collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Pre season 2025 by London Villan
[Today at 05:27:01 PM]


Aston Villa vs Newcastle pre-match thread by Garyth
[Today at 05:17:14 PM]


Leander Dendoncker - on loan to Anderlecht by Matt C
[Today at 05:15:04 PM]


Reserves and Academy 2025-26 by simon ward 50
[Today at 03:59:15 PM]


Tony Head by Virgil Caine
[Today at 02:49:07 PM]


Aston Villa Women 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 02:36:41 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 01:21:59 PM]


A strange pre-season by AndyB6
[Today at 01:13:22 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Pre season 2025 by London Villan
[Today at 05:27:01 PM]


Re: Aston Villa vs Newcastle pre-match thread by Garyth
[Today at 05:17:14 PM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker - on loan to Anderlecht by Matt C
[Today at 05:15:04 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by olaftab
[Today at 05:14:21 PM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker - on loan to Anderlecht by ChicagoLion
[Today at 05:00:33 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by ChicagoLion
[Today at 04:59:03 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by john e
[Today at 04:13:51 PM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker - on loan to Anderlecht by john e
[Today at 04:07:56 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Takeover Thread - Recon Group - NOW WITH NEW POLL  (Read 2839362 times)

Offline ciggiesnbeer

  • Member
  • Posts: 6794
  • Location: Mass hysteria for Aston Villa. Some team from the mountains in Russia
  • GM : 23.01.2019

Offline Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58440
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
not that I am disagreeing entirely with his article, but clubs like Sevilla, Atletico Madrid, Wigan, Swansea to name a few has shown you don't need to spend like Chelsea or Barcelona to be competitive or win trophies. If we found an owner even of Lerner's level financially but motivated to invest in line with PL revenues which keep on growing then most of us would be just fine. It would be great to think that competing with Man City was just around the corner with the right investment, but I'd take competing with Newcastle or Everton as stepping stone. You don't need to be Sheik Mansoor to do that.

Offline Phil from the upper holte

  • Member
  • Posts: 10142
  • Location: B62
How have Chelsea spunked so much cash then?

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37139
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
How have Chelsea spunked so much cash then?

Because they sold Luiz for £50m, which gives them a big chunk to play with.

Offline ktvillan

  • Member
  • Posts: 5815
  • Location: In the land of Gazi Baba, pushing water uphill wth a fork
not that I am disagreeing entirely with his article, but clubs like Sevilla, Atletico Madrid, Wigan, Swansea to name a few has shown you don't need to spend like Chelsea or Barcelona to be competitive or win trophies. If we found an owner even of Lerner's level financially but motivated to invest in line with PL revenues which keep on growing then most of us would be just fine. It would be great to think that competing with Man City was just around the corner with the right investment, but I'd take competing with Newcastle or Everton as stepping stone. You don't need to be Sheik Mansoor to do that.

And what happens when the likes of Atletico Madrid, Sevilla and co do achieve some success?  The rich boys simply come in and plunder all their best players and they are back to square one.  As Southampton are currently discovering.  Sustained success is now impossible without a sugar daddy splashing the cash.  Those without have long been just making up the numbers.  The only real hope was the possibility that they might be the next lucky winner of the sugar daddy lottery.  All FFP is doing is pretty much removing that final hope and rubber stamping the closed shop.

Offline David_Nab

  • Member
  • Posts: 4285
  • Location: Luton
  • GM : 24.12.2015
How have Chelsea spunked so much cash then?

Because they sold Luiz for £50m, which gives them a big chunk to play with.

Likely to get a decent fee for Lukau too , sold Mata and Van Buryne last season for good money too.Chelsea snap up players young then sell them on for decent fee's .Add Champs league cash and decent sponsorship from Samsung and that's how they continue to spend.

Interesting stat in last 9 years 3 clubs have won the league United /Chelsea and City take afer the latter 2 getting their from rich owners and United would have dominated.

Athetico and Southampton are 2 clubs that did well last season , Chelsea have taken 3 players off Athetico and Liverpool alone have taken 3 off Southampton.Whilst they top teams have always plunderd the smaller clubs for one club to take around a 3rd of another teams players in one hit is pretty poor going.


Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Ian Taylor is taking us over its all making sense now.

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 42820
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
The richer clubs have always bought the best players though. What is happening to Southampton isn't something new.


Offline Hookeysmith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13296
  • Age: 61
  • Location: One hand on the handle of the mad / sane door
  • GM : 06.02.2026
not that I am disagreeing entirely with his article, but clubs like Sevilla, Atletico Madrid, Wigan, Swansea to name a few has shown you don't need to spend like Chelsea or Barcelona to be competitive or win trophies. If we found an owner even of Lerner's level financially but motivated to invest in line with PL revenues which keep on growing then most of us would be just fine. It would be great to think that competing with Man City was just around the corner with the right investment, but I'd take competing with Newcastle or Everton as stepping stone. You don't need to be Sheik Mansoor to do that.

And what happens when the likes of Atletico Madrid, Sevilla and co do achieve some success?  The rich boys simply come in and plunder all their best players and they are back to square one.  As Southampton are currently discovering.  Sustained success is now impossible without a sugar daddy splashing the cash.  Those without have long been just making up the numbers.  The only real hope was the possibility that they might be the next lucky winner of the sugar daddy lottery.  All FFP is doing is pretty much removing that final hope and rubber stamping the closed shop.
A closed shop is what they always wanted and now have

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74471
  • GM : 28.08.2025
The most succinct description of FFP I've heard is that it is the 'big' clubs "pulling up the ladder behind them".

Offline clash city rocker

  • Member
  • Posts: 3773
  • Location: Out in the sticks these days
And when it comes to ' big clubs' we missed the boat..shame really

Offline johnny from donny

  • Member
  • Posts: 1087
A few of the DNS on twitter are saying the club has been taken off the market & Randy is staying

Offline Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59457
  • Age: 54
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
  • GM : 05.04.2019
DNS?

Online olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43746
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
A few of the DNS on twitter are saying the club has been taken off the market & Randy is staying
Last season it was Benteke this season it's Randy we are truly blessed.

Offline Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58440
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal