collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Pre season 2025 by London Villan
[Today at 01:28:03 PM]


Leander Dendoncker - on loan to Anderlecht by London Villan
[Today at 01:25:25 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 01:21:59 PM]


A strange pre-season by AndyB6
[Today at 01:13:22 PM]


23 April 1975 by martin o`who??
[Today at 01:08:38 PM]


Villa v Juventus by martin o`who??
[Today at 01:04:10 PM]


Leon Hickman by BC Villain
[Today at 11:52:40 AM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by AV82EC
[Today at 11:33:17 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Takeover Thread - Recon Group - NOW WITH NEW POLL  (Read 2837382 times)

Offline old man villa fan

  • Member
  • Posts: 3458
  • Location: Birmingham
Re: The Takeover Thread
« Reply #2925 on: May 11, 2014, 06:48:08 PM »
The worrying think for me is that Lerner will probably want at least £200m for Villa and that would be with about £100m loss to him.  On top of that, a new owner would have to invest at least £30-40m straight off and more to come.

Who wants to invest that much in football now for a club that is so far away from the top.  As a business venture, it does not stack up in the short to medium term so we are relying on somebody on an ego trip.

The alternative is a new owner who sees a long slow climb back as being financially viable but will the Villa fans will accept that.  I do not think so in the world we now live in.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: The Takeover Thread
« Reply #2926 on: May 11, 2014, 06:49:28 PM »
Leaving the match report late on the OS.Hopefully they are busy typing up something a bit more important.

It will be tomorrow. I don't think they would do anything today. It will be face to face with Faulkner tomorrow is my hopeful guess.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ok_42shL_5E

Offline Rolta

  • Member
  • Posts: 129
Re: The Takeover Thread
« Reply #2927 on: May 11, 2014, 06:51:32 PM »
Anyone else in the "Lambert needs to go" camp find themselves not actually that bothered if he does or not because they're too focused on the takeover?

No, I want him gone yesterday. Ultimately no better than Big Eck

One of these managers put the club in a secure financial position on a tiny budget with an inexperienced squad (as a result of fixing the finances) – and has had to play without 3 of his most expensive signings for most of the season. The other one signed Given on a 5 year deal and N'Zogbia on 4 years or something – plus Alan Hutton and Jermaine Jenas – he had plenty of expensive proven premiership players on high wages and still did an awful job.

If you really think Lambert has done a job on the level of McCleish, then I despair.

I'm not exactly feeling inspired as a Villa supporter right now, but I for one can see that Lambert has been in a pretty thankless position since he's been here. Some managers come to clubs and bring success by spending loads of money, but the clubs (Portsmouth, Leeds) disappear because they were spending above their means. That's where we were going (only without the success). Even if Lambert goes, he has definitely done an impressive job on the finances and put the club in a decent position for the future. Now all we need are better footballers :p


Offline Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59457
  • Age: 54
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
  • GM : 05.04.2019
Re: The Takeover Thread
« Reply #2928 on: May 11, 2014, 06:53:04 PM »
McLeish.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35591
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: The Takeover Thread
« Reply #2929 on: May 11, 2014, 06:56:26 PM »
The worrying think for me is that Lerner will probably want at least £200m for Villa and that would be with about £100m loss to him.  On top of that, a new owner would have to invest at least £30-40m straight off and more to come.

Who wants to invest that much in football now for a club that is so far away from the top.  As a business venture, it does not stack up in the short to medium term so we are relying on somebody on an ego trip.

The alternative is a new owner who sees a long slow climb back as being financially viable but will the Villa fans will accept that.  I do not think so in the world we now live in.

I don't want owners who see it as a business venture. I want an egotist who wants us to have a front three of Ronaldo, Bale and Messi. But seriously, if you want it to work as a business I think you need to create the kind of club who will attract huge sponsorship, commercial income, TV money and crowds.

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: The Takeover Thread
« Reply #2930 on: May 11, 2014, 06:57:35 PM »
Just hope there isn't anything more sinister going on behind the scenes.
Some of the noises / vibes seem really dark and negative.

Offline Rolta

  • Member
  • Posts: 129
Re: The Takeover Thread
« Reply #2931 on: May 11, 2014, 06:59:10 PM »
McLeish.

I didn't even want to write his name :o

Offline Rudy65

  • Member
  • Posts: 4560
Re: The Takeover Thread
« Reply #2932 on: May 11, 2014, 06:59:45 PM »
Anyone else in the "Lambert needs to go" camp find themselves not actually that bothered if he does or not because they're too focused on the takeover?

