collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

FFP by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 12:08:48 AM]


Pre season 2025 by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 12:02:34 AM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by LeeB
[August 10, 2025, 11:58:10 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by PeterWithesShin
[August 10, 2025, 11:52:27 PM]


Standard of Refereeing by Somniloquism
[August 10, 2025, 10:51:55 PM]


Season Ticket 2025/26 by pauliewalnuts
[August 10, 2025, 10:50:54 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by algy
[August 10, 2025, 10:41:43 PM]


Where will Villa finish 2025/26 by Des Little
[August 10, 2025, 10:34:29 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: FFP by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 12:08:48 AM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 12:02:34 AM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by LeeB
[August 10, 2025, 11:58:10 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by PeterWithesShin
[August 10, 2025, 11:52:27 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[August 10, 2025, 11:42:15 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Brazilian Villain
[August 10, 2025, 11:39:18 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Brazilian Villain
[August 10, 2025, 11:36:22 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by olaftab
[August 10, 2025, 11:33:23 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Nathan Baker - Sold  (Read 146801 times)

Offline cheltenhamlion

  • Member
  • Posts: 18734
  • Location: Pedmore, Stourbridge
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #750 on: July 28, 2017, 10:41:41 AM »
I am not happy if that is the case. We are leaving ourselves a bit light outside of the wasters we don't want playing for us in the centre of defence.

Offline Matt Collins

  • Member
  • Posts: 10884
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #751 on: July 28, 2017, 10:41:42 AM »
Disappointed to see him go. But Bristol more his level. Defence was good last year but partially because Bruce played midfield deep. Hoping for a more expansive style this year and think that would show up his limitations more

Does leave us looking light for cover - though maybe Bruce thinks Jedinak can routinely do that

Hoping Richards remains well down pecking  order

Offline Villatillidie25

  • Member
  • Posts: 724
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #752 on: July 28, 2017, 10:43:04 AM »
Don't quite understand this one unless they just can't get rid of Richards and need somebody off the wage bill/transfer funds in. Maybe Bruce thinks some combination of Bree, De Laet, Jedinak, Richards as 4th choice is enough (assuming Elphick leaves).
Also probably suggests Amavi isn't going anywhere as Baker (and De Laet to a lesser degree) would probably be cover for Taylor

Offline Matt Collins

  • Member
  • Posts: 10884
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #753 on: July 28, 2017, 10:44:13 AM »
I do think Baker probably instigated this. He seemed to be in Bruce's thoughts if the Mail are to be believed

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15650
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #754 on: July 28, 2017, 10:46:42 AM »
Glad he's off. Let's face it for most of his time here he's been a car crash player.

Online tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15418
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #755 on: July 28, 2017, 10:47:03 AM »
Supposedly having a medical at Bristol City this morning
wow, I find that surprising. He's not good enough for Prem but perfectly adequate for the next season.
Is Alex Bruce about to join us?

Could be a few reasons I suppose.  If he is looking for defenders who can play out from the back, then it wouldn't be so much of a surprise that Baker is being moved on.  Also, he might feel that one of the younger players is a better bet than Baker. 

That leaves us with Chester, Terry, Samba, possibly Jedinak and some kids though, so I would have thought he might have to look to bring another defender in. 

Offline Des Little

  • Member
  • Posts: 12829
  • Location: A5 Ultra
  • GM : 03.05.2021
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #756 on: July 28, 2017, 10:48:52 AM »
There goes one of our 3 songs

Disclaimer - I know we have loads more, but we don't sing 'em!

Offline Matt Collins

  • Member
  • Posts: 10884
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #757 on: July 28, 2017, 10:50:42 AM »
If we're really bringing the squad down to 20 seniors I'm not sure we will bring a CB in

Definitely suggests we're not going 3 at the back though

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #758 on: July 28, 2017, 10:50:47 AM »
He's been playing first team football for a couple of seasons now i doubt he'd want to be on the bench at his age when he could walk into another lower table Championship team.

Offline Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18101
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 16.02.2026
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #759 on: July 28, 2017, 10:52:56 AM »
There goes one of our 3 songs

Disclaimer - I know we have loads more, but we don't sing 'em!
Every cloud has a silver lining ...

He is a pretty limited player: it's the absence of tailormade cover for Terry (which the left-footed Baker provides) that I find surprising. We certainly won't miss his dreadful distribution and poor set-piece scoring record.

Offline Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36427
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #760 on: July 28, 2017, 10:56:01 AM »
We have signed two centre backs which must tell him where he sits in the pecking order.

Offline Des Little

  • Member
  • Posts: 12829
  • Location: A5 Ultra
  • GM : 03.05.2021
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #761 on: July 28, 2017, 10:57:15 AM »
I doubt he was one of those ear marked to move on, therefore I expect Bruce to bring someone in as cover - unless anyone can enlighten me on any of the younger lads in the squad?

Ignore me - I forgot about Samba!  Sorry
« Last Edit: July 28, 2017, 11:02:12 AM by Des Little »

Offline Matt Collins

  • Member
  • Posts: 10884
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #762 on: July 28, 2017, 11:00:06 AM »
Amavi falling through probably means we need to raise ££ elsewhere - either for new signings or FFP

Offline JUAN PABLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 34294
  • Location: hinckley
    • http://www.scifimafia.net
  • GM : Aug, 2014
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #763 on: July 28, 2017, 11:02:43 AM »
as long as Elphick joins him

Offline Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18101
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 16.02.2026
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #764 on: July 28, 2017, 11:17:05 AM »
as long as Elphick joins him
And Richards - I've seen nothing to suggest that he anything other than a liability; rehabilitation or not.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal