We are not a charity. Add to it he's another in the line that aren't good enough, we will be better off when his contract runs down and if any one of the rumours are to be believed it should be cancelled.
Quote from: aj2k77 on May 24, 2014, 04:38:09 PMWe are not a charity. Add to it he's another in the line that aren't good enough, we will be better off when his contract runs down and if any one of the rumours are to be believed it should be cancelled.One of the rumours are that he's been suffering from depression. If you think that means he should sacked, you're not a very nice person.
Quote from: silhillvilla on May 23, 2014, 08:47:09 PMNot sure what to think. If it's any consolation, it's probably houllier's fault.
Not sure what to think.
We are not a charity.
Played in holding midfield he should be in the team. At centre half not for me.
Quote from: aj2k77 on May 24, 2014, 04:38:09 PMWe are not a charity.You don't have to be "a charity" to act with some dignity. Should we have cancelled Petrov's contract a year early?Put it this way: we've just sacked two members of staff. We couldn't afford to keep Marc Albrighton. If Herd had committed gross misconduct or pissed the club about, as you seem to have assumed on the basis of zero evidence, don't you think they'd have already got rid of him by now?
Just back to everything the club do is shit at the moment comments. So far we've offered new contracts to two players who haven't been near the first team for the best part of a year. On the other hand they have let a player go who was arguably our best player for the last half a dozen or so games of last season. It might be considered that this is strange.
Quote from: kippaxvilla2 on May 25, 2014, 01:25:23 AMJust back to everything the club do is shit at the moment comments. So far we've offered new contracts to two players who haven't been near the first team for the best part of a year. On the other hand they have let a player go who was arguably our best player for the last half a dozen or so games of last season. It might be considered that this is strange........or it might just be considered that the most visible one was offered a big contract elsewhere.
Quote from: amfy on May 25, 2014, 01:34:28 AMQuote from: kippaxvilla2 on May 25, 2014, 01:25:23 AMJust back to everything the club do is shit at the moment comments. So far we've offered new contracts to two players who haven't been near the first team for the best part of a year. On the other hand they have let a player go who was arguably our best player for the last half a dozen or so games of last season. It might be considered that this is strange........or it might just be considered that the most visible one was offered a big contract elsewhere.Or alternatively you could've got rid of a very injury prone players wages and another player who isn't very good and saved his wages to secure the services of the player you lost with an improved contract.