No, I want him gone yesterday. Ultimately no better than Big Eck

One of these managers put the club in a secure financial position on a tiny budget with an inexperienced squad (as a result of fixing the finances) – and has had to play without 3 of his most expensive signings for most of the season. The other one signed Given on a 5 year deal and N'Zogbia on 4 years or something – plus Alan Hutton and Jermaine Jenas – he had plenty of expensive proven premiership players on high wages and still did an awful job.

If you really think Lambert has done a job on the level of McCleish, then I despair.

I'm not exactly feeling inspired as a Villa supporter right now, but I for one can see that Lambert has been in a pretty thankless position since he's been here. Some managers come to clubs and bring success by spending loads of money, but the clubs (Portsmouth, Leeds) disappear because they were spending above their means. That's where we were going (only without the success). Even if Lambert goes, he has definitely done an impressive job on the finances and put the club in a decent position for the future. Now all we need are better footballers :p

You are being too kind

He only lost Benteke a month ago and Kozak in feb. Hardly most of the season. okore,  i grant was a big loss.

Not sure how much you watch but in no way has Lamber done a impressive job as you suggest. He has spent smething like 40m, chicken feed compared to man City but which should  at least enable us to compete with Palace and Stoke.

Offline Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59457
  • Age: 54
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
  • GM : 05.04.2019
Re: The Takeover Thread
« Reply #2933 on: May 11, 2014, 06:59:55 PM »
Sorry. TOSM.

Online ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31005
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: The Takeover Thread
« Reply #2934 on: May 11, 2014, 07:01:51 PM »
Hughes got 50 points this season with Stoke. Pulis got Palace to 47. Both more than we have seen in 4 years. Lambert has spent 40 million. And we are weak, disorganised and regressed terribly from being a genuine threat going forward to being limp and defensive.

He simply has to go.

Offline Deano's Mullet

  • Member
  • Posts: 22819
  • Location: Erdington now Sussex
Re: The Takeover Thread
« Reply #2935 on: May 11, 2014, 07:05:37 PM »
Does anyone think that even with the squad we had Hughes, Pulis, maybe even Allardyce would all still have got more out of the team in terms of efficiency, performances on the pitch and tactically more ambitious? That 45 mins spell of passing at Liverpool haunts me. Why didn't we set up to play like that more often?

Offline sirlordbaltimore

  • Member
  • Posts: 2846
Re: The Takeover Thread
« Reply #2936 on: May 11, 2014, 07:06:30 PM »
One of these managers put the club in a secure financial position on a tiny budget with an inexperienced squad (as a result of fixing the finances) – and has had to play without 3 of his most expensive signings for most of the season. The other one signed Given on a 5 year deal and N'Zogbia on 4 years or something – plus Alan Hutton and Jermaine Jenas – he had plenty of expensive proven premiership players on high wages and still did an awful job.

If you really think Lambert has done a job on the level of McCleish, then I despair.

Our last set of accounts were woeful. Secure financial position my arse! the wage bill had gone up in the last report i'm sure

Tiny budget = 45m, or over 22m per season. Hardly chicken feed

Not only do i dislike him more than McLeish as a manager, I think he's done an even worse job



Offline john e

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20485
  • GM : 28.06.2024
Re: The Takeover Thread
« Reply #2937 on: May 11, 2014, 07:07:49 PM »
If we got new owners with bundles of money surely they wouldn't just be able to splash it around on top players because of the fair play rules

Not that it matters cus the sale to a multi billionaire ant gona happen anyway, IMO

Offline Mazrim

  • Member
  • Posts: 21173
  • Location: Hall Green.
Re: The Takeover Thread
« Reply #2938 on: May 11, 2014, 07:08:16 PM »
Lambert has done an appalling job. He bemoaned the fact he had to use academy players but where is the strker HE bought? (Helenius) Where is the winger he bought? (Tonev). Why are we playing a loan player at left back when he has signed two left backs already and with money so tight? Why did he buy Kozak at all when we needed a midfielder so desperately? Why take a fat useless oaf from warming Wigan's bench to warm ours instead? Why has he allowed the coaching staff he hired to poison the atmosphere at the club and oversee terrible training regimes? Why is Baker played instead of Clark when he's quite clearly hopeless? Why do the team play like strangers? The team hardly changes after all? Karim El Ahmadi?

Terrible manager. Terrible job.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: The Takeover Thread
« Reply #2939 on: May 11, 2014, 07:08:32 PM »
Does anyone think that even with the squad we had Hughes, Pulis, maybe even Allardyce would all still have got more out of the team in terms of efficiency, performances on the pitch and tactically more ambitious? That 45 mins spell of passing at Liverpool haunts me. Why didn't we set up to play like that more often?
When we press we get time on the ball and look a good side.It's in the side but the manager has failed apart from the odd half to get it out of the players.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal