collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Other Games 2025-26 by john e
[Today at 08:42:12 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Pat Mustard
[Today at 08:35:02 PM]


FFP by cdbearsfan
[Today at 08:34:54 PM]


Morgan Rogers - PFA Young Player of the Year 24/25 by Toronto Villa
[Today at 08:23:31 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Londonvilla
[Today at 07:57:07 PM]


Jacob Ramsey - Gone by aj2k77
[Today at 07:53:54 PM]


Aston Villa v Newcastle Post-Match Thread by pauliewalnuts
[Today at 07:41:23 PM]


Unai Emery by Louzie0
[Today at 07:17:35 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Other Games 2025-26 by john e
[Today at 08:42:12 PM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Pat Mustard
[Today at 08:35:02 PM]


Re: FFP by cdbearsfan
[Today at 08:34:54 PM]


Re: FFP by The Edge
[Today at 08:33:37 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by The Edge
[Today at 08:31:41 PM]


Re: FFP by ChicagoLion
[Today at 08:27:07 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 08:24:09 PM]


Re: Morgan Rogers - PFA Young Player of the Year 24/25 by Toronto Villa
[Today at 08:23:31 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Cricket Thread 2016  (Read 501351 times)

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55124
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2015
« Reply #345 on: March 09, 2015, 10:34:30 AM »
Fucking woeful. 6 months to prepare and look at this shambles. Moores has to go.

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: The Cricket Thread 2015
« Reply #346 on: March 09, 2015, 10:35:53 AM »
Nearly all over now, and just like our football team at World Cups it will be a blessing because we have stunk the place out, we're no better than those Associate sides that they want to get rid of in future WCs.
Awful, need to rip it up and start again (great tune).

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55124
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2015
« Reply #347 on: March 09, 2015, 10:37:48 AM »
Thing is we all saw it earlier, how do the players not? They just ambled along at the top and sure enough now we're buried. It's yet another fucking pathetic effort at the World Cup. Just what has to happen for English cricket to realise that how we approach ODIs is completely wrong.
Incidentally I bet Cook's sitting at home a relieved man.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37282
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2015
« Reply #348 on: March 09, 2015, 10:41:49 AM »
The worst thing about this is we can put decent players in this England squad but, just like the Lambert era Villa without a complete change in philosophy we're always going to be this tame, negative side that fails on the big stage every time.

Moores was the wrong choice at the time (he'd already failed with England and then gone away and done very little in the county game before getting the job back) and now it's clear that he's not going to change the direction this team is heading.

Online olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43861
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: The Cricket Thread 2015
« Reply #349 on: March 09, 2015, 10:42:20 AM »
13 overs to get 103 with 4 in hand my money is on England.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55124
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2015
« Reply #350 on: March 09, 2015, 10:50:53 AM »
England won't win this, but even if they do it doesn't change the fact that Moores and the entire philosophy is wrong. Ali, Taylor, Buttler, Morgan(in theory) and Root are all fully capable ODI players who are being stifled. I think you can only have one of Broad, Woakes and Anderson and I'd go for Woakes. Jordan has had his threat coached out of him for the most part.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37282
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2015
« Reply #351 on: March 09, 2015, 10:51:29 AM »
13 overs to get 103 with 4 in hand my money is on England.

Dunno, it's all on Buttler really, we need to hope for Woakes to rotate the strike and Jordan has the ability to flash some but tha't not reliable in either case, it's really not fair on Buttler that he's again been asked to come in and be the only player in the top 7 who really attacks and wins the game for us.

Offline Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13936
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2015
« Reply #352 on: March 09, 2015, 10:56:18 AM »
England won't win this, but even if they do it doesn't change the fact that Moores and the entire philosophy is wrong. Ali, Taylor, Buttler, Morgan(in theory) and Root are all fully capable ODI players who are being stifled. I think you can only have one of Broad, Woakes and Anderson and I'd go for Woakes. Jordan has had his threat coached out of him for the most part.

It's as though Moores is the Lambert of Cricket, dour and uninspiring. He's always struck me as someone who is too afraid of failure and this is rubbing off on the players.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37282
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2015
« Reply #353 on: March 09, 2015, 11:12:42 AM »
Woakes has done a good job supporting Buttler here.  Exactly what we needed from him, he's rotated the strike well and run well.

As for Buttler, for me, he's right up there with Maxwell, De Villiers and Dhoni as a mid-order powerhouse who can take the game away from teams very quickly.

Offline Chris Jameson

  • Member
  • Posts: 21621
  • DIY guru
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: The Cricket Thread 2015
« Reply #354 on: March 09, 2015, 11:13:24 AM »

Moores was the wrong choice at the time (he'd already failed with England and then gone away and done very little in the county game before getting the job back)

Apart from leading Lancashire to their first title win in 77 years, I'm not a fan but credit where it's due.

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: The Cricket Thread 2015
« Reply #355 on: March 09, 2015, 11:16:23 AM »

Moores was the wrong choice at the time (he'd already failed with England and then gone away and done very little in the county game before getting the job back)

Apart from leading Lancashire to their first title win in 77 years, I'm not a fan but credit where it's due.

True. But if our inexperienced attack could have taken 6 wickets at hampshire then he wouldn't have. They weren't the best team that year. I have no problem with Yorkshire winning it last year because they were the best. But, i guess its nitpicking.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37282
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2015
« Reply #356 on: March 09, 2015, 11:19:05 AM »

Moores was the wrong choice at the time (he'd already failed with England and then gone away and done very little in the county game before getting the job back)

Apart from leading Lancashire to their first title win in 77 years, I'm not a fan but credit where it's due.

and then relegating them the next season.

Offline Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13936
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2015
« Reply #357 on: March 09, 2015, 11:19:58 AM »
Over to you then Mr Woakes.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37282
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2015
« Reply #358 on: March 09, 2015, 11:20:01 AM »
Woakes has done a good job supporting Buttler here.  Exactly what we needed from him, he's rotated the strike well and run well.

As for Buttler, for me, he's right up there with Maxwell, De Villiers and Dhoni as a mid-order powerhouse who can take the game away from teams very quickly.

feck, jinxed him, sorry all.

Jordan needs to slog a few here.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37282
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2015
« Reply #359 on: March 09, 2015, 11:25:13 AM »
third umpire has got that wrong for me, I don't think you can say the shoulder of the bat is definitely not down there, the reverse angle casts enough doubt for me.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal