Quote from: silhillvilla on August 30, 2014, 11:00:45 AMQuote from: Ryu on August 30, 2014, 10:58:17 AMQuote from: silhillvilla on August 30, 2014, 10:56:22 AMI don't rate him. He's another average non creative sideways passing midfielder. A poor mans carrick as referred to a few pages back by someone else. You don't rate him? You hadn't mentioned it.Just backing up my argument on the pros and cons of cleverley. I will leave it there. If he signs I wish him well . I just think the money should be spent elsewhere on better quality. You didn't mention any pros that I remember. Like his 89% pass completion from last season. You just bemoaned his lack of the intangible quality of "creativity". Creativity basically means finding space on the pitch where you can hurt the opposition. This comes from multiple things and requires movement, passing and dribbling. Whether you think a team managed by Lambert can be good at these things is another matter, but if we signed Cleverley I reckon he'd be the best passer in our side but Andreas Iniesta couldn't find defence splitting passes for a static forward line. Creativity comes from the whole team, not one player.
Quote from: Ryu on August 30, 2014, 10:58:17 AMQuote from: silhillvilla on August 30, 2014, 10:56:22 AMI don't rate him. He's another average non creative sideways passing midfielder. A poor mans carrick as referred to a few pages back by someone else. You don't rate him? You hadn't mentioned it.Just backing up my argument on the pros and cons of cleverley. I will leave it there. If he signs I wish him well . I just think the money should be spent elsewhere on better quality.
Quote from: silhillvilla on August 30, 2014, 10:56:22 AMI don't rate him. He's another average non creative sideways passing midfielder. A poor mans carrick as referred to a few pages back by someone else. You don't rate him? You hadn't mentioned it.
I don't rate him. He's another average non creative sideways passing midfielder. A poor mans carrick as referred to a few pages back by someone else.
Quote from: Ryu on August 30, 2014, 11:06:18 AMQuote from: silhillvilla on August 30, 2014, 11:00:45 AMQuote from: Ryu on August 30, 2014, 10:58:17 AMQuote from: silhillvilla on August 30, 2014, 10:56:22 AMI don't rate him. He's another average non creative sideways passing midfielder. A poor mans carrick as referred to a few pages back by someone else. You don't rate him? You hadn't mentioned it.Just backing up my argument on the pros and cons of cleverley. I will leave it there. If he signs I wish him well . I just think the money should be spent elsewhere on better quality. You didn't mention any pros that I remember. Like his 89% pass completion from last season. You just bemoaned his lack of the intangible quality of "creativity". Creativity basically means finding space on the pitch where you can hurt the opposition. This comes from multiple things and requires movement, passing and dribbling. Whether you think a team managed by Lambert can be good at these things is another matter, but if we signed Cleverley I reckon he'd be the best passer in our side but Andreas Iniesta couldn't find defence splitting passes for a static forward line. Creativity comes from the whole team, not one player. Thank you for putting into words my exasperation at seeing that term 'creativity' chucked around like we should just go and pluck it off the shelf.
After the rubbish we've signed recently such as Tonev, Luna and Sylla, I can't believe anybody would moan about somebody coming from Man U, even if they aren't exactly at the top of their game.
To cut to the chase: Have Manure accepted our bid, if so, are we in talks?
Valencia bid accepted also