Arsenal I think
Quote from: Toronto Villa on May 09, 2015, 02:59:14 AMQuote from: DB on May 09, 2015, 12:04:21 AMRubbish. You don't have to win the world cup to be considered the best. It takes 11 players to win it, he can't do it on his own.I imagine some would have different opinion of Maradona also if that game and that incident hadn't taken place in 1986. Also what would people think about him if we had access to his games, goals and highlights like we do Messi today? There simply wasn't the depth of coverage as there is today.There is no doubt Messi is absolutely sensational but it will always be a legitimate argument as long as Messi doesn't bring a WC to his country. Brazil was such a great opportunity and he wasn't able to elevate his game throughout the tournament as Maradona did in 1986 and to a lesser extent in 1990. And you can certainly make the case that he had around him far greater talent, especially in midfield and attack to help him than Maradona had.Can you clarify why it's so crucial that Messi win the World Cup but it doesn't matter that Maradona didn't win any European Cups? Napoli played in it twice, it's not like he didn't have the opportunity to do so.If Messi is expected to drag Argentina to World Cup victory just to keep par with Maradona, surely Maradona should be expected to have matched Messi's achievements in other areas, which he failed to do?And let's say that Higuain didn't miss those two chances in the Final last summer and Argentina had gone on to win - does that somehow make Messi a much better player even though he did nothing differently?
Quote from: DB on May 09, 2015, 12:04:21 AMRubbish. You don't have to win the world cup to be considered the best. It takes 11 players to win it, he can't do it on his own.I imagine some would have different opinion of Maradona also if that game and that incident hadn't taken place in 1986. Also what would people think about him if we had access to his games, goals and highlights like we do Messi today? There simply wasn't the depth of coverage as there is today.There is no doubt Messi is absolutely sensational but it will always be a legitimate argument as long as Messi doesn't bring a WC to his country. Brazil was such a great opportunity and he wasn't able to elevate his game throughout the tournament as Maradona did in 1986 and to a lesser extent in 1990. And you can certainly make the case that he had around him far greater talent, especially in midfield and attack to help him than Maradona had.
Rubbish. You don't have to win the world cup to be considered the best. It takes 11 players to win it, he can't do it on his own.
And let's say that Higuain didn't miss those two chances in the Final last summer and Argentina had gone on to win - does that somehow make Messi a much better player even though he did nothing differently?