Is this tactical genius Pulis in any way related to the bloke who Lambert's team beat and outplayed on their own pitch last season?
To be fair, Stoke under Pulis spend 80M quid - Net spend. That is a big chunk of change.
Quote from: ciggiesnbeer on April 20, 2014, 10:58:55 PMTo be fair, Stoke under Pulis spend 80M quid - Net spend. That is a big chunk of change.That's why he got the flick, IMO. He spent a lot of Coates's money and his team still relied on elbows, throw-ins and marginal refereeing decisions.
For all his faults, Pulis organises teams, gives everybody a clear role, plays to the players strengths and uses every possible means to get a result... I wish we had some of his ideas being put into action.
The fact that the reports on Vlaar and Clark are exactly the same is bizarre.The debate on here is not about who is more tactically astute between Pulis and Lambert: it is about the implied systematic cheating in a professional game that has many £££'s riding on it.It's just plain wrong and - if found to be accurate - the perpetrators should be caned ... but won't be by a toothless FA.
I wonder how much the bribe was to give the team sheet in advance and did it come with a player by player fact sheet?The other question is who apart from Lambert knew the team selection in advance?
The fact that the reports on Vlaar and Clark are exactly the same is bizarre.