collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Pre season 2025 by Steve67
[Today at 10:01:25 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by paul_e
[Today at 09:58:47 PM]


Francesco Calvo - President of Business Operations by algy
[Today at 09:42:06 PM]


Season Ticket 2025/26 by Scratchins
[Today at 09:36:14 PM]


Where will Villa finish 2025/26 by andyh
[Today at 09:05:36 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by ADVILLAFAN
[Today at 08:51:55 PM]


Leon Hickman by dave.woodhall
[Today at 08:45:14 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Nathan Baker - Sold  (Read 146463 times)

Offline Lastfootstamper

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11634
  • Age: 59
  • Location: Greater Birmingham
  • GM : PCM
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #240 on: November 10, 2014, 07:40:01 PM »
The thing is and we saw it fleetingly at the weekend, we can knock it about and string a few passes together. I genuinely we have players that can do that and actually want to. It's the complete lack of movement in the final third that leads to us just whacking it aimlessly to the flanks that kills us all too often. With a more technical manager who would address that problem I think the likes of Cleverley or Westwood would improve no end. Fuck, even Pulis would figure it out.

Infuriating, isn't it? We just have no grasp of the basic understanding that a forward is as much a part of the team ethic as anyone else. Drop into space, receive, give it, turn, MOVE, your side now has possession ten yards further up the pitch. It's so simple that I'm confident even the current incumbents of our jerseys could manage it. The way it is at the moment, even when we do (briefly) keep the ball, we're effectively playing with just eight or nine men. It's little wonder when it then, almost invariably, goes tits-up, and we relinquish possession whilst still in our own fkn half.

Online pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74524
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #241 on: November 10, 2014, 07:41:45 PM »
Baker is starting to look like some sort of member of a U-boat crew with that beard.

*insert predictable 'we are going down like one' style joke here*

Offline Lastfootstamper

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11634
  • Age: 59
  • Location: Greater Birmingham
  • GM : PCM
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #242 on: November 10, 2014, 07:51:13 PM »
I'm confident that with the right coaching we could become a possession based team but Lambert keeps coming out with this line about possession not mattering. Whilst games can be won with the minority of possession, having that as your ruling tactic is crazy.

As is expecting people to continue to part with their hard-earned to come and watch you when that's what's on offer.

Offline adrenachrome

  • Member
  • Posts: 13806
  • Location: The Foundry
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #243 on: November 10, 2014, 08:14:45 PM »
Baker is starting to look like some sort of member of a U-boat crew with that beard.

*insert predictable 'we are going down like one' style joke here*


Online Ian.

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15636
  • Location: Back home in the Shire
  • GM : 09.01.2026
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #244 on: November 10, 2014, 08:38:12 PM »
The thing is and we saw it fleetingly at the weekend, we can knock it about and string a few passes together. I genuinely we have players that can do that and actually want to. It's the complete lack of movement in the final third that leads to us just whacking it aimlessly to the flanks that kills us all too often. With a more technical manager who would address that problem I think the likes of Cleverley or Westwood would improve no end. Fuck, even Pulis would figure it out.

Infuriating, isn't it? We just have no grasp of the basic understanding that a forward is as much a part of the team ethic as anyone else. Drop into space, receive, give it, turn, MOVE, your side now has possession ten yards further up the pitch. It's so simple that I'm confident even the current incumbents of our jerseys could manage it. The way it is at the moment, even when we do (briefly) keep the ball, we're effectively playing with just eight or nine men. It's little wonder when it then, almost invariably, goes tits-up, and we relinquish possession whilst still in our own fkn half.
Remember back to that first season under Lambert?

We started off trying to knock the ball around, this was the reason Bent (apparently) didn't fit in. He wasn't  a modern day striker who helps with ball retention. So what the hell happened?

Last season I put it down to too many players picked from lower leagues just simply not good enough. Confidence was a major issue along with major injuries.

This season we look stronger than ever (under Lambert), on paper anyway, however while we have a ice rink as our training ground the injury crisis is still there, but saying that the main core of players are better than the last two seasons, so why are we so useless with keeping the damn ball and creating anything that resembles an effort on target?

Offline adrenachrome

  • Member
  • Posts: 13806
  • Location: The Foundry
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #245 on: November 10, 2014, 08:48:58 PM »
Oh that the training ground was just an ice rink. It is also a refuge for psychopathic bone crunchers, sociopathic relatives of the manager  and a germ warfare site stocked with virulent virus cultures. 

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #246 on: November 10, 2014, 09:24:28 PM »
The thing is and we saw it fleetingly at the weekend, we can knock it about and string a few passes together. I genuinely we have players that can do that and actually want to. It's the complete lack of movement in the final third that leads to us just whacking it aimlessly to the flanks that kills us all too often. With a more technical manager who would address that problem I think the likes of Cleverley or Westwood would improve no end. Fuck, even Pulis would figure it out.

