collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Emi Buendia by Rigadon
[Today at 12:40:59 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by paul_e
[Today at 12:39:51 PM]


Aston Villa vs Newcastle pre-match thread by AV82EC
[Today at 12:39:36 PM]


Jacob Ramsey by Rigadon
[Today at 12:39:28 PM]


Games Moved for TV by VillaTim
[Today at 12:23:36 PM]


Where will Villa finish 2025/26 by Richard
[Today at 12:17:01 PM]


George Hemmings by jwarry
[Today at 11:39:46 AM]


Evann Guessand by cdbearsfan
[Today at 11:36:10 AM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary  (Read 37649 times)

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63328
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary
« Reply #105 on: April 09, 2014, 06:48:15 PM »
Happier, better times under Herbert:



I get so misty-eyed remembering those halcyon days.

that must be photoshopped Dave because that never happened. Ellis was great compared to that asset stripping Lerner bloke who nobody ever sees.
Isn't the real issue that back then the Fans did care and did vent their spleen where as now, everybody is just punch drunk by the now years of mismanagement and piss poor appointments. I think all the protest has been sucked out of the fans. It just feels like we are all walking Zombie like to the Championship.
Lerner is the unqualified architect of this demise, Faulkner his corporate bullshit yes man and Lambert his clueless foreman.

Spot on.

Let me get this right. Back then it was so bad that we protested. Now it's worse so we... don't protest.

Could you explain the logic there, please?

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75766
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary
« Reply #106 on: April 09, 2014, 06:51:27 PM »
It took the best part of 20 years before there were any real protests against Ellis from fans, and even then they were sporadic and generally short lived. 86/87 was hardly a hotbed of protests as we finished bottom for example.

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30227
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary
« Reply #107 on: April 09, 2014, 06:51:47 PM »
Happier, better times under Herbert:



I get so misty-eyed remembering those halcyon days.

that must be photoshopped Dave because that never happened. Ellis was great compared to that asset stripping Lerner bloke who nobody ever sees.
Isn't the real issue that back then the Fans did care and did vent their spleen where as now, everybody is just punch drunk by the now years of mismanagement and piss poor appointments. I think all the protest has been sucked out of the fans. It just feels like we are all walking Zombie like to the Championship.
Lerner is the unqualified architect of this demise, Faulkner his corporate bullshit yes man and Lambert his clueless foreman.

Spot on.

After the amount of money Lerner has put in, i'd be embarrassed to be hanging signs over the top of the Holte End.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75766
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary
« Reply #108 on: April 09, 2014, 06:52:56 PM »
Ah the good old days of the "Spend or Go" poster campaign around the city.

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63328
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary
« Reply #109 on: April 09, 2014, 06:54:07 PM »
Ah the good old days of the "Spend or Go" poster campaign around the city.

Many years later I found out who did them. You'd be amazed to learn his identity.

Offline sirlordbaltimore

  • Member
  • Posts: 2846
Re: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary
« Reply #110 on: April 09, 2014, 07:11:38 PM »
After the amount of money Lerner has put in, i'd be embarrassed to be hanging signs over the top of the Holte End.

You mean our money, as in don't we owe it him in 'loans' ?

Or will he feck off and not want it all back ?

If it's the latter and he will walk without wanting to recoup it then, and only then will I considered it as his money that's been wasted

Offline go on the dog

  • Member
  • Posts: 180
Re: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary
« Reply #111 on: April 09, 2014, 07:12:05 PM »
Howard Hodgson? ;D

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30227
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary
« Reply #112 on: April 09, 2014, 07:14:11 PM »
After the amount of money Lerner has put in, i'd be embarrassed to be hanging signs over the top of the Holte End.

You mean our money, as in don't we owe it him in 'loans' ?

Or will he feck off and not want it all back ?

If it's the latter and he will walk without wanting to recoup it then, and only then will I considered it as his money that's been wasted

There's no pleasing some people is there?

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary
« Reply #113 on: April 09, 2014, 07:19:33 PM »
After the amount of money Lerner has put in, i'd be embarrassed to be hanging signs over the top of the Holte End.

You mean our money, as in don't we owe it him in 'loans' ?

Or will he feck off and not want it all back ?

If it's the latter and he will walk without wanting to recoup it then, and only then will I considered it as his money that's been wasted

There's no pleasing some people is there?
Learner is untouchable to some,don't see why.

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29199
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary
« Reply #114 on: April 09, 2014, 07:20:12 PM »
After the amount of money Lerner has put in, i'd be embarrassed to be hanging signs over the top of the Holte End.

