collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

FFP by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 12:08:48 AM]


Pre season 2025 by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 12:02:34 AM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by LeeB
[August 10, 2025, 11:58:10 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by PeterWithesShin
[August 10, 2025, 11:52:27 PM]


Standard of Refereeing by Somniloquism
[August 10, 2025, 10:51:55 PM]


Season Ticket 2025/26 by pauliewalnuts
[August 10, 2025, 10:50:54 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by algy
[August 10, 2025, 10:41:43 PM]


Where will Villa finish 2025/26 by Des Little
[August 10, 2025, 10:34:29 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: FFP by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 12:08:48 AM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 12:02:34 AM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by LeeB
[August 10, 2025, 11:58:10 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by PeterWithesShin
[August 10, 2025, 11:52:27 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[August 10, 2025, 11:42:15 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Brazilian Villain
[August 10, 2025, 11:39:18 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Brazilian Villain
[August 10, 2025, 11:36:22 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by olaftab
[August 10, 2025, 11:33:23 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Nathan Baker - Sold  (Read 146809 times)

Offline Matt Collins

  • Member
  • Posts: 10884
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #555 on: December 03, 2016, 03:23:30 PM »
Elphick was worse than most though. I think he went through a spell of gifting the oppo a one on one through an errant back pass, for four matches in a row

Luckily we're  in the championship

Offline Bottom Right 89

  • Member
  • Posts: 857
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #556 on: December 04, 2016, 01:19:26 AM »
Get well soon Nathan

Offline exigo

  • Member
  • Posts: 2857
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #557 on: December 04, 2016, 10:30:54 AM »
Get well soon Nathan

Get well very very soon.

Offline Tony Erdington

  • Member
  • Posts: 1884
  • Location: 1982
  • Being There
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #558 on: December 04, 2016, 12:03:48 PM »

Offline footyskillz

  • Member
  • Posts: 3262
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #559 on: December 13, 2016, 03:14:16 AM »
Any news on baker being available ?   I certainly would start him if fit

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #560 on: December 18, 2016, 04:37:34 PM »
Couldn't really argue with Kodija being MOTM today, but Baker ran him close in my opinion.  I really hope we can keep him fit, but because we are just so much better at the back with him playing.

Offline brian green

  • Member
  • Posts: 18357
  • Age: 87
  • Location: Nice France
  • GM : 19.06.2020
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #561 on: December 18, 2016, 04:52:23 PM »
I still have some of the dead cats that were hurled at me when I supported his contract extension.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75760
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #562 on: December 18, 2016, 05:05:42 PM »
One person replied to your post back then and that was only saying he wasn't young.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75760
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #563 on: December 18, 2016, 05:09:15 PM »
Couldn't really argue with Kodija being MOTM today, but Baker ran him close in my opinion.  I really hope we can keep him fit, but because we are just so much better at the back with him playing.

I'd have given it Baker, but as you say, can't argue with Kod winning it either.

Offline four fornicholl

  • Member
  • Posts: 4995
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #564 on: December 18, 2016, 05:13:07 PM »
I remember him being well respected at Bristol and that experience seems to be invaluable this season.
Well done Nathan for getting your head down and working hard.

Offline West Derby Villan

  • Member
  • Posts: 13600
  • Location: Turn left junction 21A
  • GM : 09.05.2022
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #565 on: December 18, 2016, 05:24:43 PM »
Good to see him back today. He brought a balance and confidence back to the defence.

Offline brian green

  • Member
  • Posts: 18357
  • Age: 87
  • Location: Nice France
  • GM : 19.06.2020
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #566 on: December 18, 2016, 05:26:38 PM »
I do have other contacts PWS than those who respond on this forum.  I apologise if I gave the impression that the dead cats came from this quarter.  However, the fact that the name "50p head" continues to attach itself hints at the criticism both he and Clark have been subjected to.

Offline frank

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2824
  • Location: Horsham, West Sussex
  • GM : 29.01.2026
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #567 on: December 18, 2016, 05:35:50 PM »
Man of the match for me. Very strong in the air, brave in the tackle, both of which we would expect, but also accurate with his passing,  which hasn't always been the case. Overall a very impressive performance. Chester too had a very good game.

Offline Matt Collins

  • Member
  • Posts: 10884
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #568 on: December 18, 2016, 05:40:55 PM »
He was really good again

Cutting out the rash challenges and mistakes

Offline Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36427
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #569 on: December 18, 2016, 05:42:02 PM »
I do have other contacts PWS than those who respond on this forum.  I apologise if I gave the impression that the dead cats came from this quarter.  However, the fact that the name "50p head" continues to attach itself hints at the criticism both he and Clark have been subjected to.

The 50p comment was perfectly valid a year ago as was headless chicken for his reckless lunges and the ease with which he was pulled out of position.

I have been very impressed with his improvement and I think the influence of Chester must have a lot to do with it for the way he organises the back line. It will be interesting to see how he fares if and when we get promoted when he will be pack playing against far smarter players.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal