Quote from: supertom on November 13, 2014, 09:46:55 PMQuote from: Dave on November 13, 2014, 09:41:31 PMIt's all relative. If you're comparing it to the profit that Spurs made on Bale or Man Utd made on Ronaldo then it wasn't huge.If you're comparing it to 97% of transfers made then all four were pretty good. In financial terms at least, it doesn't even bear thinking about what we did with the monies we received. I'm more concerned about not making anything on transfers since 2011. If we sold players on for profit, wouldn't we be accused of being a selling club?
Quote from: Dave on November 13, 2014, 09:41:31 PMIt's all relative. If you're comparing it to the profit that Spurs made on Bale or Man Utd made on Ronaldo then it wasn't huge.If you're comparing it to 97% of transfers made then all four were pretty good. In financial terms at least, it doesn't even bear thinking about what we did with the monies we received. I'm more concerned about not making anything on transfers since 2011.
It's all relative. If you're comparing it to the profit that Spurs made on Bale or Man Utd made on Ronaldo then it wasn't huge.If you're comparing it to 97% of transfers made then all four were pretty good. In financial terms at least, it doesn't even bear thinking about what we did with the monies we received.
Quote from: Clampy on November 13, 2014, 09:48:09 PMQuote from: supertom on November 13, 2014, 09:46:55 PMQuote from: Dave on November 13, 2014, 09:41:31 PMIt's all relative. If you're comparing it to the profit that Spurs made on Bale or Man Utd made on Ronaldo then it wasn't huge.If you're comparing it to 97% of transfers made then all four were pretty good. In financial terms at least, it doesn't even bear thinking about what we did with the monies we received. I'm more concerned about not making anything on transfers since 2011. If we sold players on for profit, wouldn't we be accused of being a selling club?Possibly, but even some of our mid-range players we probably should have sold for more (or in some cases anything). Trouble is if you're not Chelsea or Man City, and possibly Utd you're basically a selling club. Sometimes you have to shift someone on whilst they're sellable, and use it to try and further your squad. Sometimes it works (Southampton) and sometimes it just turns out badly (Spurs). It's all retrospect but had we sold Benteke in 2013 we could probably have bought 3-4 good players for what we'd have got. Whether we could trust Lambert to get adequate replacements is another argument though (of which the correct answer is no).
The one that always gives me a cold sweat is Cahill sold for £3m and Curtis Davies coming in for £10m.
Quote from: silhillvilla on November 14, 2014, 07:34:00 AMThe one that always gives me a cold sweat is Cahill sold for £3m and Curtis Davies coming in for £10m. Didn't Cahill go for £5m?It's still a shit deal mind.
back on topic, I'm really worried about Delph's contract. I hope somebody gives him enough money to buy Jay Lloyd's shoe collection.