What delusional myth?I watched the game live. Normally at Anfield when you're winning by one goal in the last 10 minutes, you think you might feel the squeeze, not at that game though. Nothing in the proceedig 80 minutes had given me any cause to think Liverpool would do anything to trouble Guzan, even With England's great hope comig on. They did nothing and looked entirely in effectual. We didn't ride luck at all, luck doesn't exist. They had one attempt at Guzan and spent the majority of the game passing from centre half to centre half. Lovren must have touched the ball more times than any other player.Even Rodgers, who is actually not in the Sam Allardyce school of myopia, conceded we deserved it. Granted, the defence wasn't really stretched, but we were as solid as anything. You're re-writing history to suit a narrative.Liverpool aren't in the class of Arsenal, Chelsea or Man City. They are the epitome of a one man band, highlighted further by Gerrard's slow walk to retirement. Much like Spurs proved, it doesn't matter if you spend £100 million, if you lose a world class player in Suraez or Bale and replace him with three or four good ones, you're still poorer for it.
I think we're just shit-scared of losing the ball and not being able to get back into our defensive shape quickly enough when playing these teams (which will include Everton next week) who have these top-quality players who will absolutely plaster you when breaking into space.The first two games were pretty rubbish possession-wise as well but that first half against Hull, even though they made it kinda easy for us, those two goals were genuinely a product of a sensible passing game, and that was without Cleverley or Benteke, both of whom in theory are pretty tidy on the ball, so there's clearly potential there. Yesterday was dire, but I'm not quite ready to accept defeat on this thing just yet, at least until we see whether this nonsense continues against some of the more mediocre teams.
Quote from: passitsideways on October 05, 2014, 02:51:18 AMI think we're just shit-scared of losing the ball and not being able to get back into our defensive shape quickly enough when playing these teams (which will include Everton next week) who have these top-quality players who will absolutely plaster you when breaking into space.The first two games were pretty rubbish possession-wise as well but that first half against Hull, even though they made it kinda easy for us, those two goals were genuinely a product of a sensible passing game, and that was without Cleverley or Benteke, both of whom in theory are pretty tidy on the ball, so there's clearly potential there. Yesterday was dire, but I'm not quite ready to accept defeat on this thing just yet, at least until we see whether this nonsense continues against some of the more mediocre teams. Everton is two weeks away. By which time Benteke should be fit to start and consequently we will have a forward who can hold it up to bring others into play around him and I would expect to see our share of possession begin to improve.
Please don't tell me where I do and don't give credit, especially when I said we defended "well", which you obviously failed to see through misty eyes.
Quote from: Jimbo on October 05, 2014, 10:22:43 AMPlease don't tell me where I do and don't give credit, especially when I said we defended "well", which you obviously failed to see through misty eyes.You said it yourself; no strategy, down to luck, myths.
I think the Cleverley, Delph, Westwood trio looks very promising as the core of our midfield. I would hope that will see us retain the ball much better but it is pure fantasy to think that we can dominate against clubs with the quality and depth of squad as Man City and Chelsea.
I really enjoyed winning at Anfield, it was as comfortable an away win as Stoke. I didn't enjoy Newcastle, as I was nervous in our need to avoid defeat. Fortunately the game was something of a non-entity.