Quote from: paulcomben on April 26, 2014, 02:23:45 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on April 26, 2014, 02:20:25 PMQuote from: paulcomben on April 26, 2014, 02:19:26 PMWe have no evidence to suggest that Helenius would contribute anything to a team under pressure, for which he has not played in months.we have evidence that the current players haven't won in 5 and have lost 4 of those games. It wouldn't hurt to try something different.Cowans, Given and settled selections are all different.I hope you're right. I think having Helenius at the very least on the bench would have provided another option, something different. Maybe even a target for Albrighton.
Quote from: Toronto Villa on April 26, 2014, 02:20:25 PMQuote from: paulcomben on April 26, 2014, 02:19:26 PMWe have no evidence to suggest that Helenius would contribute anything to a team under pressure, for which he has not played in months.we have evidence that the current players haven't won in 5 and have lost 4 of those games. It wouldn't hurt to try something different.Cowans, Given and settled selections are all different.
Quote from: paulcomben on April 26, 2014, 02:19:26 PMWe have no evidence to suggest that Helenius would contribute anything to a team under pressure, for which he has not played in months.we have evidence that the current players haven't won in 5 and have lost 4 of those games. It wouldn't hurt to try something different.
We have no evidence to suggest that Helenius would contribute anything to a team under pressure, for which he has not played in months.
Quote from: Toronto Villa on April 26, 2014, 02:28:11 PMQuote from: paulcomben on April 26, 2014, 02:23:45 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on April 26, 2014, 02:20:25 PMQuote from: paulcomben on April 26, 2014, 02:19:26 PMWe have no evidence to suggest that Helenius would contribute anything to a team under pressure, for which he has not played in months.we have evidence that the current players haven't won in 5 and have lost 4 of those games. It wouldn't hurt to try something different.Cowans, Given and settled selections are all different.I hope you're right. I think having Helenius at the very least on the bench would have provided another option, something different. Maybe even a target for Albrighton.I am not trying to be right. I am assessing the evidence and second guessing the tough decisions that the management team have to make. Keep chopping and changing every match like Lambo's original coaching team or reassure these 17 that they are trusted and supported to get the job done. Like them, I would pick the latter because, on balance, that is more likely to be successful. But, not at all guaranteed.
Apparently we haven't won at Swansea since 1971 in the old Third Division, winning 2-1 at the Vetch.Imagine we've only played them 5/6 times..Please Villa..A point at least..Or bugger all for wba,fulham,Norwich.Next year boring,safe mid table please.
Quote from: garyshawsknee on April 26, 2014, 02:17:48 PMMight as well push Bacuna further forward and play Lowton, it's not like we are overflowing with options. Ye gods, UTV.Certainly my thought when I saw this.
Might as well push Bacuna further forward and play Lowton, it's not like we are overflowing with options. Ye gods, UTV.
Holt's been the best Villa player for the last month, so he has gone in the squad.Id have had Helenius on the bench instead of Sylla and had Clark cover the defensive midfield role.
Helenius for Holt? An unproven non-match fit skinny novice for a proven battling English old fashioned number 9 who encourages his team mates and has been in scraps before? Holt is shit, but in this situation Helenius would be shitter.