Lerner/Lambert v Ellis/O'Leary

[Clampy]

No, SLB said that. You said that my calling his point ridiculous was an example of my never criticising Lerner, part of a wider omerta on criticism of the owner which you appear to believe is going on.

Yet again I haven't said that,and thank's for letting me know what I am beliving.Dear me we really do think alot of ourself don't we.

In fairness BLS, you did come out with 'see what I mean' a bit earlier after Montbert's sarcastic comment about defending Lerner. I can only presume that's what Montbert is referring to.

[bertlambshank]

No, SLB said that. You said that my calling his point ridiculous was an example of my never criticising Lerner, part of a wider omerta on criticism of the owner which you appear to believe is going on.

Yet again I haven't said that,and thank's for letting me know what I am beliving.Dear me we really do think alot of ourself don't we.

In fairness BLS, you did come out with 'see what I mean' a bit earlier after Montbert's sarcastic comment about defending Lerner. I can only presume that's what Montbert is referring to.

Then why didn't he say that instead of trying be a clever sod.

[Monty]

No, SLB said that. You said that my calling his point ridiculous was an example of my never criticising Lerner, part of a wider omerta on criticism of the owner which you appear to believe is going on.

Yet again I haven't said that,and thank's for letting me know what I am beliving.Dear me we really do think alot of ourself don't we.

In fairness BLS, you did come out with 'see what I mean' a bit earlier after Montbert's sarcastic comment about defending Lerner. I can only presume that's what Montbert is referring to.

Then why didn't he say that instead of trying be a clever sod.

I didn't think it was that clever. If you did, then I suppose that says what it says about you.

[bertlambshank]

And the pack is out again all this anti/pro bollocks has to stop.Just because somebody doesn't agree it why does take so many of the pro camp to make the point.

[bertlambshank]

No, SLB said that. You said that my calling his point ridiculous was an example of my never criticising Lerner, part of a wider omerta on criticism of the owner which you appear to believe is going on.

Yet again I haven't said that,and thank's for letting me know what I am beliving.Dear me we really do think alot of ourself don't we.

In fairness BLS, you did come out with 'see what I mean' a bit earlier after Montbert's sarcastic comment about defending Lerner. I can only presume that's what Montbert is referring to.

Then why didn't he say that instead of trying be a clever sod.

I didn't think it was that clever. If you did, then I suppose that says what it says about you.

Yawn.

[LeeB]

And the pack is out again all this anti/pro bollocks has to stop.Just because somebody doesn't agree it why does take so many of the pro camp to make the point.

Pro fucking what?

My issue with points in this thread has been with revisionism about the reign of Doug.

[Clampy]

And the pack is out again all this anti/pro bollocks has to stop.Just because somebody doesn't agree it why does take so many of the pro camp to make the point.

It's not a pack though, it's just individual comments made by individual posters.

[bertlambshank]

And the pack is out again all this anti/pro bollocks has to stop.Just because somebody doesn't agree it why does take so many of the pro camp to make the point.

It's not a pack though, it's just individual comments made by individual posters.

Sorry don't see it that way at the moment.

[LeeB]

And the pack is out again all this anti/pro bollocks has to stop.Just because somebody doesn't agree it why does take so many of the pro camp to make the point.

It's not a pack though, it's just individual comments made by individual posters.

Sorry don't see it that way at the moment.

No, that's your problem mate.

[PeterWithesShin]

Despite all the shite claimed, there is no pack on either side. Just people posting their views and different posters agreeing or disagreeing depending on when they are online. It's how an internet forum works funnily enough.

[Monty]

And very few people are solely pro or anti, most have good and bad things to say about Lerner. And anyway, even if people are entirely pro or anti it doesn't matter - what is objected to are hysterical statements based on no evidence whatsoever. If someone had come out and said that they support Lerner because he might one day put in £200m to buy Messi that would be just as ridiculous as someone saying they hate him because he might pull the plug and call in his loans.

[ChicagoLion]

Despite all the shite claimed, there is no pack on either side. Just people posting their views and different posters agreeing or disagreeing depending on when they are online. It's how an internet forum works funnily enough.

No it isnt

Sorry just trying to start an arguement

[PeterWithesShin]

Despite all the shite claimed, there is no pack on either side. Just people posting their views and different posters agreeing or disagreeing depending on when they are online. It's how an internet forum works funnily enough.

No it isnt

Sorry just trying to start an arguement

Yes it is!

And until everyone agrees i'll scweam and scweam until i'm sick.

[Clampy]

Is this the room for an argument?

[bertlambshank]

Despite all the shite claimed, there is no pack on either side. Just people posting their views and different posters agreeing or disagreeing depending on when they are online. It's how an internet forum works funnily enough.

We are going to have to agree to disagree on this one.Since Saturday there has been a change of posting style if anybody 'has a go at the club'.