Infuriating, isn't it? We just have no grasp of the basic understanding that a forward is as much a part of the team ethic as anyone else. Drop into space, receive, give it, turn, MOVE, your side now has possession ten yards further up the pitch. It's so simple that I'm confident even the current incumbents of our jerseys could manage it. The way it is at the moment, even when we do (briefly) keep the ball, we're effectively playing with just eight or nine men. It's little wonder when it then, almost invariably, goes tits-up, and we relinquish possession whilst still in our own fkn half.
Remember back to that first season under Lambert?

We started off trying to knock the ball around, this was the reason Bent (apparently) didn't fit in. He wasn't  a modern day striker who helps with ball retention. So what the hell happened?

Last season I put it down to too many players picked from lower leagues just simply not good enough. Confidence was a major issue along with major injuries.

This season we look stronger than ever (under Lambert), on paper anyway, however while we have a ice rink as our training ground the injury crisis is still there, but saying that the main core of players are better than the last two seasons, so why are we so useless with keeping the damn ball and creating anything that resembles an effort on target?

Tempo. When we pass the ball from the defence into midfield you see a lot of good passing and movement and done with a good tempo. Then, as has been mentioned the lack of movement up front means that we then have to go backwards and the tempo drops. The lack of a technically proficient forward and movement up front means that we lose the ball all to frequently.

Offline dcdavecollett

  • Member
  • Posts: 3618
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #247 on: November 10, 2014, 11:53:03 PM »
It isn't just Benteke's goals that make him so important to the team but his ability to keep and rotate the ball as well.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15418
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #248 on: November 11, 2014, 12:07:03 AM »
The thing is and we saw it fleetingly at the weekend, we can knock it about and string a few passes together. I genuinely we have players that can do that and actually want to. It's the complete lack of movement in the final third that leads to us just whacking it aimlessly to the flanks that kills us all too often. With a more technical manager who would address that problem I think the likes of Cleverley or Westwood would improve no end. Fuck, even Pulis would figure it out.

Infuriating, isn't it? We just have no grasp of the basic understanding that a forward is as much a part of the team ethic as anyone else. Drop into space, receive, give it, turn, MOVE, your side now has possession ten yards further up the pitch. It's so simple that I'm confident even the current incumbents of our jerseys could manage it. The way it is at the moment, even when we do (briefly) keep the ball, we're effectively playing with just eight or nine men. It's little wonder when it then, almost invariably, goes tits-up, and we relinquish possession whilst still in our own fkn half.
Remember back to that first season under Lambert?

We started off trying to knock the ball around, this was the reason Bent (apparently) didn't fit in. He wasn't  a modern day striker who helps with ball retention. So what the hell happened?

Last season I put it down to too many players picked from lower leagues just simply not good enough. Confidence was a major issue along with major injuries.

This season we look stronger than ever (under Lambert), on paper anyway, however while we have a ice rink as our training ground the injury crisis is still there, but saying that the main core of players are better than the last two seasons, so why are we so useless with keeping the damn ball and creating anything that resembles an effort on target?

Tempo. When we pass the ball from the defence into midfield you see a lot of good passing and movement and done with a good tempo. Then, as has been mentioned the lack of movement up front means that we then have to go backwards and the tempo drops. The lack of a technically proficient forward and movement up front means that we lose the ball all to frequently.

We've been lacking that player who can find space and link things up in the final third.  I honestly think that a player capable of doing that would make a massive difference to us.  I still think that some of our defensive players (Hutton, Baker and Cissokho in particular) are very suspect in possession, which doesn't help.   

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75757
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #249 on: November 25, 2014, 12:32:33 AM »
This is from a few days ago in the Mail. More great news on the injury front.

Quote
Just when will Aston Villa’s injury list relent?

Today we can reveal the news that Nathan Baker will be out for at least two months with a knee injury.

Offline Matt C

  • Member
  • Posts: 6209
  • Location: Southern California
  • GM : 18.06.2020
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #250 on: November 25, 2014, 03:16:44 AM »
With five centre halves this year I thought we stood a chance of managing the odd amounts of injuries we get in that position but it's going to be tight again.

Offline Goldie.7

  • Member
  • Posts: 5255
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #251 on: April 19, 2015, 07:29:29 PM »
Baker out for the season

Manager Tim Sherwood admitted Baker's injury is too severe for him to play any further part during the run-in.

 :'( :'(



Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31020
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #252 on: April 19, 2015, 07:53:17 PM »
Just said on the pst match thread, where the fuck is Senderos? Baker going off injured again is a massive shame for him, and he is now in fairness a decent premier league centre half when fit, but we are not reliant on Vlaar staying fit for 6 more games, and 7 more weeks this season. More chance of Bill Gates buying us this summer.

Offline Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 41435
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #253 on: April 19, 2015, 07:57:10 PM »
He looked brilliant today. Gutted for him.

Offline SoccerHQ

  • Member
  • Posts: 43236
  • Location: Down, down, deeper and Down.
  • GM : 19.06.2021
Re: Nathan Baker
« Reply #254 on: April 19, 2015, 07:58:04 PM »
Hopefully playing just one game a week will help us now but yeah Vlaar getting injured before a final would be a disaster for us as he's shown he's capable of great performances in big games for club and country.

Senderos is actually suppose to be training now so he needs to be put back on the bench.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal