Bizarre. He's a solid, fairly reliable defender, especially in this league.Why haven't we dumped Samba, Elphick and Richards instead?
Good luck Nathan. You had the bloody awful luck of being in some shit teams.
Like Hutton people always seem to willing to overlook the bad bits of his game because he was a trier. We need to get over that and start expecting technical competence from the whole squad as a minimum.
Quote from: brian green on July 28, 2017, 03:18:26 PMGood luck Nathan. You had the bloody awful luck of being in some shit teams.Yeah and he was one of the reasons we had so many shit teams. Lets get it right ....we had a solid defence last season in the Championship ....had we have had goals in us we may not still be hereBaker was a solid performer who at this level is fine .....I would rather have him at the club than Richards but nobody will buy him
The difference between Nathan Baker and players like Richards, Lescott, Agbonlahor, Elphick and co. was that he always tried and did his best. He is not a gifted player but he is an honest one. If we had had another ten with his bravery and commitment we would not have stunk out the Premiership. Perhaps we would have gone down but as the laughing stocks we became.
Banned for the first three games! I hope we got a good price for him. Very average player whether he tried hard or not. I think him going answers the question about us playing three at the back.