You mean our money, as in don't we owe it him in 'loans' ?

Or will he feck off and not want it all back ?

If it's the latter and he will walk without wanting to recoup it then, and only then will I considered it as his money that's been wasted

So, in this hypothetical scenario for which there isn't just no evidence but which in fact runs contrary to the evidence, you're furious with the owner? I too am livid with him because of the part he'll play in the assassination of President Hillary Clinton. I'll never forgive him for this once it's happened if it happens.
« Last Edit: April 09, 2014, 07:21:53 PM by Montbert »

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary
« Reply #115 on: April 09, 2014, 07:23:00 PM »
After the amount of money Lerner has put in, i'd be embarrassed to be hanging signs over the top of the Holte End.

You mean our money, as in don't we owe it him in 'loans' ?

Or will he feck off and not want it all back ?

If it's the latter and he will walk without wanting to recoup it then, and only then will I considered it as his money that's been wasted

So, in this hypothetical scenario for which there isn't just no evidence but which in fact runs contrary to the evidence, you're furious with the owner? I too am livid with him because of the part he'll play in the assassination of President Hillary Clinton. I'll never forgive him for this once it's happened if it happens.
See what I mean.

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30227
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary
« Reply #116 on: April 09, 2014, 07:25:17 PM »
After the amount of money Lerner has put in, i'd be embarrassed to be hanging signs over the top of the Holte End.

You mean our money, as in don't we owe it him in 'loans' ?

Or will he feck off and not want it all back ?

If it's the latter and he will walk without wanting to recoup it then, and only then will I considered it as his money that's been wasted

So, in this hypothetical scenario for which there isn't just no evidence but which in fact runs contrary to the evidence, you're furious with the owner? I too am livid with him because of the part he'll play in the assassination of President Hillary Clinton. I'll never forgive him for this once it's happened if it happens.
See what I mean.

Not really, no.

So, if you want to protest then go ahead. What's your banner going to say?

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29199
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary
« Reply #117 on: April 09, 2014, 07:28:35 PM »
After the amount of money Lerner has put in, i'd be embarrassed to be hanging signs over the top of the Holte End.

You mean our money, as in don't we owe it him in 'loans' ?

Or will he feck off and not want it all back ?

If it's the latter and he will walk without wanting to recoup it then, and only then will I considered it as his money that's been wasted

So, in this hypothetical scenario for which there isn't just no evidence but which in fact runs contrary to the evidence, you're furious with the owner? I too am livid with him because of the part he'll play in the assassination of President Hillary Clinton. I'll never forgive him for this once it's happened if it happens.
See what I mean.

Well spotted, I have indeed never made a criticism of Randy Lerner in all my 10,000+ posts during his ownership.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary
« Reply #118 on: April 09, 2014, 07:30:20 PM »
After the amount of money Lerner has put in, i'd be embarrassed to be hanging signs over the top of the Holte End.

You mean our money, as in don't we owe it him in 'loans' ?

Or will he feck off and not want it all back ?

If it's the latter and he will walk without wanting to recoup it then, and only then will I considered it as his money that's been wasted

So, in this hypothetical scenario for which there isn't just no evidence but which in fact runs contrary to the evidence, you're furious with the owner? I too am livid with him because of the part he'll play in the assassination of President Hillary Clinton. I'll never forgive him for this once it's happened if it happens.
See what I mean.

Not really, no.

So, if you want to protest then go ahead. What's your banner going to say?
'Who said anything about a protest' on a blue bedsheet in red paint.
I expected an answer like that.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary
« Reply #119 on: April 09, 2014, 07:32:33 PM »
After the amount of money Lerner has put in, i'd be embarrassed to be hanging signs over the top of the Holte End.

You mean our money, as in don't we owe it him in 'loans' ?

Or will he feck off and not want it all back ?

If it's the latter and he will walk without wanting to recoup it then, and only then will I considered it as his money that's been wasted

So, in this hypothetical scenario for which there isn't just no evidence but which in fact runs contrary to the evidence, you're furious with the owner? I too am livid with him because of the part he'll play in the assassination of President Hillary Clinton. I'll never forgive him for this once it's happened if it happens.
See what I mean.

Well spotted, I have indeed never made a criticism of Randy Lerner in all my 10,000+ posts during his ownership.
This getting the same as the Lambert thread,some of the answers coming back are getting silly,and are trying to get a reaction.
Its a boring way of getting a point across.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal