught why on earth shouldn't he walk?
Quote from: Chris Jameson on August 22, 2015, 05:58:41 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on August 22, 2015, 05:18:17 PMBairstow shouldn't be walking there. This is a poor show.I'm not watching but I see he was out caught, if he hit it and it was caught why on earth shouldn't he walk?Because it hit Voges grill, which means it's not out and he's walked after being given out incorrectly in that fashion before.
Why are some players wearing black armbands by the way?
Quote from: PaulWinch again on August 22, 2015, 07:22:44 PMQuote from: Chris Jameson on August 22, 2015, 05:58:41 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on August 22, 2015, 05:18:17 PMBairstow shouldn't be walking there. This is a poor show.I'm not watching but I see he was out caught, if he hit it and it was caught why on earth shouldn't he walk?Because it hit Voges grill, which means it's not out and he's walked after being given out incorrectly in that fashion before.It's one thing to criticise him for a poor shot but walking when he believes he is out doesn't warrant any criticism. I hate the way cricket has changed where a batsman can stand his ground and more or less say prove it even though they know they're out. It's cheating basically.
Quote from: Chris Jameson on August 22, 2015, 09:47:49 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on August 22, 2015, 07:22:44 PMQuote from: Chris Jameson on August 22, 2015, 05:58:41 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on August 22, 2015, 05:18:17 PMBairstow shouldn't be walking there. This is a poor show.I'm not watching but I see he was out caught, if he hit it and it was caught why on earth shouldn't he walk?Because it hit Voges grill, which means it's not out and he's walked after being given out incorrectly in that fashion before.It's one thing to criticise him for a poor shot but walking when he believes he is out doesn't warrant any criticism. I hate the way cricket has changed where a batsman can stand his ground and more or less say prove it even though they know they're out. It's cheating basically.I think Paul is fair enough in his point. Bairstow was given out like this before. Fair enough thinking he was out on that occasion, but surely numerous people at that time (not to mention the media) would have then clued him in on the rule. To just walk off when the exact same thing happens again is bloody stupid!! In no way does this excuse the umpire for being unaware of the rules however.Not walking is cheating, I agree.
Right, no London matches in the next Ashes please.